Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 69: 163-173, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32473308

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to establish the initial safety of triple neuroprotection (TNP) in an acute stroke setting in patients presenting outside the window for systemic tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). METHODS: Over 12,000 patients were referred to our vascular services with carotid artery disease, of whom 832 had carotid intervention with a stroke rate of 0.72%. Of these, 25 patients presented (3%), between March 2015 and 2019, with acute dense stroke. These patients had either failed tPA or passed the recommended timing for acute stroke intervention. Fifteen (60%) had hemi-neglect with evidence of acute infarct on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and a Rankin score of 4 or 5. Ninety-six percent had an 80-99% stenosis on the symptomatic side. Mean ABCD3-I score was 11.35. All patients underwent emergency carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with therapeutically induced hypothermia (32-34°C), targeted hypertension (systolic blood pressure 180-200 mm Hg), and brain suppression with barbiturate. RESULTS: There were no cases of myocardial infarction, death, cranial nerve injury, wound hematoma, or procedural bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 8.4 (±9.5) days. All cases had resolution of neurological symptoms, except 3 who had failed previous thrombolysis. Eighty percent had a postoperative Rankin score of 0 on discharge and 88% of patients were discharged home with 3 requiring rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Positive neurological outcomes and no serious adverse events were observed using TNP during emergency CEA in patients with acute brain injury. We recommend TNP for patients who are at an increased risk of stroke perioperatively, or who have already suffered from an acute stroke beyond the recommended window of 24 hr. Certainly, the positive outcomes are not likely reproducible outside of high-volume units and patients requiring this surgery should be transferred to experienced surgeons in appropriate tertiary referral centers.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Hipertensión , Hipotermia Inducida , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Tiopental/administración & dosificación , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Urgencias Médicas , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tiopental/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA