RESUMEN
Objectives. To identify the effect of a Breakfast in the Classroom (BIC) initiative on the foods and drinks students consume in the morning.Methods. Sixteen public schools in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, that provide universal breakfast participated in a group randomized trial to examine the effects of BIC with complementary nutrition promotion between 2013 and 2016. Control schools (n = 8) offered breakfast in the cafeteria before school. Baseline data were collected from 1362 students in grades 4 to 6. Endpoint data were collected after 2.5 years. Students self-reported the foods and drinks they consumed in the morning.Results. At endpoint, there was no effect of the intervention on breakfast skipping. Nearly 30% of intervention students consumed breakfast foods or drinks from multiple locations, as compared with 21% of control students. A greater proportion of intervention students than control students consumed 100% juice, and a smaller proportion consumed sugar-sweetened beverages and foods high in saturated fat and added sugar.Conclusions. A BIC initiative led to improvements in the types of foods and drinks students consumed in the morning. However, the program did not reduce breakfast skipping and increased the number of locations where students ate.
Asunto(s)
Desayuno , Servicios de Alimentación/organización & administración , Instituciones Académicas , Bebidas/clasificación , Niño , Femenino , Alimentos/clasificación , Asistencia Alimentaria , Humanos , Masculino , Philadelphia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Universal access to the School Breakfast Program (SBP) is intended to help low-income and food-insecure students overcome barriers to eating breakfast. However, SBP participation is often still low despite universal access. Further information is needed with regard to these children's breakfast behaviors, and in particular breakfast behaviors among youth from food-insecure families, to inform effective breakfast interventions. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine breakfast behaviors among a large sample of urban students with universal access to the SBP and to identify differences in breakfast behaviors among children from food-secure compared with food-insecure households. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 821 fourth- through sixth-grade students and their parents from 16 schools was conducted. Students reported the foods/drinks selected and location of obtaining food/drink on the morning of data collection, parents reported household food security status using the 6-item Food Security Survey Module, and the school district provided SBP participation data during the fall semester of 2013. Multivariable linear regression models accounting for school-level clustering were used to examine differences in breakfast behaviors across 3 levels of household food security: food secure, low food secure, and very low food secure. RESULTS: Students participated in the SBP 31.2% of possible days, with 13% never participating in the SBP. One-fifth (19.4%) of students purchased something from a corner store for breakfast, and 16.9% skipped breakfast. Forty-six percent of students were food insecure; few differences in breakfast behaviors were observed across levels of food security. CONCLUSIONS: Despite universal access to the SBP, participation in the SBP is low. Breakfast skipping and selection of foods of low nutritional quality in the morning are common, regardless of household food security status. Additional novel implementation of the SBP and addressing students' breakfast preferences may be necessary to further reduce barriers to students obtaining a free, healthful breakfast. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01924130.
Asunto(s)
Desayuno , Conducta Alimentaria , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Valor Nutritivo , Pobreza , Población Urbana , Peso Corporal , Niño , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Conducta de Elección , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Preferencias Alimentarias , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Instituciones AcadémicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess caloric knowledge of participants and determine if an e-mail and/or text message intervention could increase knowledge of recommended daily caloric intake. DESIGN: Randomized, control trial. SETTING: Johns Hopkins Hospital Cobblestone Café. PARTICIPANTS: The 246 participants reported eating at the Café at least twice/week. INTERVENTION(S): Participants randomized to control, e-mail, or text condition. The text and e-mail conditions received a message on four consecutive Mondays stating the recommended daily caloric intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge of the government reference value of 2,000 calories. ANALYSIS: Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Multivariate logistic regression examined the effectiveness of text and e-mail messaging for improving knowledge of the government calorie reference value. RESULTS: Baseline awareness of the daily calorie reference value in study population was low. Participants in the text message condition were twice as likely to know the government calorie reference value compared to controls (p = .047, odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [1.01, 4.73]). No significant differences were found for the e-mail condition (p = .5). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Many people do not know the daily recommended caloric intake. Public education on the government calorie reference value is necessary for menu-labeling interventions to be more effective. Weekly text messaging can serve as an effective modality for delivering calorie information and nutrition education.
Asunto(s)
Correo Electrónico , Ingestión de Energía , Etiquetado de Alimentos , Sistemas Recordatorios/instrumentación , Restaurantes , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Adulto , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increasing school breakfast participation has been advocated as a method to prevent childhood obesity. However, little is known about children's breakfast patterns outside of school (e.g., home, corner store). Policies that increase school breakfast participation without an understanding of children's breakfast habits outside of school may result in children consuming multiple breakfasts and may undermine efforts to prevent obesity. The aim of the current study was to describe morning food and drink consumption patterns among low-income, urban children and their associations with relative weight. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of data obtained from 651 4th-6th graders (51.7% female, 61.2% African American, 10.7 years) in 2012. Students completed surveys at school that included all foods eaten and their locations that morning. Height and weight were measured by trained research staff. RESULTS: On the day surveyed, 12.4% of youth reported not eating breakfast, 49.8% reported eating one breakfast, 25.5% reported eating two breakfasts, and 12.3% reported eating three or more breakfasts. The number of breakfasts consumed and BMI percentile showed a significant curvilinear relationship, with higher mean BMI percentiles observed among children who did not consume any breakfast and those who consumed ≥ 3 breakfasts. Sixth graders were significantly less likely to have consumed breakfast compared to younger children. A greater proportion of obese youth had no breakfast (18.0%) compared to healthy weight (10.1%) and overweight youth (10.7%, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: When promoting school breakfast, policies will need to be mindful of both over- and under-consumption to effectively address childhood obesity and food insecurity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01924130 from http://clinicaltrials.gov/.
Asunto(s)
Desayuno , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Alimentaria , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/prevención & control , Sobrepeso , PhiladelphiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Breakfast in the Classroom (BIC) initiative, a common approach to implementing the federal School Breakfast Program, is advocated as a method to improve students' academic performance. However, the influences of BIC on academic outcomes are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a BIC initiative which provided free, universal BIC on attendance and standardized test performance over 2.5 years, vs free universal breakfast served in the cafeteria before school, among students in an urban school district serving a low-income population. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted between 2013 and 2016; 16 kindergarten through eighth-grade public schools in Philadelphia, PA, were enrolled and randomized to condition. Baseline data for 1,362 fourth- through sixth-grade students were provided by the school district. Midpoint data were collected after 1.5 years and endpoint data after 2.5 years. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Schools were eligible in the case that ≥50% of students qualified for free or reduced-priced meals, did not offer BIC, and received programming as part of the US Department of Agriculture Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Parents consented for their children to participate. INTERVENTION: Intervention schools provided BIC and breakfast-related nutrition-promotion activities. Control schools provided breakfast in the cafeteria before the school day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Student attendance and standardized exam scores. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Weighted generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate differences in outcomes between conditions at midpoint and endpoint. RESULTS: The BIC initiative did not influence attendance (ß ± standard error = .004 ± .06; P = 0.94) or standardized reading exam scores (ß ± standard error = .02 ± .06; P = 0.79) after 2.5 years. Students in BIC initiative schools had lower standardized math exam scores than those in control schools, although this difference was small (ß ± standard error = -.20 ± .07; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: BIC did not improve academic outcomes among students attending low-income, urban schools.
Asunto(s)
Asistencia Alimentaria , Servicios de Alimentación , Desayuno , Niño , Humanos , Instituciones Académicas , EstudiantesRESUMEN
Importance: Serving breakfast in the classroom is promoted to increase participation in the federal School Breakfast Program. However, little is known about the effect of breakfast in the classroom on children's weight status. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a breakfast in the classroom initiative, which combined breakfast in the classroom with breakfast-specific nutrition education, on overweight and obesity among urban children in low-income communities. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cluster-randomized clinical trial among 1362 fourth- through sixth-grade students from low-income urban communities across 2.5 years. Sixteen kindergarten through eighth grade Philadelphia public schools with universal breakfast participated. Participants were recruited in September 2013, and the intervention began in January 2014. Data analysis took place from April 1, 2018, to August 30, 2018. Interventions: Intervention schools received a program that included breakfast in the classroom and breakfast-specific nutrition education. Control schools continued breakfast before school in the cafeteria and standard nutrition education. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of overweight and obesity. Secondary outcomes included the combined prevalence of overweight and obesity, incidence and prevalence of obesity, changes in body mass index (BMI) z score, and School Breakfast Program participation. Results: Among the 1362 students, mean (SD) age was 10.8 (0.96) years and 700 (51.4%) were female; 907 (66.6%) were black, 233 (17.1%) were Hispanic, 100 (7.3%) were white, 83 (6.1%) were Asian, and 39 were of multiple or other race/ethnicity. After 2.5 years, students in intervention schools had participated in the School Breakfast Program 53.8% of days, compared with 24.9% of days among students in control schools (ß = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22-0.42). There was no difference between intervention and control schools in the combined incidence of overweight and obesity after 2.5 years (11.7% vs 9.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.31; 95% CI, 0.85-2.02; P = .22). However, the incidence (11.6% vs 4.4%; OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.47-4.00) and prevalence (28.0% vs 21.2%; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.92) of obesity were higher in intervention schools than in control schools after 2.5 years. Conclusions and Relevance: A breakfast in the classroom initiative increased participation in the School Breakfast Program and did not affect the combined incidence of overweight and obesity. However, the initiative had an unintended consequence of increasing incident and prevalent obesity. Further research is needed to identify approaches to increase participation in the School Breakfast Program that do not increase obesity among students. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01924130.
Asunto(s)
Desayuno , Asistencia Alimentaria , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Niño , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , MasculinoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate breakfast location and children's food choices. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 1,371 fourth- through sixth-grade students in 2013. Foods and beverages in 17 categories characterized breakfast choices: (1) ≥ 1 fruits or vegetables, (2) ≥ 1 foods high in saturated fats and added sugars (SFAS), and (3) meeting School Breakfast Program (SBP) requirements. RESULTS: Among breakfast eaters (n = 1,133; 82.6%), 46.0% ate at home, 13.1% ate at school, 41.0% ate at multiple locations; and 21.8% ate at a corner store. Those eating at school were more likely to consume ≥1 fruit or vegetable (odds ratio [OR] = 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.87), less likely to eat ≥1 SFAS food (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.94), and more likely to meet SBP requirements (OR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.42-4.29). Those eating at corner stores (n = 247) were more likely to consume high-SFAS foods (63.9% vs 9.2%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Eating school breakfast increased the odds of consuming fruit, choosing lower SFAS, and meeting nutritional requirements of the SBP relative to other locations.
Asunto(s)
Desayuno , Dieta , Servicios de Alimentación , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Dieta/normas , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Servicios de Alimentación/normas , Servicios de Alimentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Frutas , Humanos , Masculino , Pobreza , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , VerdurasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this case study were to develop role models for health in the fire service through knowledge and behaviour change, to improve the role models' own health, and to facilitate behaviour change in other firefighters through their example. DESIGN: Volunteers interested in improving their own health and serving as role models to others in the fire service were identified at a statewide Maryland fire service leadership meeting. SETTING: Participants worked with the Johns Hopkins Weight Management Center to learn how to improve their own health and shared that knowledge with others in their fire departments. PARTICIPANTS: Three Maryland fire service leaders were recruited at a leadership meeting with the goal of improving their own health and becoming role models. One participant dropped out shortly after beginning, while two male participants, aged 57 and 61, completed the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measures were collected at baseline and 12 months, and included weight, blood pressure and fasting glucose and cholesterol. Semi-structured interviews were conducted approximately 14 months postintervention to determine the participants' perceptions of their own health and impact on others in the fire service. RESULTS: Each participant had biweekly to monthly visits over a one-year period to learn the knowledge and skills that would assist him with improving dietary behaviours, increasing fitness and achieving a healthy weight. Case study participants experienced reductions in body weight (-13% and -11% of total body weight), glucose and blood pressure. Qualitative one-on-one interviews conducted postintervention with the participants revealed that they embraced their status as role models and felt their success inspired other firefighters. Their experiences suggest that role models can play an important role in helping firefighters increase self-efficacy, self-regulation and social support in the workplace environment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide promising evidence for the use of role models to improve health, especially in the workplace.