Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(3): 638-643, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32622667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little has been reported on urological complications of total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: To assess urological reconstructive outcomes and adverse events in this setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 104 patients underwent TPE from 2004 to 2016 in this single-centre, retrospective study. Electronic and paper records were evaluated for data extraction. Mean follow-up was 36.5 mo. INTERVENTION: TPE. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Urological complications were analysed using two-tailed t and chi-square tests, binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty-three (61%) patients received radiotherapy prior to TPE. Incontinent diversions included ileal conduit (n = 95), colonic conduits (n = 4), wet colostomy (n = 1), and cutaneous ureterostomy (n = 1). Three patients had a continent diversion. The overall urological complication rate was 54%. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, 30 patients, five patients, and one patient had grade III, IV, and V complications, respectively. The commonest complication was urinary tract infection (in 32 [31%] patients). Anastomotic leaks were seen in 14 (13%) cases, of which eight (8%) were urinary leaks. Fistulas were seen in three (3%) patients, involving the urinary system. A return to theatre was required in 12 (12%) patients. Ureteroenteric strictures were seen in seven (7%). No differences were seen in urological outcomes in patients with primary or recurrent rectal cancer (p = 0.69), or by radiation status (p = 0.24). The main limitation is the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: TPE is complex with recognised high risk of morbidity. In this cohort, there was no significant difference in outcomes between primary and recurrent disease, and surgery after radiation. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we assessed urological complications following total pelvic exenteration. Urinary complications affected more than half of patients. Urinary tract infection is the commonest risk. Approximately one-third of patients required surgical, radiological, or endoscopic intervention ± intensive care admission. Radiation prior to the operation did not affect urinary complications.


Asunto(s)
Exenteración Pélvica , Neoplasias del Recto , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/complicaciones , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Exenteración Pélvica/efectos adversos , Exenteración Pélvica/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA