Lessons learned and recommendations from the COVID-19 pandemic: Content analysis of semi-structured interviews with intensive care unit nurse managers in the United Arab Emirates.

AIM: This study aims to explore how nursing services were managed and provided in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic and clarify the management lessons learned. BACKGROUND: The surge in the number of patients with COVID-19 worldwide and the unpredictability of new variants mean the voices of nurse managers who participated in fighting the pandemic in intensive care units must be considered. Health care systems need specific plans to face similar future crises. METHOD: This is a descriptive, qualitative, narrative study using indirect content analysis. RESULTS: We analysed 37 intensive care unit nurse managers' reflections on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Four themes were extracted: restructuring organisations' resources, issues with family-centred care, education and training and policy reforms. CONCLUSIONS: Promising strategies for Emirati intensive care units in planning for responses to future crises include maximizing organisation resources, boosting family-centred care, providing in-service training for nurses and policy reform. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Our findings will support health care leaders, educators, policymakers and researchers to improve the management of similar pandemic situations. This study presents fundamental data concerning the subjective experiences of intensive care unit nurse managers. These experiences may inform development of multi-dimensional strategies including: ensuring the adequacy of projected supplies, space and nursing workforce; establishing communication protocols; and reforming existing policies.

Evidence that the brief symptom inventory can be used to measure anxiety quickly and reliably in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: : Anxiety is not routinely assessed in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Failure to identify and treat patients who are anxious after AMI makes them more vulnerable to the adverse effects of anxiety, including higher complication rates. The anxiety subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a simple, reliable measure of anxiety with minimal patient burden. However, there is limited evidence of reliability and validity of the BSI as a measure of anxiety in patients hospitalized for AMI. OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the BSI in hospitalized AMI patients. METHOD: : A total of 536 patients admitted for AMI (62 +/- 14 years of age, 66% men, 85% white, 27% with previous myocardial infarction) completed the BSI and the state portion of the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) within 72 hours of admission. Internal consistency reliability, criterion-related validity, and construct validity of the BSI were tested. RESULTS: : There was sufficient evidence of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = .87), which supported the reliability of the BSI. There was evidence of criterion-related validity based on the Spearman rho correlation coefficient of 0.70 (P < .001) between BSI and SAI scores. Anxious patients had higher complication rates than did nonanxious patients (BSI, 1.31 +/- 0.13 vs 0.82 +/- 0.08, respectively, P < .001; SAI, 1.34 +/- 0.13 vs 0.80 +/- 0.07, respectively, P < .001), demonstrating adequate construct validity. In a logistic regression, BSI scores were independent predictors of in-hospital complications after controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables, which further supported construct validity. CONCLUSION: : These results provide support for the BSI as a reliable, valid instrument for measuring anxiety in patients hospitalized for AMI.

Persistent (Anxiety and Depression) Affected Academic Achievement and Absenteeism in Nursing Students.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are common among nursing students due to different factors. When they are minimal and not persistent, they work as stimuli for good achievement. However, when they are high or persistent they have negative consequences (i.e. low academic achievement and higher absenteeism rates). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to check the effect of persistent anxiety and depression on nursing student academic achievement and absenteeism rate. METHODS: A prospective observational correlational design with a convenience sample of 170 students enrolled in the undergraduate and graduate programs-college of nursing at a private university in Amman, Jordan. Anxiety and depression were measured twice at the beginning of the semester and then two months later by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Data regarding grade point average, number of absenteeism and the gender of the students; were collected from the electronic system of the university. RESULTS: Persistently anxious group has lower grade point average than persistently non-anxious group (mean [SD], 64.1 [13.8] vs. 73.1 [12.3], P< .001). Moreover, they have higher absenteeism rate than persistently non-anxious group (7.62 [5.7] vs. 4.0 [3.4], P< .001) and higher than transiently anxious group (7.62 [5.7] vs. 4.7 [4.6], P< .05). Persistently depressed group has lower grade point average than persistently non-depressed group (64.0 [13.8] vs. 73.2 [13.0], P< .001) and lower than transiently depressed (64.0 [13.8] vs. 71.7 [10.6], P< .01). CONCLUSION: Nursing administrators should search for the underlying causes for these negative emotions. Furthermore, setting strategies to control these negative emotions is highly recommended.

Effects of ß-blockers and anxiety on complication rates after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is common after acute myocardial infarction and increases the number of complications and the length of stay in the hospital. Anxiety-induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system is hypothesized to be an underlying cause of increased complication rates. Little is known about whether use of ß-blockers eliminates the effects of anxiety on complication rate and length of stay. OBJECTIVE: To compare number of complications and length of stay among nonanxious and anxious patients receiving ß-blockers during hospitalization. METHOD: A total of 322 patients with acute myocardial infarction participated in this study within 48 hours of hospital admission. Patients completed the Brief Symptom Inventory to assess anxiety level. After discharge, medical records were reviewed to determine use of ß-blockers, type and number of complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: Most patients (96%) were treated with less than 200 mg daily of metoprolol. Anxious patients had more complications (mean [SD], 1.43 [0.15] vs 0.73 [.09], P ≤ .01) and longer stays (7.0 [0.49] vs 5.7 [0.36] days, P < .05) than did nonanxious patients. To test whether the dose of ß-blocker made a difference, the interaction between daily dose and anxiety score was tested. No interaction was found between metoprolol dose and anxiety score, and no main effect was found for metoprolol dose. CONCLUSION: Anxious patients had more complications and longer stays than did nonanxious patients. The administration of metoprolol did not eliminate this relationship, perhaps because patients did not receive a sufficient dose of metoprolol to counter the effect of anxiety.