Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with major depression: factor analysis and Rasch analysis.

BACKGROUND: The EQ-5D is one of the most recommended questionnaires for cost-effectiveness studies. AIMS: To study the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with major depression. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 433 patients with major depression who completed the EQ-5D-5L and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) questionnaires at baseline, of whom 310 also did six months later. The structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis, the item functioning by item response analysis, and reliability by Cronbach's alpha. Convergent validity and known-groups validity was studied using the PHQ-9 and a general health question. To assess responsiveness effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS: The results supported the unidimensionality and showed adequate item functioning, with somewhat age-related item differential functioning for the mobility dimension. Cronbach's alpha was 0.77. The EQ-5D-5L showed a high correlation with the PHQ-9 and general health. The more severe the depression level and the poorer the general health, the lower the EQ-5D-5L scores (p < 0.001). Responsiveness parameters showed moderate changes among "improved" patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the adequate psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with major depression. It could be very useful for clinicians and researchers as an outcome measure and for use in economic evaluation.

Medication adherence in schizophrenia.

Non-adherence is a major problem in the treatment of schizophrenia. Its high prevalence, potentially severe consequences and associated costs make the study of this phenomenon a priority issue. In this article, basic non-adherence concepts of prevalence, consequences, evaluation methods, methodological restrictions of available studies, risk factors and intervention strategies, are reviewed. Studying non-adherence risk factors is a necessary step toward designing adequately oriented intervention strategies. An operative definition of adherence and good knowledge of its evaluation methods are essential to study this phenomenon. Unfortunately, most available studies contain methodological restrictions, especially concerning the evaluation methods, and an agreed operative definition of adherence has only very recently been reached. Knowing non-adherence risk factors, intervention strategies and available evidence on their effectiveness is essential in making treatment decisions in daily clinical practice.