Temporary-permanent pacemakers are associated with better clinical and safety outcomes compared to balloon-tipped temporary pacemakers.

BACKGROUND: Balloon Tipped Temporary Pacemakers (BTTP) are the most used temporary pacemakers; however, they are associated with a risk of dislodgement and thromboembolism. Recently, Temporary Permanent Pacemakers (TPPM) have been increasingly used. Evidence of outcomes with TPPM compared to BTTP remains scarce. METHODS: Retrospective, chart review study evaluating all patients who underwent temporary pacemaker placement between 2014 and 2022 (N = 126) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) at a level 1 trauma center. Primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the safety profile of TPPM versus BTTP. Secondary objectives include patient ambulation and healthcare utilization in patients with temporary pacemakers. RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics distribution including gender, race, and age at temporary pacemaker insertion (p > .05). Subclavian vein was the most common site of access for the TPPM cohort (89.0%) versus the femoral vein in the BTTP group (65.1%). Ambulation was only possible in the TPPM group (55.6%, p < .001). Lead dislodgement, venous thromboembolism, local hematoma, and access site infections were less frequently encountered in the TPPM group (OR = 0.23 [95% CI (0.10-0.67), p < .001]). Within the subgroup of patients with TPPM, 36.6% of the patients were monitored outside the ICU setting. There was no significant difference in the pacemaker-related adverse events among patients with TPPM based on their in-hospital setting. CONCLUSION: TPPM is associated with a more favorable safety profile compared to BTTP. They are also associated with earlier patient ambulation and reduced healthcare utilization.

QT prolongation predicts all-cause mortality above and beyond a validated risk score.

INTRODUCTION: QT prolongation is a risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. In large cohorts, QT interval was associated with all-cause mortality, but these analyses may contain residual confounding. Whether the QT interval provides prognostic information above and beyond a validated mortality risk score is unknown. We hypothesized that QT interval on ECG will independently predict mortality after adjustment for the Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score, which was validated to predict mortality nationwide at the Veterans Administration (VA) (c-index 0.86). METHODS: Outpatients with an ECG at the Minneapolis VA from 2012 to 2016 were included in this retrospective cohort study. ECGs with ventricular rate < 50 or > 100 beats/min and those with QRS > 120 ms were excluded. QT intervals were corrected (QTc) using the Bazett's formula. CAN score, calculated within 1-week of the ECG, was obtained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. RESULTS: Of the 31,201 patients, 427 (1.4%) had QTc ≥ 500 ms, 1799 (5.8%) had QTc 470-500 ms and 28,975 (92.9%) had QTc < 470 ms. Compared to those with QTc < 470 ms, CAN-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for 1-year mortality (1.76 for QTc 470-500 and 2.70 for QTc > 500 ms; p < 0.0001 for both) and for 5-year mortality (1.75 for QTc 470-500 and 2.48 for QTc > 500 ms; p < 0.0001 for both) were significantly higher in those with longer QTc. C-index for CAN score and QTc predicting 1-year mortality was 0.837. CONCLUSIONS: QT prolongation predicts all-cause mortality independently of a validated mortality risk prediction score.

Mortality associated with antiarrhythmic medication for atrial fibrillation among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend amiodarone as the preferred antiarrhythmic medication (AAM) in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), due to potential pro-arrhythmic risk with other AAM. However, there are limited data to support this assertion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 8204 patients who were prescribed AAM for AF and had transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at the multicenter, VA Midwest Health Care Network from 2000 to 2021. We excluded patients without LVH (septal or posterior wall dimension ≤1.4 cm). The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality during antiarrhythmic therapy or within 6 months after stopping it. Propensity-stratified analyses were performed between amiodarone versus non-amiodarone (Vaughan-Williams Class I and III) AAM. RESULTS: A total of 1277 patients with LVH (mean age 70.2 ± 9.5 years) were included in the analysis. Of these, 774 (60.6%) were prescribed amiodarone. Baseline characteristics of the two comparison groups were similar after propensity adjustment. After a median 1.40 years of follow-up, 203 (15.9%) patients died. Incidence rates per 100 patient-year follow-up was 9.02 (7.58-10.66) for amiodarone and 4.98 (3.91-62.56) for non-amiodarone. In propensity-stratified analysis, amiodarone use was associated with 1.58 times higher risk of mortality (95% CI 1.03-2.44; p = .038). Sub-group analysis in 336 (26.3%) patients with severe LVH showed no difference in mortality (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.82-2.43, p = .21). CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF and LVH, amiodarone was associated with a significantly higher mortality risk than other AAM.

Academic cardiac electrophysiologists' perspectives on sleep apnea care.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is an important, modifiable risk factor in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of the study was to evaluate cardiac electrophysiologists' (EPs) perception of OSAS. METHODS: We designed a 27-item online Likert scale-based survey instrument entailing several domains: (1) relevance of OSAS in EP practice, (2) OSAS screening and diagnosis, (3) perception on treatments for OSAS, (4) opinion on the OSAS care model. The survey was distributed to 89 academic EP programs in the USA and Canada. While the survey instrument questions refer to the term sleep apnea (SA), our discussion of the diagnosis, management, and research on the sleep disorder is more accurately described with the term OSAS. RESULTS: A total of 105 cardiac electrophysiologists from 49 institutions responded over a 9-month period. The majority of respondents agreed that sleep apnea (SA) is a major concern in their practice (94%). However, 42% reported insufficient education on SA during training. Many (58%) agreed that they would be comfortable managing SA themselves with proper training and education and 66% agreed cardiac electrophysiologists should become more involved in management. Half of EPs (53%) were not satisfied with the sleep specialist referral process. Additionally, a majority (86%) agreed that trained advanced practice providers should be able to assess and manage SA. Time constraints, lack of knowledge, and the referral process are identified as major barriers to EPs becoming more involved in SA care. CONCLUSIONS: We found that OSAS is widely recognized as a major concern for EP. However, incorporation of OSAS care in training and routine practice lags. Barriers to increased involvement include time constraints and education. This study can serve as an impetus for innovation in the cardiology OSAS care model.

Improvement of left ventricular function with surgical revascularization in patients eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% is the cornerstone criterion for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) eligibility. Improvement in EF may occur in ICD-eligible patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of this process are unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 427 patients with EF ≤ 35% who underwent CABG in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial and had a systematic pre- and postoperative (4 months) EF assessment using the identical cardiac imaging modality. All imaging studies were interpreted at a core laboratory. Improvement in EF was defined as postoperative EF > 35% and >5% absolute improvement from baseline. Of the 427 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 9.5 and 50 women), 125 (29.2%) had EF improvement. Their mean EF increased from 26.8% (±5.8%) to 43.3% (±6.5%) (p < .0001). EF improvement occurred in only 20% of patients with a preoperative EF < 25%. The odds of EF improvement were 1.96 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-4.23, p = .09) in patients with myocardial viability. In adjusted analyses, EF improvement was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96; p = .03) and heart failure mortality (HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.87; p = .027). CONCLUSION: Nearly 1/3rd of ICD-eligible patients undergoing CABG had significant improvement in EF, obviating the need for primary prevention ICD implantation. These results provide patients and clinicians data on the likelihood of ICD eligibility after CABG and support the practice of reassessment of EF after revascularization.

Mortality and readmission risk in relation to QRS duration among patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: In ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), QRS prolongation (QRS > 120 msec) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) each carry an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and/or HF hospitalization. Less is known about implications of conduction abnormalities following an acute HF hospitalization for HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort of 1454 patients discharged from after a HF hospitalization between 2015 and 2019 with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 45% were identified (age 75.1 ± 10.8 years, EF 58.5% ± 10.2%). All patients' electrocardiograms were classified by QRS duration (prolonged - 545 [37.5%] vs. normal [QRS ≤ 120 msec] 909 [62.5%]). QRS prolongation was comprised of: LBBB (4.2%), right bundle branch block (RBBB, 18.3%), intraventricular conduction delay (9.7%), and ventricularly paced (9.7%). Over 4.09 ± 1.00 years, 769 (52.9%) patients died. Survival was similar between normal and prolonged QRS cohorts with an age and sex adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01 (95%CI: 0.87-1.17, p = 0.16). Recurrent HF hospitalization occurred in 91 (16.7%) with QRS prolongation vs. 90 (9.9%) without (odds ratio: 1.82 [95%CI: 1.33-2.50, p < 0.001]). RBBB carried 2.26 higher odds of recurrent HF hospitalization (95%CI: 1.56-3.28). CONCLUSIONS: Following a HF hospitalization, QRS prolongation increased the odds of re-admission for HF in patients with HFpEF without differences in overall mortality.

Trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction among individuals eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) among patients eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. BACKGROUND: EF is the cornerstone criterion for ICD therapy, but the risk of sudden cardiac death remains after an improvement in EF. METHODS: We examined the trajectory of EF among 1178 participants of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) who had three or more assessments of EF, at least 90 days apart. A follow-up EF > 35% or >10% absolute increase in EF from baseline were examined as the criteria for EF improvement. RESULTS: At first follow-up, 381 (32%) patients had an improvement of EF to >35%. However, EF had returned back to ≤35% in 109 (27%) of these patients at second follow-up. Similarly, 446 (38%) patients experienced a >10% improvement in EF at first follow-up, but 109 (24%) of these had a subsequent >10% decrease in EF at the second follow-up. Of the 32 patients with normalized EF (≥55%) at first follow-up, 18 (56%) had a subsequent >10% decrease in EF. The fluctuation in EF was present in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy but a higher proportion of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy had an improvement in EF to >35% at first follow-up compared to those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (38% vs. 27%, p = < .0001). CONCLUSION: There is substantial fluctuation of EF among patients who are eligible for ICD therapy.

Utility of nuclear stress imaging in predicting long-term outcomes one-year post CABG Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Early MPI after CABG is currently considered rarely appropriate in asymptomatic patients. This study aimed to identify prognostic value of nuclear stress-imaging post-CABG. METHODS: This was a single center prospective study looking at long-term outcomes post-CABG. Per protocol participants underwent SPECT-MPI stress testing and coronary angiogram on the same day, 1-year following CABG. Defect size was semi-quantified. The primary outcomes were the composite of death and congestive heart failure. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants underwent nuclear stress-imaging and angiography, with a median follow-up of 11.1 years. Three separate stress findings predicted the primary outcome: inability to reach stage 3 of a Bruce protocol (OR 7.3, CI 2.4-22.1, P < 0.001), LVEF < 45% (OR 4.0, CI 1.1-15.3, P = 0.041) and a moderate-large stress defect size (HR 2.31, CI 1.1-1.5, P = 0.04). These findings appear to be additive and strongest among patients who underwent exercise stress testing (HR 10.6, CI 3.6-30.6, P < 0.001). Graft disease was identified in 39 (46%) patients and compared to those individuals with no graft disease, did not predict long-term adverse outcomes (P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In clinically stable patients early after revascularization with CABG, SPECT-MPI can identify patients at higher risk of heart failure and death.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a common arrhythmia in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but its incidence, predictors, and significance have not been determined in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of arrhythmias in two cohorts of patients with an HFpEF diagnosis. Patients in cohort 1 (n = 40) underwent routine arrhythmia surveillance with a 14-day ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor. Patients in cohort 2 (n = 85) had cardiac pacemakers and underwent routine device interrogations. RESULTS: In cohort 1, 13 patients (32.5%) had one or more episodes of nonsustained VT (NSVT) on ambulatory ECG. In cohort 2, 38 patients (44.7%) had NSVT on cardiac pacemaker interrogations. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.0 (1.6 to 5.1) years, 15 (12%) patients died (20% of patients with NSVT versus 6.8% of those without NSVT; P = .03). In logistic regression analysis, NSVT was associated with a 3.4-fold higher odds of death (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 10.53; P = .04) in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with HFpEF have a relatively high, and possibly underappreciated, burden of NSVT, which confers a higher risk of mortality. The frequent episodes of NSVT in these patients may provide insight into the mechanism of sudden cardiac death in HFpEF.

NT-Pro BNP Predicts Myocardial Injury Post-vascular Surgery and is Reduced with CoQ10: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

BACKGROUND: NT-Pro BNP levels provide incremental value in perioperative risk assessment prior to major noncardiac surgery. Whether they can be pharmacologically modified in patients prior to an elective vascular operation is uncertain. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was implemented at a single institution. Patients were screened during their preoperative vascular clinic appointment and randomly assigned to CoQ10 (400 mg per day) versus Placebo for 3 days prior to surgery. Biomarkers, including NT-Pro BNP, troponin I and C-reactive protein were obtained prior to and following surgery for up to 48 hours. The primary endpoint was postoperative NT-Pro BNP levels, and secondary endpoint measures included myocardial injury, defined by an elevated cardiac troponin level and length of stay. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized to receive either CoQ10 (N = 62) versus Placebo (N = 61) for 3 days before vascular surgery. Preoperative cardiac risks included ischemic heart disease (N = 52), CHF (N = 12), stroke (N = 23), and diabetes mellitus (N = 48) and the planned vascular procedures were infrainguinal (N = 78), carotid (N = 36), and intraabdominal (N = 9). There were no intergroup differences in these clinical variables. NT-Pro BNP levels (median; IQs) in the CoQ10 and Placebo groups were 179 (75-347) and 217 (109-585) pg/ml, respectively, (P = 0.08) preoperatively, and 397 (211-686) and 591 (288-1,433) pg/ml respectively, (P = 0.01) at 24 hours following surgery. Patients with an elevated NT-Pro BNP had a higher incidence of myocardial injury, (58% vs. 20%; P < 0.01) and a longer hospital stay (4.4 ± 3.8 vs. 2.8 ± 3.2 days; P < 0.02) compared with individuals without an elevated NT-Pro BNP level. CONCLUSIONS: NT-Pro BNP levels predict adverse events post-vascular surgery and are lowered in those patients assigned to preoperative administration of CoQ10. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03956017. Among patients undergoing elective vascular surgery, 123 patients were randomized to either CoQ10 (400 mg/day) versus placebo for three days preoperatively. NT-Pro BNP levels (median; IQs) in the CoQ10 and Placebo groups were 179 (75-347) and 217 (109-585) pg/ml, respectively, (P = 0.08) preoperatively, and 397 (211-686) and 591 (288-1,433) pg/ml, respectively, (P = 0.01) post-surgery. Patients with an elevated NT-Pro BNP had a higher incidence of myocardial injury (58% vs. 20%; P < 0.01) and a longer hospital stay (4.4 ± 3.8 vs. 2.8 ± 3.2 days; P < 0.02) compared with individuals without an NT-Pro BNP elevation. In conclusion, BNP predicts adverse outcomes and can be reduced with preoperative CoQ10.

Implications of Frailty among Men with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes, but little is known of the impact of frailty on patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). This study sought to determine the prevalence of frailty, based on quantitative assessment, and assessed its potential impact on outcomes among community-dwelling men with ICDs. METHODS: A total of 124 ICD-treated men presenting for a routine device clinic appointment between May and October 2016 underwent frailty assessment consisting of three components: shrinking (weight loss ≥5% during the past year), weakness (inability to rise from a chair without using their arms), and self-reported poor energy level. Patients who had no components were considered robust, those with 1 component were intermediate stage, and those with ≥2 components were deemed frail. RESULTS: Mean age was 70.4 (±9.7) years. Of the 124 men, 31 (25%) were considered to be frail, 65 (52%) were intermediate, and 28 (23%) were robust. Frail men were older and were more likely to have symptomatic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension (P < 0.05 for all) compared with nonfrail men. During a follow-up of 16 months, frail men were significantly more likely to die compared with nonfrail men (29% vs 5.4%, P < 0.0003). The incidence of appropriate ICD shocks (16.1% vs 6.5%) or hospitalizations (38.7% vs 23.7%) tended to be higher among frail versus nonfrail patients, but neither reached statistical significance (P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-fourth of men with ICD are frail. Almost one-third of frail ICD patients died within 16 months. It may be useful to assess frailty in patients with ICD.

QTc dispersion as a novel marker in identifying patients requiring an epicardial approach for ablation of scar mediated ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Epicardial exit sites of ventricular tachycardia (VT) are frequently encountered during VT ablation requiring an epicardial ablation approach for successful elimination of VT. We sought to assess the utility of repolarization markers in identifying individuals requiring an epicardial ablation approach in addition to an endocardial approach. METHODS: 32 patients who underwent successful ablation for scar mediated VT were included in the study. Fourteen patients who required a combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation were defined as epicardial VT group (Epi) whereas 18 patients who were successfully ablated from the endocardium alone constituted the endocardial VT group (Endo). Repolarization markers during sinus rhythm were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A higher QTc max and QTc dispersion were seen in the Epi group compared to Endo group (479 ± 34 vs 449 ± 20, p = 0.008 and 63 ± 13 vs 38 ± 8, p = 0.001, respectively). Ts-p and Ts-p/Tp-e were higher in the Epi group (166 ± 23 vs 143 ± 23, p = 0.008 and 1.55 ± 0.26 vs 1.3 ± 0.21, p < 0.005). On multivariate regression, QTc dispersion was an independent predictor of the need for an epicardial approach to ablation. A QTc dispersion more than 51.5 msec identified individuals requiring a combined epicardial and endocardial approach to ablation with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring an epicardial ablation have a higher QTc dispersion. A value greater than 51.5 msec reliably differentiates between the two groups with high sensitivity and specificity.

Trends of hospitalizations for syncope/collapse in the United States from 2004 to 2013-An analysis of national inpatient sample.

INTRODUCTION: Syncope/collapse is a common reason for emergency department visits, and approximately 30-40% of these individuals are hospitalized. We examined changes in hospitalization rates, in-hospital mortality, and cost of syncope/collapse-related hospital care in the United States from 2004 to 2013. METHODS: We used the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2004 to 2013 to identify syncope/collapse-related hospitalizations using ICD-9, code 780.2, as the principal discharge diagnosis. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2013, there was a 42% reduction in hospitalizations with a principal discharge diagnosis of syncope/collapse from 54,259 (national estimate 253,591) in 2004 to 31,427 (national estimate 156,820) in 2013 (P < 0.0001). The mean length of hospital stays decreased (2.88 ± 0.04 days in 2004 vs. 2.54 ± 0.02 in 2013; P < 0.0001), while in-hospital mortality did not change (0.28% in 2004 vs. 0.18% in 2013; P  =  0.12). However, mean charges (inflation adjusted) for syncope/collapse-related hospitalization increased by 43.6% from $17,514 in 2004 to $25,160 in 2013 (P < 0.0001). The rates of implantation of permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillator remained low during these hospitalizations, and decreased over time (P for both < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization rates for syncope/collapse have decreased significantly in the US from 2004 to 2013. Despite a modest reduction in length of stay, the cost of syncope/collapse-related hospital care has increased.

Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) 2A trial (P2). The generalizability of the trial results to the broader population of patients with intermediate surgical risk remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of SAVR and TAVR among patients with intermediate surgical risk treated in the VA Healthcare System. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes on all SAVR (1987-2014) and TAVR procedures (2015-2017) performed at the Minneapolis VA Healthcare System. Patients were divided into three groups based on their estimated 30-day mortality risk. The primary outcome was a composite of death or stroke at 30-days. RESULTS: A total of 1,049 patients underwent SAVR with (n = 468, 45%) or without CABG (n = 581, 55%) and 110 underwent TAVR during the study period. Intermediate-risk patients represented 29.4% and 40% of patients undergoing SAVR and TAVR, respectively. The predicted 30-day mortality risk of intermediate-risk patients was 5.5% for the SAVR group and 5.2% for the TAVR group (P = 0.54). The observed combined rate of stroke or death at 30-days for intermediate-risk patients treated with SAVR and TAVR was 11% and 2.2%, respectively (P = 0.05). The results for SAVR and TAVR at the VA were comparable to the P2 trial and STS database (all P = NS). The results did not change when the analysis was restricted to a more contemporary (2005-2014) surgical cohort or isolated SAVR. The number needed to treat to prevent one death/stroke with TAVR was 10. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of TAVR as the preferred treatment modality in intermediate-risk patients may result in significant improvements in morbidity and mortality.

A single center experience on the clinical utility evaluation of an insertable cardiac monitor.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) has been largely on the device performance and safety with only limited studies on the clinical utility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of ICM in patients with a variety of clinical presentations. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study on the clinical utility, as measured by both expected and unexpected clinical useful ICM findings and the initiation of therapeutic interventions, was conducted. RESULTS: Ninety-five consecutive patients (median age 68 years) received ICM Reveal LINQ™ for clinical indications of unexplained syncope (53), cryptogenic stroke (19), unexplained infrequent palpitations (14) and AF management (9). During a median follow-up of 414 days, the causes for unexplained syncope were arrhythmia-related (11.3%), arrhythmia-unrelated (32%) and undetermined (56.6%). Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke was detected in 31.6% (6/19). The clinical utility occurrence was 48.4% with the expected and incidental (unexpected) clinical utility of 41% and 7.4% patients respectively. Of these, therapeutic interventions based on ICM diagnoses were initiated in 18.9% (18/95) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICM (Reveal LINQ™) offers substantial expected and unexpected clinical utility in patients with a variety of clinical presentations. The causes of nearly one third of patients receiving ICM for unexplained syncope were unrelated to cardiac arrhythmia. Nearly one fifth of patients with newly diagnosed arrhythmia from ICM received therapeutic interventions.

Hospital Readmission Rates Following AMI: Potential Interventions to Improve Efficiency.

OBJECTIVES: Quality of care utilization measures for patients admitted to the hospital with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) include length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rates. Our aim was to test whether efforts resulting in reduced LOS in patients diagnosed as having AMI would result in a higher risk of readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge and whether specific interventions could be targeted to reduce readmissions. METHODS: Using data supplied by the Veterans Affairs Inpatient Evaluation Center, we analyzed both the readmissions within 30 days of an AMI and LOS and determined the timing of readmissions and associated diagnoses. RESULTS: During 2013-2015, 35 (13.3%) of 263 patients with AMI were readmitted within 30 days of discharge compared with 19 (13.4%) of 142 patients during 2016 (not significant). During the same time, LOS was <3 days in most patients. From 2013 to 2015, the initial hospital time was 6 ± 6 days, whereas time out of the hospital before readmission was 11 ± 8 days; these times did not differ from 2016. Initial therapeutic decisions were based on coronary anatomy in >90% of patients with a decision to proceed with revascularization in most patients. Diagnoses during readmission to the hospital were also similar during early and later time periods and most frequently were a result of either coronary artery bypass grafting-related complications from the initial hospitalization or elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Acute coronary syndrome-related diagnoses and recurrent noncardiac causes of chest pain also were common diagnoses during both time periods and did not involve extensive workup during the readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions for patients with AMI were stable during a 4-year period, at a time that efforts to reduce LOS were emphasized. Because a significant proportion of readmissions involved noncardiac sources of chest pain, improved communication between the emergency department and in-patient cardiology services at the time of triage may be a feasible way to improve efficiency of utilization.

Development and Validation of a Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction Model for the General Population.

BACKGROUND: Most sudden cardiac death (SCD) events occur in the general population among persons who do not have any prior history of clinical heart disease. We sought to develop a predictive model of SCD among US adults. METHODS: We evaluated a series of demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic measures in participants in the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) (n=13 677) and the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study) (n=4207) who were free of baseline cardiovascular disease. Our initial objective was to derive a SCD prediction model using the ARIC cohort and validate it in CHS. Independent risk factors for SCD were first identified in the ARIC cohort to derive a 10-year risk model of SCD. We compared the prediction of SCD with non-SCD and all-cause mortality in both the derivation and validation cohorts. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the SCD prediction equation was better at predicting SCD than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiovascular Disease Pooled Cohort risk equation. RESULTS: There were a total of 345 adjudicated SCD events in our analyses, and the 12 independent risk factors in the ARIC study included age, male sex, black race, current smoking, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medication, diabetes mellitus, serum potassium, serum albumin, high-density lipoprotein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and QTc interval. During a 10-year follow-up period, a model combining these risk factors showed good to excellent discrimination for SCD risk (c-statistic 0.820 in ARIC and 0.745 in CHS). The SCD prediction model was slightly better in predicting SCD than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort risk equations (c-statistic 0.808 in ARIC and 0.743 in CHS). Only the SCD prediction model, however, demonstrated similar and accurate prediction for SCD using both the original, uncalibrated score and the recalibrated equation. Finally, in the echocardiographic subcohort, a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% was present in only 1.1% of participants and did not enhance SCD prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to derive and validate a generalizable risk score that provides well-calibrated, absolute risk estimates across different risk strata in an adult population of white and black participants without a clinical diagnosis of cardiovascular disease.