Benefits of Aerosolized, Point-of-care, Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (ASCS) for the Closure of full Thickness Wounds from Thermal and Non-Thermal Causes: Learning Curves from the first 50 Consecutive cases at an Urban, Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (ASCS) in closing full-thickness (FT) defects from injury and infection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although ASCS has documented success in closing partial-thickness burns, far less is known about the efficacy of ASCS in FT defects. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with FT defects (burn 17, necrotizing infection 13, crush 7, degloving 5, other 8) underwent closure with the bilayer technique of 3:1 widely-meshed, thin, split-thickness skin graft and 80:1 expanded ASCS. End points were limb salvage rate, donor site reduction, operative and hospital throughput, incidence of complications, and re-epithelialization by 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Definitive wound closure was achieved in 76%, 94%, and 98% of patients, at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. Limb salvage occurred in 42/43 patients (10 upper, 33 lower extremities). Mean area grafted was 435 cm2; donor site size was 212 cm2, representing a potential reduction of 50%. Mean surgical time was 71 minutes; total OR time was 124 minutes. Mean length-of-stay was 26.4 days; time from grafting to discharge was 11.2 days. 4/50 patients (8%) required 6 reoperations for bleeding (1), breakdown (4), and amputation (1). 4/50 patients (8%) developed hypertrophic scarring, which responded to silicone sheeting (2) and laser resurfacing (2). Mean follow-up was 92.7 days. CONCLUSION: When used for closure of FT wounds, point-of-care ASCS is effective and safe. Benefits include rapid re-epithelialization, high rate of limb salvage, reduction of donor site size and morbidity, and low incidence of hypertrophic scarring.

Nonoperative Management Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population is highly debated with uncertain cost-effectiveness. We performed a decision tree cost-effectiveness analysis of NOM versus early laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis in children. METHODS: We created a decision tree model for a simulated cohort of 49,000 patients, the number of uncomplicated appendectomies performed annually, comparing NOM and LA. We included postoperative complications, recurrent appendicitis, and antibiotic-related complications. We used the payer perspective with a 1-year time horizon. Model uncertainty was analyzed using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Event probabilities, health-state utilities, and costs were obtained from literature review, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and Medicare fee schedules. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, NOM costs $6530/patient and LA costs $9278/patient on average at 1 y. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) differences minimally favored NOM compared to LA with 0.997 versus 0.996 QALYs/patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for NOM over LA was $4,791,149.52/QALY. NOM was dominant in 97.4% of simulations, outperforming in cost and QALYs. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed NOM was 99.6% likely to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Our model demonstrates that NOM is a dominant strategy to LA over a 1-year horizon. We use recent trial data demonstrating higher rates of early and late NOM failures. However, we also incorporate a shorter length of index hospitalizations with NOM, reflecting a contemporary approach to NOM and ultimately driving cost-effectiveness. Long-term follow-up data are needed in this population to assess the cost-effectiveness of NOM over longer time horizons, where healthcare utilization and recurrence rates may be higher.

The Use of Sequential Surveys to Shorten Implementation Time for Healthcare System-Level Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways improve healthcare quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesized that the RAND Method (a hybrid Delphi approach), involving anonymous sequential surveys and face-to-face meetings, would allow for more rapid agreement and initiation of new ERAS pathways. METHODS: Using the ERAS Society guidelines for cesarean section as a baseline, our institution's ERAS Leadership Team (ELT) compiled published literature and institutional practices to design a 32-component survey that was sent to obstetricians, nurse midwives, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, and nurses. Components that did not reach 90% consensus were included in a second survey the following week, and meetings were held to review results. At the conclusion of this process, time to agreement was retrospectively compared to the colorectal ERAS pathway process at this institution. RESULTS: ERAS pathway components were compiled and reviewed by 121 stakeholders at 7 hospitals using iterative surveys with review meetings over a 13-week period. Survey response rates were 61% and 50% in the initial and follow-up surveys, respectively. There was agreement on 28/32 and 32/32 items on the initial and follow-up surveys. Using the RAND Method, time to agreement decreased by 54.1% (24 vs 13 weeks) compared to prior system-wide efforts to standardize the colorectal surgery ERAS pathway. DISCUSSION: With rapidly expanding healthcare systems, effective methods to gain consensus and adopt ERAS pathways are critical to implementation of ERAS guidelines. We demonstrate that the RAND Method allows for a transparent and efficient means of agreement across a diverse group of clinicians practicing in several settings.

The Effect of Area Social Deprivation on Health Behavior and Health Care Utilization in an Adult Trauma Population.

Social determinants of health may mediate health disparities, but these variables are not routinely measured in clinical practice. This is a retrospective, single-institution study that evaluates the effect of area deprivation on outcomes after trauma admission. Adult trauma patients 18 years and older were eligible. Patients were stratified into high-area (HSD) or low-area (LSD) social deprivation cohorts using zip code of residence. Regression modeling was used to explain the association between HSD, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Patients who resided in HSD areas made up 29.5% of the study population, were more likely to be younger, male, and identify as a non-White race. Patients in the HSD cohort were also less likely to be admitted to the ICU (OR 0.84, CI 0.71-0.98) and discharged with additional services (OR 0.73, CI 0.57-0.94). We found that independently, area social deprivation affects trauma outcomes and the resources a patient is provided after discharge.