RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Alcohol consumption is increasing in women, who more frequently report abdominal symptoms compared to men. We aimed to examine differences in presentation of acute pancreatitis [AP] in male and female patients hospitalized with alcohol-associated AP. METHODS: We analyzed 138 patients enrolled in an ongoing case-crossover study of alcohol-associated AP conducted across 5 medical centers in the U.S. Patients meeting the Revised Atlanta Classification of AP and who scored 3 or higher on the AUDIT-C instrument were invited to participate in the study and were interviewed while hospitalized with AP. Sex differences in the timing and type of pancreas-associated pain, alcohol consumption, clinical presentation, and quality of life were examined by Chi-squared tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests and t-tests. RESULTS: Female patients reported significantly longer interval from onset of pain to deciding to seek medical attention (median 40 h, interquartile range [IQR] 14, 74) as compared to males (14 h, IQR 4, 50; p = 0.005). While male patients were more likely to have been admitted to the intensive care unit [ICU] (21%) as compared to female patients (7%; p = 0.04), the incidence of SIRS or severe AP did not differ by sex. Quality of life measures as reported through the PROMIS-29 instrument were equally suboptimal in both sexes. Anxiety disorders were diagnosed more frequently among females (61%) than in males (41%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In a large case series of alcohol-associated AP, we found that female patients delayed seeking medical care compared to males. However, there were no differences in the type, location and intensity of abdominal pain.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Cruzados , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Background: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among adolescents in the United States (U.S.) has surpassed conventional tobacco products (CTPs), including cigarettes. Increasingly, ENDS are used concurrently with CTPs and substances such as cannabis. However, few studies involve Central Appalachia, a region with historically high rates of tobacco and other substance use. Objective: To examine prevalence of concurrent use of ENDS and cannabis among school-going adolescents in Appalachian Tennessee and delineate associations between ENDS use and substance-related risk behavior (cannabis use), social relations (peer use), and school-related risk behavior (academic performance). Methods: Data were obtained from a survey conducted with youth aged 13-17 years in 2018 in a county in Appalachian Tennessee (n = 280). A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to evaluate associations between ENDS and cannabis use, and other factors. Results: Overall, lifetime ENDS and cannabis prevalence estimates were 31.1% and 18.6%, respectively. Lifetime ENDS users had increased odds of also being lifetime cannabis users [OR = 9.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.44-24.75]. Lifetime ENDS users had increased odds of reporting ENDS use among peers [OR = 12.11; 95% CI: 5.40-27.12] and lower academic performance (OR associated with mostly C or D vs. A grades was 4.28, 95% CI: 1.68-10.90). Conclusion: This study found an association between ENDS and cannabis use among adolescents in Appalachian Tennessee exists. Additionally, peer use and academic performance were associated with ENDS use. The findings have implications for public health intervention planning to address not only ENDS but also substance use among Appalachian youth.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Productos de Tabaco , Adolescente , Región de los Apalaches/epidemiología , Humanos , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a complex disease representing a significant portion of gastrointestinal-related hospitalizations in the U.S. Understanding risk factors of AP might provide attractive therapeutic targets. We evaluated hypophosphatemia a prognostic marker in AP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of electronic health records of patients with AP from 01/ 01/2012-12/31/2021 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center with serum phosphate measured within 48 hours of admission. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate associations with ICU admission and AP severity. Multivariable log-linear modeling was employed to examine associations with length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 1526 patients admitted for AP, 33% (499) had a serum phosphate level measured within 48 hours. Patients with hypophosphatemia were more likely to have ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.75-7.62; P < 0.001), have a longer hospital stay (log-LOS = 0.34; SE; 0.09; 95% CI: 0.17-0.52; P < 0.001), and have moderate or severe AP (AOR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.16-2.80; P < 0.001) compared with those without hypophosphatemia. CONCLUSION: Serum phosphate is infrequently measured in patients with AP and shows promise as an early prognostic marker for outcomes of AP.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Hipofosfatemia , Tiempo de Internación , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Hipofosfatemia/sangre , Hipofosfatemia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pancreatitis/sangre , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Aguda , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fosfatos/sangre , Factores de Riesgo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rates of dental visits of older adults in the United States, particularly in Tennessee, are rapidly increasing, coupled with the growing complexity of older adults' dental treatment. Notably, increased dental visits help detect and treat dental disease and offer opportunities for preventive care. This longitudinal study aimed to examine the prevalence and determinants of dental care visits amongst Tennessee seniors. METHODS: This observational study combined multiple cross-sectional studies. Five even years of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance system data were used, including 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. Our data were limited to Tennessee seniors (60 years or older). Weighting was conducted to account for the complex sampling design. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with dental clinic visits. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The current study comprised 5362 Tennessee seniors. Older individuals visiting dental clinics within 1 year gradually decreased from 76.5% in 2010 to 71.2% in 2018. The majority of participants were female (51.7%), White (81.3%), and located in Middle Tennessee (43.5%). Logistic regression showed that those more likely to visit dentists or dental clinics included females (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.8), never-smokers and former smokers (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.4), individuals with some college education (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4), college graduates (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.8-4.1), and those with high incomes (eg, >$50,000; OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 3.7-8.7). Conversely, Black participants (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8), participants with fair/poor health (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.8), and those who have never married (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8) were less likely to report dental visits. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of Tennessee seniors visiting dental clinics within 1 year have gradually decreased from 76.5% in 2010 to 71.2% in 2018. Several factors were associated with seniors seeking dental treatment. Effective interventions to improve dental visits should take the identified factors into account.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Tennessee/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Estudios LongitudinalesRESUMEN
Background: Following the national implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014, barriers still exist that limit the adoption of substance use treatment (SUT) services in mainstream health care (MHC) settings in the United States. This study provides an overview of current evidence on barriers and facilitators to integrating various SUT services into MHC. Methods: A systematic search was conducted with the following databases: "PubMed including MEDLINE", "CINAHL", "Web of Science", "ABI/Inform", and "PsycINFO." We identified barriers and/or facilitators affecting patients, providers, and programs/systems. Results: Of the 540 identified citations, 36 were included. Main barriers were identified for patients (socio-demographics, finances, confidentiality, legal impact, and disinterest), providers (limited training, lack of time, patient satisfaction concerns, legal implications, lack of access to resources or evidence-based information, and lack of legal/regulatory clarity), and programs/systems (lack of leadership support, lack of staff, limited financial resources, lack of referral networks, lack of space, and lack of state-level support). Also, we recognized key facilitators pertaining to patients (trust for providers, education, and shared decision making), providers (expert supervision, use of support team, training with programs like Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO), and receptivity), and programs/systems (leadership support, collaboration with external agencies, and policies e.g., those expanding the addiction workforce, improving insurance access and treatment access). Conclusions: This study identified several factors influencing the integration of SUT services in MHC. Strategies for improving SUT integration in MHC should address barriers and leverage facilitators related to patients, providers, and programs/systems.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 vaccination in the United States has stalled, with some of the lowest rates in the South. Vaccine hesitancy is a primary contributor and may be influenced by health literacy (HL). This study assessed the association between HL and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a population residing in 14 Southern states. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a web-based survey conducted between February and June 2021. METHODS: The outcome was vaccine hesitancy, and the main independent variable was HL, assessed as an index score. Descriptive statistical tests were performed, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted, controlling for sociodemographic and other variables. RESULTS: Of the total analytic sample (n = 221), the overall rate of vaccine hesitancy was 23.5%. Vaccine hesitancy was more prevalent in those with low/moderate HL (33.3%) vs those with high HL (22.7%). The association between HL and vaccine hesitancy, however, was not significant. Personal perception of COVID-19 threat was significantly associated with lower odds of vaccine hesitancy compared with those without perception of threat (adjusted odds ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.73; P = .0189). The association between race/ethnicity and vaccine hesitancy was not statistically significant (P = .1571). CONCLUSIONS: HL was not a significant indicator of vaccine hesitancy in the study population, suggesting that general low rates of vaccination in the Southern region may not be due to knowledge about COVID-19. This indicates a critical need for place-based or contextual research on why vaccine hesitancy in the region transcends most sociodemographic differences.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad , VacunaciónRESUMEN
We aimed to investigate the association between either or both of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and non-BZDs and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. The participants with at least two prescriptions of BZDs and/or non-BZDs were identified as hypnotics users, whereas those without any prescription of hypnotics were non-hypnotics users. The hypnotics and non-hypnotics cohorts were 1:1 matched on their propensity scores. A total of 109,704 AF-free individuals were included; 610 AF cases occurred in the 54,852 hypnotics users and 166 in the 54,852 non-hypnotics users during the 602,470 person-years of follow-up, with a higher risk of new-onset AF in the users than the non-users (hazard ratio (HR): 3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04−4.28). The users at the highest tertiles of the estimated defined daily doses per one year (DDD) had a greater risk for AF than the non-users, with the risk increasing by 7.13-fold (95% CI: 5.86−8.67) for >0.74-DDD BZDs, 10.68-fold (95% CI: 6.13−18.62) for >4.72-DDD non-BZDs, and 3.26-fold (95% CI: 2.38−4.47) for > 1.65-DDD combinations of BZDs with non-BZDs, respectively. In conclusion, hypnotics use was associated with elevated incidence of AF in the Taiwanese population, which highlighted that the high-dose usage of hypnotics needs more caution in clinical cardiological practice.
RESUMEN
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use, including e-cigarettes, has surpassed the use of conventional tobacco products. Emerging research suggests that susceptibility to e-cigarette use is associated with actual use among adolescents. However, few studies exist involving adolescents in high-risk, rural, socioeconomically distressed environments. This study examines susceptibility to and subsequent usage in school-going adolescents in a rural distressed county in Appalachian Tennessee using data from an online survey (N = 399). Relying on bivariate analyses and logistic regression, this study finds that while 30.6% of adolescents are ever e-cigarette users, 15.5% are current users. Approximately one in three adolescents are susceptible to e-cigarettes use, and susceptibility is associated with lower odds of being a current e-cigarette user (OR = 0.03; CI: 0.01-0.12; p < 0.00). The age of tobacco use initiation was significantly associated with decreased current use of e-cigarettes (OR = 0.89; CI: 0.83-0.0.97; p < 0.01). Overall, the results of this exploratory study suggest the need for larger studies to identify unique and generalizable factors that predispose adolescents in this high-risk rural, socioeconomically disadvantaged region to ENDS use. Nevertheless, this study offers insight into e-cigarette usage among U.S adolescents in rural, socioeconomically disadvantaged environments and provides a foundation for a closer examination of this vulnerable population.