Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12118459

RESUMEN

A recent outbreak of dengue in Bangladesh was marked by many fatal complications. As clinical virulence varies among the genotypes of dengue virus, a study was conducted to investigate the molecular genotypes of dengue in Bangladesh. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to determine viral genotypes using oligonucleotide generic primers that produce a 511 bp product. The resulting product was typed by nested PCR with strain-specific primers, yielding 482 (DEN-1), 119 (DEN-2), 290 (DEN-3) and 392 (DEN-4), visualized on UV transilluminator after electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Of 45 clinically diagnosed dengue patients (mean age 28 years; male/female 30/15), 19 (42.2%) had detectable viral RNA in their blood. However, during the first 5 days of fever in 30 patients, the frequency was 60% (18/30), implying that the sooner serum is drawn after the fever, the greater the chances of detecting viral RNA. DEN-3 was detected in all except 2 patients who were infected with DEN-2. DEN-2 (two cases) and DEN-4 (one case) were present as co-infections with DEN-3. All of the patients presented with fever, anorexia and vomiting; many had headache and general body ache; a few had a rash. About a quarter had suffered episodes of bleeding, while ascites, pleural effusion and CNS symptoms were found in a few patients Patients positive for viral RNA were also positive for anti-dengue IgM (p=0.007) in subsequent sampling. The study suggests the predominance of DEN-3 infection with occasional co-infection with other types, during the recent outbreak of dengue in Bangladesh.


Asunto(s)
Virus del Dengue/genética , Dengue/epidemiología , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Secuencia de Bases , Cartilla de ADN , Dengue/virología , Virus del Dengue/inmunología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , ARN Viral/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa
2.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 22(9): 560-4, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22980608

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a geographical analysis of biomedical publications from the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries over the past 25 years (1985-2009) using the PubMed database. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Web-based search during September 2010. METHODOLOGY: A data extraction program, developed by one of the authors (SFS), was used to extract the raw publication counts from the downloaded PubMed data. A search of PubMed was performed for all journals indexed by selecting the advanced search option and entering the country name in the 'affiliation' field. The publications were normalized by total population, adult illiteracy rate, gross domestic product (GDP), secondary school enrollment ratio and Internet usage rate. RESULTS: The number of PubMed-listed papers published by the SAARC countries over the last 25 years totalled 141,783, which is 1.1% of the total papers indexed by PubMed in the same period. India alone produced 90.5% of total publications generated by SAARC countries. The average number of papers published per year from 1985 to 2009 was 5671 and number of publication increased approximately 242-fold. Normalizing by the population (per million) and GDP (per billion), India (133, 27.6%) and Nepal (323, 37.3%) had the highest publications respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a marked imbalance among the SAARC countries in terms of biomedical research and publication. Because of huge population and the high disease burden, biomedical research and publication output should receive special attention to formulate health policies, re-orient medical education curricula, and alleviate diseases and poverty.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Asia Occidental , Bibliometría , Humanos , PubMed , Investigación Cualitativa
3.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 2: 85-93, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23745079

RESUMEN

The rapid development of new drugs, therapies, and devices has created a dramatic increase in the number of clinical research studies that highlights the need for greater participation in research by physicians as well as patients. Furthermore, the potential of clinical research is unlikely to be reached without greater participation of physicians in research. Physicians face a variety of barriers with regard to participation in clinical research. These barriers are system-or organization-related as well as research-and physician-related. To encourage physician participation, appropriate organizational and operational infrastructures are needed in health care institutes to support research planning and management. All physicians should receive education and training in the fundamentals of research design and methodology, which need to be incorporated into undergraduate medical education and postgraduate training curricula and then reinforced through continuing medical education. Medical schools need to analyze current practices of teaching-learning and research, and reflect upon possible changes needed to develop a 'student-focused teaching-learning and research culture'. This article examines the barriers to and benefits of physician participation in clinical research as well as interventions needed to increase their participation, including the specific role of undergraduate medical education. The main challenge is the unwillingness of many physicians and patients to participate in clinical trials. Barriers to participation include lack of time, lack of resources, trial-specific issues, communication difficulties, conflicts between the role of clinician and scientist, inadequate research experience and training for physicians, lack of rewards and recognition for physicians, and sometimes a scientifically uninteresting research question, among others. Strategies to encourage physician participation in clinical research include financial and nonfinancial incentives, adequate training, research questions that are in line with physician interests and have clear potential to improve patient care, and regular feedback. Finally, encouraging research culture and fostering the development of inquiry and research-based learning among medical students is now a high priority in order to develop more and better clinician-researchers.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA