Transcriptomic Profiling Identifies an Exosomal microRNA Signature for Predicting Recurrence Following Surgery in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: We performed genome-wide expression profiling to develop an exosomal miRNA panel for predicting recurrence following surgery in patients with PDAC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pretreatment risk stratification is essential for offering individualized treatments to patients with PDAC, but predicting recurrence following surgery remains clinically challenging. METHODS: We analyzed 210 plasma and serum specimens from 4 cohorts of PDAC patients. Using a discovery cohort (n = 25), we performed genome-wide sequencing to identify candidate exosomal miRNAs (exo-miRNAs). Subsequently, we trained and validated the predictive performance of the exo-miRNAs in two clinical cohorts (training cohort: n = 82, validation cohort: n = 57) without neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), followed by a post-NAT clinical cohort (n = 46) as additional validation. RESULTS: We performed exo-miRNA expression profiling in plasma specimens obtained before any treatment in a discovery cohort. Subsequently we optimized and trained a 6-exo-miRNA risk-prediction model, which robustly discriminated patients with recurrence [area under the curve (AUC): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.89] and relapse-free survival (RFS, P < 0.01) in the training cohort. The identified exo-miRNA panel was successfully validated in an independent validation cohort (AUC: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65- 0.88, RFS: P < 0.01), where it exhibited comparable performance in the post-NAT cohort (AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.85, RFS: P < 0.01) and emerged as an independent predictor for RFS (hazard ratio: 2.84, 95% CI: 1.30-6.20). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a novel, noninvasive exo-miRNA signature that robustly predicts recurrence following surgery in patients with PDAC; highlighting its potential clinical impact for optimized patient selection and improved individualized treatment strategies.

Clinically Relevant Late-Onset Biliary Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Late-onset biliary complications (LBC) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) can be serious. This study aimed to clarify the frequency and risk factors of severe LBC after PD. METHODS: We defined LBC as biliary complications occurring 3 months after PD and severe LBC as cases that required intensive care. A total of 318 patients who underwent PD between 2010 and 2018 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Hospitalization for severe LBC was required in 59 patients (19%), of whom 20 had liver abscesses (6.3%); 18, acute cholangitis (5.7%); 12, biliary stones (3.8%); and 21, biliary strictures (6.6%). Interventional radiological or endoscopic treatment was required in 32 patients (10%), of whom 9 had a benign primary disease with biliary stones and/or strictures. Thirteen of the remaining 23 patients with a malignant primary disease had liver abscesses and cholangitis. Significant independent risk factors for severe LBC in patients with malignant primary disease were recurrence around the hepaticojejunostomy (odds ratio 6.5, P = 0.013) and chemotherapy (odds ratio 13.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe LBC after PD may occur regardless of whether the primary disease is benign or malignant. The course of severe LBC differs according to the primary disease, and therefore, appropriate follow-up and optimal treatment should be recommended according to the condition of the patient and the disease state.

A gene expression signature for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), optimal treatment selection, including multimodality regimens such as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), can be clinically transformative. Unfortunately, currently no predictive biomarkers are available that can guide the use of NACRT in PDAC patients. Accordingly, herein we developed a novel gene signature that can preoperatively predict NACRT-sensitivity in PDAC patients. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a 10-gene panel in 749 PDAC cases, which included two public datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium; n = 276), and three clinical specimen cohorts (n = 417), and a pre-NACRT endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy cohort (n = 56). The potential predictive performance of this signature was evaluated and compared to CA-19-9 levels and key clinicopathological factors. We first evaluated the prognostic potential of a 10-gene panel which significantly predicted overall survival in both public datasets (P < .01, P < .01), and two in-house patient cohorts (P < .01, P = .04). In the pre-NACRT EUS-FNA cohort, we established a radio-sensitivity gene panel (RSGP) which yielded highly robust (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) for predicting response to gemcitabine-based NACRT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that RSGP was an independent predictor for response to NACRT (OR = 2.70; 95% CI: 1.25-5.85), and this response-prediction was even more robust when CA-19-9 levels were included into the model. In conclusion, we have validated and developed a novel gene signature that is highly robust in predicting response to NACRT, even in preoperative settings, highlighting its clinical significance for optimizing and personalizing treatment strategies in PDAC patients.

A MicroRNA Signature Identifies Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients at Risk for Lymph Node Metastases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) frequently metastasize to the lymph nodes; strategies are needed to identify patients at highest risk for lymph node metastases. We performed genome-wide expression profile analyses of PDAC specimens, collected during surgery or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-need aspiration (EUS-FNA), to identify a microRNA (miRNA) signature associated with metastasis to lymph nodes. METHODS: For biomarker discovery, we analyzed miRNA expression profiles of primary pancreatic tumors from 3 public data sets (The Cancer Genome Atlas, GSE24279, and GSE32688). We then analyzed 157 PDAC specimens (83 from patients with lymph node metastases and 74 without) from Japan, collected from 2001 through 2017, for the training cohort and 107 PDAC specimens (63 from patients with lymph node metastases and 44 without) from a different medical center in Japan, from 2002 through 2016, for the validation cohort. We also analyzed samples collected by EUS-FNA before surgery from 47 patients (22 patients with lymph node metastases and 25 without; 17 for the training cohort and 30 from the validation cohort) and 62 specimens before any treatment from patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (9 patients with lymph node metastasis and 53 without) for additional validation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the statistical differences in miRNA expression between patients with vs without metastases. RESULTS: We identified an miRNA expression pattern associated with diagnosis of PDAC metastasis to lymph nodes. Using logistic regression analysis, we optimized and trained a 6-miRNA risk prediction model for the training cohort; this model discriminated patients with vs without lymph node metastases with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.89). In the validation cohort, the model identified patients with vs without lymph node metastases with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.81). In EUS-FNA biopsy samples, the model identified patients with vs without lymph node metastases with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89). The miRNA expression pattern was an independent predictor of PDAC metastasis to lymph nodes in the validation cohort (odds ratio, 17.05; 95% CI, 2.43-119.57) and in the EUS-FNA cohort (95% CI, 0.65-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Using data and tumor samples from 3 independent cohorts, we identified an miRNA signature that identifies patients at risk for PDAC metastasis to lymph nodes. The signature has similar levels of accuracy in the analysis of resected tumor specimens and EUS-FNA biopsy specimens. This model might be used to select treatment and management strategies for patients with PDAC.

Clinical relevance of CD70 expression in resected pancreatic cancer: Prognostic value and therapeutic potential.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant expression of CD70 in several malignancies is potentially associated with poor patient prognosis and could serve as a therapeutic target. However, the clinical relevance of CD70 expression in pancreatic cancer has not been thoroughly explored. METHODS: We evaluated CD70 expression in 166 surgical specimens obtained from human patients with pancreatic cancer. We analyzed the function of CD70 in proliferation and migration using pancreatic cancer cell lines with silenced CD70 expression. RESULTS: CD70 expression was positively stained in 42 patients (25%). In the whole cohort, high CD70 expression was not associated with overall survival (OS: 33.1 vs. 40.8 months, P = 0.256), although it was significantly associated with inferior OS in a population of patients that completed adjuvant chemotherapy (OS: 45.4 vs. 63.8 months, P = 0.027). Moreover, the incidence of hematogenous metastasis was significantly higher in patients with high CD70 expression than in those with low CD70 expression (P = 0.020). This finding was also statistically significant in multivariate analyses (P = 0.001). In vitro experiments demonstrated that CD70 expression contributed to cancer cell proliferation independently of gemcitabine treatment as well as cell migration. Furthermore, real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of frozen surgical tissues showed a correlation between the expression of CD70 and mesenchymal markers. CONCLUSIONS: CD70 expression in pancreatic cancer might be involved in hematogenous metastasis. Furthermore, our results imply that CD70 overexpression can serve as a novel prognostic factor and a potential therapeutic target in patients who have completed adjuvant chemotherapy.

Does direct invasion of peripancreatic lymph nodes impact survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A retrospective dual-center study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can directly invade the peripancreatic lymph nodes; however, the significance of direct lymph node invasion is controversial, and it is currently classified as lymph node metastasis. This study aimed to identify the impact of direct invasion of peripancreatic lymph nodes on survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A total of 411 patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatic resection at two high-volume centers from 2006 to 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Sixty (14.6%) patients had direct invasion of the peripancreatic lymph nodes without isolated lymph node metastasis (N-direct group), 189 (46.0%) had isolated lymph node metastasis (N-met group), and 162 (39.4%) had neither direct invasion nor isolated metastasis (N0 group). There was no significant difference in median overall survival between the N-direct group (35.0 months) and the N0 group (45.6 month) (p = 0.409), but survival was significantly longer in the N-direct compared with the N-met group (25.0 months) (p = 0.003). Similarly, median disease-free survival was similar in the N-direct (21.0 months) and N0 groups (22.7 months) (p = 0.151), but was significantly longer in the N-direct compared with the N-met group (14.0 months) (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified resectability, adjuvant chemotherapy, and isolated lymph node metastasis as independent predictors of overall survival. However, direct lymph node invasion was not a predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Direct invasion of the peripancreatic lymph nodes had no effect on survival in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and should therefore not be classified as lymph node metastasis.

Limited resection vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

It is well known that surgery is the mainstay treatment for duodenal adenocarcinoma. However, the optimal extent of surgery is still under debate. We aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of limited resection (LR) and pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. A systematic electronic database search of the literature was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. All studies comparing LR and pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were selected. Long-term overall survival was considered as the primary outcome, and perioperative morbidity and mortality as the secondary outcomes. Fifteen studies with a total of 3166 patients were analyzed; 995 and 1498 patients were treated with limited resection and pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Eight and 7 studies scored a low and intermediate risk of publication bias, respectively. The LR group had a more favorable result than the pancreatoduodenectomy group in overall morbidity (odd ratio [OR]: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.65) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR: 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.43). Mortality (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.33) and overall survival (OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-1.13) were not significantly different between the two groups, although comparison of the two groups stratified by prognostic factors, such as T categories, was not possible due to a lack of detailed data. LR showed long-term outcomes equivalent to those of pancreatoduodenectomy, while the perioperative morbidity rates were lower. LR could be an option for selected duodenal adenocarcinoma patients with appropriate location or depth of invasion, although further studies are required.

Phase II Study of the Triple Combination Chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/Oxaliplatin/Irinotecan) in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

LESSONS LEARNED: The triple combination chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was an effective treatment that appeared to be better tolerated than the widely used FOLFIRINOX regimen.SOXIRI regimen may provide an alternative approach for advanced pancreatic cancer. BACKGROUND: In our previous phase I study, we determined the recommended dose of a biweekly S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This phase II study was conducted to assess the safety and clinical efficacy in patients with unresectable PDAC. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced PDAC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients received 80 mg/m2 of S-1 twice a day for 2 weeks in alternate-day administration, 150 mg/m2 of irinotecan on day 1, and 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-five enrolled patients received a median of six (range: 2-15) treatment cycles. The RR was 22.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4-40.1); median OS, 17.7 months (95% CI: 9.8-22.0); and median PFS, 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.2-8.4). Furthermore, the median OS in patients with distant metastasis was 10.1 months, whereas that in patients with locally advanced PDAC was 22.6 months. Major grade 3 or 4 toxicity included neutropenia (54%), anemia (17%), febrile neutropenia (11%), anorexia (9%), diarrhea (9%), and nausea (9%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: SOXIRI is considered a promising and well-tolerated regimen in patients with unresectable PDAC.

Significance of the inflammation-based prognostic score in recurrent pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer (RPC) is improving with the appearance of new anticancer drugs, prognostic indicators for RPC are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate significance of the inflammation-based prognostic score, including modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in patients with RPC. METHODS: This study reviewed 263 patients of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at our institution between 2006 and 2015. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values. The prognostic significance of the inflammation-based prognostic scores were evaluated by a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 172 patients (65.4%) who had recurrence was included in this study. The optimal PNI for predicting 1-year survival after recurrence was 40 with higher area under receiver operating characteristics curve value (0.704) in comparison with other inflammation-based prognostic scores. A univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that liver metastasis (P < 0.001) and PNI < 40 (P < 0.001) were independently associated with the survival time after recurrence. When each of the two predictors was counted as one point and the points were calculated for all cases, a good stratified survival curve was obtained, showing the shorter survival in the higher points: median survival times of 2, 1, and 0 points were 4.3, 11.1, and 21.2 months, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation-based prognostic scores, especially PNI is useful clinical biomarker for predicting the survival time after recurrence in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Risk Factors for Late-Onset Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) occasionally occurs repeatedly or leads to a serious condition. This retrospective study aimed to clarify its frequency and pathogenesis. METHODS: A total of 147 consecutive patients who underwent PD for pancreatic cancer between 2006 and 2014 were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage on postoperative day 100 or later. Furthermore, recurrence and portal vein (PV) hemodynamics were thoroughly reevaluated by computed tomography. RESULTS: Eleven patients experienced late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The bleeding sites were gastrojejunostomy in four patients, choledochojejunostomy in two, transverse colic marginal vein in one, and unknown in four. The median occurrence time of late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage was 13.3 months after PD. PV occlusion (63.6 vs. 8.9%; p < 0.001), no patency of PV-splenic vein (SPV) confluence (54.5 vs. 12.7%; p = 0.002), and SPV ligation (36.4 vs. 9.6%; p = 0.025) were found to be significant risk factors for late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Among 11 patients who experienced late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 7 had PV occlusion and 6 had local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested for the first time that both oncologic and non-oncologic factors might contribute to late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage after PD for pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, PV occlusion, no PV-SPV patency, and SPV ligation were found to be significant risk factors for late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Therefore, to prevent late-onset gastrointestinal hemorrhage, we must consider various approaches to maintain the patency of the PV and SPV.

A Comparison Between Plastic and Metallic Biliary Stent Placement in Patients Receiving Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal stent type in patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is uncertain. The present study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of biliary metallic stent (MS) and plastic stent (PS) in patients undergoing preoperative NACRT for resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 43 patients who required either biliary MS or PS before initiating NACRT for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer. Seventeen patients had MS (MS group), while 23 patients had PS (PS group). All patients received preoperative NACRT, including gemcitabine and concomitant three-dimensional radiation of 54 Gy, and underwent pancreatectomy. Stent patency, surgery postponement, postoperative outcomes, and cost-effectiveness were compared between these groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demographic or tumor characteristics between the groups. Stent patency was significantly longer in the MS group than in the PS group (p = 0.042). There were no differences in time to surgery, intraoperative characteristics, surgical complications, margin positivity, and pathological response between the groups. Furthermore, the medical cost of maintenance of biliary drainage during NACRT was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: MS placement compared to PS in patients receiving preoperative NACRT provided no significant benefits during the postoperative course of pancreatectomy. However, MS placement was associated with long stent patency while showing no economic disadvantage. Therefore, MS placement may be recommended in patients receiving preoperative NACRT for resectable pancreatic cancer.

Is distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? -Multicenter surgical group study.

OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively investigated the operative outcomes of patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) for invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) located at the body and tail. METHODS: Data from 395 patients with PDAC who underwent DP with margin-negative resection (R0 or R1) were collected from seven high-volume centers in Japan from 2001 to 2012. Among them, 72 patients underwent DP with en-bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR). The remaining 323 patients underwent conventional DP with splenectomy (DP-S). To determine the efficacy of DP-CAR, clinicopathological data were compared between the DP-CAR and the DP-S groups. RESULTS: The DP-S group consisted mainly of patients with resectable disease (93%), and conversely, all patients in the DP-CAR group had borderline resectable or unresectable disease. The overall morbidity was significantly higher in the DP-CAR group than in the DP-S group (63% vs 47%, respectively; P = 0.017). The median survival time (MST) of the DP-CAR group was significantly shorter than that of the DP-S group (17.5 vs 28.6 months, respectively; P = 0.004). However, the MST of patients in the DP-CAR group (n = 61, 85%) who received adjuvant therapy was significantly longer than that of patients in the DP-S group (n = 65, 20%) who underwent R1 resection (21.9 vs 16.7 months, respectively; P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: DP-CAR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy provided an acceptable overall survival rate in patients with highly advanced PDAC, but should be performed with great caution because of high morbidity. Patients with a high risk of positive surgical margins with DP-S may be candidates for DP-CAR.

Risk Factors for Unresectable Recurrence After Up-Front Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence that preoperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is superior to up-front surgery (UFS). The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with poor prognosis after UFS for CRLM. METHODS: Data about consecutive patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection at Nara Medical University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2015 were retrieved from a prospective database. Recurrence that developed within 2 years after liver resection and could not be surgically resected was defined as unresectable recurrence (UR). Preoperative risk factors associated with UR after UFS were analyzed. Among the patients with the identified risk factors, the patients who were treated with UFS were compared with those who received preoperative chemotherapy via propensity score-matching analysis. RESULTS: There were 167 patients treated with UFS, and 71 of them developed UR (the UR group). The overall survival (OS) rate of the UR group was significantly worse than that of the non-UR group (5-year survival rate: 3.8 vs. 66.8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a primary colorectal cancer N factor of N2-3 as a risk factor for UR (hazard ratio 2.72, p = 0.004). Propensity score-matching analysis demonstrated that among patients with N2-3 primary colorectal cancer the post-initial treatment OS of the patients treated with UFS was significantly worse than that of the patients who received preoperative chemotherapy (5-year survival rate: 11.1 vs. 30.0%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRLM with a primary colorectal cancer N factor of N2-3 should be considered for preoperative chemotherapy.

Prognostic factors for actual long-term survival in the era of multidisciplinary treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Recent advances in multidisciplinary treatments are improving the postoperative prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the prognosis even after potentially curative resection remains poor. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical and pathological features of actual 5-year survivors under current circumstances. METHODS: A total of 128 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC at our institution between January 2006 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The actual 5-year overall survival rate for all patients was 30.9%, with a median survival time of 33.1 months. Of 128 patients, 25 (19.5%) survived for 5 years after surgery without disease recurrence. A univariate analysis showed that the pretreatment serum CA19-9 value, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, and UICC stage at resection were significant predictive factors for the actual long-term survival. A multivariate analysis showed that a pretreatment serum CA19-9 value ≥ 110 U/mL was a significant unfavorable prognostic indicator. In addition, all subjects in the 5-year survival group completed adjuvant chemotherapy. The recurrence rate in the liver was significantly lower and that in the lung significantly higher in the long-term survival group than in the short-term survival group. CONCLUSIONS: The factors contributing to the long-term survival of PDAC were the pretreatment CA19-9 value and the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. To achieve the actual long-term survival and cure after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, further treatment strategies enhancing the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy are required.

Significance of bacterial culturing of prophylactic drainage fluid in the early postoperative period after liver resection for predicting the development of surgical site infections.

PURPOSES: The relationship between the results of bacterial drainage fluid cultures in the early postoperative period after liver resection and the development of surgical site infections (SSIs) is unclear. We evaluated the diagnostic value of bacterial cultures of drainage fluid obtained on postoperative day (POD) 1 after liver resection. METHODS: The cases of all consecutive patients who underwent elective liver resection from January 2014 to December 2016 were analyzed. The association between a positive culture result and the development of SSIs was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 195 consecutive patients were studied. Positive drainage fluid cultures were obtained in 6 patients (3.1%). A multivariate analysis revealed that a positive drainage fluid culture was an independent risk factor for SSIs (odds ratio: 8.04, P = 0.035), and combined resection of the gastrointestinal tract was a risk factor for a positive drainage fluid culture (P = 0.006). Among the patients who did not undergo procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract, there was no association between drainage fluid culture positivity and SSIs. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of positive culture results for drainage fluid collected on POD 1 after liver resection was associated with SSIs. However, among patients who did not undergo procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract, it was not a predictor of SSIs.

Reinforced staplers for distal pancreatectomy.

PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers during distal pancreatectomy (DP) remain controversial because of the small sample size. This multicenter single-arm prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers with bioabsorbable material during DP. METHODS: Between October 2014 and August 2015, 121 patients scheduled for DP were enrolled in this study at 11 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. Protocol treatment was defined as "distal pancreatectomy using reinforced staplers." RESULTS: Per-protocol analysis of 105 patients was performed; 16 of the patients were excluded based on discontinuation of protocol treatment criteria. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 13 (12.4%) of 105 patients. The overall morbidity rate was 29.5% (31 of 105 patients) and severe complication (Clavien classification IIIa or more) was 10.5% (11/105). Mortality rate was 0%, although reoperations were performed on two patients (1.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of independent risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after DP using reinforced stapler closure was operative time more than 240 min (P = 0.047, odds ratio 5.79), registration numbers less than 10 (P = 0.046, odds ratio 13.01), and staple line hemorrhage (P = 0.003, odds ratio 16.34). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety of reinforced staplers for pancreatic stump closure during DP. However, the efficacy of reinforced staplers for decreasing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula could not be drawn from this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02270554) and UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000015384).

Increased tumour ADC value during chemotherapy predicts improved survival in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether changes to the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of primary tumour in the early period after starting chemotherapy can predict progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Subjects comprised 43 patients with histologically confirmed unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy. Minimum ADC values in primary tumour were measured using the selected area ADC (sADC), which excluded cystic and necrotic areas and vessels, and the whole tumour ADC (wADC), which included whole tumour components. Relative changes in ADC were calculated from baseline to 4 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy. Relationships between ADC and both PFS and OS were modelled by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 11.0 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, sADC change was the strongest predictor of PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 4.5; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.7-11.9; p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for OS revealed sADC change and CRP as independent predictive markers, with sADC change as the strongest predictive biomarker (HR, 6.7; 95 % CI, 2.7-16.6; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Relative changes in sADC could provide a useful imaging biomarker to predict PFS and OS with chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. KEY POINTS: • Relative change in ADC value can predict survival in unresectable pancreatic cancer. • ADC change could determine a chemosensitivity of pancreatic cancer. • ADC values should be measured by excluding cystic, necrotic areas and vessels.

[A Case of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Its Disease Progression Could Be Controlled by Multimodal Treatment].

The patient was a 73-year-old man, diagnosed with advanced huge hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava and extrahepatic metastases. Radiation therapy(50 Gy)was applied for the bone metastases, primary tumor, and tumor thrombus, and the patient received a cisplatin transcatheter arterial infusion(100mg/ body, 5 courses). Sorafenib was administered orally once the local lesion was under control. The tumor showed a partial response according to the RECIST criteria, but the tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava almost disappeared. The presence of a tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava must be regarded as an oncologic emergency. Acisplatin transcatheter arterial infusion and radiation therapy may be treatment options for unresectable cases.

[Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombi Treated with Curative Liver Resection and Perioperative Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy - A Case Report].

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)with main portal vein(MPV)and/or the inferior vena cava(IVC)tumor thrombi is dismal. The management of HCC with severe tumor thrombus is complicated. In this study, we report a case of HCC with tumor thrombi in the MPV and IVC that was successfullytreated via liver resection and perioperative hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAI). A 68-year-old man was referred to our institution to treat huge HCC lesion in the right lobe of the liver. Abdominal computed tomography(CT)revealed a tumor(12 cm in diameter)in the right hepatic lobe and tumor thrombi in the MPV and IVC. The patient was initiallytreated with HAI(cisplatin 100mg/body). After 3 courses of HAI, the tumor was dramaticallyreduced in size, and the thrombus in the IVC had disappeared; however, the thrombus in the MPV remained. Therefore, we performed right hepatectomy, wedge resection of the IVC, combined resection of the MPV, and portal vein reconstruction. The histopathological findings of the resected specimen revealed that viable cancer cells were observed onlyin an 8×8mm lesion. Subsequently, HAI was performed as adjuvant therapy for 3 courses. The patient died of other causes 2 years 3 months after surgery. There was no sign of recurrence at the time of death. This case suggested that perioperative HAI and liver resection mayrepresent an effective treatment strategyfor HCC with severe tumor thrombus.