The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the octogenarian population: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced age is a known risk factor for poor outcomes after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for cardiac support. The use of ECMO support in patients over the age of 80 is controversial, and sometimes its use is contraindicated. We aimed to assess the use of ECMO in octogenarian patients to determine survival and complication rates. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis was completed at a large, urban academic medical center. Patients requiring V-A ECMO support between December of 2012 and November of 2019 were included as long as the patient was at least 80 years of age at the time of cannulation. Post cardiotomy shock patients were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients met eligibility criteria; all received V-A ECMO support. Overall, the majority of patients (71.7%; 33/46) survived to decannulation, and 43.5% (20/46) survived to discharge. Patients who were previously rescued from percutaneous interventions tend to have a better survival than other patients (p = .06). The most common complications were renal and hemorrhagic. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that advanced age alone should not disqualify patients from cannulating and supporting with V-A ECMO.

Inter-hospital COVID ECMO air transportation.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required rapid and effective protocol adjustments at every level of healthcare. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is pivotal to COVID-19 treatment in cases of refractory hypoxemic hypercapnic respiratory failure. As such, our large, metropolitan air ambulance system in conjunction with our experts in advanced cardiopulmonary therapies modified protocols to assist peripheral hospitals in evaluation, cannulation and initiation of ECMO for rescue and air transportation of patients with COVID-19 to our quaternary center. The detailed protocol is described alongside initial data of its use. To date, 14 patients have been placed on ECMO support at an outside facility and successfully transported via helicopter to our hub hospital using this protocol.

Tracheostomy while on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Comparison of Percutaneous and Open Procedures.

Although the ideal timing of tracheostomy for critically ill patients is controversial, transitioning from an endotracheal tube can be beneficial. Concerns arise for patients under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Studies have described percutaneous and open tracheostomy approaches for critically ill patients but, to our knowledge, have not compared the two specifically in ECMO patients. This study analyzed safety and aimed to identify if there was a difference in major bleeding or other tracheostomy-associated complications. A single-center retrospective cohort study of all patients who received tracheostomy while on ECMO from July 2013 to May 2019 was completed. The primary endpoint was a significant difference in the incidence of a major bleeding adverse event at 48 hours. Secondary endpoints included differences in the incidence of complications (e.g., procedure-related mortality, ECMO decannulation, tracheal/esophageal injury, and pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum) and survival to discharge. A secondary analysis separated the groups further by comparing those with bleeding events and those without. The study included 27 ECMO patients: 16 (59%) in the percutaneous arm and 11 in the open arm. The median number of ECMO days before tracheostomy was 10 vs. 13, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for major bleeding events (percutaneous 44% vs. open 27%, p = .45), procedure-related mortality, or procedure-related complications. Both percutaneous and open tracheostomies in patients on ECMO require a multidisciplinary approach to minimize adverse effects. Major bleeding does occur, but there was no statistically significant correlation between bleeding events and the type of the tracheostomy approach. Thus, both open and percutaneous tracheostomy approaches have a favorable safety profile.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Utility in Postpartum Patients.

Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used in many different populations, its use in pregnant or postpartum patients has not been widely studied. This article reviews the ECMO experience in this population at a large urban hospital. Electronic medical records for all pregnant or postpartum patients who required ECMO between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on clinical characteristics, outcomes, and complications were gathered. Comparisons between survivors and nonsurvivors were completed. Ten postpartum patients were identified. The patients presented as follows: four with cardiac arrest, one with a massive pulmonary embolism, three with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), one with combined ARDS and cardiogenic shock, and one with suspected amniotic embolism. Survival to decannulation was 70%, and survival to discharge was 60%. When comparing survivors vs. nonsurvivors, ECMO survivors tended to have shorter support times vs. nonsurvivors. Otherwise, no differences were noted in age, mechanical ventilation time, or length of stay. Disseminated intravascular coagulation was a common phenomenon in this patient cohort. After initiation of ECMO, elevated serum lactate levels, lower systolic blood pressure, and acute renal failure were predictors of mortality. In a single institution at a large metroplex, we present data regarding the use of ECMO in postpartum patients. ECMO can be successfully used in selected postpartum patients with severe cardiac or respiratory dysfunction. Multidisciplinary collaboration on a regular basis will streamline the ECMO referral in a timely manner. Furthermore, larger studies are indicated to understand the utility of ECMO in larger cohorts.

Prehabilitation Maximizing Functional Mobility in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Supported on Axillary Impella.

Physical therapy (PT) benefits for critically ill patients are well recognized; however, little data exist on PT in patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support. In this single-center retrospective study (February 2017-January 2022), we analyzed 37 patients who received an axillary Impella device (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) and PT to "prehabilitate" them before durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) implantation. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility tool assessed the functional status at different points during admission. Immediately after Impella placement, the median AM-PAC score was 12.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 9-15), and the scores continued to significantly increase to 18.4 (IQR, 16-23) before dLVAD and up to 20.7 (IQR, 19-24) at discharge, indicating improved independence. No PT-related complications were reported. Thus, we hypothesize that critically ill patients initially deemed equivocal candidates may safely participate in PT while maximizing functional activities before dLVAD placement.

Open Surgical Insertion of TandemHeart Device for Left Ventricular Unloading.

TandemHeart (Cardiac Assist Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) is a valuable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that provides left atrial to femoral artery bypass and directly unloads the left ventricle. The device is inserted under fluoroscopic guidance in the cardiac catheterization laboratory without requiring invasive surgical exposure. However, this device is unique because it directly unloads the oxygenated blood from the left atrium and may be needed for postoperative support in patients undergoing various open cardiac surgeries. In this article, we provide a detailed description of the open surgical insertion of a TandemHeart device.

Surgical Explantation of Impella 5.5 With Inflow Thrombus in Patients Undergoing Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

The Impella 5.5® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a microaxial flow pump that promotes left ventricular unloading and improves end-organ perfusion before durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Thrombus formation after Impella 5.5 insertion can occur and represents a significant challenge to device explantation. Durable LVAD implantation is typically performed without aortic cross-clamping, so a dislodged thrombus can potentially embolize and lead to catastrophic events. We describe our technique to safely explant an Impella 5.5 in patients who develop a thrombus on the inflow portion of the device before surgical LVAD implantation.

Delayed versus primary sternal closure for left ventricular assist device implantation: Impact on mechanical circulatory support infections.

BACKGROUND: Delayed sternal closure may be required after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation due to coagulopathy or hemodynamic instability. There is conflicting data regarding infection risk. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who received their first LVAD between May 2012 and January 2021. Patients were divided into delayed sternal closure (DSC) and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We used chi-squared or Fisher Exact tests, as appropriate, to compare the incidence of postoperative LVAD-related infections (mediastinal/sternal wound) and LVAD-specific infections (driveline and pump pocket) after definitive chest closure between these two groups. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients met eligibility criteria, including 127 (39%) patients that underwent DSC and 200 (61%) patients that had a PSC. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar except for an overrepresentation of men (87% vs. 75%, p = .016), Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class I-II patients (89% vs 66%, p < .001), patients with a previous sternotomy (43% vs 13%, p < .001), and patients with chronic kidney disease (55% vs 43%, p = .030) in the DSC group. The median DSC time was 24 (IQR: 24-48) hours. The incidence of LVAD-related mediastinal/sternal wound infection was similar between the DSC and PSC groups (4.7% vs 3.0%, p = .419). There was no difference between DSC and PSC groups in the incidence of driveline infection (6.3% vs 9%, p = .411) and pump pocket infection (1.6% vs 1.5%, p =.901), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DSC does not seem to increase the incidence of LVAD-related or LVAD-specific infection rates in heart failure patients undergoing device implantation surgery.

Use of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Before Durable Device Implantation in Patients With Cardiac Cachexia: Case Series.

Frailty and malnutrition in patients with heart failure are barriers to durable left ventricular assist device (D-LVAD) support and heart transplantation. Moreover, cachexia in patients with advanced heart failure carries a high mortality risk. There are no guidelines for these patients other than increased caloric intake and rehabilitation. Patients suffering from cardiac cachexia and heart failure may benefit from temporary, percutaneous assist device support to improve the underlying heart disease and reverse the catabolic state. We retrospectively reviewed patients from January 2017 to January 2022. All patients who received Impella support (5.0 or 5.5, Abiomed) before D-LVAD implantation were screened. Those who met the criteria for cardiac cachexia were included. Patient demographics, nutritional and biochemical markers, and survival data were collected. A total of 14 patients were included. The majority of patients were male (85.7%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (64.3%). Caloric intake, physical strength, and ambulation improved. Prealbumin levels improved from a median of 13.7-18.0 mg/dl ( p < 0.006) while on Impella 5.0 or 5.5 support. All patients survived to discharge and the 6 month follow-up. In conclusion, use of the Impella device improves cardiogenic shock symptoms and, consequently, may improve cachexia status prior to D-LVAD implantation.

Does the Type of Chronic Heart Failure Impact In-Hospital Outcomes for Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures?

BACKGROUND: This study assessed in-hospital outcomes of patients with chronic systolic, diastolic, or mixed heart failure (HF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients with aortic stenosis and chronic HF who underwent TAVR or SAVR between 2012 and 2015. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine outcome risk. RESULTS: A cohort of 9,879 patients with systolic (27.2%), diastolic (52.2%), and mixed (20.6%) chronic HF were included. No statistically significant differences in hospital mortality were noted. Overall, patients with diastolic HF had the shortest hospital stays and lowest costs. Compared with patients with diastolic HF, the risk of acute myocardial infarction (TAVR odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.20-3.19; P = .008; SAVR OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.98-1.95; P = .067) and cardiogenic shock (TAVR OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.43-3.23; P < .001; SAVR OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.42-2.53; P ≤ .001) was higher in patients with systolic HF, whereas the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (TAVR OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.76; P < .001; SAVR OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; P = .004) was lower following aortic valve procedures. In TAVR, the risk of acute deep vein thrombosis and kidney injury was higher, although not statistically significant, in patients with systolic HF than in those with diastolic HF. CONCLUSION: These outcomes suggest that chronic HF types do not incur statistically significant hospital mortality risk in patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR.

Implantation of the heartmate II in a patient of 34 years after a Mustard procedure.

A growing number of patients have undergone the Mustard procedure for transposition of the great arteries, after which the morphologic right ventricle serves as the systemic ventricle. If this ventricle fails, ventricular assist device support may be necessary, but implanting the inflow cannula can be challenging in these patients because of the moderator band and trabeculation of the morphologic right ventricle. We describe successful assist device implantation in a 34-year-old patient who had undergone the Mustard procedure in infancy.

HeartMate-II left ventricular assist device infections resulting from gastrointestinal-tract fistulas.

BACKGROUND: In patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), pump-related infection can cause adverse effects that may result in death. METHODS: We describe three patients who had infections related to a fistula between the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the LVAD pocket and who subsequently underwent successful heart transplantation without developing sepsis. In no case did the LVAD-related infection adversely affect the outcome of transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: For detecting the fistulas, full upper-GI endoscopy and colonoscopy were superior to other types of diagnostic imaging studies.

Thoracic compartment syndrome: a case report.

Thoracic compartment syndrome has been observed after trauma and after mediastinal and cardiac procedures; however, an adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like presentation has not been described as a part of thoracic compartment syndrome. We describe the case of an obese patient who underwent coronary artery bypass (his third such procedure) and hiatal hernia reduction during the same operation, followed by transmyocardial laser revascularization and full chest closure the next day. The patient was hypoxic after chest closure. Two days later, his peak airway pressure increased, and his cardiac and urine outputs decreased. Chest radiography findings suggested ARDS without hemodynamic instability. After we reopened the sternal incisions, the patient's symptoms reversed. Although our patient initially appeared to have ARDS, we believe the organ-volume displacement that occurred during the lengthy dual operation produced a thoracic and abdominal compartment syndrome that responded to decompression of the chest.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Reinsertion for Recurrence of End-Stage Heart Failure Eleven Years after Device Removal: Case Report.

After demonstrated myocardial recovery in patients with durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, the device may occasionally be explanted. A 38-year-old female with nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent implantation of an LVAD as a bridge-to-transplant therapy. After one year, the patient demonstrated sufficient myocardial recovery allowing the LVAD to be explanted. A Teflon felt strip plug was created and placed within the apical sewing ring to occlude the opening into the left ventricle. Eleven years later, the patient presented with recurrence of severe heart failure. Due to morbid obesity, the patient was not a heart transplant candidate. Therefore, a second LVAD was implanted with a concomitant gastric sleeve procedure. When the plug was surgically removed from the sewing ring, no thrombus was observed; however, the ventricular surface was completely endothelialized. The patient recovered without any complications, was discharged from the hospital, and is currently listed for a heart transplant. This case demonstrates remission from heart failure lasting for more than a decade. If a second LVAD is needed due to exacerbation of severe heart failure, it can be safely introduced through the previous sewing ring after removing the Teflon plug.

Aortic Root Dissection Due to an Automated Fastener Device.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right thoracotomy is frequently performed in patients with aortic valve disease. The Cor-Knot Device (LSI Solutions) is an automated fastener that secures valve sutures. This case report is for a patient who developed postcardiotomy shock during a minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. The patient was found to have an aortic root dissection involving 90% of the aortic root circumference, including bilateral coronary ostia. The autopsy revealed that the aortic damage could be explained by a direct aortic intimal tear from the distal tip of the device shaft. The device was most likely not in perfect apposition to the sewing ring because of the restricted angle and space between the ribs.

Surgically Implanted Impella Device for Patients on Impella CP Support Experiencing Refractory Hemolysis.

The Impella CP (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) is widely used in cardiac catheterization laboratories for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, but it is also known to cause significant hemolysis. The risk of hemolysis can be reduced by properly positioning the device, ensuring an adequate volume status, and using full anticoagulation strategies; however, in some cases hemolysis persists. We present a case series of eight patients that were diagnosed with cardiogenic shock, underwent Impella CP placement, and then suffered from refractory hemolysis which was treated by upgrading the Impella device to the 5.0 or 5.5 version. Fifty percent (4/8) of the patients in this series were already receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, and the levels of plasma free hemoglobin (pFHb) and lactate dehydrogenase continued to increase after the implantation of the Impella CP. The median time between Impella CP placement and the diagnosis of refractory hemolysis was 16.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 8.0-26.0). The median time between the diagnosis of hemolysis to Impella upgrade was 6.0 hours (IQR, 4.0-7.0). A total of 87.5% (7/8) of patients experienced a drop in pFHb to below 40 mg/dl at 72 hours post-Impella upgrade, and they were discharged without any further need of dialysis. One patient expired due to irreversible multiple organ failure. We propose that early identification of hemolysis by close monitoring of pFHb and upgrading to the Impella 5.5 reduces hemolysis, prevents further kidney damage, and significantly improves clinical outcomes.

Transaortic Placement of Percutaneous Mechanical Support Device via Partial Sternotomy: Feasible Option for Unsuitable Axillary Artery Access.

Acute decompensated refractory cardiogenic shock is an emergency in which the prompt instauration of mechanical circulatory support improves outcomes. The typical, initial approach for device delivery is via femoral vessels due to easy access and safety. If longer support is needed, the femoral access will severely impair the patient's mobility and can also limit the amount of support given as the new-generation devices are too large for direct arterial insertion. Upper-body arterial conduits (UBACs) are used for the delivery of larger, percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs). The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a pVAD that can be deployed through a UBAC by either axillary/subclavian access or a transaortic approach. The latter approach is typically used in cases of postcardiotomy shock, in which the ascending aorta is already exposed through a full sternotomy. However, in some cases, the axillary artery is not suitable due to size (<6 mm in diameter), and a smaller pVAD is delivered into the heart. To avoid providing suboptimal support, we present an alternative, minimally invasive approach in which the larger device is delivered through the ascending aorta. This article summarizes the details of this approach through a mini upper partial sternotomy and reviews the relevant technical considerations.

Timely use of a CentriMag heart assist device improves survival in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is often fatal despite inotropic and circulatory support. We compared our experience with the CentriMag left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for patients with PCS at two time periods: in the operating room (OR) after unsuccessful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and after transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We reviewed 22 patients' records (13 men, nine women; age, 65 ± 12 years) who underwent open heart surgery (January 2004 to September 2009) and required LVAD support for PCS despite maximal inotropic and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support. In ten patients who could not be weaned from CPB despite high-dose inotropic therapy (≥ 3 agents) and IABP support, the CentriMag was implanted in the OR (immediate group). The other 12 patients were weaned from CPB with high-dose inotropic therapy and IABP but became increasingly unstable or had a cardiac arrest in the ICU, and the CentriMag was implanted for circulatory support (delayed group). RESULTS: Preoperatively, the average ejection fraction was 40% ± 12%, the creatinine level was 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/dL, and the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation was 13.1 ± 4.6. The duration of CentriMag support was 5 ± 3 days. The immediate group had significantly better survival (7/10 vs. 2/12, p = 0.027), higher cardiac index (2.4 ± 0.3 L/min/m(2) vs. 1.7 ± 0.3 L/min/m(2), p = 0.001), and lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (20 ± 6 mmHg vs. 29 ± 8 mmHg, p = 0.024) than the ICU group. No perioperative complications related to device implantation occurred. CONCLUSION: In patients with PCS, timely placement of a CentriMag LVAD may increase the chance of eventual recovery.

Intraoperative Management for Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation With Concurrent Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Case Series.

The increasing coincidence of obesity with heart failure may preclude eligibility for orthotopic heart transplantation, requiring continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy. This report describes intraoperative considerations for patients who underwent LVAD implantation with concurrent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to promote weight loss. In particular, right ventricular dysfunction associated with acute left ventricular unloading may be compounded by pneumoperitoneum for LSG due to the difficulty in ventilating patients with obesity, hypercarbia-mediated increase in pulmonary vascular resistance, and variable cardiac loading conditions. We identify specific anesthetic challenges and discuss methods of monitoring and management.

Aortic root repair in a patient with acquired hemophilia A: case report.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA) who require open heart surgery have a life-threatening risk of hemorrhage. Limited data exist to guide perioperative management of these patients. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis, concomitant aortic valve endocarditis, and severe aortic regurgitation presented to our hospital. Bleeding and abnormal coagulation tests were noted during the initial workup, and she was diagnosed with AHA. The perioperative management plan included the use of pharmaceuticals, porcine recombinant factor VIII, and blood products. Extensive preoperative coagulation data were obtained, and factor VIII levels were continuously monitored to mitigate bleeding complications. The aortic valve replacement and root repair were uneventful. CONCLUSION: Cardiac surgery in patients with AHA is possible as long as complex perioperative hemostatic and hematology management is used.