Case Report: WATCHMAN Procedure Complicated By Atrial Perforation and Device Dislodgement.

Atrial perforation and device dislodgment are uncommon encounters after percutaneous left atrial appendage exclusion procedures. The literature describes how various endovascular and surgical approaches can be applied to treat these complications. In this case report, we describe an atrial perforation that occurred after a WATCHMAN™ FLX device (Boston Scientific) deployment. Heart manipulation with lifting was required for the atrial repair. During this maneuver, the device dislodged and was managed by surgical device extraction and left atrial appendage resection and suture closure. Minimal to no manipulation of the left atrium during surgical exploration was found to be invaluable in order to avoid device dislodgement and additional surgical corrective interventions. Additionally, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography at the beginning and conclusion of the case is key in monitoring the device position and identifying device dislodgement.

Surgical Explantation of Impella 5.5 With Inflow Thrombus in Patients Undergoing Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

The Impella 5.5® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a microaxial flow pump that promotes left ventricular unloading and improves end-organ perfusion before durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Thrombus formation after Impella 5.5 insertion can occur and represents a significant challenge to device explantation. Durable LVAD implantation is typically performed without aortic cross-clamping, so a dislodged thrombus can potentially embolize and lead to catastrophic events. We describe our technique to safely explant an Impella 5.5 in patients who develop a thrombus on the inflow portion of the device before surgical LVAD implantation.

Perioperative Impella 5.5 Support for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Pull Back/Push Through Technique, Safeguards, and Pitfalls.

In patients undergoing aortic valve surgery, preoperative reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is not uncommon and is associated with poor outcomes. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be preemptively used in patients presenting with high periprocedural risk. The Impella 5.5 is a percutaneous left ventricular assist device that has been increasingly used in various cardiac surgeries. In this article, we present a step-by-step guide, safeguards, and pitfalls on how to replace the aortic valve and preserve this transaortic MCS device for postoperative support in patients with concomitant aortic valve pathology and left ventricular dysfunction.

Aortic valve disorders and left ventricular assist devices.

Aortic valve disorders are important considerations in advanced heart failure patients being evaluated for left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and those on LVAD support. Aortic insufficiency (AI) can be present prior to LVAD implantation or develop de novo during LVAD support. It is usually a progressive disorder and can lead to impaired LVAD effectiveness and heart failure symptoms. Severe AI is associated with worsening hemodynamics, increased hospitalizations, and decreased survival in LVAD patients. Diagnosis is made with echocardiographic, device assessment, and/or catheterization studies. Standard echocardiographic criteria for AI are insufficient for accurate diagnosis of AI severity. Management of pre-existing AI includes aortic repair or replacement at the time of LVAD implant. Management of de novo AI on LVAD support is challenging with increased risks of repeat surgical intervention, and percutaneous techniques including transcatheter aortic valve replacement are assuming greater importance. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive approach to contemporary diagnosis and management of aortic valve disorders in the setting of LVAD therapy.

Open Surgical Insertion of TandemHeart Device for Left Ventricular Unloading.

TandemHeart (Cardiac Assist Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) is a valuable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that provides left atrial to femoral artery bypass and directly unloads the left ventricle. The device is inserted under fluoroscopic guidance in the cardiac catheterization laboratory without requiring invasive surgical exposure. However, this device is unique because it directly unloads the oxygenated blood from the left atrium and may be needed for postoperative support in patients undergoing various open cardiac surgeries. In this article, we provide a detailed description of the open surgical insertion of a TandemHeart device.

Use of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Before Durable Device Implantation in Patients With Cardiac Cachexia: Case Series.

Frailty and malnutrition in patients with heart failure are barriers to durable left ventricular assist device (D-LVAD) support and heart transplantation. Moreover, cachexia in patients with advanced heart failure carries a high mortality risk. There are no guidelines for these patients other than increased caloric intake and rehabilitation. Patients suffering from cardiac cachexia and heart failure may benefit from temporary, percutaneous assist device support to improve the underlying heart disease and reverse the catabolic state. We retrospectively reviewed patients from January 2017 to January 2022. All patients who received Impella support (5.0 or 5.5, Abiomed) before D-LVAD implantation were screened. Those who met the criteria for cardiac cachexia were included. Patient demographics, nutritional and biochemical markers, and survival data were collected. A total of 14 patients were included. The majority of patients were male (85.7%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (64.3%). Caloric intake, physical strength, and ambulation improved. Prealbumin levels improved from a median of 13.7-18.0 mg/dl ( p < 0.006) while on Impella 5.0 or 5.5 support. All patients survived to discharge and the 6 month follow-up. In conclusion, use of the Impella device improves cardiogenic shock symptoms and, consequently, may improve cachexia status prior to D-LVAD implantation.

Implantation of a vagus nerve stimulator for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: An educational video.

Objectives: Implantation and use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) systems is a proven treatment strategy for epilepsy and depression, and extensive research regarding vagal control of the heart has led to the idea of VNS as a potential adjunct treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We describe our experience with the implantation of an investigational VNS system to manage patients living with HFrEF. Methods: As part of the ongoing ANTHEM-HFrEF (Autonomic Regulation Therapy to Enhance Myocardial Function and Reduce Progression of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) Pivotal Study, a 67-year-old male patient with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy was randomized to implantation of the VITARIA System (LivaNova Inc). The electrical lead requires no mapping for placement around the vagus nerve. The surgical procedure was completed uneventfully under general anesthesia, and the device was activated in the operating room after surgery. Results: Following successful implantation and activation of the VNS system, the patient was discharged to home on the same day. Conclusions: Current, ongoing studies, such as the ANTHEM-HFrEF Pivotal Study, are designed to determine the long-term effects of VNS on heart failure symptoms, hospitalization rates, and survival. The VNS-implantation procedure was straightforward.

Surgically Implanted Impella Device for Patients on Impella CP Support Experiencing Refractory Hemolysis.

The Impella CP (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) is widely used in cardiac catheterization laboratories for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, but it is also known to cause significant hemolysis. The risk of hemolysis can be reduced by properly positioning the device, ensuring an adequate volume status, and using full anticoagulation strategies; however, in some cases hemolysis persists. We present a case series of eight patients that were diagnosed with cardiogenic shock, underwent Impella CP placement, and then suffered from refractory hemolysis which was treated by upgrading the Impella device to the 5.0 or 5.5 version. Fifty percent (4/8) of the patients in this series were already receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, and the levels of plasma free hemoglobin (pFHb) and lactate dehydrogenase continued to increase after the implantation of the Impella CP. The median time between Impella CP placement and the diagnosis of refractory hemolysis was 16.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 8.0-26.0). The median time between the diagnosis of hemolysis to Impella upgrade was 6.0 hours (IQR, 4.0-7.0). A total of 87.5% (7/8) of patients experienced a drop in pFHb to below 40 mg/dl at 72 hours post-Impella upgrade, and they were discharged without any further need of dialysis. One patient expired due to irreversible multiple organ failure. We propose that early identification of hemolysis by close monitoring of pFHb and upgrading to the Impella 5.5 reduces hemolysis, prevents further kidney damage, and significantly improves clinical outcomes.

Transaortic Placement of Percutaneous Mechanical Support Device via Partial Sternotomy: Feasible Option for Unsuitable Axillary Artery Access.

Acute decompensated refractory cardiogenic shock is an emergency in which the prompt instauration of mechanical circulatory support improves outcomes. The typical, initial approach for device delivery is via femoral vessels due to easy access and safety. If longer support is needed, the femoral access will severely impair the patient's mobility and can also limit the amount of support given as the new-generation devices are too large for direct arterial insertion. Upper-body arterial conduits (UBACs) are used for the delivery of larger, percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs). The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a pVAD that can be deployed through a UBAC by either axillary/subclavian access or a transaortic approach. The latter approach is typically used in cases of postcardiotomy shock, in which the ascending aorta is already exposed through a full sternotomy. However, in some cases, the axillary artery is not suitable due to size (<6 mm in diameter), and a smaller pVAD is delivered into the heart. To avoid providing suboptimal support, we present an alternative, minimally invasive approach in which the larger device is delivered through the ascending aorta. This article summarizes the details of this approach through a mini upper partial sternotomy and reviews the relevant technical considerations.

Combining On-Table Embolization with Immediate Resection to Safely Excise Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas.

The management of symptomatic giant hepatic hemangiomas (> 10 cm) varies in the literature. Multiple interventional approaches have been described including surveillance, embolization, enucleation, and resection based on tumor size, location, relationship to vascular and biliary structures, and the quality and quantity of the functional liver remnant. Resection is often performed as a last resort due to the risk of major hemorrhage. Preoperative arterial embolization is an option; however, many patients will experience severe pain, fever, transaminitis, acidosis, recanalization, and collateral inflow that limit its utility. Furthermore, patients require post-procedure inpatient observation, and there is no consensus on the appropriate time interval between procedures. We present and demonstrate a technique in the video that utilizes a hybrid operating room with on-table angiogram capabilities to perform hemangioma inflow embolization and immediate hepatic resection under the same anesthesia in a single procedure. Combining on-table embolization with immediate resection avoids many of the pitfalls of preoperative embolization, while enhancing the safety of the resection by decreasing the size of the tumor, enabling compressibility, and facilitating exposure of the vascular inflow and outflow. It is an efficient use of hospital resources and eliminates an intervening hospital admission. We have found it to be a preferred approach to enhance the safety and feasibility of resection for massive hepatic hemangiomas with minimal intraoperative blood loss and reduced risk.