Hierarchical demography: a general approach with an application to honey bees.

Hierarchical population structure, where individuals are aggregated into colonies or similar groups that themselves grow, survive or perish, and potentially produce offspring groups, is an important feature of many biological systems, most notably eusocial organisms such as the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Despite this hierarchical structure, there is a paucity of analytical models and theory linking the dynamics of individuals within colonies to the dynamics of a population of colonies. We present an analytical framework that provides a simple, robust, and predictive theory for the population dynamics of hierarchical organisms. Our framework explicitly describes and links demographic dynamics for the different levels in the hierarchy (individuals, groups, population). We illustrate the application of the framework by developing a model for honey bees and analyzing the effects of life history traits such as worker life span and size at swarming on the growth rate of populations. We conclude by discussing possible extensions of the model that increase its realism and expand its usefulness beyond swarm-founding, monogynous, eusocial insects.

Characteristics and outcome of patients brought to an emergency department by police under the provisions (Section 10) of the Mental Health Act in Victoria, Australia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcome of patients brought to an emergency department by police under Section 10 of Mental Health Act (Victoria, Australia). METHODS: Retrospective medical record review. Patients referred under Section 10 provisions treated in calendar year 2009 were identified from ED database. Data collected included demographics, incident details, patient management, final diagnosis and disposition. Primary outcomes of interest were ED diagnosis and disposition. Secondary outcomes were length of stay in ED and use of restraint or sedation. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety seven presentations by 164 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly male (58%) with median age of 35 years (IQR 22-44, range 16-69). The most common presenting complaint (65%) was threat of self harm. No sedation or restraint was used in 61%. Sixty seven percent were deemed safe for discharge home while 26% were admitted to a psychiatric ward (equally divided between voluntary and involuntary admission). The predominant discharge diagnosis was self harm ideation or intent (35%). Median ED length of stay was 156 min (inter-quartile range 79-416). CONCLUSION: Most patients brought to ED by police under Section 10 provisions were for threat of self harm and did not require sedation or restraint. The majority are discharged home. Further work exploring less restrictive or traumatic processes to facilitate psychiatric assessment of this group of patients is warranted.

When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation.

Conservation should benefit ecosystems, nonhuman organisms, and current and future human beings. Nevertheless, tension among these goals engenders potential ethical conflicts: conservationists' true motivations may differ from the justifications they offer for their activities, and conservation projects have the potential to disempower and oppress people. We reviewed the promise and deficiencies of integrating social, economic, and biological concerns into conservation, focusing on research in ecosystem services and efforts in community-based conservation. Despite much progress, neither paradigm provides a silver bullet for conservation's most pressing problems, and both require additional thought and modification to become maximally effective. We conclude that the following strategies are needed to make conservation more effective in our human-dominated world. (1) Conservation research needs to integrate with social scholarship in a more sophisticated manner. (2) Conservation must be informed by a detailed understanding of the spatial, temporal, and social distributions of costs and benefits of conservation efforts. Strategies should reflect this understanding, particularly by equitably distributing conservation's costs. (3) We must better acknowledge the social concerns that accompany biodiversity conservation; accordingly, sometimes we must argue for conservation for biodiversity's sake, not for its direct human benefits.