Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 152(5): 1095-1106, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574079

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concern about disease exacerbations and fear of reactions after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations are common in chronic urticaria (CU) patients and may lead to vaccine hesitancy. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the frequency and risk factors of CU exacerbation and adverse reactions in CU patients after COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: COVAC-CU is an international multicenter study of Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs) that retrospectively evaluated the effects of COVID-19 vaccination in CU patients aged ≥18 years and vaccinated with ≥1 dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. We evaluated CU exacerbations and severe allergic reactions as well as other adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccinations and their association with various CU parameters. RESULTS: Across 2769 COVID-19-vaccinated CU patients, most (90%) received at least 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses, and most patients received CU treatment and had well-controlled disease. The rate of COVID-19 vaccination-induced CU exacerbation was 9%. Of 223 patients with CU exacerbation after the first dose, 53.4% experienced recurrence of CU exacerbation after the second dose. CU exacerbation most often started <48 hours after vaccination (59.2%), lasted for a few weeks or less (70%), and was treated mainly with antihistamines (70.3%). Factors that increased the risk for COVID-19 vaccination-induced CU exacerbation included female sex, disease duration shorter than 24 months, having chronic spontaneous versus inducible urticaria, receipt of adenovirus viral vector vaccine, having nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug/aspirin intolerance, and having concerns about getting vaccinated; receiving omalizumab treatment and Latino/Hispanic ethnicity lowered the risk. First-dose vaccine-related adverse effects, most commonly local reactions, fever, fatigue, and muscle pain, were reported by 43.5% of CU patients. Seven patients reported severe allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination leads to disease exacerbation in only a small number of CU patients and is generally well tolerated.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Urticaria Crónica , Urticaria , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Urticaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunación/efectos adversos
2.
Neurobiol Dis ; 182: 106147, 2023 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178811

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has sparked a global pandemic with severe complications and high morbidity rate. Neurological symptoms in COVID-19 patients, and neurological sequelae post COVID-19 recovery have been extensively reported. Yet, neurological molecular signature and signaling pathways that are affected in the central nervous system (CNS) of COVID-19 severe patients remain still unknown and need to be identified. Plasma samples from 49 severe COVID-19 patients, 50 mild COVID-19 patients, and 40 healthy controls were subjected to Olink proteomics analysis of 184 CNS-enriched proteins. By using a multi-approach bioinformatics analysis, we identified a 34-neurological protein signature for COVID-19 severity and unveiled dysregulated neurological pathways in severe cases. Here, we identified a new neurological protein signature for severe COVID-19 that was validated in different independent cohorts using blood and postmortem brain samples and shown to correlate with neurological diseases and pharmacological drugs. This protein signature could potentially aid the development of prognostic and diagnostic tools for neurological complications in post-COVID-19 convalescent patients with long term neurological sequelae.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Sistema Nervioso Central , Encéfalo
3.
Clin Immunol ; 254: 109696, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481010

RESUMEN

AIMS: To understand the characteristics of combined immunodeficiency disorders that affect cellular and humoral immunity (CID) in the Arabian Peninsula. METHODS: Retrospective study of 236 patients with CID from the region were enrolled from 2004 to 2022. RESULTS: 236 patients were included with a majority being profound CID. Among patients with a family history of CID, the ages at onset and diagnosis, and the delay in diagnosis were lower compared to those with no family history of CID, but this did not affect time to transplant. HSCT was performed for 51.27% of the patients with median time from diagnosis to HSCT of 6.36 months. On multivariate analysis, patients who underwent early transplant had increased odds of having CD3 count ≤1000 cell/µl, diagnosed by screening or erythroderma. CONCLUSION: There is a delay in diagnosis and treatment of CID in our region. Establishing newborn screening programs and HSCT units in our region are the urgent need.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunidad Humoral , Tamizaje Neonatal
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(14)2023 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37511610

RESUMEN

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic relapsing neuroinflammatory skin disease that is characterized by a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. It reflects a profound interplay between genetic and environmental factors, and a recently disclosed neuroimmune dysregulation that drives skin barrier disruption, pruritus, and microbial imbalance. In terms of the key external environmental players that impact AD, air quality and itch severity linkage have been thoroughly researched. The impact of ambient air pollutants including particulate matter (PM) and AD pruritic exacerbation has been recorded despite reductions in air pollution levels in in developed countries. The developing countries have, on the contrary, experienced significant urbanization and industrialization with limited environmental protection standards in the past decades. This unprecedented construction, petrochemical industry utilization, and increment in population counts has been paired with consistent exposure to outdoor PM. This may present a key cause of AD pruritic exacerbation supported by the fact that AD prevalence has intensified globally in the past 50 years, indicating that environmental exposure may act as a trigger that could flare up itch in vulnerable persons. At the molecular level, the impact of PM on severe pruritus in AD could be interpreted by the toxic effects on the complex neuroimmune pathways that govern this disease. AD has been recently viewed as a manifestation of the disruption of both the immune and neurological systems. In light of these facts, this current review aims to introduce the basic concepts of itch sensory circuits in the neuroimmune system. In addition, it describes the impact of PM on the potential neuroimmune pathways in AD pathogenesis with a special focus on the Fc Epsilon RI pathway. Finally, the review proposes potential treatment lines that could be targeted to alleviate pruritus based on immune mediators involved in the Fc Epsilon signaling map.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Dermatitis Atópica , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/metabolismo , Receptores de IgE/metabolismo , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Prurito/metabolismo , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos
5.
Qatar Med J ; 2023(2): 2, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic respiratory diseases (allergic rhinitis and asthma) are major health problems with high prevalence causing significant patient morbidity as well as an economic burden (1). Sensitization to inhaled allergens is a major factor in the pathogenesis of allergic respiratory diseases (2). This study aims to determine the commonest aeroallergen sensitization in patients with allergic symptoms who attended an Adult Allergy Clinic in Qatar. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the skin prick test results database of 20 aeroallergens performed between January 1st to December 31st, 2022, at an Adult Allergy clinic in Qatar. Based on skin test results, the most prevalent aeroallergens were determined. RESULTS: A total of 554 patients (43% males, 57% females), aged between 12-87 years, 36±13.8 (mean ± SD), underwent skin prick test, of which 378 patients (68%) had positive results. There were no significant sex differences in the frequency of atopy (males: 60% versus females: 65% p= .076). Of the total 554 patients, 62% were diagnosed with Allergic rhinitis, 19% with non-allergic rhinitis, 32% with asthma, 6.7% with chronic urticaria, and 6.5% with atopic dermatitis. The frequency of sensitivity to aeroallergens was Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 49.5%, Dermatophagoides farina 38.6%, Cat 37.3%, American Cockroach 25.9%, Russian thistle 24%, German cockroach 20%, Rough pigweed 19%, Bermuda grass 11%, and 8% to seven grass mix. 61 % were sensitized to indoor aeroallergens and 31% to different pollens (outdoor). Of the 378 patients who were sensitized, 145 patients (38%) were monosensitized, and 233 (62%) were polysensitized (≥2 allergens). There were no significant differences in the frequency of polysensitization between males and females (M:F: 1:1, p=0.938). CONCLUSION: Insects (house dust mites and cockroaches) and animal protein (cat hair) were the most prevalent positive aeroallergen by skin tests. However, weed, tree pollens (Russian thistle, Rough pigweed, Mesquite tree), and grass pollens (Bermuda and seven grass mix) were also positive for a minority of patients. 62% of patients were polysensitized to aeroallergens.

6.
Qatar Med J ; 2023(2): 3, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025333

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency (PIDD). SCIG is as effective as IVIG in preventing infections.1 However, SCIG has advantages over IVIG as it causes fewer systemic reactions and can be infused at home by the patient leading to improved quality of life.2 Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with PIDD who received SCIG in an Adult Allergy Clinic in Qatar. Patients who received IVIG before SCIG and are naïve to IgG replacement were included. We compared Serum IgG levels, the number of antibiotic courses received, and the number of hospital admissions one year before and one year after starting SCIG. SF36 score was used to compare health-related quality of life scores before SCIG and after one year of SCIG. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included in the study, of which 17 were on prior IVIG replacement, and three were naive to replacement. SCIG replacement resulted in the maintenance of serum IgG levels in those who received IVIG prior. SCIG resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of antibiotics prescribed and hospitalization in the naïve subgroup but no substantial change in the prior IVIG group. 6/20 patients developed side effects like injection site pain, swelling, and headache. No patients developed significant systemic side effects. 10/20 patients discontinued the SCIG therapy, four patients due to side effects, and others due to noncompliance and financial reasons. SF36 Score was compared for the five patients in IVIG prior group and showed no significant improvement in individual score but improvement in the overall score (p=0.003) Conclusions: In our experience, SCIG therapy effectively prevents recurrent infection in PIDD patients, and patients did not experience any significant systemic side effects. There is a substantial improvement in the quality of life. However, compliance continues to be a problem.

7.
Qatar Med J ; 2023(2): 4, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is the primary diagnostic approach for contact dermatitis,1 an inflammatory skin reaction caused by exposure to external irritants. The pathophysiology of contact dermatitis may entail an immunological response (hypersensitivity type IV), a non-immunological response (irritant contact dermatitis), or a mix of the two. The diagnosis of contact dermatitis requires a correlation between a positive patch test and clinical relevance.2 This study aims to determine the prevalence of allergy sensitization among adults in Qatar and the allergens most frequently associated with positive patch test findings. METHODS: Retrospective analysis used patch testing data from 2015 to 2022. RESULTS: Of the 87 patients tested, 43 had at least one positive reaction (mean age 41.7; range 19-68). Females were 33 of the total patients (76.7%). Thirteen (30%) patients had two or more positive reactions. The most common allergen groups associated with positive patch test reactions were nickel sulfate no. 12 (27.9%), and all reactants were female. followed by gold sodium thiosulfate no. 10 (23.3%, F:M = 2.3), p-phenylenediamine no. 10 (23.3%, F:M = 1.5), and p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin no. 7 (16.2%, F:M = 6). Twenty-six reactants had one or more allergic disorders (allergic rhinitis, asthma, drug allergy, insect bite allergy, or chronic idiopathic urticaria), and 11 had atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSION: Triggering agents for contact dermatitis vary among geographic regions and populations. This study gives an idea of the allergens that are the most common sensitizers among the contact dermatitis population in the adult allergy clinic in Qatar.

8.
Qatar Med J ; 2023(2): 22, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025337

RESUMEN

Background: The prevalence of asthma is 9% among adults in Qatar, and its severity can be attributed to intrinsic and extrinsic factors such as environmental changes. As part of the project to investigate the association between air pollution and asthma severity, the rate of exacerbations in adult patients with asthma has been studied in Qatar. Methods: Retrospective data of patients with asthma (16-70 years) from January 2019 to December 2021 was retrieved from Cerner medical records. Frequencies of exacerbations in inpatient and outpatient departments were analyzed using means ± SD and median (IQR) for descriptive data and frequency and percentage for categorical data. Exacerbations were divided into single, double, and more than double for each quarter of the year (January 2019-December 2021) using SPSS and Minitab statistical packages. Results: A total of 6977 exacerbations visits (representing 6558 patients) were identified during the study period. The mean ± SD age was 41±14.3 years, with a female: male ratio of almost 1:1. The patients from the MENA region, including Qataris, presented 67% compared to 33% from the Indian subcontinent and other countries. The number of patient visits for hospitalization due to exacerbations showed a distinctive pattern during the three years. The highest record of asthmatics with exacerbations was observed in 2019 (42.7%) compared to half the rate in 2020 and 2021 (28.5%, 28.8%), respectively. The single exacerbation group was almost five times higher than 2 or >2 exacerbation groups in all years (2019-2021). Conclusion: This preliminary overview provides the rate of exacerbation episodes in patients with asthma in Qatar. One cause of these exacerbations can be attributed to air quality changes. The drop in the exacerbation rate observed in 2020-2021 could be explained by COVID-19 lockdown regulations or patients' adherence to prescribed meds. We aim to propose preventive and therapeutic strategies to alleviate asthmatics' symptoms and improve their quality of life.

9.
Qatar Med J ; 2023(2): 20, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025335

RESUMEN

Background: Chronic Urticaria (CU) is a complex skin disease that appears as recurrent raised itchy rash/angioedema or both for more than six weeks. The pathophysiology of CU is complex and has yet to be understood entirely. It is predominantly a mast cell-driven disease with the possible involvement of type 2 inflammation. Current evidence largely favors mast cell activation by an IgE-mediated autoallergic mechanism or an autoimmune mechanism by IgG autoantibodies to IgE/ high-affinity receptor of IgE. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small coding RNAs regulating gene expression at the post-transcription level. This study aimed to investigate the circulating miRNA as potential biomarkers in CU patients compared to healthy controls. Methods: The miRNA gene expression was done in seven patients with CU and seven healthy controls. The expression of miRNA is done using TaqMan openArray human advanced miRNA Panel. ExpressionSuite Software (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) is used for data analysis to quantify the miRNA expressions. P<0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. Results: A significant upregulation (p<0.05) in the miR-451a, miR-9-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-296-5p, and miR-182-5p was observed in CU compared to controls. Dysregulation of miR-451a is identified as an early biomarker in allergic diseases. Functional enrichment analysis with the KEGG pathway and disease ontology databases showed that these miRNAs were associated with skin diseases and inflammation. The differentially expressed miRNAs contribute to determining the genes regulated in CU. miRNA-based therapies that target different genes in a given pathway might be a potential candidate for treating CU. Conclusion: miRNA field has grown steadily over the past few years, but the role of circulating miRNAs in CU remains relatively unexplored. This study showed that the upregulated circulating miRNA might play an essential role in CU pathogenesis and inflammation. Also, our study highlights the importance of miRNAs as a future biomarker and potential therapeutic target to be investigated.

10.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(12): e13901, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an increased demand for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) to treat various diseases including combined immunodeficiencies (CID), with limited worldwide availability. Variables affecting the decision regarding CID patients' prioritization for HSCT are not known. We aimed to determine general, clinical, and immunologic factors associated with the higher risk of early death (≤6 months after diagnosis) in untransplanted CID patients. METHODS: Data collection was done retrospectively from five centers and included general patients' information, and clinical and laboratory variables. Inclusion criteria were untransplanted patients who are either dead or alive with a follow-up period ≥6 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six CID patients were reported by participating centers, of whom 111 were included in the study with a cumulative follow-up period of 278.6 years. Seventy-two patients died with the median age of death of 10.5 months. 35.1% of the patients succumbed within 6 months after the diagnosis. Having a history of Candida infections, sepsis or hepatomegaly was associated with an increased risk of early death. None of the other general or clinical variables was associated with such risk. Bivariate analysis of lymphocyte subsets showed that patients with the following counts: CD3+  < 100, CD4+  < 200, CD8+  < 50, or CD16+ CD56+ <200 cells/µl had increased risk of early death. In adjusted analysis, increased risk of early death was observed among patients with CD3+ count <100 cells/µl. CONCLUSION: Combined immunodeficiencies patients with a history of Candida infections, sepsis, hepatomegaly, or severe T-lymphopenia should be given priority for HSCT to avoid early death.


Asunto(s)
Candidiasis , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria , Sepsis , Humanos , Lactante , Inmunidad Humoral , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hepatomegalia/etiología , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/etiología , Sepsis/etiología , Candidiasis/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos
11.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 4, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause different types of allergic and pseudo allergic reactions. This results in difficulties in clinical practice. Most cases of NSAID hypersensitivity are mediated by the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 enzyme (COX-1), which results in depletion of the protective prostaglandin E2, and promotes the unrestrained synthesis of inflammatory mediators from mast cells. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are considered safe alternatives in patients with NSAID allergy, although hypersensitivity reactions to COX-2 inhibitors have also been reported. Our study aimed to report the experience in Qatar for using COX2 inhibitors as an alternative treatment for nonselective NSAID allergy. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent open challenge with a single dose of oral celecoxib 200 mg were retrieved from the procedure log of the Allergy and immunology Division in Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar, from 2013 to 2022. The challenge was considered positive if the patient developed cutaneous or respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were identified; 4 with a history of celecoxib allergy. The remaining 27 (23 females and 4 males); with mean ( ± SD, range) age of 42 ( ± 12, 20-65) years had hypersensitivity to one (n = 11) or more than one (n = 16) nonselective NSAID, manifested as cutaneous, respiratory, or anaphylactic symptoms. Those 4 patients with celecoxib allergy were challenged and only one with a historical reaction of anaphylaxis developed anaphylaxis during the challenge. Celecoxib was well tolerated in all 27 patients with hypersensitivity reactions to nonselective NSAIDs. Also, patients were contacted by telephone call at 24 hours and after 1 week with no evidence of delayed reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Selective COX-2 and nonselective NSAIDs have similar overall efficacy as analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic agents. Hypersensitivity reaction to COX-2 inhibitors has been reported; however, it is rare. So, it is safer to challenge the patients with COX-2 inhibitors before prescribing them as alternative medication in patients with Nonselective NSAID allergies. We plan to conduct a single-/double-blind placebo-controlled study for more patients, especially using graded challenges for high-risk profile candidates. Also, it may be of significance to test more than one type of selective COX-2 to avoid drug-specific reactions.

12.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 1, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909396

RESUMEN

Allergic diseases are common medical conditions that now show an increasing trend globally and contributes to poor quality of life of the affected individual. Allergies can be fatal in a few instances such as anaphylaxis, severe asthma, and hereditary angioedema if the symptoms are not recognized and treated correctly. (1, 2) The first Allergy Conference in Qatar aimed to highlight the burden of allergic diseases in Qatar and globally with a special focus on educating both the physicians and the community. The preparation for this conference over the past three years threw up a few challenges, mainly owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that affected all forms of face-to-face interactions and social gatherings. Therefore, our conference was held virtually on February 05, 2022, which was more than two years from the first planned date. The conference was sponsored by the Hamad Medical Corporation in partnership with the Qatar Allergy and Immunology Society. In our scientific program, the scientific committees selected topics related to 3 major areas in allergy practice (systemic, respiratory, and skin allergy disorders). Abstract submissions were encouraged in areas related to audits, case reports, service development, and clinical and basic research in the field of allergy. Additional topics were included related to the current COVID-19 pandemic and COVID-19 vaccinations. We received 34 abstracts and accepted 28 for poster abstracts. Among them, 6 received approval for oral presentations; and 6 (21.4%) had the term COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 in their title, which supported the burden related to COVID-19 in our community and association between this new pandemic and our allergy practice and disorders.

13.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 6, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968520

RESUMEN

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a known Primary immunodeficiency disease that results in recurrent, life-threatening bacterial, fungal infections and granuloma formation which requires lifelong antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis. Sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (TMP-SMX/Septrin) is the prophylactic antibacterial drug of choice.1 Adverse drug reactions, including Fixed Drug Eruption (FDE) to TMP-SMX in CGD patients, are challenging as it may result in serious complications and difficulties in management. A seventeen-year-old Qatari female diagnosed with CGD was maintained on prophylactic TMP-SMX and itraconazole since childhood. She developed bullous skin lesions involving the face, neck, and trunk sparing the limbs. The skin lesion was confirmed to be FDE by skin biopsy. TMP-SMX was discontinued as it was suspected to be the causative agent. Atovaquone 1500 mg and clarithromycin 250 mg daily were started as an alternative, but the patient could not tolerate them. TMP-SMX slow graded challenge and desensitization were performed; however, the patient developed similar lesions in the previous affected areas on day 3 of desensitization, which responded well to discontinuation of TMP-SMX along with administration of steroid. FDE to TMP-SMX as the causative agent was confirmed. An MDT meeting was conducted to evaluate other available options for treatment. Also, the case was discussed with international immunology colleagues. The recommendation was to go for bone marrow transplantation to treat the primary disease. Six years post transplants, the patient is doing well and is not on any medications apart from the hormonal replacement therapy patch. CGD predisposes to several gram-positive, gram-negative bacterial (Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Serratia marcescens, Nocardia species) and fungal infections.2 TMP-SMX is an ideal antibiotic as it is relatively cheap with good coverage and orally available. In the medical literature, desensitization can be tried in FDE, especially if there is no alternative for the needed drug. FDE signs should be observed when administered TMP-SMX.

14.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 3, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909407

RESUMEN

Omalizumab (XOLAIR®) is a recombinant DNA-derived humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that binds to IgE and was first introduced in Qatar in 2009. Omalizumab is used to treat moderate-to-severe allergic asthma (SAA), chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). In this study, we have described a proposal to investigate the outcomes and impact of the clinical use of omalizumab for the labeled indications (SAA, CIU, and CRSwNP) and other off-label indications (food allergy, dermatitis, and others) in clinical practice in Qatar. This is a mixed-design study in which the first stage included a chart review of all the patients from the Allergy and Immunology Division registry who received omalizumab since May 2009. The second stage was a cross-sectional questionnaire to review all (previous and current) patients and identify their current health status and treatment outcomes. The third stage was a proof of concept and consisted of selecting a cohort to investigate the omalizumab mechanism for patients before and after administration. Patients with a physician diagnosis of asthma and/or urticaria fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for omalizumab administration and patients with off-label indications were recruited. Expected outcomes included identifying the real-life effectiveness and the experience of using omalizumab in Qatar and reporting all potential adverse effects that might have been missed during early trials or other published studies. This study was essential to observe Qatar's local clinical practice regarding the use of omalizumab; and in addition, we could gather data about the risk factors contributing to disease recovery or progression and those resulting in favorable or unfavorable outcomes. We expect the results to augment the current knowledge about understanding diseases and the global experience on the use of omalizumab.

15.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 16, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to local anesthetics (LA) are relatively common; however, true IgE-mediated allergy is extremely rare, estimated to occur in less than 1%. Investigating patients with suspected allergy to LA should begin with a detailed history to exclude other more common operation theater related culprit medications, followed by skin testing. The subcutaneous challenge is considered the gold standard for confirming true IgE-mediated allergy to LA. In this study, we have described the skin prick test results of patients with suspected lidocaine allergy who had historical reaction symptoms typical to IgE-mediated allergic reactions. METHODS: The data were retrieved from the allergy procedure log registry for patients who were referred to the allergy clinic with a suspected allergic reaction to lidocaine at the Hamad Medical Corporation between 2016 and 2020. These patients' symptoms of historical reactions to lidocaine were compared to their skin test results. RESULT: A total of 7 patients were identified. The skin test result for lidocaine was positive in only 1 patient; his historical reaction was anaphylaxis (urticaria/angioedema and shortness of breath). The remaining 6 patients had a negative result for skin and challenge tests. Of these 6 patients with negative results, 4 had only urticaria/angioedema as historical reactions; 1 had systematic manifestation (tachycardia) along with urticaria/angioedema, and 1 experienced systemic symptoms (shortness of breath, chest pain, and palpitation) with no skin or mucous membrane involvement (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Negative skin test and subcutaneous challenge with a history of generalized cutaneous symptoms and/or systemic symptoms during the reaction to LA can be attributed to many causes, such as an IgE-mediated reaction against a component other than lidocaine (e.g., latex), medication side effects (adrenaline in combined preparations), and/or symptoms of primary disease (chronic spontaneous urticaria/angioedema).

16.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 2, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968517

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is a well-known fact that patients with chronic urticaria (CU) are not at a higher risk for a serious allergic reaction such as anaphylaxis from medications. However, there is a fear and some misconceptions regarding allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine among patients and physicians, which might result in resistance to vaccination. Data about the incidence and severity of COVID-19 vaccine reactions in the CU population are scarce. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the real-world (Qatar) experience of the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on patients with CU and analyze the rates of vaccine-associated reactions and risk factors associated. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study conducted as a part of COVAC-CU international under the GALEN UCARE program. Adult patients with CU who received one or more doses of COVID-19 vaccination were administered a questionnaire regarding their demographic characteristics and any potential unfavorable effect of the vaccination from the November 03 to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: These are preliminary results from an ongoing study. The data were collected from 91 patients with CU, of whom 79.12% had chronic spontaneous urticaria, 15.3% had chronic inducible urticaria, and the remaining had both. Of these patients, 74.7% were women. The average age of the patients was 39.3 (range 15-68) years. The majority (84.6%) of them received 2 vaccine doses, 13.1% received 3 doses, and the remaining received 1 dose. Most (70.3%) of these patients did not experience any worsening in CU after vaccination. A total of 62.6% patients reported some type of side effects to the vaccine (16.4% had CU exacerbation and 46.1% other types of reactions, such as fever and muscle pain). None of the patients reported anaphylaxis. Two patients reported improvement in their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our local data suggest that patients with CU in Qatar can safely take the COVID-19 vaccine. Most patients with CU did not experience any worsening in symptoms, and there were no reports of a severe reaction (anaphylaxis). We recommend maximizing symptom control prior to vaccination to minimize the risk of worsening urticarial symptoms.

17.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 7, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968518

RESUMEN

Specialist nurses have a crucial role within the allergy and immunology specialty that reflects their competence in an increasingly complex area of work and ability to use advanced diagnostic testing and therapeutic modalities. A specialist nurse in Qatar follows the local Hamad Medical Cooperation (HMC) guidelines and the competency published by the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI). Specialist Allergy Nurses Learning domain: Learn and review the written standard operating procedure (SOP) and protocols for all diagnostic and therapeutic allergy procedures, including skin prick testing (inhaled, food, and others), intradermal testing, skin patch testing, penicillin testing, food and drug challenges, different desensitization protocols, and biologics and other medication administration. In addition, learn the protocol for immunotherapy administration and maintain an updated knowledge of trends and developments in the field by reading relevant articles, journals, and related material and attending seminars and conferences, as needed. Maintain a safe work environment: Perform all the above procedures and medication administration with a high grade of competency under physician supervision. Apply quality measures to ensure safety. Furthermore, perform stocktaking by regularly checking procedure requirements, availability of items and consumables, date of expiry of items, and medications. Monitor the patients closely during drug and food allergy challenge procedures and record and report patients' vitals and reactions to treating physicians. Ensure that a patient stays the required observation time after injection(s). General care: Assess patient needs and suggest solutions to patient care problems. Provide education and resources for the patient and family support as needed. React appropriately and on time during patient reaction situations to mitigate early adverse reactions. Maintain patient, employee, and clinic confidentiality. Specialist Immunology Nurses• Develop specialist knowledge and experience in immunology.• Develop nurse-led clinics for administering immunoglobulin replacement therapy safely and effectively based on patients' preferences (IV vs. SC and in-hospital vs. home programs).• Coordinate communication between members of the multidisciplinary team to facilitate the appropriate delivery of care.• Provide education and resources for the patient and family support (insurance issues, resources for vaccination recommendations, concerns regarding traveling and vacations, pregnancy, and any other lifecycle changes).

18.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 29, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy has been used as antibody replacement therapy in primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) for more than 50 years. In this study, we aimed to define IVIG usage and adverse reactions and complications in PID and explain how subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) replacement therapy is an alternative that improves the patient experience. In addition, the additional nursing responsibilities associated with this service were also identified. METHODS: Data and service satisfaction surveys for the last 10 years were reviewed from the Allergy and Immunology Division log registry for those on IVIG and SCIG. RESULTS: IVIG practice: Most patients currently on IVIG in our unit have PID. Adverse reactions occur during the initial 30 to 60 minutes of the infusion and are mild and self-limited. Infusion reactions are more likely to occur in patients receiving IVIG for the first time. Infusion-related complications included pyrogenic reactions, allergic reactions, and vasomotor symptoms. Complications reported in the literature such as the transmission of blood-borne pathogens and other serious complications, including thrombotic events, renal adverse events, and aseptic meningitis were never reported. Pyrogenic reactions occurred at a rate ≥ 100 mL/hr in at least 3 patients, and a slower infusion rate of ≤ 75 mL/hr mitigated this rate-related complication. SCIG program: This program started in Qatar in 2017. Usually, the clinician assesses and evaluates several factors to help select candidates for this therapy, including the perceptions of inconvenience and/or pain of IV infusions, presence of difficult vein access, and other relevant clinical and social factors. Once training in the appropriate techniques has been accomplished (3-6 sessions), it is most often self-administered in the home setting by the patient or a parent for a child. Table 1 summarizes patients on SCIG. Additional nursing responsibilities: The nursing role in subcutaneous IgG administration is primarily that of an educator and to help the patient/family become independent. This can be achieved by the assessment of appropriate patient selection for self-administration. Determining which patients are suitable include adequate patient education with return demonstration of the necessary skill set, monitoring parameters, educating patients about their medication, and providing educational resources and support. CONCLUSION: SCIG administration can be a convenient alternative for patients with PID receiving long-term IVIG.

19.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 8, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis and asthma exacerbation are strongly linked to respiratory viral and bacterial infections. COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about the risk of infection and the severity of COVID-19 infection in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis. However, increasing evidence suggests that atopic disease protects against severe COVID-19 illness owing to the underlying type 2 inflammatory process. Many studies have reported the impact of asthma on COVID-19 disease; however, data on allergic rhinitis are scarce. In this study, we aimed to investigate the severity and outcome of COVID-19 disease in adult patients with allergic rhinitis in Qatar during the first pandemic wave. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of asthma and/or allergic rhinitis who had a positive COVID-19 RT-PCR between February 01, 2020, and December 01, 2020. Parameters evaluated included the WHO classification of COVID-19 disease severity as mild, moderate, severe, and critical; COVID-19 disease outcome; and mortality. Patients with allergic rhinitis were defined as those with typical allergic rhinitis symptoms and positive skin prick test or specific IgE to perennial or seasonal inhaled allergens. Only data about patients with allergic rhinitis has been presented in this report. RESULTS: We screened 97 EMR Cerner records of patients who had the diagnosis code for allergic rhinitis. Nine patients met the inclusion criteria of allergic rhinitis diagnosis; the remaining either had no allergy testing or had negative allergy tests. Seven (77.7%) patients had mild COVID-19, whereas only one (11.1%) patient each had moderate and severe disease. The length of hospital stays for 6 patients ranged from 5-13 days, and the remaining 3 patients were quarantined at home. No reports of critical cases or death were identified. All the patients recovered from COVID-19 with a favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: This preliminary data showed that most patients with allergic rhinitis had mild COVID-19 disease. Furthermore, all of them recovered well, similar to the available data from previous studies. A limitation of this study is the small population size.

20.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(2): 14, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic disease characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, asthma, and intolerance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Aspirin challenge is considered the gold standard for diagnosing AERD. Many patients with AERD have reported clinical benefits when desensitized to aspirin and maintained on daily aspirin therapy. In this study, we have summarized aspirin challenges and aspirin desensitization in our division during the past ten years. METHODS: We reviewed aspirin challenges and desensitization procedures performed in the Allergy and Immunology Division at the Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, between 2010 and 2020 from our procedures log registry and reported the results of the procedures. RESULTS: The procedures were performed for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, and bronchial asthma with a historical reaction to NSAIDs or those never exposed to NSAIDs. The challenge and desensitization procedure protocol is outlined in table.1. Of the 45 procedures performed, 36 (80%) patients reacted during aspirin desensitization; and their characteristics, historical reaction to NSAIDs, provoking dose, length of desensitization, and types of reactions were reviewed. Of the reactors, 32 (88%) patients completed aspirin desensitization successfully. The mean ( ± SD) age of patients was 46 ( ± 11.6) years, and 51% were women. The historical symptoms were asthma symptoms (56%) and naso-ocular (21%). The common (71%) reaction during the procedure was asthma symptoms, and 29% had naso-ocular symptoms. The provoking dose was 50-75 mg in most patients. The desensitization procedure was carried out over 2 days in most patients; however, 29% of the patients needed more than 2 days to complete the desensitization. None of the reactors needed emergency epinephrine use or hospital admission. CONCLUSION: In our review, desensitization was successful in all the patients who reacted to aspirin, and it was the only therapeutic choice for patients with AERD before the era of biologics. The procedure was well tolerated in most patients. Aspirin challenge was positive in 80% of our patients with suspected AERD, and this has an important diagnostic value that may help in choosing the proper biologic, such as dupilumab, for these patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA