Perioperative Albumin Among Adults Undergoing Thoracic Surgery in the United States: Utilization, Associations With Clinical Outcomes, and Contribution to Hospital Costs.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the use of albumin among adults undergoing thoracic surgery in the United States, compare baseline characteristics, clinical and cost outcomes of recipients versus nonrecipients, and determine albumin's contribution to total hospital costs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide sample of US hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing open and minimally invasive thoracic surgery between 2011 and 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Albumin on the day of surgery (identified using itemized hospital billing logs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Albumin was used in 170 of 342 US hospitals, among 13% and 7% of 14,672 and 22,532 patients who, respectively, underwent open and minimally invasive thoracic surgery (median volume 500 mL). Baseline comorbidities and organ-supportive treatments were several-fold more prevalent among recipients (particularly vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and red cell transfusions). In standardized mortality ratio propensity score weighted analysis, albumin use was not associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted relative risk 1.17 [0.72, 1.92] and 1.51 [0.97, 2.34], with open and minimally invasive procedures), but was associated with morbidity and higher costs, more so with minimally invasive procedures than with open surgery. Total costs among recipients were higher by $4,744 ($3,591, $5,897) and $5,088 ($4,075, $6,100) for open and minimally invasive procedures, respectively. Albumin accounted for 2.6% of this difference (median $124 [$83-$189] per patient). CONCLUSIONS: Albumin use varies widely across hospitals, and 9% of patients receive it (median 500 mL). Use was not associated with in-hospital mortality and was associated with more morbidity and cost. The cost of albumin accounted for a trivial portion of hospital costs. Clinical trials must examine the effects of albumin on complications and costs after thoracic surgery.

Fulminant sepsis secondary to severe lung contusion from the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System device.

INTRODUCTION: Portable mechanical chest compression devices have been developed to improve upon many problems of manual compression, increase patient survival, and improve neurologic outcomes. However, the use of these devices is not without risk of harm to the patient. CASE REPORT: We describe a patient who received chest compressions from a mechanical compression device after cardiac arrest and subsequently developed fulminant sepsis secondary to lung contusions and a necrotizing pulmonary infection. DISCUSSION: Although injuries from the LUCAS have been reported, we believe this is the first reported fatal complication related to direct pulmonary injury from a mechanical compression device. CONCLUSION: More investigation is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of the LUCAS especially in obese patients.

Continuous renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: implications in the COVID-19 era.

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19)) was identified as the causative agent of viral pneumonias in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and has emerged as a pandemic causing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ dysfunction. Interim guidance by the World Health Organization states that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be considered as a rescue therapy in COVID-19-related ARDS. International registries tracking ECMO in COVID-19 patients reveal a 21%-70% incidence of acute renal injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) during ECMO support. The indications for initiating RRT in patients on ECMO are similar to those for patients not requiring ECMO. RRT can be administered during ECMO via a temporary dialysis catheter, placement of a circuit in-line hemofilter, or direct connection of continuous RRT in-line with the ECMO circuit. Here we review methods for RRT during ECMO, RRT initiation and timing during ECMO, anticoagulation strategies, and novel cytokine filtration approaches to minimize COVID-19's pathophysiological impact.

Superior vena cava syndrome during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19.

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is typically associated with malignant tumors obstructing the SVC, but as many as 40% of cases have other etiologies. SVC obstruction was previously described during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (VV ECMO) in children. In this report, we describe a woman with adult respiratory distress syndrome resulting from infection with coronavirus-19 who developed SVC syndrome during VV ECMO. A dual-lumen ECMO cannula was inserted in the right internal jugular vein, but insufficient ECMO circuit flow, upper body edema, and signs of hypovolemic shock were observed. This clinical picture resolved when the right internal jugular vein was decannulated in favor of bilateral femoral venous cannulae. Our report demonstrates that timely recognition of clinical signs and symptoms led to the appropriate diagnosis of an uncommon ECMO complication.

Voxelotor as a Treatment of Persistent Hypoxia in the ICU.

Hypoxia is encountered frequently in the ICU as a result of a wide range of pathologic characteristics. The oxygen-hemoglobin dissociation curve describes hemoglobin's affinity for a given Po2 and factors affecting uptake and offload. Research in manipulating this relationship between hemoglobin and oxygen is sparing. Voxelotor is a hemoglobin oxygen-affinity modulator that is approved by the US Food and Drug Association for use in the management of sickle cell disease. We present two patients without sickle cell disease who underwent treatment with this novel agent to assist with chronic hypoxia and weaning of mechanical support.

Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound in Adults: Image Acquisition and Interpretation.

Over the past two decades, diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a rapid and non-invasive bedside tool for addressing clinical inquiries related to gastric content. One emerging concern pertains to patients about to undergo sedation and/or endotracheal intubation: the elevated risk of aspiration from the patient's stomach contents. Aspiration of gastric contents into the lungs poses a serious and potentially life-threatening complication. This occurs more frequently when the stomach is considered "full" and can be affected by the techniques employed for airway management, making it potentially preventable. To mitigate the risk of peri-procedural aspiration, two distinct medical specialties (anesthesiology and critical care medicine) have independently developed techniques to utilize ultrasonography for identifying patients requiring "full stomach" precautions. Due to these separate specialties, the work of each group remains relatively unfamiliar outside its respective field. This article presents descriptions of both techniques for gastric ultrasound. Furthermore, it explains how these approaches can complement each other when one of them falls short. Regarding image acquisition, the article covers the following topics: indications and contraindications, selection of the appropriate probe, patient positioning, and troubleshooting. The article also delves into image interpretation, complete with example images. Additionally, it demonstrates how one of the two techniques can be employed to estimate gastric fluid volume. Lastly, the article briefly discusses medical decision-making based on the findings of this examination.

Pulmonary artery pulsatility index as a predictor of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: It is critical to identify patients at increased risk of right ventricular failure (RVF) before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is a hemodynamic parameter that is a specific measure of right ventricular function and may better identify LVAD recipients at risk for RVF. This systematic review analyzes the predictive value of preoperative PAPi to RVF in the setting of LVAD implantation. METHODS: Databases were searched for all studies reporting on PAPi and RVF after LVAD implantation. Data collected included: number of patients, patient characteristics, incidences of RVF, PAPi, central venous pressure (CVP), CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular stroke work index. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (4,756 patients) were included in this review. The incidence of RVF was found to be 27.48% (1,307 patients). The weighted mean (standard deviation) of preoperative PAPi associated with RVF vs No RVF was 2.17 (2.36) and 2.87 (3.21), respectively. When comparing LVAD recipients with RVF and No RVF, patients who developed RVF had a significantly lower preoperative PAPi by a WMD (95% CI) of -0.74 [-1.00, -0.49] (p < .001). The remaining variables (CVP; CVP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; and right ventricular stroke work index) were also confirmed as predictors of RVF after LVAD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates the utility of PAPi as a clinical predictor of RVF after LVAD implantation. Based on our findings, we recommend that PAPi be used in conjunction with traditional hemodynamic parameters when risk stratifying LVAD recipients for RVF.