Opioid sparing effect of epidural levobupivacaine on postoperative pain treatment in major spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Continuous epidural administration of a local anesthetic drug for postoperative pain treatment of patients, who undergo a fusion operation of lumbar vertebrae is limited by the suction of wound drainage. The effect of the single epidural administration of levobupivacaine 0.25% 10 mL 20 minutes before finishing of skin closure was examined on the postoperative demand for piritramide. METHODS: The study was conducted in a prospective, single blind and randomized manner. Forty patients scheduled for posterior intervertebral body fusion of two or three vertebrae were divided into two groups. Group A received levobupivacaine 0.25% 10 mL epidurally, Group B received piritramide 0.08 mg kg(-1) i.v. Time of administration was 20 minutes before predicted finish of skin closure in both groups. Piritramide was administered intravenously to achieve a VAS of 3 or less during the phase of awakening. After regaining of co-operativity, piritramide was self administered via PCA pump. VAS and the demand of piritramide within 12 hours postoperative were recorded. RESULTS: VAS at the time of being approachable (P = 0.23), VAS at the time of regaining co-operativity (P = 0.53) and VAS 12 hours postoperative (P = 0.27) did not differ significantly. The postoperative demand of piritramide was significantly lower in Group A (0.36 +/- 0.25 mg kg(-1) vs. 0.52 +/- 0.19 mg kg(-1) in Group B) (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: The epidural administration of levobupivacaine 0.25% 10 mL 20 minutes before finishing of skin closure effects opioid sparing in the pain treatment of patients undergoing posterior interbody fusion of two or three vertebrae.

Computerized Angiographic Occlusion Rating for Ruptured Clipped Aneurysms is Superior to Subjective Occlusion Rating.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The computerized occlusion rating to estimate angiographic occlusion of embolized aneurysms is superior to the subjective occlusion rating. In this study, we compared the 2 methods in the analysis of aneurysms clipped after subarachnoid hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pre- and postoperative angiographic images (DSA) of 95 selected patients were analyzed and stratified in 4 grades (grade 0 for 100%, grade I for <99%-90%, grade II for <89%-70%, grade III for <70% occlusion) by using the subjective (angiographic) occlusion rating and the computerized (angiographic) occlusion rating. For the subjective occlusion rating, the occlusion rate was estimated; for the computerized occlusion rating, the "occluded" and "nonoccluded" aneurysm areas were automatically calculated in square millimeters after outlining the ideal occlusion line. RESULTS: With the subjective occlusion rating, 75 (78.9%), 12 (12.6%), 7 (7.4%), and 1 (1.1%) and with the computerized occlusion rating 45 (47.4%), 24 (25.3%), 20 (21.0%), and 6 (6.3%) patients had aneurysms stratified to grades 0, I, II and III, respectively. The interobserver variation was significant with the subjective occlusion rating but not with the computerized occlusion rating. The subjective occlusion rating overestimated aneurysm occlusion in 30 (31.6%) patients. Mean values were the following: subjective occlusion rating of 97.5 ± 6.3% and computerized occlusion rating of 93.5 ± 9.7%; P = < .001. No patient rebled, and 4 patients underwent retreatment during 36 ± 38.9 months; the predictive value (log-rank, Kaplan-Meier) of the subjective and computerized occlusion ratings with respect to retreatment was highly significant for both methods (subjective occlusion rating: χ(2), 29.65; P < .001; computerized occlusion rating: χ(2), 35.57, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 methods showed remarkable differences in the estimation of the angiographic occlusion rates of clipped aneurysms. The clearly lower interobserver variation of the computerized versus subjective occlusion rating may indicate a superiority of the computerized occlusion rating.