Kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors: an increased risk of urinary complications - the UriNary Complications Of Renal Transplant (UNyCORT) study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of expanded criteria donors (ECD) on urinary complications in kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The UriNary Complications Of Renal Transplant (UNyCORT) is a cohort study based on the French prospective Données Informatisées et VAlidées en Transplantation/Computerized and VAlidated Data in Transplantation (DIVAT) cohort. Data were extracted between 1 January 2002 and 1 January 2018 with 1-year minimum follow-up, in relation to 44 pre- and postoperative variables. ECD status was included according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) definition. The primary outcome of the UNyCORT study was the association between the donor's ECD/standard criteria donors (SCD) status and urinary complications at 1 year in uni- and multivariate analysis. Sub-group analysis, stratified analysis on ECD/SCD donor's status and transplant failure analysis were then conducted. RESULTS: Between 1 January 2002 and 1 January 2018, 10 279 kidney transplants in adult recipients were recorded within the DIVAT network. A total of 8559 (83.4%) donors were deceased donors and 1699 (16.6%) were living donors (LD). Among donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, 224 (2.85%) were uncontrolled DCD and 93 (1.09%) were controlled DCD donors. A total of 3617 (43.9%) deceased donors were ECD. The overall urological complication rate was 16.26%. The donor's ECD status was significantly associated with an increased risk of urological complications at 1 year in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.71; P < 0.001) and especially with stenosis and ureteric fistulae at 1 year. There is no association with LD, uncontrolled and controlled DCD. The placement of an endo-ureteric stent was beneficial in preventing urinary complications in all donors and particularly in ECD donors. CONCLUSION: The donor's ECD status is associated with a higher likelihood of stenosis and ureteric fistulae at 1 year. Recipients of grafts from ECD donors should probably be considered for closer urological monitoring and systematic preventive measures.

Early steroid withdrawal and optimization of mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Early posttransplant steroid withdrawal may increase the risk of acute rejection and the occurrence of subclinical acute rejection (SCAR). We assessed the feasibility and safety of early steroid withdrawal in low-risk patients receiving cyclosporine A (CsA) and the impact of optimization of mycophenolic acid exposure on steroid withdrawal success. METHODS: De novo, low-immunological risk kidney recipients received an anti-interleukin-2-receptor-α antibody induction, a short course of 7 days of corticosteroids, and CsA with 2-hr postdose concentration monitoring. They were randomized to adjusted dose (AD) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) or a fixed-dose (FD) regimen. MMF 3 g was initiated posttransplant and then adjusted starting at week 2 to a 0 to 12 hr area under the concentration time curve of 40 mg · h/L versus 2 g daily, respectively. The primary endpoint was a composite of the proportion of patients experiencing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and those with SCAR identified on the 3-month protocol biopsy. RESULTS: Among 247 analyzed patients, only 22 in the AD group and 17 in the FD group experienced BPAR or SCAR (P=0.46). The rate of SCAR was low: 4% (AD) and 2.5% (FD). No between-group difference in the incidence of BPAR was observed. TDM yielded MMF doses ranging from 1 to 4 g/d and significantly reduced interpatient variability at weeks 26 and 52 in the AD group. CONCLUSIONS: In low-immunological risk kidney recipients, MMF combined with CsA allows early corticosteroid discontinuation with good tolerability. In this group of patients, TDM of MMF does not improve clinical outcome.