RESUMEN
CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS is characterized by progressive inflammation and fibrosis of the pericardium. It manifests with symptoms of heart failure. The only effective treatment is surgical pericardiectomy. The assessment and diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis with echocardiography is well described with spontaneous ventilation. However, there are limited data on constrictive pericarditis assessment with transesophageal echocardiography with positive pressure ventilation. Also, intraoperative hepatic venous Doppler flow mostly is used intraoperatively to assess the severity of tricuspid regurgitation by focusing on the flow reversal during systole. In this e-challenge, the authors focus on the hepatic vein Doppler tracing as a means to show improvement in diastolic function during positive pressure ventilation in a patient undergoing pericardiectomy. This case demonstrates a severely blunted diastolic flow pattern in the hepatic vein that is reversed after successful pericardiectomy. Also, it shows blunted flow during systole compared to diastole post-pericardiectomy, indicating high right atrial pressure.
Asunto(s)
Pericardiectomía , Pericarditis Constrictiva , Ecocardiografía , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Venas Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Humanos , Pericarditis Constrictiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Pericarditis Constrictiva/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Critical care education is an important, mandatory component of residency training in anesthesiology. Currently, there is no accepted national standardized curriculum, and a prioritized critical care content outline would be beneficial to the creation of a pragmatic standardized residency curriculum. The modified Delphi method is a recognized method for establishing consensus in medical education. Methods: We developed a prioritized critical care content outline using the modified Delphi method. Topics were selected from critical care topics included in the Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Anesthesiology and the American Board of Anesthesiology Content Outline. Panel members rated critical care topics on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 9 = mandatory). Consensus was defined as ≥75% rating the topic as very important to mandatory for inclusion (Likert scale 7-9). Topics with >80% consensus were removed from subsequent surveys and included in the final list, and topics with <50% were removed. Members were asked to select the ideal timing of topic delivery during residency (Foundational-Early Residency, Intermediate-Mid Residency, Advanced-Late Residency). Results: A total of 158 panel members who were contacted using national anesthesiology organization email lists completed the initial round, 119 (75%) completed the second iteration, and 116 (73%) completed the third. Response rate on the first survey was (22/55) 40% for anesthesiology critical care program directors, (18/132) 14% for core anesthesiology residency program directors, and (77/1150) 7% for the remaining respondents. Trainees (n = 41) were not included in response rate calculations. Most participants (103/158, 65%) had completed both core anesthesiology and subspecialty critical care medicine training and most (87/158, 55%) had formal roles in medical education. Forty-one (26%) responders were currently in training. All panelists worked in institutions with graduate medical education (GME) learners. Fifty-eight of 136 (43%) topics met consensus for inclusion. Most consensus topics (50/58, 86%) were recommended to be delivered early during residency with the other 8 topics to be delivered in the middle of residency. Conclusions: We developed a prioritized critical care content outline for anesthesiology residents that includes highly recommended critical care topics with ideal timing for inclusion in residency. This outline provides the first step in developing a pragmatic standardized curriculum to guide faculty and programs in critical care education.
RESUMEN
This article reviews noteworthy investigations and society recommendations published in 2023 relevant to the care of critically ill cardiothoracic surgical patients. We reviewed 3,214 articles to identify 18 publications that add to the existing literature across a variety of topics including resuscitation, nutrition, antibiotic management, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), neurologic care following cardiac arrest, coagulopathy and transfusion, steroids in pulmonary infections, and updated guidelines in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodosRESUMEN
The past year in critical care medicine was notable for ongoing sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic, including nationwide shortages and critical care demand in many regions in excess of usual operating capacity. Despite these challenges, evidence-based medicine and investigations into the optimal management of the critically ill continued to be at the forefront. This article is a collection of studies published in 2022 which are specifically relevant to cardiothoracic critical care. These noteworthy publications add to the existing literature across a broad spectrum of topics, from optimal timing of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), delirium prevention, updates in nutrition guidelines, alternative defibrillation techniques, novel ventilator management, and observing the downstream psychological impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapiaRESUMEN
This year marked a number of milestones in critical care. As vaccines for the SARS-CoV-2 virus became widely available and were confirmed to be exceptionally effective against severe illness and hospitalization, we were then faced with new variants and the resource-intense responses necessary to combat them. Despite challenges new and old, we have persevered and continued to provide excellent care to our patients while pushing the boundaries of clinical research. This article is a collection of studies published in 2021 relevant to critical care, with a specific focus on cardiothoracic critical care. To ignore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic would do a disservice to our colleagues, many of whom have made incredible breakthroughs in novel therapies to the coronavirus, and yet we present additional themes of delirium, acute kidney injury, lung transplant, advances in ECMO as well as biomarkers of sepsis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/terapia , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
This year will be forever marked by the drastic changes COVID-19 wrought on our personal and professional lives. New roles and challenges in critical care have forced us to be constantly nimble and flexible in how we approach medicine. The strain of these challenges is apparent throughout the health care community and our society as a whole. Despite this adversity, 2020 will also be remembered for fantastic advances in research. This article is a collection of influential and exciting studies published in 2020 encompassing a broad swath of critical care with a focus on cardiothoracic critical care. Themes include examinations of early extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, the impact of sedation and other risk factors on perioperative mortality, a novel fluid resuscitation strategy following cardiac surgery, and advances in the fields of heart and lung transplantation as well as how they were affected by COVID-19. Given that many cardiothoracic intensivists were redeployed to the care of SARS-CoV-2 patients, we also discuss important advances in therapeutics for the virus.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipoxia/diagnóstico , Hipoxia/etiología , Hipoxia/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapiaRESUMEN
The origin of sinoatrial node (SAN) pacemaker activity in the heart is controversial. The leading candidates are diastolic depolarization by "funny" current (If) through HCN4 channels (the "Membrane Clock" hypothesis), depolarization by cardiac Na-Ca exchange (NCX1) in response to intracellular Ca cycling (the "Calcium Clock" hypothesis), and a combination of the two ("Coupled Clock"). To address this controversy, we used Cre/loxP technology to generate atrial-specific NCX1 KO mice. NCX1 protein was undetectable in KO atrial tissue, including the SAN. Surface ECG and intracardiac electrograms showed no atrial depolarization and a slow junctional escape rhythm in KO that responded appropriately to ß-adrenergic and muscarinic stimulation. Although KO atria were quiescent they could be stimulated by external pacing suggesting that electrical coupling between cells remained intact. Despite normal electrophysiological properties of If in isolated patch clamped KO SAN cells, pacemaker activity was absent. Recurring Ca sparks were present in all KO SAN cells, suggesting that Ca cycling persists but is uncoupled from the sarcolemma. We conclude that NCX1 is required for normal pacemaker activity in murine SAN.