Optimal timing and outcomes among COVID-19 patients undergoing tracheostomy.

BACKGROUND: Patients who require mechanical ventilation secondary to severe COVID-19 infection have poor survival. It is unknown if the benefit of tracheostomy extends to COVID-19 patients. If so, what is the optimal timing? METHODS: Retrospective cohort study within a large hospital system in the United States. The population included patients with COVID-19 from January 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020. In total, 93,918 cases were identified. They were excluded if no intubation or tracheostomy, underwent tracheostomy before intubation, <18 years old, hospice patients before admission, and bacterial pneumonia. In total, 5,911 patients met the criteria. Outcomes between patients who underwent endotracheal intubation only versus tracheostomy were compared. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. All patients who underwent tracheostomy versus intubation only were compared. Three cohort analysis compared early (<10 days) versus late (>10 days) tracheostomy versus control. Eight cohort analysis compared days 0-2, days 3-6, days 7-10, days 11-14, days 15-18, days 19-22, and days 23+ to tracheostomy versus control. RESULTS: There was an overall inpatient mortality rate of 37.5% in the tracheostomy cohort compared to 54.4% in the control group (P < .0001). There was an early tracheostomy group inpatient mortality rate of 44.7% (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.52-1.01) compared to 33.1% (adjusted odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.58) in the late tracheostomy group. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with tracheostomy had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to intubated only. Optimal timing for tracheostomy placement for COVID-19 patients is 11 days or later. Future studies should focus on early tracheostomy patients.

Chronic Posterior Sternoclavicular Dislocation in a Contact Athlete: A Case Report.

CASE: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular dislocation (PSCD) is an uncommon injury that often presents in a delayed fashion and can be difficult to diagnose. Standard treatments include reduction of acute injuries and possible reconstruction for chronic injuries. We describe a 16-year-old male football player with a traumatic PSCD and initial dyspnea and dysphagia. He returned to playing contact sports without undergoing reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the literature that suggests reduction as a primary treatment of PSCD, this case shows that a contact-sport athlete may be able to return to competitive sports with a chronic PSCD.