RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The burden of diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia is considerable, with high prevalence rates affecting the population's health and healthcare resources. This situation necessitates attention from healthcare policymakers. The study aims to compare lifestyle practices between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals in Saudi Arabia to inform targeted health interventions. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to compare lifestyle practices, including dietary habits, physical activity levels, and smoking habits, between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A 12-month cross-sectional study was conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 424 participants, evenly distributed across age, gender, and socioeconomic status, were enrolled. A total of 424 participants, balanced for age, gender, and socioeconomic status, were recruited. Data were collected via structured interviews employing a validated questionnaire. The King Fahad Medical City IRB approved the study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. RESULTS: The study found that diabetic individuals were more likely to be older, male, and sedentary (p < 0.001). They were also at a higher likelihood of being current smokers (p = 0.002) and consuming whole grains regularly. Non-diabetic individuals consumed more fruits and fast food and had more flexible meal schedules (p < 0.001). Both groups had similar levels of regular vegetable consumption. A significantly lower proportion of diabetics (40 individuals; 20%) engaged in moderate physical activity three to four days a week compared to non-diabetics (80 individuals; 36%), which was highly significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study identified critical differences in lifestyle practices between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals in Saudi Arabia. These findings underscore the need for tailored health interventions to address the rising diabetes rates and promote healthier lifestyle practices among the Saudi population.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objectives were to assess the effectiveness of the educational program in enhancing students' understanding of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, correcting misconceptions, and increasing overall awareness. Additionally, the study aimed to identify factors influencing knowledge improvement and willingness to be vaccinated against HPV, including prior knowledge, information sources, session attendance, and school type. METHODS: In this study, 148 participants were enrolled from secondary schools in Saudi Arabia, and data were collected through pre- and post-educational session assessments, logistic regression analyses, and qualitative investigations. Educational sessions focused on key aspects of the HPV vaccine, including its preventive benefits, administration details, and side effects, tailored to address common misconceptions and enhance understanding among students. RESULTS: The study revealed significant improvements in students' knowledge post-educational sessions, particularly in key areas such as cervical cancer prevention, gender recommendations, vaccine administration, and side effect awareness. Prior knowledge, information sources, session attendance, and school type significantly influenced knowledge enhancement and willingness to be vaccinated against HPV. The qualitative analysis provided additional insights into challenges, perceptions, and misconceptions surrounding HPV vaccination, underlining the significance of targeted education and cultural sensitivity in promoting vaccination uptake. CONCLUSION: The findings underscored the effectiveness of the educational intervention in enhancing HPV vaccine awareness, dispelling myths, and fostering informed decision-making among Saudi Arabian adolescent populations. The study emphasizes the critical role of tailored educational programs in correcting misconceptions, promoting accurate knowledge, and ultimately increasing vaccination acceptance for improved public health outcomes and disease prevention efforts. Ongoing efforts are essential to sustain and expand educational initiatives to enhance HPV vaccine understanding and adolescent uptake.
RESUMEN
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19763.].
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the academic and clinical processes of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship training held by the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCHS). METHODS: A cross-sectional, nationwide, survey-based study was conducted between June and December 2020. PEM program directors as well as fellowship trainees were eligible. The collected data were under the following domains: (1) sociodemographic and work-related characteristics; (2) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient flow and PEM procedures; (3) impact on emergency skills and competence; (4) impact on academic performance; and (5) attitudes toward PEM practice and potential solutions. Monthly reports of PEM visits and procedures were also collected from program directors. RESULTS: A total of 11 PEM program directors and 42 fellows responded. During the pandemic, the number of total ED visits decreased by 70.1%, ED inpatient admissions fell by 57.3%, and the number of intraosseous need insertion and lumbar puncture procedures fell by 76.7% and 62.3%, respectively; the temporal differences in the median frequencies were statistically significant. The pandemic has influenced the knowledge acquisition and leadership skills of one-third of program directors (36.4% and 27.3%, respectively) and the skills and competence of fellows (31.0%). The majority of directors and fellows showed that online classes/webinars were useful (100% and 95.2%, respectively), and there was no need to extend the current fellowship training to compensate for learning deficits (62.7% and 78.6%, respectively). The importance of dedicated modalities to fill in the training gap increased by 62.5% of program directors and 35.7% of fellows. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had significant effects on clinical procedures and academic activities in the PEM fellowship program. The impact was consistently perceived across PEM program directors and fellows. Technology-driven solutions are warranted to mitigate the expected learning and clinical deficits due to reduced clinical exposure.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the role of objective olfactory dysfunction (OD) and gustatory dysfunction (GD) testing among patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who presented with respiratory symptoms. METHODS: A prospective, blinded, observational study was conducted in the emergency units of two tertiary hospitals. Participants were asked to identify scents in the pocket smell test (PST) and flavors in four different solutions in the gustatory dysfunction test (GDT). We assessed the level of agreement between objective findings and self-reported symptoms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chemosensory dysfunction for diagnosing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. RESULTS: Of 250 participants, 74 (29.6%) were SARS-CoV-2-positive. There was slight agreement between self-reported symptoms and objective findings (kappa = 0.13 and 0.10 for OD and GD, respectively). OD assessed by the PST was independently associated with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.46). This association was stronger when OD was combined with objective GD, cough, and fever (adjusted odds ratio = 7.33, 95% confidence interval, 1.17-45.84). CONCLUSIONS: Neither the PST nor GDT alone are useful screening tools for COVID-19. However, a diagnostic scale based on objective OD, GD, fever, and cough may help triage patients with suspected COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Ageusia , COVID-19 , Trastornos del Olfato , Ageusia/diagnóstico , Anosmia/diagnóstico , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Tos/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Humanos , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Trastornos del Gusto/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study explores the prevalence and patterns of the use of pharmacologic sleep aids and stimulants among Saudi Arabia's emergency physicians (EPs) and emergency medical services (EMS) providers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We adopted a descriptive, cross-sectional design. To collect data on the types and frequencies of sleep aids and stimulants used, we distributed a semi-structured, anonymous, web-based questionnaire to registered EPs, paramedics, and emergency medicine technicians (EMTs) in the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties. An internal consistency analysis showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.667) of the questionnaire. A subscale analysis confirmed the results-alpha values were 0.720 and 0.618 for the use of sleep aids and stimulants, respectively. RESULTS: Males and females represented 81.8% and 18.2%, respectively, of the valid sample of 669 participants. Respondents aged 25-34, 35-44, and 45-55 years represented 51.9%, 32.7%, and 10.2% of the sample, respectively. Results showed that a majority of the respondents (67.1%) used stimulants. Caffeine was the most common stimulant; caffeine and energy drinks were used by 65.9% and 17.2% of the respondents, respectively. Caffeine, energy drinks, nicotine, and ephedrine were used by 65.9%, 17.2%, 18.5%, and 17.3% of the respondents, respectively. The respondents who used at least one sleeping aid and those using only one and two sleeping aids accounted for 36.6%, 15.6%, and 9.7%, respectively. The most common sleeping aids antihistamines and marijuana were used on most days by 13.4% and 13.3% of the respondents, respectively. The average monthly number of night shifts (P = 0.025) significantly influenced sleep aid use. Respondents working in night shifts for 3-5 months or more than 7 days were more likely to use sleeping aids. CONCLUSION: Future research should enhance health workers' knowledge of the efficacy and safety of these medications and guide strategies to organize and reduce night shift work.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The effect of different degrees of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on long-term outcomes after tricuspid valve repair is the subject of ongoing research. We sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative RV dysfunction on mortality and recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after tricuspid valve repair for secondary TR concomitant with left-side valve surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, including 548 patients who underwent repair of secondary TR (2009-2017) at a single institution. Patients were grouped according to preoperative right ventricular (RV) systolic function into three groups; normal RV function (group 1, n = 451), mild RV dysfunction (group 2, n = 60) and moderate/severe RV dysfunction (group 3, n = 37). Study endpoints were mortality and recurrence of TR. RESULTS: Group 3 was associated with the highest hospital mortality (10.2%, p = .06). Predictors of moderate or higher grade TR were NYHA class (HR 2.1, p = 0.03); preoperative TR grade (HR 1.9, p < 0.01), mild RV dysfunction (HR 2.4, p < 0.01), isolated RV dilatation (HR 2.0, p < 0.01), and flexible TV repair prostheses (HR 2.4, p = 0.01). Predictors of mortality were renal impairment (HR 3.0, p < 0.01), ejection fraction (HR 0.97, p = 0.02), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (HR 1.02, p = 0.02), preoperative TR grade (HR 1.7, p < 0.01), and moderate/severe RV dysfunction (HR 3.1, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared to normal and mild degree of RV dysfunction, moderate and severe RV dysfunction were independent predictors of poor long-term survival. Isolated RV dilatation increased the recurrence of TR. RV dysfunction and dilatation could be indications of tricuspid valve repair.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: During the world-wide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, there is an urgent need to rapidly increase the readiness of hospitals. Emergency departments (EDs) are at high risk of facing unusual situations and need to prepare extensively in order to minimize risks to health care providers (HCPs) and patients. In situ simulation is a well-known method used in training to detect system gaps that could threaten safety. STUDY OBJECTIVES: One objective is to identify gaps, test hospital systems, and inform necessary modifications to the standard processes required by patients with COVID-19 presenting at the hospital. The other objective is to improve ED staff confidence in managing such patients, and to increase their skills in basic and advanced airway management and proper personal protective equipment (PPE) techniques. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental study in which 20 unannounced mock codes were carried out in ED resuscitation and isolation rooms. A checklist was designed, validated, and used to evaluate team performances in three areas: donning, basic and advanced airway skills, and doffing. A pre- and post-intervention survey was used to evaluate staff members' perceived knowledge of ED procedures related to COVID-19 and their airway management skills. RESULTS: A total of 20 mock codes were conducted in the ED. Overall, 16 issues that posed potential harm to staff or patients were identified and prioritized for immediate resolution. Approximately 57.4% of HCPs felt comfortable dealing with suspected/confirmed, unstable COVID-19 cases after mock codes, compared with 33.3% beforehand (P = .033). Of ED HCPs, 44.4% felt comfortable performing airway procedures for suspected/confirmed COVID-19 cases after mock codes compared with 29.6% beforehand. Performance of different skills was observed to be variable following the 20 mock codes. Skills with improved performance included: request of chest x-ray after intubation (88.0%), intubation done by the most experienced ED physician (84.5%), and correct sequence and procedure of PPE (79.0%). CONCLUSION: Mock codes identified significant defects, most of which were easily fixed. They included critical equipment availability, transporting beds that were too large to fit through doors, and location of biohazard bins. Repeated mock codes improved ED staff confidence in dealing with patients, in addition to performance of certain skills. In situ simulation proves to be an effective method for increasing the readiness of the ED to address the COVID-19 pandemic and other infection outbreaks.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/educación , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Entrenamiento Simulado , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , SARS-CoV-2 , Arabia SauditaRESUMEN
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have multisystem organ involvement. Thrombotic events are well-recognized complications of COVID-19. Such complications may include the pulmonary, renal, and other organs vasculature. The risk of coagulopathy is usually related to the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. Few cases suggested that the coagulopathy risk may persist for some period after the recovery from COVID-19. We report the case of a middle-aged man with severe COVID-19 pneumonia that required seven days of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation who presented with headache and left-sided weakness that occurred three days after his discharge. A computed tomography scan was performed to rule out intracranial hemorrhage before initiating the thrombolytic therapy. The scan demonstrated hemorrhage in the right temporal lobe with surrounding vasogenic edema along with density in the right transverse sinus. Subsequently, computed tomography venography was performed and demonstrated the filling defect representing right sigmoid venous sinus thrombosis. The patient received conservative measures in the form of intravenous hydration, anticoagulation, analgesics, and anticonvulsants. During the hospital stay, the patient had improvement in his symptom and mild neurological deficit persisted. The case highlighted that risk of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 pneumonia may persist for some period after the recovery from the disease. Hence, thromboprophylaxis may be indicated in selected patients with a risk of thrombotic events after their recovery from severe COVID-19.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure performed to manage intracranial hypertension. Once performed, patients are obligated to undergo another surgical procedure known as cranioplasty to reconstruct the cranial defect. Cranioplasty still has one of the highest rates of infection. The factors contributing to the high rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after cranioplasty are not well established. This study aims to estimate the incidence of SSI and determine its possible risk factors for patients who underwent cranioplasty using bone flaps subcutaneously preserved in abdominal pockets. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the predictors of infection among patients who underwent cranioplasty from subcutaneously preserved bone flaps in abdominal pockets between January 2005 and December 2018 at a level l trauma center. RESULTS: A total of 103 cases of cranioplasty from subcutaneously preserved bone flaps were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.2 ± 14.8 years (range, 5-67 years). The median interval between DC and cranioplasty was 115 days. The most frequent indication for DC was traumatic brain injury (76.4%). The incidence of SSI was noted in 15.7% of patients. The most significant predictors of infection in patients requiring cranioplasty were blood glucose levels and skull defect size (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Blood glucose levels and skull defect size were the only identifiable risk factors associated with SSI. Storing bone flaps in subcutaneous abdominal pockets is cost-efficient but carries considerable risk of infection.