Prevalence of Medically Resistant Epilepsy in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of medically resistant epilepsy (MRE) in our hospital and to compare the prevalence with that in other populations. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who visited the epilepsy clinics at King Fahd University Hospital, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia between January 2017 and December 2018. This study included patients aged ≥14 years who had at least 2 unprovoked seizures 24 h apart. Patients who had provoked seizure(s), paroxysmal events, or syncope or had incomplete medical records were excluded. The definition and classification of the International League Against Epilepsy were used. Moreover, we searched the En-glish literature using PubMed and Google Scholar to compare the prevalence of MRE between our population and other populations. RESULTS: In total, 1,151 patients were screened, and 751 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 751 patients, 229 (male: 56.3%, female: 43.7%; mean age: 32.07 years, and standard deviation, 12.2 years) had MRE, with a cumulative prevalence of 30%. The etiology was as follows: unknown, 63.3% (n = 145); structural, 31.9% (n = 73); genetic, 3.1% (n = 7); and infectious, 1.7% (n = 4). None of the patients had metabolic or immune-related etiologies. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MRE in our population (30%) is close to that in other populations (30-36.5%). Early identification of such patients is crucial to improve their management.

Guillain-Barré syndrome post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a systematic review and data analysis on its clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological features.

Introduction: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disease that affects almost 0.8-1.9 cases per 100,000 people worldwide every year. This is the most prevalent cause of subacute flaccid paralyzing illness today. It is a subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; the typical scenario involves ascending symmetrical flaccid paralysis, but in some circumstances, sensory, autonomic, and cranial neuropathy may also be involved. Several vaccines have been found to have complications since the previous century. Numerous case reports of GBS in the literature have been reported following COVID-19 vaccines in recent times. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive examination of GBS cases that have been reported after COVID-19 vaccines; to analyze the descriptive statistical analysis of data gathered regarding clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological characteristics; to discuss, based on the available evidence, whether the disease has a preference for a particular vaccine type; and to speculate on the potential pathogenesis. Methodology: This review has been carried out by recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Result: Reviewing 60 case reports illustrated that most of them are from the USA (18.1%) and the majority of affected individuals were males (60%). The results favored the association between vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, particularly AstraZeneca vaccine, and the GBS. The mean of symptoms onset is 11.4 days. The results of diagnostic tests such as LP are consistent mostly with albumin-cytological dissociation (81.81%), where brain and spine MRI was unremarkable in 59.52%. Regarding electrodiagnostic tests, AIDP is the most common variant (61.81%). The management was not consistent among the case reports. However, IVIG is the most frequent way of treating these patients (68.33%). The functional outcome was documented in 47 patients; 65% improved with medical management. Conclusion: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of reported cases of GBS following COVID-19 vaccines and descriptive statistical analysis of collected data on clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological features, to discuss, based on available results, whether the disease has a predilection to a specific vaccine type and to speculate the potential pathogenesis.

Spontaneous Simultaneous Bilateral Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage (SSBBGH): Systematic Review and Data Analysis on Epidemiology, Clinical Feature, Location of Bleeding, Etiology, Therapeutic Intervention and Outcome.

Background: Spontaneous simultaneous bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage (SSBBGH) is an extremely rare condition with only a few published case reports and series. However, there is no systematic review that has been published yet. Objective: The study aims to conduct a systematic review on spontaneous simultaneous bilateral basal ganglion bleeding and a descriptive statistical analysis of collected data on epidemiology, clinical features, etiology, therapeutic approach and prognosis. This review aims to be a clinical reference for busy clinicians when they are faced with such a rare condition. Methodology: This review has been carried out in accordance with recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Review of 60 cases showed that SSBBGH affected predominantly male patients (70%) with an average age of 50.8 ± 15.33 years and the male-to-female ratio was 2.5:1. The female patients tend to be older with an average age of 54.22 ± 16.67 years. Location of SSBBGHwas more common in the putamen (90% vs 10% non-putaminal). SSBBGH posed a significant mortality rate (33.33%). Among patients who survived, only 40.6% (13/32 report) have had favorable outcomes (mRS ≤2) and the remaining 59.4% (19/32) ended up with poor functional status (mRS ≥3-5). The most common implicated etiologies were hypertension followed by alcohol intoxication. Conclusion: SSBBGH is a rare clinical entity with significant morbidity and mortality. Systemic approach can lead to early recognition of etiology and prompt treatment. Hypertension and the putamen are the most common etiology and location of SSBBGH, respectively. History of hypertension and age can help narrow differential diagnosis and limit unnecessary testing or intervention.

Intracranial bleeding under vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants: results of the RADOA registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) has increased sharply and DOAC are the oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) of choice for the majority of patients with newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Intracranial hemorrhage is the most severe adverse event of OAT. Systematic data on the course of intracranial hemorrhage under DOAC compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are warranted to enable shared decision making in AF patients needing OAT. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the patients with intracranial bleedings from the prospective multicenter emergency department-based RADOA registry, which collected data on patients admitted with major bleeding while taking VKA or DOAC. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality until day 30. We evaluated hematoma volume and short-term clinical outcomes in relation to the extent of active OAT according to coagulation parameters and OAT plasma levels measured by UPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Of 193 patients with major bleeding, 109 (56.5%) had intracranial hemorrhage [52.3% intracerebral (ICH), 33.9% subdural (SDH), 11.0% subarachnoidal (SAH)]. 64 (58.7%) were on VKA and 45 (41.2%) were on DOAC. On admission, we could confirm active anticoagulation in 97.7% of VKA-treated patients based on either INR > 1.3 or phenprocoumon levels and in 75.8% of DOAC-treated patients based on DOAC levels. Patients suffering an intracranial hemorrhage under VKA showed significantly larger hematoma volumes and a higher in-hospital mortality. Especially in intracerebral hemorrhage, we observed a higher initial severity and numerically greater proportion of early changes towards palliative therapy under VKA, which coincided with a numerically higher case fatality. CONCLUSIONS: We show significantly smaller hematoma volumes for ICH and SDH under DOAC in comparison to VKA and a significantly lower 30-day in-hospital mortality rate of DOAC-ICH, even before the introduction of specific antidotes. These data strongly support the use of DOAC whenever possible in patients requiring OAT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01722786.

Extensive Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) After the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine without Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) in a Healthy Woman.

BACKGROUND COVID-19 is an acute respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was discovered in 2019. The high transmission and seriousness of COVID-19 necessitated the development of an effective vaccine to control spread of the disease. Multiple vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, namely, the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna (mRNA), and the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (vector) vaccines. As these novel vaccines have been used, adverse effects have been reported, ranging from mild myalgia to severe anaphylaxis and thrombotic events. Thrombotic consequences raised suspicion for the development of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), which is a severe condition associated with occlusion of venous sinuses and disruption of the venous system flow. CASE REPORT A 28-year-old healthy woman presented with a 2-week history of persistent and progressive headache 4 days after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Cerebral computed tomography (CT) and CT venography confirmed the presence of extensive thrombus involving the left transverse and sigmoid sinus as well as the internal jugular vein. Furthermore, other than recent the COVID-19 vaccination, there were no precipitant risk factors in her clinical history or in the detailed laboratory work-up. CONCLUSIONS Headache associated with red flags following administration of any COVID-19 vaccine should prompt urgent neuroimaging to rule out secondary causes and determine the appropriate management. Our patient lacked the typical profile of CVST commonly seen following administration of the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine. The findings of low platelet count may indicate the peculiar pathophysiology of a thrombotic event associated with with the Pfizer vaccine.

Management of Free-Floating Thrombus in the Vertebral Artery in a Middle-Aged Smoker with Secondary Polycythemia Vera.

Free-floating thrombus (FFT) of the cervicocranial arteries is a rare neurovascular condition. Up to now, there is no standardized definition for FFT. Therefore, FFT is occasionally mistaken for intraluminal thrombus (ILT) or smooth mural thrombus. The most precise and ideal definition of FFT would be a long-extended intraarterial thrombus that is attached to the arterial wall with its one end, while its other end is surrounded by blood flow and moves freely with the cardiac cycle. FFT usually manifests as an ischemic stroke, thus it is considered as an emergency case. Herein, we report a rare case of symptomatic FFT in the left vertebral artery extending from V0 to V2 segments in a middle-aged smoker, who presented with multiple embolic strokes in different territories of posterior circulation and was successfully treated medically. This case sheds light on the challenges of the clinical approach of FFT in the vertebral artery and it is an attempt to draw attention to the necessity of conducting a large-scale study to find out the ideal approach to manage such conditions.

Large Vessel Occlusion Causing Cerebral Ischemic Stroke in Previously Healthy Middle-Aged Recently Recovered from Severe COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) due to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to an unprecedented worldwide pandemic with diverse respiratory symptoms as well as systemic manifestations and complications. The neurological manifestations of COVID-19 include, but are not limited to, headache, cerebrovascular disease, and skeletal muscle injury. CASE REPORT: Herein, we present a case of stroke with large vessel occlusion in a middle-aged man, who recently recovered from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. This patient is not known to have any medical illness or surgical history and has no cerebrovascular risk factors. Moreover, the patient underwent extensive investigations, including neuroimaging, cardiac and laboratory work-up with no evidence of stroke etiology. CONCLUSION: The mechanism of cerebrovascular events in the setting of COVID-19 is still uncertain and probably multi-factorial. The prevailing hypothesis is a strong thrombotic tendency, which may even be prolonged after complete recovery. In our patient's case, hypercoagulability in the context of viral infection is the most likely mechanism for the stroke. Further studies are needed to find out the exact pathogenesis of thromboembolic events in the setting of COVID-19 infection as well as the efficacy, safety, dosage, and duration of anticoagulants in such conditions.

Recurrent Facial Palsy Due to High Jugular Bulb Dehiscence.

BACKGROUND: A high mega jugular Bulb is an enlarged and swollen upper portion of the internal jugular vein with a variation of its anatomical position among the population, mostly situated below the hypotympanum. Although most cases of jugular bulb diverticulum are asymptomatic, excessive pressure on the surrounding structures might cause various symptoms, most prominently vertigo, sensorineural hearing loss, or tinnitus. CASE REPORT: A middle-aged male who was referred to the Department of Neurology with a recurrent complaint of left-sided facial weakness associated with headache and vertigo for a period of 24 months. His symptoms were episodic, furthermore exacerbated by visiting high altitude sites. Non-resolving with conventional medical treatment. After thorough investigation, including preoperative and postoperative audiograms, neuroimaging, including computed tomography as well as magnetic resonance angiography, he was diagnosed to have right-sided superior mega jugular bulb as a causative factor. After surgical management, the patient improved significantly. At his regular follow-up in our clinic there were no exacerbations of his symptoms. CONCLUSION: Among patients who present with recurrent non-resolving facial palsy in which no apparent causative factor is identified, high jugular bulb should be suspected and investigated. Comprehensive and detailed medical history is essential for raising the suspicion for the diagnosis. Such as the case presented eliciting high altitudes as the main precipitating factor. The diagnosis is clinically elusive, commonly obscured by other common diagnoses. Surgery is recommended if antihypertensive drugs do not show improvement.