Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 131
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(1): 36-46, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37256707

RESUMEN

Introduction: Telehealth use in obstetrics has been demonstrated to improve efficiency, access to care, and pregnancy outcomes. Despite reported successful implementation of these programs, information regarding the program variations and its impact on health care costs and outcomes are scarce. Methods: This is a scoping review of pregnancy-related telehealth studies to understand the current landscape of pregnancy-related telehealth interventions as well as to subset those that are used in high-risk pregnancies. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to guide this review. Results: A total of 70 articles were included in this scoping review. Of those, 53 (75.7%) studies included a pregnant population and 17 (24.3%) studies focused on a rural and/or urban population. Most studies (n = 56; 80%) included some form of synchronous interaction between provider and participant. Patient outcomes included maternal/infant health outcomes (n = 41; 44.1%), patient satisfaction (n = 9; 9.7%), and attendance/compliance (n = 5; 5.4%). Provider-level outcomes included knowledge change (n = 11; 11.8%) and self-efficacy (n = 3; 3.2%). Other outcomes included assessment of costs and patient/provider feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Overall, there has been a growing trend in articles published on pregnancy-related telehealth studies since 2011, with 2018 having the most publications in a single year. Conclusion: This review suggests a steadily growing body of literature on pregnancy-related telehealth interventions; however, more research is needed to better understand outcomes of telehealth for pregnancy-related care, especially related to patient satisfaction, health disparities, and cost-benefit.


Asunto(s)
Atención Prenatal , Telemedicina , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Resultado del Embarazo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2023 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37973707

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertension management is complex in older adults. Recent advances in remote patient monitoring (RPM) have warranted evaluation of RPM use and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To study associations of RPM use with mortality and healthcare utilization measures of hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) utilization, and outpatient visits. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with an outpatient hypertension diagnosis between July 2018 and September 2020. The first date of RPM use with a corresponding hypertension diagnosis was recorded (index date). RPM non-users were documented from those with an outpatient hypertension diagnosis; a random visit was selected as the index date. Six months prior continuous enrollment was required. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes studied within 180 days of index date included (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) any hospitalization, (iii) cardiovascular-related hospitalization, (iv) non-cardiovascular-related hospitalization, (v) any ED, (vi) cardiovascular-related ED, (vii) non-cardiovascular-related ED, (viii) any outpatient, (ix) cardiovascular-related outpatient, and (x) non-cardiovascular-related outpatient. Patient demographics and clinical variables were collected from baseline and index date. Propensity score matching (1:4) and Cox regression were performed. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. KEY RESULTS: The matched sample had 16,339 and 63,333 users and non-users, respectively. Cumulative incidences of mortality outcome were 2.9% (RPM) and 4.3% (non-RPM), with a HR (95% CI) of 0.66 (0.60-0.74). RPM users had lower hazards of any [0.78 (0.75-0.82)], cardiovascular-related [0.79 (0.73-0.87)], and non-cardiovascular-related [0.79 (0.75-0.83)] hospitalizations. No significant association was observed between RPM use and the three ED measures. RPM users had higher hazards of any [1.10 (1.08-1.11)] and cardiovascular-related outpatient visits [2.17 (2.13-2.19)], while a slightly lower hazard of non-cardiovascular-related outpatient visits [0.94 (0.93-0.96)]. CONCLUSIONS: RPM use was associated with substantial reductions in hazards of mortality and hospitalization outcomes with an increase in cardiovascular-related outpatient visits.

3.
Health Econ ; 32(2): 277-301, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36335085

RESUMEN

Several studies have concluded that legalizing medical marijuana can reduce deaths from opioid overdoses. Drawing on micro data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a survey uniquely suited to assessing patterns of substance use, we examine the relationship between recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) and the misuse of prescription opioids. Using a standard difference-in-differences (DD) regression model, we find that RML adoption reduces the likelihood of frequently misusing prescription opioids such as OxyContin, Percocet, and Vicodin. However, using a two-stage procedure designed to account for staggered treatment and dynamic effects, the DD estimate of relationship between RML adoption and the likelihood of frequently misusing prescription opioids becomes positive. Although event study estimates suggest that RML adoption leads to a decrease in the frequency of prescription opioid abuse, this effect appears to dissipate after only 2 or 3 years.


Asunto(s)
Legislación de Medicamentos , Marihuana Medicinal , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Prescripciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Birth ; 50(2): 339-348, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35670090

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of maternal characteristics on the odds of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) through 42 days postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 77 172 births using birth certificate and insurance claims data from the Arkansas All Payers Claims Database, years 2013-2017, to identify racial disparities associated with SMM for births between April 1, 2014, and November 19, 2017. METHODS: Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the effect of sociodemographic factors and clinical comorbidities on the odds of SMM among non-Hispanic white ("white"), non-Hispanic Black ("Black"), and Hispanic women. RESULTS: The rate of SMM was 227.41 per 10 000 births, with Black women (330 per 10 000 births; 95% CI: 296.16-366.38), having a significantly higher rates than white women (197; 95% CI: 171.72-225.84) and Hispanic women (180; 95% CI: 155.86-207.54). After adjusting for maternal demographics, birth-related clinical variables, and comorbidities, SMM remained higher among Black women (aOR 1.37; 95% CI 1.11-1.70) relative to white women. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and other factors did not fully explain the Black-white disparities in SMM. Persistent disparities in the rates of SMM throughout 42 days postpartum among Black women relative to white women points to the need for higher quality, more equitable care for women of color in the fist months postpartum.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Materna , Morbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Arkansas/epidemiología , Negro o Afroamericano , Parto , Blanco , Hispánicos o Latinos
5.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(Suppl 1): 14-22, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37219692

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Estimating Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and prenatal substance exposure rates in Medicaid can help target program efforts to improve access to services. METHODS: The data for this study was extracted from the 2016-2020 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) Research Identifiable Files (RIF) and included infants born between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 with a either a NAS diagnosis or prenatal substance exposure. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, the estimated national rate of NAS experienced a 18% decline, while the estimated national rate of prenatal substance exposure experienced a 3.6% increase. At the state level in 2020, the NAS rate ranged from 3.2 per 1000 births (Hawaii) to 68.0 per 1000 births (West Virginia). Between 2016 and 2020, 28 states experienced a decline in NAS births and 20 states had an increase in NAS rates. In 2020, the lowest prenatal substance exposure rate was observed in New Jersey (9.9 per 1000 births) and the highest in West Virginia (88.1 per 1000 births). Between 2016 and 2020, 38 states experienced an increase in the rate of prenatal substance exposure and 10 states experienced a decline. DISCUSSION: Estimated rate of NAS has declined nationally, but rate of prenatal substance exposure has increased, with considerable state-level variation. The reported increase in prenatal substance exposure in the majority of US states (38) suggest that substances other than opioids are influencing this trend. Medicaid-led initiatives can be used to identify women with substance use and connect them to services.


What is already known about the topic? Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and prenatal substance exposure are significant risk factors for poor neurodevelopmental and mental health outcomes in early childhood. NAS birth rates have been increasing in the US since 2000 and the majority of NAS births are covered by Medicaid.What this article adds? This article estimates national and state-level prenatal substance exposure and NAS rates among Medicaid-covered infants born between 2016-2020 using data from the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System. This is the first study using post-2017 data to estimate national NAS rates. The findings can inform future federal and state policy efforts to improve access to screening, diagnosis and treatment among pregnant women with substance use disorder and infants with NAS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Lactante , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Femenino , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/etiología , Medicaid , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , West Virginia/epidemiología , Analgésicos Opioides
6.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 2023 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36693998

RESUMEN

Having health insurance is associated with better access to healthcare and lower rates of comorbidity in the general population, but data are limited on insurance's impact on adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). The Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs and well-beinG (CH STRONG) was conducted among ACHD in three locations from 2016 to 2019. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the associations between health insurance and both access to healthcare and presence of comorbidities. We also compared health insurance and comorbidities among ACHD to similarly-aged individuals in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) as a proxy for the general population. Of 1354 CH STRONG respondents, the majority were ≤ 30 years old (83.5%), and 8.8% were uninsured versus 17.7% in the BRFSS (p < 0.01). Compared to insured ACHD, uninsured were less likely to report regular medical care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.3) and visited an emergency room more often (aOR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.3). Among all ACHD reporting disability, uninsured individuals less frequently received benefits (aOR 0.1, CI 0.0-0.3). Depression was common among uninsured ACHD (22.5%), but insured ACHD had lower rates of depression than insured in the BRFSS (13.3% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, rates of insurance were higher among ACHD compared to the general population. Nonetheless, uninsured ACHD inconsistently accessed healthcare and benefits. Further studies are needed to determine if insurance ameliorates the risk of morbidity as ACHD age.

7.
Telemed J E Health ; 29(12): 1759-1768, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37074340

RESUMEN

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about renewed interest and investment in telehealth, while also highlighting persistent health disparities in the Southern states. Little is known about the characteristics of those utilizing telehealth services in Arkansas, a rural Southern state. We sought to compare the characteristics of telehealth utilizers and nonutilizers among Medicare beneficiaries in Arkansas before the COVID-19 public health emergency to provide a baseline for future research investigating disparities in telehealth utilization. Methods: We used Arkansas Medicare beneficiary data (2018-2019) to model telehealth use. We included interactions to assess how the association between the number of chronic conditions and telehealth was moderated by race/ethnicity and rurality, adjusted for covariates. Results: Overall telehealth utilization in 2019 was low (n = 4,463; 1.1%). The adjusted odds of utilizing telehealth was higher for non-Hispanic Black/African Americans (vs. white, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-1.52), rural beneficiaries (aOR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.79-2.21), and those with more chronic conditions (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.21-1.25). Race/ethnicity and rurality were significant moderators, such that the association between the number of chronic conditions and telehealth was strongest among white and among rural beneficiaries. Discussion: Among the 2019 Arkansas Medicare beneficiaries, having more chronic conditions was most strongly associated with telehealth use among white and rural individuals, while the effect was not as pronounced for Black/African American and urban individuals. Our findings suggest that advances in telehealth are not benefiting all Americans equally, with aging minoritized communities continuing to engage with more strained and underresourced health systems. Future research should investigate how upstream factors such as structural racism perpetuate poor health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Telemedicina , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Arkansas , Pandemias
8.
Telemed J E Health ; 29(3): 384-394, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819861

RESUMEN

Introduction: Limited information exists on the landscape of studies and policies for remote patient monitoring (RPM) in the United States. Methods: We conducted a scoping review to assess (1) for which adult patient populations and health care needs is RPM being used and (2) the landscape of national- and state-level reimbursement policies for RPM. This study was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework for scoping reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Results: A total of 399 articles were included in our final sample: 268 study articles and 131 articles of gray literature (e.g., websites, legislative bills). RPM-related articles rose drastically from 2015 to 2021, and the vast majority of articles were peer-reviewed journal articles. Of the study articles, prospective cohort studies were the most common study method, with m-health/smart watches being the most common RPM modality. RPM was found to be most commonly tested within patients with cardiovascular diseases, and the most common outcomes measured were usability and feasibility. Gray literature found 36 U.S. state Medicaid programs had reimbursement policies for RPM in 2021; however, 28 of those had at least one restriction on reimbursement (e.g., limited to specific providers). Conclusions: Despite the rapid growth in the literature on RPM and the adoption of reimbursement policies, retrospective, population-level studies, large randomized controlled trials, studies with a focus on additional favorable outcomes (e.g., quality of life), and studies evaluating trends in RPM reimbursement policies are lacking in the current literature.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Monitoreo Fisiológico
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(2): 37-42, 2022 Jan 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025857

RESUMEN

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health problem in the United States, which affects children as well as adults. During 2010-2017, maternal opioid-related diagnoses increased approximately 130%, from 3.5 to 8.2 per 1,000 hospital deliveries, and neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) increased 83%, from 4.0 to 7.3 per 1,000 hospital deliveries (1). NAS, a withdrawal syndrome, can occur among infants following in utero exposure to opioids and other psychotropic substances (2). In 2018, a study of six states with mandated NAS case reporting for public health surveillance (2013-2017) found that mandated reporting helped quantify NAS incidence and guide programs and services (3). To review surveillance features and programmatic development in the same six states, a questionnaire and interview with state health department officials on postimplementation efforts were developed and implemented in 2021. All states reported ongoing challenges with initial case reporting, limited capacity to track social and developmental outcomes, and no requirement for long-term follow-up in state-mandated case reporting; only one state instituted health-related outcomes monitoring. The primary surveillance barrier beyond initial case reporting was lack of infrastructure. To serve identified needs of opioid- or other substance-exposed mother-infant dyads, state health departments reported programmatic successes expanding education and access to maternal medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), community and provider education or support services, and partnerships with perinatal quality collaboratives. Development of additional infrastructure is needed for states aiming to advance NAS surveillance beyond initial case reporting.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Notificación Obligatoria , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Gobierno Estatal , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Subst Abus ; 43(1): 1072-1074, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442126

RESUMEN

Background: The federal government has made several efforts to increase access to buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). However, patients continue to face challenges in access to treatment for OUD. Objectives: This study seeks to examine the trends in the prevalence of buprenorphine-waivered practitioners who opt to be publicly listed on the Buprenorphine Treatment Practitioner Locator tool maintained by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and how this varies between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Methods: Administrative records of all the DATA-waivered providers collected by SAMHSA were utilized to identify the trends in the number of waivered practitioners by their public listing status from 2002-2017. We further examine how that trend varied between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Results: The total number of waivered providers increased steadily from 300 in 2002 to 41,960 in 2017. In 2015, the number of waivered providers began to increase rapidly, with the number in Medicaid expansion states increasing faster than in non-expansion states from 2014-2017 (136% vs. 59%). Even though a greater proportion of waivered providers listed their names publicly in non-expansion states than in expansion states from 2014-2017, the rate of public listing of names increased more rapidly in Medicaid expansion states than in non-expansion states (170% vs. 85%) during the same period. Conclusions: This finding suggests that even though there has been an increase in waivered providers to prescribe buprenorphine in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states, barriers to access treatment still persist. Policy initiatives that seek to expand access to substance-use treatment are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Médicos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Medicaid , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos
12.
Subst Use Misuse ; 56(2): 318-326, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33427008

RESUMEN

Background: Prior investigations have documented disparities in the supply side of Maryland's Medical Marijuana program. Initially a disproportionate share of licenses to cultivate and distribute medical marijuana were awarded to Non-Hispanic White owned businesses. The state has implemented measures to ameliorate the inequity by prioritizing license awards to qualified minority owned businesses. Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine the racial and income characteristics of communities where licensed dispensaries are located. We quantify the racial and income characteristics of communities where Maryland medical cannabis dispensaries are located and explore whether Maryland medical marijuana dispensaries disproportionately locate in high-income, majority-White zip codes. Method: Using data from the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission and the American Communities Survey, we create geocodes for each of the operating dispensaries as of December 2019. We examine the distribution of medical cannabis dispensaries by zip code level household income and zip code level racial distribution. The data set encompasses 85 operating cannabis dispensaries in Maryland and 6.1 million Marylanders distributed across 468 zip codes in 2018-2019. Results: The analysis indicates that dispensaries are concentrated in zip codes whose residents are racially diverse, and with higher concentrations of retail establishments. Conclusion: Community level racial or income disparities in access to medical cannabis were not observed in Maryland. Access to medical cannabis, based on ability to pay out of pocket for the product, may be uneven.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Marihuana Medicinal , Comercio , Humanos , Renta , Mercadotecnía , Maryland
13.
Subst Use Misuse ; 56(4): 571-574, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People experiencing homelessness have been particularly hard hit by the opioid crisis. This epidemic has also impacted individuals experiencing homelessness in ways that are distinct from how it has impacted individuals with stable housing. However, not much is known about comorbid health conditions and health services utilization among adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are experiencing homelessness. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted utilizing a large national all-payer electronic health record database. The sample for the analysis is comprised of 2,080 individuals with OUD who had an ICD-10 Z code of homelessness (Z59.0), and the comparison group includes 980 individuals with OUD covered under Medicaid who were matched on age and gender to the homeless population. RESULTS: Higher rates of mental health conditions such as bipolar disorder (48%) and schizophrenia (22%) were present among individuals with OUD experiencing homelessness compared to individuals with OUD covered under Medicaid not experiencing homelessness (26% and 8%, respectively). In addition, higher rates of alcohol (44%) and stimulant abuse (30%) were also present among the patients compared to the comparison group (29% and 9%, respectively). Utilization of buprenorphine for OUD and treatment for mental health conditions were low among the patients experiencing homelessness. CONCLUSION: Underlying mental health conditions and polysubstance use contribute toward making individuals experiencing homelessness more susceptible to adverse health outcomes associated with OUD. Health policy initiatives directed toward treatment engagement might benefit from an emphasis on addressing housing instability that many individuals with OUD might be experiencing.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Problemas Sociales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(4): e179-e184, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30045348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of children are receiving care for behavioral health conditions in emergency departments (EDs). However, studies of mental health-related care coordination between EDs and primary and/or specialty care settings are limited. Such coordination is important because ED care alone may be insufficient for patients' behavioral health needs. METHODS: We analyzed claims during the year 2014 from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Medicaid and Commercial databases for outpatient services and prescription drugs for youth 2 to 18 years old with continuous enrollment. We applied a standard care coordination measure to insurance claims data in order to examine whether youth received a primary care or specialty follow-up visit within 7 days following an ED visit with a psychiatric diagnosis. We calculated descriptive statistics to evaluate differences in care coordination by enrollees' demographic, insurance, and health-related characteristics. In addition, we constructed a multivariate logistic regression model to detect the factors associated with the receipt of care coordination. RESULTS: The total percentages of children who received care coordination were 45.8% (Medicaid) and 46.6% (private insurance). Regardless of insurance coverage type, children aged 10 to 14 years had increased odds of care coordination compared with youth aged 15 to 18 years. Children aged 2 to 5 years and males had decreased odds of care coordination. CONCLUSIONS: It is of concern that fewer than half of patients received care coordination following an ED visit. Factors such as behavioral health workforce shortages, wait times for an appointment with a provider, and lack of reimbursement for care coordination may help explain these results.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño , Medicaid , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Masculino , Estados Unidos
15.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 28(4): 478-490, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500897

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) is a growing public health challenge. Prior research suggests that non-Hispanic whites (whites), non-Hispanic African Americans (African Americans), and Hispanics have differing risks for ADRD. OBJECTIVE: To examine the existence of serious psychological distress (SPD) among whites, African Americans, and Hispanics; to calculate the predicted probability of ADRD in whites, African Americans, and Hispanics, and to decompose the differences among ADRD populations, quantifying the burden of higher SPD among African Americans and Hispanics, compared to whites. DATA AND METHOD: The authors use nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2007-2015) to estimate the association between ADRD and race, ethnicity, and SPD. Using Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis, the authors estimate to what extent higher SPD among Hispanics and African Americans was associated with higher ADRD rates compared to whites. RESULTS: After controlling for individuals' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and co-existing medical conditions, the presence of SPD was still significantly associated with a higher likelihood of having ADRD. The model predicted significantly higher likelihood of having ADRD among African Americans (7.1%) and Hispanics (5.7%) compared to whites (4.5%). Higher rates of having SPD among African Americans explained 15% of white-black difference and 40% of the white-Hispanic difference in ADRD rates, respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a significant relationship between SPD and ADRD and that the burden of SPD was greater among African Americans and Hispanics with ADRD. Efficient screening using self-reported SPD, compared to simply using diagnoses codes of mental illness, may be more helpful to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in ADRD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/etnología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Salud Mental/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
J Ment Health Policy Econ ; 23(3): 151-182, 2020 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33411677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) gives states the option of expanding Medicaid coverage to low-income individuals; however, not all states have chosen to expand Medicaid. The ACA Medicaid expansions are particularly important for Americans with mental health conditions because they are substantially more likely than other Americans to have low incomes. AIMS OF THE STUDY: We examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on adults who were newly eligible for Medicaid using the 2008-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). METHODS: We use the AHRQ PUBSIM model to identify low-income adults aged 19-64 who were either newly Medicaid eligible if they lived in an expansion state or would have been eligible had their state opted to expand its Medicaid program. We estimate linear probability models within a difference-in-difference framework. An additional interaction term allows us to test for differences among those with serious psychological distress (SPD) or probable depression (PD). Outcomes of interest are insurance coverage by type, behavioral health treatment by service (specifically, any behavioral health treatment, any specialty treatment, any psychotropic medication, any ambulatory treatment outside of an emergency department, and any emergency department treatment), quantities of behavioral health treatment services, and out of pocket spending on healthcare. RESULTS: Our adjusted difference-in-differences estimates indicate Medicaid expansion increased any insurance coverage by 14.2 percentage points and increased Medicaid coverage by 21.2 percentage points. Insurance coverage for individuals with SPD/PD in expansion states increased by an additional 12.9 percentage points. Medicaid expansion did not have an effect on behavioral health treatment for the newly eligible population as a whole or for the subset with SPD/PD. DISCUSSION: Consistent with previous Medicaid expansions, we find that the ACA Medicaid expansions substantially increased insurance rates for the newly Medicaid-eligible population, regardless of mental health status but the overall effect on insurance coverage was stronger among those with SPD/PD. The lack of an effect on treatment use suggests that providing insurance coverage alone may be insufficient to guarantee that people with mental illness will receive the treatment they need. Limitations include that our difference-in-difference estimator may not account for time-varying factors that change contemporaneously with the expansions. Our estimates may also be affected by other provisions of the ACA that went into effect at the same time as the Medicaid expansions. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Although the ACA has resulted in increased coverage for low-income individuals, more outreach efforts may be needed to encourage individuals with mental illness to get the treatment they need.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
17.
J Ment Health Policy Econ ; 23(1): 19-25, 2020 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32458814

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research has documented a low rate of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment utilization among individuals involved in the criminal justice system. However, racial disparities in sources of payment for OUD treatment have not been examined in the existing literature. AIM OF THE STUDY: Although substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is relatively rare for all criminal justice system involved racial-groups, previous research has indicated that, among individuals with SUD, members of racial minority groups receive treatment at lower rates than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Given the alarming rise of OUD in the US and the association between source of payment and utilization of health care services, this study seeks to quantify racial disparities in sources of payment for OUD treatment among individuals with criminal justice involvement. METHOD: Using data from the 2008-2016 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), this study analyzes data on non-incarcerated individuals with OUD who have had any criminal justice involvement in the previous 12 months. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method for non-linear models is implemented to determine the extent that differences in OUD treatment utilization across non-Hispanic Blacks and non-Hispanic Whites are explained by observed and measurable characteristics and/or unobserved factors. RESULTS: Results indicate that non-Hispanic Whites are more likely to have their OUD treatment paid by a court (10%) relative to non-Hispanic Blacks (4.0%). Black-White differences in measurable factors explain 87% of the disparity, while the rest is attributed to unobserved factors. Non-Hispanic Blacks are more likely to have their OUD treatment paid by public insurance (77% vs 36%) than non-Hispanic Whites and only 72% of this disparity can be explained by observed characteristics. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE: Our findings indicate racial disparities in sources of payment for OUD treatment among the criminal justice-involved population. Expansion of health insurance coverage and access to substance use disorder treatments would be beneficial for reducing health care disparities. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Equitable treatment options in the criminal justice system that incentivize OUD treatment availability may help address racial disparities in sources of payment among the criminal justice-involved population with OUD. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Future research should focus on understanding the main factors driving the court's treatment decisions among the criminal justice system involved individuals.


Asunto(s)
Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Crimen/etnología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etnología , Grupos Raciales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
18.
Community Ment Health J ; 56(8): 1419-1428, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32072374

RESUMEN

Although the coordination of follow-up behavioral health-related care between hospitals and outpatient behavioral health care settings is important, studies on this topic are few. Claims were selected from Truven Health Analytics' Marketscan databases during 2014 for youth aged 2-18 years who had an inpatient stay with a behavioral health diagnosis. Analyses identified whether youth received a behavioral health follow-up visit within 30 days following a hospitalization. The percentage of children who received post-hospitalization follow-up care was 59.1% (Medicaid) and 59.4% (private insurance). While children less than 15 years old (Medicaid) had increased odds of follow-up care compared with youth aged 15-18 years, children 2-9 years old with commercial insurance had decreased odds of follow-up care. Variations in follow-up care by patient characteristics provide an opportunity to target efforts to increase coordinated care to those who are least likely to receive it.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Atención Ambulatoria , Adolescente , Niño , Hospitalización , Humanos , Medicaid , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
19.
J Pediatr ; 206: 256-267.e3, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322701

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To use the latest data to estimate the prevalence and correlates of currently diagnosed depression, anxiety problems, and behavioral or conduct problems among children, and the receipt of related mental health treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) to report nationally representative prevalence estimates of each condition among children aged 3-17 years and receipt of treatment by a mental health professional. Parents/caregivers reported whether their children had ever been diagnosed with each of the 3 conditions and whether they currently have the condition. Bivariate analyses were used to examine the prevalence of conditions and treatment according to sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. The independent associations of these characteristics with both the current disorder and utilization of treatment were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among children aged 3-17 years, 7.1% had current anxiety problems, 7.4% had a current behavioral/conduct problem, and 3.2% had current depression. The prevalence of each disorder was higher with older age and poorer child health or parent/caregiver mental/emotional health; condition-specific variations were observed in the association between other characteristics and the likelihood of disorder. Nearly 80% of those with depression received treatment in the previous year, compared with 59.3% of those with anxiety problems and 53.5% of those with behavioral/conduct problems. Model-adjusted effects indicated that condition severity and presence of a comorbid mental disorder were associated with treatment receipt. CONCLUSIONS: The latest nationally representative data from the NSCH show that depression, anxiety, and behavioral/conduct problems are prevalent among US children and adolescents. Treatment gaps remain, particularly for anxiety and behavioral/conduct problems.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastorno de la Conducta/epidemiología , Trastorno de la Conducta/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Adolescente , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Trastorno de la Conducta/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA