Healthcare professionals' perspectives on optimizing pain care-related education at a Canadian children's hospital: A qualitative study.

Objectives: Pain affects all children and youth, yet acute and procedural pain remains undertreated in Canadian hospitals. To improve pain management practices in paediatric hospitals, it is necessary to understand how healthcare professionals (HCPs) wish for educational interventions to be designed to improve their pain management practice. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 HCPs between October and December 2020. Snowball sampling was used to first recruit interested members from the hospital's Pediatric Pain Management Committee. Interviews were conducted per participant preference and included Zoom, telephone, and in-person interviews. Recruitment ceased when data were determined sufficiently rich. A thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts and reflexive field notes were used to create a data set focused on knowledge mobilization and clinical education. Results: Three core themes were identified: (a) the necessity for just-in-time education for HCPs; (b) the availability of clinical pain champions to educate staff; and (c) the provision of resources to educate children and their families about available pain management interventions. Just-in-time education included suggestions for in-service training, hands-on training, and regular updates on the latest research. Pain champions, including clinical nurse educators, were stressed as being important in motivating staff to improve their pain management practices. Participants noted the lack of resources for patient and family education on pain management and suggested providing more multimodal resources and educational opportunities. Conclusion: Having local champions introduce pain management initiatives and just-in-time education positively impacts the implementation climate, which also helps HCPs provide evidence-based education and resources to patients and families.

Creating a Low-Stimulus Clinic to improve immunization success rates for children with alternate environment needs: A quality improvement initiative.

Patients with specific sensory needs may face barriers to receiving their immunizations. Therefore, a Low-Stimulus Clinic was created in Alberta. Modifications to regular clinic space included lower visual and auditory input, access to longer appointment times and private clinic spaces, development of pre-appointment comfort plans, and offering of in-vehicle immunization. Between April 2021 and May 2022, 90% (641/712) of booked patients were successfully immunized. The top reasons for accessing the clinic included autism spectrum disorder (229/712, 32%), and needle fear/phobia (195/712, 27%). The Low-Stimulus Clinic had a high rate of successful vaccination for populations that may otherwise have been less likely to receive immunizations. Its workflows support the principles of choice, collaboration, and control in creating a positive immunization experience for patients and their families. Having such clinics widely available is a key step in reducing barriers to accessing vaccines for individuals with specific sensory needs.

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Improving Family-Centred Pain Care in a Tertiary Pediatric Centre.

BACKGROUND: Despite being a core component of family-centered and compassionate care, children's pain is often undertreated in Canadian hospitals. Nurses' and other healthcare professionals' (HCPs) ability to understand and respond to a child and their family's pain care needs is integral to improving this care in a family-centered manner. PURPOSE: To understand nurses' and other HCPs' perceptions of child and family needs to make care more collaborative and patient- and family-centered. METHODS: Eighteen participants were recruited and represented the specialties of nursing (n = 8), psychology (n = 1), child life services (n = 2), medicine/surgery (n = 3), and administration/leadership (n = 4); 3 of the administrators had a nursing background. Transcripts were analysed using a semantic, inductive approach with two coders using a codebook to ensure reliability. RESULTS: Participants felt that pain care was important, but that it needs to take greater priority in the hospital. In our analysis, we identified four core needs that nurses and other HCPs have to provide better pain care: 1. Better acknowledgement of child and family experiences; 2. Better visual and written knowledge translation tools for patients and families; 3. Better provision of verbal pain education to children and families by nurses and other HCPs; and 4. Help for patients and families to advocate for better pain care when they feel their needs are not being met. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses and other HCPs value patient- and family-centered pain care, and wish to empower families to advocate for it when it is sub-optimal.

Consequences of the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on child and adolescent mental, psychosocial, and physical health: A scoping review and interactive evidence map.

Effects of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on children stem beyond immediate infectious and post-infectious risks. Our aim was to conduct a scoping review and produce an online Interactive Evidence Map (IEM) highlighting available literature around unintended effects of the pandemic on children's and adolescents' mental, psychosocial, and physical health. A search was run monthly in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register from May 1st 2021 through April 30th 2022. All articles involving children and adolescents under 18 years of age relating to any unintended mental, psychosocial, and physical health consequences of the pandemic and resultant restrictions were included. Data were extracted and topics categorized, with corresponding data uploaded into EPPI-Reviewer and transferred to EPPI-Mapper for visualization. A total of 14,555 citations were screened and 826 (6%) articles included. Most articles reported on mental health outcomes, particularly anxiety (n = 309, 37%) and depression (n = 294, 36%). Psychosocial outcomes related to lockdowns such as loneliness (n = 120, 15%) and impact on adolescent relationships with others (n = 149, 18%) were also reported. Fewer articles examined physical consequences, but those that did mostly focused on child abuse (n = 73, 9%). Overall, currently mapped literature focuses on consequences related to mental health outcomes such as anxiety and depression.

Prevalence of pain-related presentations in Canadian pediatric emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: Pain is a common reason for attendance to the emergency department; however, pediatric specific data on the prevalence, location, and etiology of painful presentations are limited in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of pain-related presentations to pediatric emergency departments during the triage process and characterize the anatomical locations and organ systems most affected by pain in a modern cohort. METHODS: A two-center health record review of triage documentation was conducted at Canadian pediatric emergency departments. All children (< 18 years) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted from administrative sources with one week of consecutive patients included every 3 months over a one-year timeframe. Regression analyses were completed to identify variables associated with painful presentations and analgesia provision during the triage process. RESULTS: A total of 7208 emergency department presentations were included. Median [IQR] child age was 5.2 [1.9, 11.8] years and 53.2% were male. 58.8% of children were found to have pain as a component of their triage presentation. Of those with pain (n = 4237), 24.1% had a pain score documented and 13.8% had analgesia provided at triage. Location of pain (n = 4523) was predominantly in the head (38.0%), extremities (27.8%), and abdomen (22.8%). Primary organ systems most affected (n = 4237) included the musculoskeletal (31.1%), gastrointestinal (18.3%), and cutaneous (including lacerations) (14.4%) systems. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pain was identified in almost 60% of all pediatric emergency department presentations at the time of triage. Suboptimal documentation of pain scores and provision of analgesia at triage were found for children with pain. These results support early assessment and implementation of pain management strategies at triage. Results can also focus further research efforts to the management of the most commonly presenting types of pediatric pain.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La douleur est un motif courant de présence à l'urgence, mais les données pédiatriques spécifiques sur la prévalence, l'emplacement et l'étiologie des présentations douloureuses sont limitées dans la littérature. Par conséquent, l'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer la prévalence des présentations liées à la douleur aux services d'urgence pédiatriques au cours du processus de triage et de caractériser les emplacements anatomiques et les systèmes d'organes les plus touchés par la douleur dans une cohorte moderne. MéTHODES: Un examen des dossiers médicaux de deux centres des documents de triage a été effectué aux services d'urgence pédiatriques du Canada. Tous les enfants (< 18 ans) étaient admissibles à l'inclusion. Les données ont été extraites de sources administratives avec une semaine de patients consécutifs inclus tous les 3 mois sur une période d'un an. Des analyses de régression ont été effectuées pour identifier les variables associées aux présentations douloureuses et à l'analgésie pendant le processus de triage. RéSULTATS: Un total de 7208 présentations à l'urgence ont été incluses. L'âge médian [IQR] des enfants était de 5,2 [1,9, 11,8] ans et 53,2 % étaient des hommes. 58,8 % des enfants présentaient de la douleur dans leur présentation de triage. Parmi les personnes souffrant de douleur (n = 4237), 24,1 % avaient un score de douleur documenté et 13,8 % avaient reçu une analgésie au triage. L'emplacement de la douleur (n = 4523) était principalement dans la tête (38,0 %), les extrémités (27,8 %) et l'abdomen (22,8 %). Les systèmes d'organes primaires les plus touchés (n = 4237) comprenaient les systèmes musculosquelettiques (31,1 %), gastro-intestinaux (18,3 %) et cutanés (y compris les lacérations) (14,4 %). CONCLUSIONS: Dans cette étude, la douleur a été identifiée dans près de 60 % de toutes les présentations aux urgences pédiatriques au moment du triage. La documentation sous-optimale des scores de douleur et la fourniture d'analgésie au triage ont été trouvées pour les enfants souffrant de douleur. Ces résultats appuient l'évaluation précoce et la mise en œuvre de stratégies de gestion de la douleur au triage. Les résultats peuvent également concentrer davantage les efforts de recherche sur la gestion des types de douleur pédiatrique les plus courants.

Pain experiences of marginalized children in the emergency department: A scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Pain affects all children, and in hospitals across North America, this pain is often undertreated. Children who visit the emergency department (ED) experience similar undertreatment, and they will often experience a painful procedure as part of their diagnostic journey. Further, children and their caregivers who experience social injustices through marginalization are more likely to experience healthcare disparities in their pain management. Still, most of our knowledge about children's pain management comes from research focused on well-educated, white children and caregivers from a middle- or upper-class background. The aim of this scoping review is to identify, map, and describe existing research on (a) how aspects of marginalization are documented in randomized controlled trials related to children's pain and (b) to understand the pain treatment and experiences of marginalized children and their caregivers in the ED setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews using the Participant, Concept, Context (PCC) framework and key terms related to children, youth, pain, ED, and aspects of marginalization. We will search Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Trials, iPortal, and Native Health Database for articles published in the last 10 years to identify records that meet our inclusion criteria. We will screen articles in a two-step process using two reviewers during the abstract and full-text screening stages. Data will be extracted using Covidence for data management and we will use a narrative approach to synthesize the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated in academic manuscripts, at academic conferences, and with partners and knowledge users including funders of pain research and healthcare professionals. Results of this scoping review will inform subsequent quantitative and qualitative studies regarding pain experiences and treatment of marginalized children in the ED.

A national survey of children's experiences and needs when attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing a child's emergency department (ED) experience positively impacts their memories and future healthcare interactions. Our objectives were to describe children's perspectives of their needs and experiences during their ED visit and relate this to their understanding of their condition. METHODS: 514 children, aged 7-17 years, and their caregivers presenting to 10 Canadian pediatric EDs completed a descriptive cross-sectional survey from 2018-2020. RESULTS: Median child age was 12.0 years (IQR 9.0-14.0); 56.5% (290/513) were female. 78.8% (398/505) reported adequate privacy during healthcare conversations and 78.3% (395/504) during examination. 69.5% (348/501) understood their diagnosis, 89.4% (355/397) the rationale for performed tests, and 67.2% (338/503) their treatment plan. Children felt well taken care of by nurses (90.9%, 457/503) and doctors (90.8%, 444/489). Overall, 94.8% (475/501) of children were happy with their ED visit. Predictors of a child better understanding their diagnosis included doctors talking directly to them (OR 2.21 [1.15, 4.28]), having someone answer questions and worries (OR 2.51 [1.26, 5.01]), and older age (OR 1.08 [1.01, 1.16]). Direct communication with a doctor (OR 2.08 [1.09, 3.99]) was associated with children better understanding their treatment, while greater fear/ 'being scared' at baseline (OR 0.59 [0.39, 0.89]) or at discharge (OR 0.46 [0.22, 0.96]) had the opposite effect. INTERPRETATION: While almost all children felt well taken care of and were happy with their visit, close to 1/3 did not understand their diagnosis or its management. Children's reported satisfaction in the ED should not be equated with understanding of their medical condition. Further, caution should be employed in using caregiver satisfaction as a proxy for children's satisfaction with their ED visit, as caregiver satisfaction is highly linked to having their own needs being met.

Mental Health Hospitalizations in Canadian Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Over the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in multiple socially restrictive public health measures and reported negative mental health impacts in youths. Few studies have evaluated incidence rates by sex, region, and social determinants across an entire population. Objective: To estimate the incidence of hospitalizations for mental health conditions, stratified by sex, region, and social determinants, in children and adolescents (hereinafter referred to as youths) and young adults comparing the prepandemic and pandemic-prevalent periods. Design, Setting, and Participants: This Canadian population-based repeated ecological cross-sectional study used health administrative data, extending from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2023. All youths and young adults from 6 to 20 years of age in each of the Canadian provinces and territories were included. Data were provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information for all provinces except Quebec; the Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux provided aggregate data for Quebec. Exposures: The COVID-19-prevalent period, defined as April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measures were the prepandemic and COVID-19-prevalent incidence rates of hospitalizations for anxiety, mood disorders, eating disorders, schizophrenia or psychosis, personality disorders, substance-related disorders, and self-harm. Secondary measures included hospitalization differences by sex, age group, and deprivation as well as emergency department visits for the same mental health conditions. Results: Among Canadian youths and young adults during the study period, there were 218 101 hospitalizations for mental health conditions (ages 6 to 11 years: 5.8%, 12 to 17 years: 66.9%, and 18 to 20 years: 27.3%; 66.0% female). The rate of mental health hospitalizations decreased from 51.6 to 47.9 per 10 000 person-years between the prepandemic and COVID-19-prevalent years. However, the pandemic was associated with a rise in hospitalizations for anxiety (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08-1.14), personality disorders (IRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.16-1.25), suicide and self-harm (IRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13), and eating disorders (IRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.60-1.73) in females and for eating disorders (IRR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31-1.67) in males. In both sexes, there was a decrease in hospitalizations for mood disorders (IRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86), substance-related disorders (IRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86), and other mental health disorders (IRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.79). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of Canadian youths and young adults found a rise in anxiety, personality disorders, and suicidality in females and a rise in eating disorders in both sexes in the COVID-19-prevalent period. These results suggest that in future pandemics, policymakers should support youths and young adults who are particularly vulnerable to deterioration in mental health conditions during public health restrictions, including eating disorders, anxiety, and suicidality.