Characteristics of ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring in ischemic versus nonischemic patients implanted with a biventricular cardioverter-defibrillator for primary or secondary prevention of sudden death.

OBJECTIVES: The InSync ICD Registry evaluated patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation systems are prescribed for both primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure with both ischemic and nonischemic etiology. The characterization of ventricular tachyarrhythmias detected by the ICD is not well known in these subpopulations. METHODS: We enrolled 421 patients with symptomatic heart failure despite optimized medical treatment, ventricular dyssynchrony, and primary or secondary ICD indications. An electrophysiologist reviewed all spontaneous episodes. Patients were grouped by etiology and ICD indications. RESULTS: The 421 patients included 292 ischemic (159 primary prevention) and 129 nonischemic (68 primary prevention) patients. In 19 +/- 11 months of follow-up, 110 patients (63 ischemic, 30 primary prevention and 47 nonischemic, 21 primary prevention) presented ventricular tachyarrhythmias, occurring in a ventricular tachycardia (VT) or a ventricular fibrillation zone (1382 and 456 events, respectively). The incidence of overall ventricular tachyarrhythmias in nonischemic patients in secondary prevention (35.7% at 1 year) was higher than in ischemic patients implanted for either indication (16.5% and 22.9% at 1 year, respectively). The incidence of self-terminating ventricular tachyarrhythmias was greater in patients with nonischemic heart disease, regardless of indication. Patients with ischemic heart disease in primary prevention had a lower occurrence of VTs, whereas nonischemic patients in primary prevention had faster VTs. CONCLUSIONS: Both rate of occurrence and characteristics of detected ventricular tachyarrhythmias vary according to underlying etiology and indication. Therefore, different device programming according to patient's profile is advisable to improve ventricular tachyarrhythmias management.

Clinical management of electromagnetic interferences in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: review of the literature and focus on magnetic resonance conditional devices.

The number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has greatly increased in the last 10 years. Many electronic devices used in daily activities generate electromagnetic interferences (EMIs) that can interact with CIEDs. In clinical practice, it is very important to know the potential sources of EMIs and their effect on CIEDs in order to understand how to manage or mitigate them. A very important source of EMI is magnetic resonance (MR), which is considered nowadays the diagnostic gold standard for different anatomical districts. In this review, we focused on the effects of EMI on CIEDs and on the clinical management. Moreover, we made a clarification about MR and CIEDs.In patients with CIEDs, EMIs may cause potentially serious and even life-threatening complications (inappropriate shocks, device malfunctions, inhibition of pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients) and may rarely dictate device replacement. The association of inappropriate shocks with increased mortality highlights the importance of minimizing the occurrence of EMI. Adequate advice and recommendations about the correct management of EMIs in patients with CIEDs are required to avoid all complications during hospitalization and in daily life. Furthermore, the article focused on actual management about MR and CIEDs.