RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are critical for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). This study aims to identify cross-continental differences in utilization of primary prevention ICDs and survival free from sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ARVC. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of ARVC patients without prior VA enrolled in clinical registries from 11 countries throughout Europe and North America. Patients were classified according to whether they received treatment in North America or Europe and were further stratified by baseline predicted VA risk into low- (<10%/5 years), intermediate- (10%-25%/5 years), and high-risk (>25%/5 years) groups. Differences in ICD implantation and survival free from sustained VA events (including appropriate ICD therapy) were assessed. RESULTS: One thousand ninety-eight patients were followed for a median of 5.1 years; 554 (50.5%) received a primary prevention ICD, and 286 (26.0%) experienced a first VA event. After adjusting for baseline risk factors, North Americans were more than three times as likely to receive ICDs {hazard ratio (HR) 3.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5, 3.8]} but had only mildly increased risk for incident sustained VA [HR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1, 1.8)]. North Americans without ICDs were at higher risk for incident sustained VA [HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.3, 3.4)] than Europeans. CONCLUSIONS: North American ARVC patients were substantially more likely than Europeans to receive primary prevention ICDs across all arrhythmic risk strata. A lower rate of ICD implantation in Europe was not associated with a higher rate of VA events in those without ICDs.
Asunto(s)
Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica , Desfibriladores Implantables , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/complicaciones , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/epidemiología , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , América del Norte/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Previous registries have shown a younger average age at presentation with cardiovascular diseases in the Middle East (ME), but no study has examined atrioventricular block (AVB). Moreover, these comparisons are confounded by younger populations in the ME. We sought to describe the average age at presentation with AVB in ME and quantify the effect of being from ME, adjusted for the overall younger population. Methodology: This was a retrospective analysis of PANORAMA registries, which collected data on patients who underwent cardiac rhythm device placement worldwide. Countries with a median population age of ≤30 were considered 'young countries'. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the effect of being from ME, adjusted for being from a 'young country', on age at presentation with AVB. Results: The study included 5,259 AVB patients, with 640 (8.2%) from the ME. Mean age at presentation was seven years younger in ME than in other regions (62.9 ± 17.8 vs. 70 ± 14.1, P < 0.001). Being from a 'young country' was associated with 5.6 years younger age at presentation (95%CI -6.5--4.6), whereas being from ME was associated with 3.1 years younger age at presentation (95%CI -4.5--1.8), (P < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: The average age at presentation with AVB in the ME is seven years younger than in other regions. While this is mostly driven by the overall younger population, being from the ME appears to be independently associated with younger age. Determinants of the earlier presentation in ME need to be assessed, and care should be taken when applying international recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Atrioventricular , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/epidemiología , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Edad de Inicio , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The use of beta-blockers (BB) in reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post-myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with reduced 1-year mortality, while their role in patients with mid-range and preserved LVEF post-MI remains controversial. We studied 31,620 patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) enrolled in seven Arabian Gulf registries between 2005 and 2017. Patients with LVEF ≤40% were excluded. The remaining cohort was divided into two groups: BB group (n = 15,541) and non-BB group (n = 2,798), based on discharge medications. Patients in the non-BB group were relatively younger (55.3 vs. 57.4, P = .004) but higher risk at presentation; with higher Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (119.2 vs 109.2, P < .001), higher percentage of cardiogenic shock (3.5 vs 1.4%, P < .001), despite lower prevalence of comorbidities, such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. BB use was associated with lower 1-year mortality in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for major confounders [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.99)]. This remained the case in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching [adjusted OR: 0.34 (95% CI 0.16-0.73)]. In this study, using Arabian Gulf countries registries, the use of BB after ACS with LVEF >40% was independently associated with lower 1-year mortality.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among Saudi patients with SLE and the general population and considered factors associated with such outcomes were taken into consideration. METHODS: This is a cohort study evaluating the period prevalence of MACE from 2020 to 2023. The study used two datasets, namely the Saudi national prospective cohort for SLE patients and the Prospective Urban-Rural Epidemiology Study Saudi subcohort (PURE-Saudi) for the general population. Participants in both studies were monitored using a standardised protocol. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or angina. The analysis was adjusted for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and SLE diagnosis through logistic regression models. RESULTS: The PURE and national SLE cohorts comprised 488 and 746 patients, respectively. Patients with SLE from the SLE cohort were younger (40.7±12.5 vs 49.5±8.6 years) and predominantly female (90.6% vs 41.6%). The prevalence of traditional risk factors was greater in the PURE cohort compared with the SLE cohort. These factors included dyslipidaemia (28.9% vs 49.4%), obesity (63% vs 85%) and diabetes (7.8% vs 27.2%), but not hypertension (19.3% vs 18.8%). MACE (defined as MI or stroke or venous thromboembolism or heart failure) occurred more frequently in patients with SLE (4.3% vs 1.6%, p=0.004). Older age and lupus diagnosis were independently associated with MACE after adjusting for conventional risk factors. The odds of MACE were significantly related to age and lupus diagnosis (p=0.00 and p=0.00, respectively), but not cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (p=0.83). CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE have a significantly higher risk of developing MACE than the general population. This risk is not well explained by traditional risk factors, which may explain the failure of CVD risk scores to stratify patients with SLE adequately. Further studies are needed to understand CVD risk's pathogenesis in SLE and mitigate it.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
Introduction: The electrophysiology field has progressed rapidly over the last 2 decades. No study has examined the characteristics of patients and types of electrophysiology procedures performed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is important given our distinctly different demographic composition and health system. As such, we sought to describe the characteristics of consecutive patients presenting for electrophysiology procedures in our tertiary care hospital. Methods: Data was collected from the electrophysiology database at King Khalid University Hospital for procedures performed between April 2016 and November 2022. Patients' characteristics were retrieved from the electronic medical record. Procedures were categorized into supraventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contraction and "complex ablations", which included atrial fibrillation and scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia ablation. If no abnormality was found, the procedure was labeled as "normal EP study". Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia among patients presenting with undifferentiated supraventricular tachycardia. Results: A total of 459 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42.06 years (±14.89 years), and 256 (55.77 %) were females. The most common procedure was supraventricular tachycardia (n = 289/459, 63.24 %), and only 5 % had complex ablations. The most common type of supraventricular tachycardia ablated was found to be atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (n = 157/289, 54 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed female sex and age to be independently associated with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (OR = 2.27 95 % CI [1.40-3.67]) for female sex and (OR = 1.02 95 % CI [1.01-1.04]) for every increase in age by 1-year. Conclusion: We reported a younger average age than other countries and less complex ablations. In addition, we reported 2 independent predictors of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in patients presenting with undifferentiated supraventricular tachycardia. Larger studies including multiple centers should be performed to confirm our findings.