Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Int Adv Otol ; 19(6): 447-453, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38088315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: RONDO 2 is a lightweight, compact, wirelessly charged, and fully integrated single-unit speech processor. Single-unit processors provide an effective and convenient alternative to behind-the-ear processors for adults. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate if RONDO 2 is suitable for and did not compromise the hearing performance of young children in everyday life. METHODS: Thirteen children aged -lt;4 years were fitted with the RONDO 2 speech processor at the first activation of the cochlear implant. They were evaluated with the LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire, LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale 12 pre-implantation. In addition to these measures, they were evaluated with the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire post-implantation. Duration of daily use and troubleshooting data were acquired. Evaluation occurred at 4 time points: before implantation and 1, 3, and 12 months post-initial activation. RESULTS: Ten out of 13 children continued using RONDO 2 after the study. Twelve months after implantation, they used it on average 11.6 hours per day and had an average Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire score of 9.1 out of 10. Average hearing performance scores continuously improved throughout the follow-up period across measures. Twelve months after implantation, the mean scores were 30.1 out of 35 for the LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire, 19.9 out of 27 for the LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire, and 7.4 out of 10 for the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale 12. CONCLUSION: Participants demonstrated high levels of satisfaction and good hearing performance with RONDO 2, which indicates that this single-unit processor could be a viable and comfortable alternative to behind-the-ear processors in young children, although larger controlled experiments are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Audición , Pruebas Auditivas
2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 207S-211S, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32986504

RESUMEN

We propose middle ear implants (MEI) as alternative hearing restoration option for patients with fibrous dysplasia of the temporal bone (FDTB). A 60-year-old man presented with unilateral right-sided conductive hearing loss (CHL) and FDTB. The Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) MEI was implanted in the right ear. Preoperatively, the right side had a pure tone average (PTA) threshold of 67 dB, speech reception threshold (SRT) = 75 dB HL, and speech discrimination score (SDS) = 54% at 80 dB HL presentation level. Postoperative aided PTA threshold of the right ear was 28 db, aided SRT = 30 db, and SDS = 96% at 65dB HL. After excluding cholesteatoma, VSB provides an alternative hearing restoration technique for adults with FDTB and CHL due to stenosis of the external auditory canal and/or ossicular crowding.


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Displasia Fibrosa Ósea/complicaciones , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/rehabilitación , Prótesis Osicular , Umbral Auditivo , Oído Medio/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Ilustración Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis , Hueso Temporal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA