Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Endocr Pract ; 26(11): 1312-1319, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33471662

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Iodine 131 (I-131) radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy has been the preferred treatment for Graves disease in the United States; however, trends show a shift toward antithyroid drug (ATD) therapy as first-line therapy. Consequently, this would favor RAI as second-line therapy, presumably for ATD refractory disease. Outcomes of RAI treatment after first-line ATD therapy are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment failure rates and potential risk factors for treatment failure, including ATD use prior to RAI treatment. METHODS: A retrospective case control study of Graves disease patients (n = 200) after I-131 RAI therapy was conducted. Treatment failure was defined as recurrence or persistence of hyperthyroidism in the follow-up time after therapy (mean 2.3 years). Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate potential risk factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: RAI treatment failure rate was 16.5%. A majority of patients (70.5%) used ATD prior to RAI therapy, predominantly methimazole (MMI) (91.9%), and approximately two-thirds of patients used MMI for >3 months prior to RAI therapy. Use of ATD prior to RAI therapy (P = .003) and higher 6-hour I-123 thyroid uptake prior to I-131 RAI therapy (P<.001) were associated with treatment failure. MMI use >3 months was also associated with treatment failure (P = .002). CONCLUSION: More patients may be presenting for RAI therapy after failing first-line ATD therapy. MMI use >3 months was associated with RAI treatment failure. Further studies are needed to investigate the association between long-term first-line ATD use and RAI treatment failure.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Graves , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Antitiroideos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Graves/radioterapia , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/uso terapéutico , Metimazol/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
3.
Cureus ; 13(3): e14157, 2021 Mar 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33927955

RESUMEN

Introduction Recent data suggest synergy of chemoradiotherapy and metformin in locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It remains unclear if similar synergy exists with stereotactic lung body radiation therapy (SBRT) and metformin. We analyzed the role of metformin on progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity in the setting of lung SBRT. Methods We identified 31 patients on metformin-treated with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Eighty-nine similarly treated patients were chosen as controls. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate cumulative PFS probabilities. Results Median follow-up was 30.7 months. Forty-two patients had diabetes, 31 (74%) of which were taking metformin concurrent with SBRT. Median PFS for metformin-users vs. metformin non-users was 36.4 months vs 48.9 months, respectively (p = 0.29). Among diabetic patients, median PFS for metformin users was 36.4 months and was unobserved for non-users (p= 0.40). On univariable analysis, male sex (p = 0.03) and tumor size (p = 0.01) were associated with the risk of progression or death; use of metformin was not significant (p = 0.34). There was no difference in grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis between metformin users vs non-users (p = 0.51) Conclusion In this retrospective sample of lung SBRT patients, we did not detect a meaningful effect of concurrent metformin use on PFS. Since SBRT and conventional RT may have different cell kill mechanisms, the previously described beneficial effects of metformin may not apply in a hypofractionated setting. These results should be validated in an independent dataset, and we await the results of ongoing clinical trials.

4.
Brachytherapy ; 20(3): 557-564, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33741275

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence of uterine perforations, review the associated complications, and propose guidelines for management of perforations after brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients with cervical cancer who received single or multiple high-dose-rate brachytherapy implants between April 2006 and May 2017 at a single academic institution. CT and MRI images were retrospectively evaluated to record incidences of uterine perforation of tandem during brachytherapy. Acute and long-term complications during and after treatment were scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0, of the National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included in the study. Perforations were observed in 22 patients (17.9%) with 31 (6.4%) of the 482 total implants. Of the different categories of adverse events, only the rate of acute infectious complications among those with perforations (n = 3, 13.6%) versus those without perforations (n = 3, 3.0%) was significant (p = 0.040). Two of the three perforated patients with acute infections had mild urinary tract infections, and all resolved without complications or treatment delays. The remaining one patient had a frank perforation of the anterior uterine wall with a subsequent Grade 3 pyometra infection despite administration of prophylactic antibiotics and 1-week treatment delay. This case was eventually resolved with cervical dilation and evacuation of fluid. Long-term complications were not different between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical cancer with uterine perforations may be able to safely proceed with brachytherapy treatment without delay or need for prophylactic antibiotics in the acute setting. Further validating data would be able to assist in establishing a new standard of care and help prevent unnecessary and harmful breaks during treatment.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Perforación Uterina , Braquiterapia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Perforación Uterina/etiología
6.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 43(1): 47-51, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Nuclear factor kappa B (NFkB) is a transcription factor shown to confer treatment resistance in tumors. A previous report suggested an association between pretreatment NFkB and poorer outcomes for cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT). We aimed to validate their findings in a larger patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Institutional Review Board approved study included patients with locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with CRT. Evaluation of both nuclear and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for NFkB was scored semiquantitatively by 3 pathologists. Cytoplasmic positivity incorporated both the intensity and percentage of immunoreactivity in invasive carcinoma (H-score), whereas nuclear positivity was assessed by percentage of positive cells. Outcomes were stratified by NFkB overexpression and tumor characteristics. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and local regional control (LC) were obtained using Kaplan-Meier and differences between groups were evaluated by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios were obtained using Cox regression for both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The mean age was 51 years old and most (78.57%) had locally advanced disease. Five-year OS, PFS, LC, and DMFS in the entire cohort were 57.18% (confidence interval [CI], 34.06%-74.82%), 48.07% (CI, 25.50%-67.52%), 72.11% (CI, 49.96%-85.73%), and 62.85% (CI, 36.33%-80.82%), respectively. There was no significant association between NFkB expression (H-index ≥180) and 3-year and 5-year OS (P-value=0.34), PFS (P-value=0.21), LC (P-value=0.86), or DMFS (P-value=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that cytoplasmic NFkB-p65 expression (H-index ≥180) was associated with a nonstatistically significant trend toward poor clinical outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated definitively with CRT.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia
7.
J Radiat Oncol ; 8(1): 97-101, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33042477

RESUMEN

One of the major challenges to proton beam therapy at this time is the uncertainty of the true range of a clinical treatment proton beam as it traverses the various tissues and organs in a human body. This uncertainty necessitates the addition of greater "margins" to the planning target volume along the direction of the beam to ensure safety and tumor target coverage. Proton radiography holds promise as both an image-guidance method for proton beam therapy and as a means of estimating particle beam range in the clinic. In this brief report, we present some of the first real and reconstructed proton radiographs using our particular system. Our qualitative review of these images indicates that this method has excellent potential as a proton radiography-based image guidance system. Based on the encouraging results of our preliminary work, more rigorous and quantitative analyses will be performed shortly and we shall continue to explore the potential of this approach for addressing the particle beam range uncertainty issue.

8.
Radiat Oncol ; 10: 218, 2015 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26510665

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We report the radiographic response rate of SBRT compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CF-EBRT) for thoracic, abdominal, skin and soft tissue RCC lesions treated at our institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty three lesions where included in the study (36 SBRT, 17 CF-EBRT), treated from 2004 to 2014 at our institution. We included patients that had thoracic, skin & soft tissue (SST), and abdominal metastases of histologically confirmed RCC. The most common SBRT fractionation was 50 Gy in 5 fractions. RESULTS: The median time of follow-up was 16 months (range 3-97 months). Median BED was 216.67 (range 66.67-460.0) for SBRT, and 60 (range 46.67-100.83) for CF-EBRT. Median radiographic local control rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 100, 93.41, and 93.41 % for lesions treated with SBRT versus 62.02, 35.27 and 35.27 % for those treated with CF-EBRT (p < 0.001). Predictive factors for radiographic local control under univariate analysis included BED ≥ 100 Gy (HR, 0.048; 95 % CI, 0.006-0.382; p = 0.005), dose per fraction ≥ 9 Gy (HR, 0.631; 95 % CI, 0.429-0.931; p = 0.021), and gender (HR, 0.254; 95 % CI, 0.066-0.978; p = 0.048). Under multivariate analysis, there were no significant predictors for local control. Toxicity rates were low and equivalent in both groups, with no grade 4 or 5 side effects reported. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of RCC metastases to thoracic, abdominal and integumentary soft tissues. Radiographic response rates were greater and more durable using SBRT compared to CF-EBRT. Further prospective trials are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of SBRT for RCC metastases.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Radiocirugia/métodos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Neoplasias Abdominales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Abdominales/secundario , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/secundario , Neoplasias Torácicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Torácicas/secundario , Neoplasias Torácicas/cirugía
9.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 5(6): e589-e596, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26142027

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We report the radiographic and clinical response rate of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional fractionated external beam radiation therapy (CF-EBRT) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) bone lesions treated at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-six consecutive patients were included in the study, with 95 total lesions treated (50 SBRT, 45 CF-EBRT). We included patients who had histologic confirmation of primary RCC and radiographic evidence of metastatic bone lesions. The most common SBRT regimen used was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-64 months). Median time to symptom control between SBRT and CF-EBRT were 2 (range, 0-6 weeks) and 4 weeks (range, 0-7 weeks), respectively. Symptom control rates with SBRT and CF-EBRT were significantly different (P = .020) with control rates at 10, 12, and 24 months of 74.9% versus 44.1%, 74.9% versus 39.9%, and 74.9% versus 35.7%, respectively. The median time to radiographic failure and unadjusted pain progression was 7 months in both groups. When controlling for gross tumor volume, dose per fraction, smoking, and the use of systemic therapy, biologically effective dose ≥80 Gy was significant for clinical response (hazard ratio [HR], 0.204; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.043-0.963; P = .046) and radiographic (HR, 0.075; 95% CI, 0.013-0.430; P = .004). When controlling for gross tumor volume and total dose, biologically effective dose ≥80 Gy was again predictive of clinical local control (HR, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.025-0.787; P = .026). Toxicity rates were low and equivalent in both groups, with no grade 4 or 5 toxicity reported. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is both safe and effective for treating RCC bone metastases, with rapid improvement in symptoms after treatment and more durable clinical and radiographic response rate. Future prospective trials are needed to further define efficacy and toxicity of treatment, especially in the setting of targeted agents.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Tolerancia a Radiación , Radiocirugia , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA