Tryton dedicated bifurcation stent in treatment of unprotected distal left main bifurcation disease.

Percutaneous coronary interventions involving coronary bifurcation lesions are more complex and associated with adverse outcomes (both angiographic and clinical) compared to non-bifurcation lesions. Tryton, a dedicated bifurcation stent, has been introduced with the aim to simplify treatment of bifurcation lesions. Tryton stent in combination with conventional drug eluting stent is safe and associated with reduced stenosis and bail-out stenting of side branch compared to provisional stenting involving a large side. However, little is known regarding safety and efficacy of Tryton stent in left main (LM) bifurcation lesion. We describe two cases of unprotected LM bifurcation stenting using Tryton stent in combination with drug eluting stent.

Association of Anemia With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Peripheral Vascular Intervention: Insights From the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2 VIC).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical features and outcomes of patients with anemia undergoing percutaneous peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in a contemporary registry. METHODS: We evaluated the differences in the clinical features and outcomes of patients with and without anemia undergoing PVI in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2 VIC) registry. Anemia was defined using World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: Baseline anemia was present in 42.3% of 15,683 patients undergoing PVI. Compared to patients without anemia, those with anemia were older (mean age, 67 years vs 71 years), were more often black (16% vs 29%), and had higher comorbidities. Anemic patients were twice as likely to present with acute limb ischemia (5% vs 11%) and undergo urgent PVI (6% vs 15%) or below-the-knee PVI (18% vs 35%). Many in-hospital adverse events were higher in anemic patients. In a propensity-matched cohort, any adverse outcome (3.4% vs 8.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-3.42) or major cardiovascular event, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or amputation (1.1% vs 3.2%; OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.83-4.79) was more likely in anemic patients. Of all adverse events, the highest odds were observed for post-PVI transfusions and amputations in anemic patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed that baseline hemoglobin (1 g/dL below the normal value) was associated with greater risk of any adverse event (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.47-1.68). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anemia was high among PVI patients and was associated with significantly greater likelihood of amputation, any adverse event, and major cardiovascular events. Whether preprocedure correction of anemia has the potential to decrease post-PVI adverse events remains to be studied.

Caught in Time: When IVC Filters Save Lives.

Inferior vena cava filters are indicated in patients with venous thromboembolic disease in whom anticoagulation is a contraindication. This case highlights the importance of inferior vena cava filter placement in patients with extensive proximal deep vein thromboses in order to prevent massive pulmonary emboli, possibly associated with sudden cardiac death.

Outcomes of correcting hyponatremia in patients with myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia has significant prognostic implications in patients with heart, failure. However, little data are available regarding its significance in patients presenting with myocardial infarction. In addition, it is not known if correction of hyponatremia impacts outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of hyponatremia in patients with myocardial infarction and the effect of its correction on all-cause mortality. METHODS: Patients with the discharge diagnosis of myocardial infarction at our institution between 2000 and 2010 with serum sodium levels measured within 24 h of admission were included in this retrospective analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the predictors of all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard model was applied to determine the adjusted survival. RESULTS: A total of 11,562 patients (67.15 ± 14.6 years, males 56.3 %) were included in the analysis. There were a total of 1,535 (13.3 %) deaths within mean follow-up duration of 5.5 ± 3.3 years. There were 425 (27.9 %) deaths in patients with corrected hyponatremia and 155 (55.3 %) deaths in persistent hyponatremia patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that corrected hyponatremia and persistent hyponatremia were independent predictors of all cause mortality (p < 0.0001). When analyzing short-term (30 days) and long-term mortality, corrected hyponatremia group did not have associated long term mortality. Various methods to correct hyponatremia were also analyzed and use of vaptans was associated with decrease in mortality in patients with hyponatremia from 115 to 125 (HR 0.45; 95 % CI 0.26-0.78, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that corrected and persistent hyponatremia in patients presenting with myocardial infarction is a predictor of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events and heart failure related 30 day rehospitalization. In certain cases, correction of hyponatremia may actually improve survival of the patients.