How Does The AJCC/TNM Staging System Eighth Edition Perform in Thyroid Cancer at A Major Middle Eastern Medical Center?

OBJECTIVE: The American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system eighth edition (TNM-8) for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has been introduced as a replacement for tumor node metastasis staging system seventh edition (TNM-7). We present the first study from a Middle Eastern population comparing these 2 versions of the TNM staging system. METHODS: We compared TNM-8 with TNM-7 in 701 patients with DTC seen during a 3-year period with a median age of 37 years (6-83) and a female-to-male ratio of 558 (79.6%) to 143 (20.4%). RESULTS: The number (%) of patients within each stage in TNM-7 and TNM-8, respectively, are as follows: stage I = 503 (71.6%) and 583 (83.2%), stage II = 52 (7.4%) and 81 (11.4%), stage III = 53 (7.6%) and 6 (0.9%), and stage IV = 93 (13.2%) and 31 (4.6%). Overall, 172 patients (24.5%) were downstaged in TNM-8 compared to that in TNM-7, as follows: 26, 30, and 24 patients from stages II, III, and IV in TNM-7 to stage I in TNM-8; 23 and 32 patients from TNM-7 stages III and IV to TNM-8 stage II; 6 patients from stage IVa in TNM-7 to stage III in TNM-8; and 31 patients from stage IVc in TNM-7 to stage IVb in TNM-8. TNM-7 and TNM-8 predicted the long-term outcome well (median follow-up, 7.9 years), but Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better separation of cancer-specific survival in TNM-8 compared to TNM-7. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TNM-7, TNM-8 approximately downstaged a quarter of DTC patients and was more robust in separating the outcome of different stages over time.

Differential Expression of Androgen Receptor in Type I and Type II Endometrial Carcinomas: A Clinicopathological Analysis and Correlation with Outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Endometrial carcinomas (EC) are the most common gynecological malignancies and are conventionally divided into type I and type II due to diagnostic and prognostic considerations. Female hormone expression in EC is extensively studied; however, data about androgen receptor (AR) expression in EC are sparse. We aimed to study AR expression in different types of EC at our institute and whether it had an impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of EC cases diagnosed and treated from 2010-2019. AR immunohistochemical expression was tested in 52 EC cases (type I = 40; type II = 12). Histological typing was verified according to conventional diagnostic criteria. Only primary EC were included without neoadjuvant therapy. Histologic score was calculated as: stain intensity (graded 0-3) × positive cells percentage (graded 0-4). Level of expression was scored from 0 to 12. RESULTS: The mean age of the selected patients was 60.3 years (range = 31-88 ± 12.6). Recurrence was detected in 11 (21.2%) patients. The outcome was 40 patients were alive without disease, eight alive with disease, three dead of disease, and one dead of other causes. About 62.5% of type I-EC and 25.0% of type II-EC were AR positive. AR expression was analyzed against different clinicopathological parameters including: type (p = 0.005), histotype (p = 0.044); grade (p = 0.035); age group (p = 0.207); menopause (p = 0.086); estrogen receptor (ER) expression (p = 0.284); atypical complex hyperplasia (p = 0.594); tumor stage (p = 0.994); tumor recurrence (p = 0.530); node status (p = 0.110); and outcome (p = 0.202). CONCLUSION: AR expression was higher in type I EC, endometrial endometrioid carcinoma histotype, and with a lower grade. AR expression was not significantly correlated with age, stage, ER, atypical hyperplasia, recurrence, node status, or outcome. Results agree with recent literature that AR expression is associated with better-differentiated EC and may be a potential hormonal therapeutic tool.

A Life-Changing Moment in a Patient with Type 1 Diabetes: Insulin Holiday.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes can be a life-changing moment for our patients particularly having to live with the idea of taking insulin all their life and the barriers it can bring about. CASE REPORT: We report a patient with ten years of autoimmune type 1 diabetes treated with insulin. He was able to stop insulin in favour of oral diabetes agents after dynamic endocrine tests confirmed micro insulin secretion despite autoimmunity. Our case demonstrates that a detailed history and thorough investigations adopting a holistic approach can sometimes change the course of disease management and can leave a positive impact on the life of our patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with partial retention of beta-cell function in type 1 diabetes can temporarily stop insulin safely with ongoing surveillance.

Comparing the utility of 30- and 60-minute cortisol levels after the standard short synacthen test to determine adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Short Synacthen test (SST) involves measuring the baseline, 30-, and 60-minute serum cortisol levels, after injecting 250 µg of synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone or Synacthen (ACTH). This study aimed to review the current clinical practice of performing SST to establish a standardized test protocol and to additionally test the hypothesis regarding performing the 60-minute cortisol test alone and the dependence of overall SST result on baseline cortisol level.Patients >14 years who underwent SST from January 2010 to December 2017 were included. Pearson's chi-square cross-tabulation was used to identify individuals with inconsistent 30- and 60-minute serum cortisol test results. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict normal responses based on the baseline cortisol value.Of the 965 patients identified from pharmacy, medical, and laboratory records, 849 were included. Mean baseline, 30-, and 60-minute cortisol levels after ACTH injection were 394 ±â€Š286.58, 722 ±â€Š327.11, and 827 ±â€Š369.30 nmol/L, respectively. Overall, 715 (84%) and 134 (16%) patients had normal and abnormal responses, respectively. Primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed in 10% and 35%, respectively, while ACTH levels were not measured in 55% of the patients. Overall, 9.49% (n = 72) of the patients had a suboptimal response at 30 minutes, but reached the threshold value of 550 nmol/L at 60 minutes. This particular subgroup's mean change (240 nmol/L) in cortisol level from baseline to 30-minute was higher than that observed in patients with abnormal response at both time-points (mean change, 152 nmol/L). No patient with 30-minute optimal responses had 60-minute suboptimal responses. The baseline serum cortisol threshold of ≥226 nmol/L had 80% sensitivity, 71% specificity, and 93% positive predictive value for detecting a normal SST (P-value < .0001).Relying on a 60-minute cortisol level can identify all normal and abnormal responses, while relying on 30-minute cortisol level alone may produce false-positives. Additionally, a baseline cortisol level of ≥226 nmol/L is a reliable threshold for determining adequate adrenal function, particularly with a low pretest hypoadrenalism probability.

The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly results from a persistent excess in growth hormone with clinical features that may be subtle or severe. The most common cause of acromegaly is a pituitary tumor that causes excessive production of growth hormone (GH), and rare cases are due to an excess of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or the ectopic production of GH. OBJECTIVE: Discuss the different diseases that present with manifestations of GH excess and clinical acromegaly, emphasizing the distinct clinical and radiological characteristics of the different pathological entities. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the published clinicopathological information about acromegaly. An English-language search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed from inception to 1 August 2019. The reference lists of relevant studies were also reviewed. RESULTS: Pituitary tumors that cause GH excess have several variants, including pure somatotroph tumors that can be densely or sparsely granulated, or plurihormonal tumors that include mammosomatotroph, mixed somatotroph-lactotroph tumors and mature plurihomonal Pit1-lineage tumors, acidophil stem cell tumors and poorly-differentiated Pit1-lineage tumors. Each tumor type has a distinct pathophysiology, resulting in variations in clinical manifestations, imaging and responses to therapies. CONCLUSION: Detailed clinicopathological information will be useful in the era of precision medicine, in which physicians tailor the correct treatment modality to each patient.

Determinants of Deescalation Failure in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Introduction. Deescalation refers to either discontinuation or a step-down of antimicrobials. Despite strong recommendations in the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (2012) to deescalate, actual practices can vary. Our objective was to identify variables that are associated with deescalation failure. Methods. In this prospective study of patients with sepsis/septic shock, patients were categorized into 4 groups based on antibiotic administration: no change in antibiotics, deescalation, escalation (where antibiotics were changed to those with a broader spectrum of antimicrobial coverage), or mixed changes (where both escalation to a broader spectrum of coverage and discontinuation of antibiotics were carried out). Results. 395 patients were studied; mean APACHE II score was 24 ± 7.8. Antimicrobial deescalation occurred in 189 (48%) patients; no changes were made in 156 (39%) patients. On multivariate regression analysis, failure to deescalate was significantly predicted by hematologic malignancy OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.4) p < 0.004, fungal sepsis OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.2-5.8) p = 0.011, multidrug resistance OR 2.9 (95% CI 1.4-6.0) p = 0.003, baseline serum procalcitonin OR 1.01 (95% CI 1.003-1.016) p = 0.002, and SAPS II scores OR 1.01 (95% CI 1.004-1.02) p = 0.006. Conclusions. Current deescalation practices reflect physician reluctance when dealing with complicated, sicker patients or with drug-resistance or fungal sepsis. Integrating an antibiotic stewardship program may increase physician confidence and provide support towards increasing deescalation rates.