The Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Sling Surgery with and without Prolapse Repair.

PURPOSE: Frailty has emerged as a significant predictor of morbidity in urological surgery, but its impact on outcomes of sling surgery for stress incontinence remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of frailty among women undergoing sling surgery and determine the association of frailty with 30-day postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP®) in 2013-2016 to identify patients undergoing sling placement using Current Procedural Terminology, 10th edition, code 57288. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on whether they underwent isolated sling placement or had a sling with concomitant prolapse surgery. Frailty was assessed using the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) developed for use with the NSQIP data set. Patients were considered frail if 2 or more factors from the mFI-5 were present. Outcomes and complications within 30 days were captured from the NSQIP data and logistic regression models used to adjust for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index and frailty. RESULTS: We identified 25,887 women who underwent sling placement, 15,087 of whom underwent isolated sling placement (Group 1) and 10,800 of whom underwent sling with concomitant prolapse repair surgery (Group 2). Frailty was present in 9.3% of patients in Group 1 and 10.2% of patients in Group 2 (p=0.0122). Among those who underwent isolated sling placement, frailty was associated with increased length of hospital stay (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, p=0.0008) and 30-day hospital readmission (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5, p=0.0093). Older patients undergoing isolated sling placement were more likely to have longer operation time (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3, p <0.0001) and hospital length of stay (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4, p <0.0001). Frailty was also associated with increased 30-day hospital readmission in patients who underwent sling with concomitant prolapse repair (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6, p=0.0003), while age was not (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1, p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: We found that frailty was present in relatively few patients undergoing sling surgery. Adverse postoperative outcomes and complications were low overall. Increased age and frailty were both associated with longer length of stay. Frailty, but not age, was significantly associated with increased likelihood of hospital readmission within 30 days following surgery. Our findings provide insight into the preoperative characteristics of women undergoing sling surgery in a large national sample, suggesting the need for preoperative identification of the frail patient.

A Rapid Method to Preoperatively Assess Frailty for Older Patients with Pelvic Floor Conditions.

PURPOSE: Assessment of frailty can help surgeons predict perioperative risk and guide preoperative counseling. However, current methods are often cumbersome in the clinical setting. We prospectively compared the effectiveness of a rapid picture based Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS-9) assessed by patient and surgeon against reference standard Fried Frailty Index in older patients with pelvic floor conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 71 patients between March 2018 and June 2019. Frailty assessment using CFS-9 (scale ranging from very fit to terminally ill) was performed followed by the Fried Frailty Index, a validated tool of 5 measures (shrinking, physical energy, activity, grip strength, walking speed). Correlations and agreement between Fried Frailty Index and CFS-9 scores from the treating surgeon, a second surgeon (surgeon 2) and patient were analyzed using sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve and Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: The patient cohort was mostly female (97.2%), with a mean age (±SD) of 73.0 (±5.9) years and 23.9% were frail using the Fried Frailty Index. Compared to the Fried Frailty Index, CFS-9 scores of the treating surgeon, surgeon 2 and patient had AUC values (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.77-0.86), 0.91 (0.84-0.91) and 0.88 (0.79-0.88), respectively. As assessed by Cohen's Kappa the CFS-9 scores all had substantial (surgeon 2, Kappa 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.85 or moderate (all other CFS-9 measures, Kappa 0.44 to 0.58) agreement with the Fried Frailty Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid and effective validated tools to screen for frailty are needed in the clinical setting. CFS-9 is an excellent predictor of frailty compared to the Fried Frailty Index for patients with pelvic floor conditions.

"Beyond the Bump" - Insight Into the Postpartum Women's Experience of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as Expressed on Reddit.

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively analyze the biopsychological experiences of postpartum women regarding pelvic organ prolapse (POP) as expressed on Reddit, a widely used internet platform for anonymous discussion and information sharing. POP is a prevalent condition in postpartum women, yet personal experiences are often not discussed due to social stigma. METHODS: "Beyondthebump," a Subreddit forum for postpartum mothers with >57,000 subscribers, was queried for "prolapse" to collect postings on POP in August 2018. Posts were analyzed qualitatively by 2 independent researchers. The principles of grounded theory were applied and preliminary themes were generated. These themes were used to derive emergent concepts. RESULTS: We analyzed 28 unique posts with 390 responses from 2014 to 2018. Qualitative analysis yielded 3 preliminary themes. (1) Women were unaware POP could occur postpartum and frustrated by the lack of prenatal discussion. (2) Women expressed a need for supportive, comprehensive, and immediate care. (3) Attributed symptoms of POP included pain and discomfort, causing difficulty with daily life. Three emergent concepts were derived. (1) POP is a difficult, debilitating condition with mental and physical effects. (2) Women with POP were self-driven and actively sought help. (3) There was motivation to increase POP awareness. CONCLUSION: Postpartum women's perspectives on POP focused on the difficulty of continuing life routines, self-drive for improvement, and motivation to raise awareness for others. Through learning from women's self-reported experiences, physicians can better meet women's needs and improve care for POP.

Tobacco use, immunosuppressive, chronic pain, and psychiatric conditions are prevalent in women with symptomatic mesh complications undergoing mesh removal surgery.

Purpose: To identify demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with symptomatic pelvic floor mesh complications who underwent mesh removal at our academic medical center. The secondary goal was to determine patient-reported outcomes after mesh removal. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients from 2011-2016 undergoing removal of mesh graft for treatment of symptomatic mesh-related complications. Patient demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, and mesh factors were evaluated. Outcomes after explant were determined by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement and a Likert satisfaction scale. Results: One hundred fifty-six symptomatic patients underwent complete or partial pelvic floor mesh removal during the study period. Mid-urethral slings comprised 86% of explanted mesh grafts. Mesh exposure or erosion was identified in 72% of patients. Eighty-one percent of patients presented with pain, and 35% reported pain in the absence of exposure or erosion. Pre-operative comorbidities included psychiatric disease (54.5%), chronic pain (34.0%), irritable bowel syndrome (20.5%) and fibromyalgia (9.6%). Forty-three percent of patients reported current or past tobacco use. At mean follow-up of 14 months, 68% of responding patients reported improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement after surgery. Conclusions: This research identified tobacco use, and psychiatric, immunosuppressive, and chronic pain conditions as prevalent in this cohort of patients undergoing mesh removal. Surgical removal can improve presenting symptoms, including for patients with pain in the absence of other indications.

Predictors of Benign Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures After Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of symptomatic ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures (UAS) formation following radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,888 consecutive patients who underwent open RC at our institution from 1995 to 2014 were included for analysis. Data were collected from institutional databases and individual medical records. Symptomatic benign UAS was defined as percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion for rising creatinine or unilateral hydronephrosis by comparing preoperative and postoperative imaging. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to identify features associated with UAS formation. RESULTS: UAS developed in 123 of 2888 patients following RC. There were 94 symptomatic and 29 asymptomatic strictures. Median follow-up was 32 months (IQR 12, 72) for patients without stricture. Higher BMI (P = 0.002), ASA score >2 (P < 0.0001), lymph node positive disease (P = 0.027), and 30-day postoperative grade 3I+ complications (P = 0.017) on univariate analysis and male gender on multivariable analysis were significantly associated with time to stricture development. However, history of prior abdominal surgery (PAS) had the strongest association with time to stricture formation (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.78, 5.94, P = 0.0001). Risk of developing a stricture within 10 years was 1.9% for patients without PAS vs 9.3% with PAS. CONCLUSION: Associated factors with an increased risk of benign UAS include higher BMI, ASA score >2, lymph node involvement, grade 3/4 complications within 30 days, male sex, and a history of PAS. We conclude that while surveillance is important for patients who undergo cystectomy for malignancy, it may be beneficial for patients with history of PAS to undergo more intensive follow-up compared to those patients without history of PAS.

"A National Study Demonstrating the Need for Improved Frailty Indices for Preoperative Risk Assessment of Common Urologic Procedures".

OBJECTIVE: To compare the associations between frailty indices and postoperative complications among older adults undergoing common urologic procedures. Frailty is known to be strongly associated with poor postoperative complications; however, the optimal way to measure frailty remains unknown. METHODS: We identified the 20 most common urologic procedures from 2013-2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Frailty was measured using the NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed with each index and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system with postoperative complications (any, major, or minor) as the outcomes. Statistical models were compared using the following fit parameters: area under the curve, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. RESULTS: A total of 158,855 procedures were identified. All frailty indices (NSQIP frailty index, simplified frailty index, and Risk Analysis Index) and ASA were associated with increased odds for any, major, and minor complications (all P values <.001). ASA demonstrated stronger model fit parameters for any, major and minor complications compared to all other indices, with an area under the curve of 0.63, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively (all P values <.001). Adding ASA to each frailty index resulted in slight improvement of model fit parameters (P value <.001). CONCLUSION: ASA slightly outperforms current frailty indices in predicting postoperative complications among individuals undergoing commonly performed urologic procedures. Our findings highlight the need for improved frailty measures for preoperative risk assessment.

The Impact of Frailty on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement and Removal Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether frailty is associated with increased odds of 30-day surgical complications among men undergoing both artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement and removal procedures and to determine whether frailty was associated with increased odds of having an AUS removal procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of men undergoing AUS placement and removal procedures using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2006 to 2013. Frailty was quantified using the NSQIP-FI (frailty index) and was applied to logistic regression models predicting 30-day complications (overall, major, and minor) and the odds of having an AUS removal procedure (over an AUS placement procedure). RESULTS: We identified a total of 624 and 147 men undergoing AUS placement and removal procedures, respectively. NSQIP-FI of ≥0.27, but not age, was associated with major complications (aOR 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.9), while age ≥85 years, but not NSQIP-FI, was associated with minor complications (aOR 7.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-45.6). Men undergoing AUS removal procedures tended to be more frail compared to men undergoing AUS placement procedures (12.9% vs 6.1% had NSQIP-FI of ≥0.27, P<.01). CONCLUSION: Men undergoing AUS removal procedures are, on average, more frail compared to men undergoing AUS placement procedures. Frailty is associated with increased odds of major complications and with having an AUS removal procedure. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating measures of frailty, instead of age alone, into the perioperative decision-making process for adults considering these types of procedures.