Conversion From Intravenous In-Hospital Belatacept Injection to Subcutaneous Abatacept Injection in Kidney Transplant Recipients During the First COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Order in France.

The first COVID-19 stay-at-home order came into effect in France on 17 March 2020. Immunocompromised patients were asked to isolate themselves, and outpatient clinic visits were dramatically reduced. In order to avoid visits to the hospital by belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) during the initial period of the pandemic, we promptly converted 176 KTRs at two French transplant centers from once-monthly 5 mg/kg in-hospital belatacept infusion to once-weekly 125 mg subcutaneous abatacept injection. At the end of follow-up (3 months), 171 (97.16%) KTRs survived with a functioning graft, 2 (1.14%) had died, and 3 (1.70%) had experienced graft loss. Two patients (1.1%) experienced acute T cell-mediated rejection. Nineteen patients (10.80%) discontinued abatacept; 47% of the KTRs found the use of abatacept less restrictive than belatacept, and 38% would have preferred to continue abatacept. Mean eGFR remained stable compared to baseline. Seven patients (3.9%) had COVID-19; among these, two developed severe symptoms but survived. Only one patient had a de novo DSA. Side effects of abatacept injection were uncommon and non-severe. Our study reports for the first time in a large cohort that once-weekly injection of abatacept appears to be feasible and safe in KTRs previously treated with belatacept.

Imlifidase for Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients With a Positive Crossmatch: The French Consensus Guidelines.

Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.

Severe relapse of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a kidney transplant recipient with negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR after rituximab.

Immunocompromised patients may experience prolonged viral shedding after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, symptomatic relapses after remission currently remain rare. We herein describe a severe COVID-19 relapse case of a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) following rituximab therapy, 3 months after a moderate COVID-19 infection, despite viral clearance after recovery of the first episode. During the clinical relapse, the diagnosis was established on a broncho-alveolar lavage specimen (BAL) by RT-PCR. The infectivity of the BAL sample was confirmed on a cell culture assay. Whole genome sequencing confirmed the presence of an identical stain (Clade 20A). However, it had an acquired G142D mutation and a larger deletion of 3-amino-acids at position 143-145. These mutations located within the N-terminal domain are suggested to play a role in viral entry. The diagnosis of a COVID-19 relapse should be considered in the setting of unexplained persistent fever and/or respiratory symptoms in KTRs (especially for those after rituximab therapy), even in patients with previous negative naso-pharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR.

Increased incidence and unusual presentations of CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients after conversion to belatacept.

Belatacept may increase cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease risk after conversion from CNI-based therapy. We analyzed CMV disease characteristics after belatacept conversion. Propensity score matching was used to compare CMV disease incidence in belatacept- and CNI-treated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). CMV disease characteristics and risk factors under belatacept were analyzed. In total, 223 KTRs (median age [IQR] 59.2 years [45.4-68.5]) were converted to belatacept (median of 11.5 months [2.5-37.0] post-transplantation); 40/223 (17.9%) developed CMV disease. Independent risk factors included increased age (p = .0164), D+/R- CMV serostatus (p = .0220), and low eGFR at conversion (p = .0355). Among 181 belatacept-treated patients matched to 181 controls, 32/181 (17.7%) experienced CMV disease (vs. 5/181 controls [2.8%]). CMV disease cumulative incidences were 6.33 and 0.91/100 person-years (p-y) in belatacept and control groups, respectively. CMV disease risk was particularly high in elderly patients (converted >70 years) and those with eGFR <30 ml/min; cumulative incidences were 18.4 and 5.2/100 p-y, respectively. CMV diseases under belatacept were atypical, with late-onset disease (24/40 patients [60%]), high CMV seropositivity (27/40, 67%), increased severe and tissue-invasive disease rates (gastrointestinal involvement in 32/40 [80%]) and life-threatening diseases (4/40 [10%]). These findings should stimulate further research to secure the use of belatacept as a valuable rescue therapy in KTRs.

Weak antibody response to three doses of mRNA vaccine in kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept.

Poor responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine have been reported after 2 vaccine injections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with belatacept. We analyzed the humoral response in belatacept-treated KTRs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received three injections of BNT162b2-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We also investigated vaccine immunogenicity in belatacept-treated KTRs with prior COVID-19 and characterized symptomatic COVID-19 infections after the vaccine in belatacept-treated KTRs. Among the 62 belatacept-treated KTRs (36 [58%] males), the median age (63.5 years IQR [51-72]), without COVID-19 history, only four patients (6.4%) developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with low antibody titers (median 209, IQR [20-409] AU/ml). 71% were treated with mycophenolic acid and 100% with steroids in association with belatacept. In contrast, in all the 5 KTRs with prior COVID-19 history, mRNA vaccine induced a strong antibody response with high antibody titers (median 10 769 AU/ml, IQR [6410-20 069]) after two injections. Seroprevalence after three-vaccine doses in 35 non-belatacept-treated KTRs was 37.1%. Twelve KTRs developed symptomatic COVID-19 after vaccination, including severe forms (50% of mortality). Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 5% of fully vaccinated patients. Administration of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not improve immunogenicity in KTRs treated with belatacept without prior COVID-19. Other strategies aiming to improve patient protection are needed.

COVID-19 severity in kidney transplant recipients is similar to nontransplant patients with similar comorbidities.

Higher rates of severe COVID-19 have been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to nontransplant patients. We aimed to determine if poorer outcomes were specifically related to chronic immunosuppression or underlying comorbidities. We used a 1:1 propensity score-matching method to compare survival and severe disease-free survival (defined as death and/or need for intensive care unit [ICU]) incidence in hospitalized KTRs and nontransplant control patients between February 26 and May 22, 2020. Patients were matched for risk factors of severe COVID-19: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, preexisting cardiopathy, chronic lung disease, and basal renal function. We included 100 KTRs (median age [interquartile range (IQR)]) 64.7 years (55.3-73.1) in three French transplant centers. After a median follow-up of 13 days (7-30), transfer to ICU was required for 34 patients (34%) and death occurred in 26 patients (26%). Overall, 43 patients (43%) developed a severe disease during a median follow-up of 8.5 days (2-14). Propensity score matching to a large French cohort of 2017 patients hospitalized in 24 centers, revealed that survival was similar between KTRs and matched nontransplant patients with respective 30-day survival of 62.9% and 71% (p = .38) and severe disease-free 30-day survival of 50.6% and 47.5% (p = .91). These findings suggest that severity of COVID-19 in KTRs is related to their associated comorbidities and not to chronic immunosuppression.

A kidney discard decision strategy based on zero-time histology analysis could lead to an unjustified increase in the organ turndown rate among ECD.

The utility of zero-time kidney biopsies (KB) in deciding to accept expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys remains controversial. However, zero-time histology is one of the main causes for discarding kidneys in the United States. In a single-centre study, we examined the utility and impact on outcome of the use of frozen section zero-time KB among ECD. Ninety-two zero-time KB were analysed for accept/discard decision between 2005 and 2015 among ECD. 53% of kidneys were rejected after zero-time KB analysis; there was no difference in individual clinical and biological data between accepted/rejected groups. However, histology of rejected kidneys showed more sclerotic glomeruli (20% vs. 8%; P < 0.001), increased interstitial fibrosis (1.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.47 ± 0.09; P < 0.0001), more arteriosclerosis (2.14 ± 0.17 vs. 1.71 ± 0.11; P = 0.0032) and arteriolar hyalinosis (2.15 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.11; P = 0.0006). Using propensity score matching, we generated a group of 42 kidney allograft recipients who received a transplant matched for donor zero-time histology and clinical characteristics with donors whose kidneys were rejected. Interestingly, their 1- and 5-year graft survival and function were similar to the global cohort of ECD recipients. In conclusion, when performed, zero-time KB was a decisive element for kidney discard decision. However, adverse zero-time histology was not associated with poorer graft survival and kidney function among ECD.

Development and validation of an optimized integrative model using urinary chemokines for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection.

The urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are promising noninvasive diagnostic markers of acute rejection (AR) in kidney recipients, but their levels might be confounded by urinary tract infection (UTI) and BK virus (BKV) reactivation. Multiparametric model development and validation addressed these confounding factors in a training set of 391 samples, optimizing the diagnostic performance of urinary chemokines. CXCL9/creatinine increased in UTI and BKV viremia with or without nephropathy (BKVN) (no UTI/leukocyturia/UTI: -0.10/1.61/2.09, P = .0001 and no BKV/viremia/BKVN: -0.10/1.90/2.29, P < .001) as well as CXCL10/creatinine (1.17/2.09/1.98, P < .0001 and 1.13/2.21/2.51, P < .001, respectively). An optimized 8-parameter model (recipient age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor specific antibodies, UTI, BKV blood viral load, CXCL9, and CXCL10) diagnosed AR with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.89) and remained highly accurate at the time of screening (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.48-1) or indication biopsies (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and within the first year (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91) or later (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96), achieving AR diagnosis with an AUC of 0.85 and 0.92 (P < .0001) in 2 external validation cohorts. Decision curve analyses demonstrated the clinical utility of the model. Considering confounding factors rather than excluding them, we optimized a noninvasive multiparametric diagnostic model for AR of kidney allografts with unprecedented accuracy.

Baseline graft status is a critical predictor of kidney graft failure after diarrhoea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhoea is one of the most frequent complications after kidney transplantation (KT). Non-infectious diarrhoea has been associated with reduced graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. However, the risk factors for renal allograft loss following diarrhoea remain largely unknown. METHODS: Between January 2010 and August 2011, 195 consecutive KT recipients who underwent standardized microbiological workups for diarrhoea at a single centre were enrolled in this retrospective study. RESULTS: An enteric pathogen was readily identified in 91 patients (47%), while extensive microbiological investigations failed to find any pathogen in the other 104. Norovirus was the leading cause of diarrhoea in these patients, accounting for 30% of the total diarrhoea episodes. The baseline characteristics were remarkably similar between non-infectious and infectious diarrhoea patients, with the exception that the non-infectious group had significantly lower graft function before diarrhoea (P = 0.039). Infectious diarrhoea was associated with a longer duration of symptoms (P = 0.001) and higher rates of acute kidney injury (P = 0.029) and hospitalization (P < 0.001) than non-infectious diarrhoea. However, the non-infectious group had lower death-censored graft survival than the infectious group (Gehan-Wilcoxon test, P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis retained three independent predictors of graft failure after diarrhoea: diarrhoea occurring ≥5 years after KT [hazard ratio (HR) 4.82; P < 0.001], re-transplantation (HR 2.38; P = 0.001) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 11.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that pre-existing conditions (re-transplantation, chronic graft dysfunction and late occurrence) determine the primary functional long-term consequences of post-transplant diarrhoea.

No clinical benefit of rapid versus gradual tapering of immunosuppression to treat sustained BK virus viremia after kidney transplantation: a single-center experience.

Immunosuppressive drug tapering is currently the recommended treatment of BK virus (BKV) viremia after kidney transplantation; however, its exact modalities remain unclear. We retrospectively compared two consecutive strategies in 111 patients with sustained viremia: a gradual monitoring/tapering group (GT, n = 57) before 2012 and a rapid monitoring/tapering group (RT, n = 54) after 2012. At viremia diagnosis, the dose of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and tacrolimus levels (T0 ) were similar among patient groups. However, following onset, the dose of MPA at 1 month (P = 0.002) and 3 months (P = 0.005) and Tac T0 at 1 month (P = 0.030) and 3 months (P = 0.006) were lower in the RT group. This rapid minimization shortened BKV viremia (P < 0.001) and resulted in a better protection of graft function in patients with confirmed BKV-associated nephropathy (P = 0.033) without impacting 5-year graft survival. Survival without rejection was similar (P = 0.571), but the RT group had increased the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs; P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis identified basiliximab versus Thymoglobulin® induction [hazard ratio (HR), 3.090; P = 0.001] and the RT strategy (HR, 6.021; P = 0.002) as independently associated with dnDSAs. Compared to a gradual tapering, rapid immunosuppression tapering to treat sustained BKV viremia does not improve medium-term clinical outcome but increases the risk of developing dnDSAs.

Reduction in late onset cytomegalovirus primary disease after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients treated with de novo everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Donor (D)+/recipient (R)- serostatus is closely associated with a higher risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. Antiviral prophylaxis is conventionally used in such patients, but late onset CMV infection/disease still occurs after the discontinuation of prophylaxis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 215 low immunological risk patients who received kidney transplantation in our center between 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients received a combination of everolimus (EVL)/reduced doses of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (EVL group) de novo, and 118 received a combination of mycophenolic acid (MPA)/standard doses of CNI (MPA group) de novo. All patients received induction by basiliximab, steroids, and standardized antiviral prophylaxis depending on their CMV D/R serostatus. D+/R- recipients comprised 17% (n = 16) of the EVL group and 19% (n = 22) of the MPA group (P = .722). In the D+/R- subgroup, the 1-year incidence of late onset CMV primary disease after the withdrawal of prophylaxis was lower in the EVL group than in the MPA group (6% vs 41%, P = .025) while the rate of CMV disease in the D+/R+ group (8% vs 6%, P = 1) and the D-/R+ group (12% vs 9%, P = 1) were similar. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 1-year CMV primary disease-free survival in seronegative patients was significantly better in the EVL group (P = .029, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that de novo use of EVL may reduce late onset CMV primary disease after the withdrawal of antiviral prophylaxis in kidney transplantation patients.

MicroRNA-146a in Human and Experimental Ischemic AKI: CXCL8-Dependent Mechanism of Action.

AKI leads to tubular injury and interstitial inflammation that must be controlled to avoid the development of fibrosis. We hypothesized that microRNAs are involved in the regulation of the balance between lesion formation and adaptive repair. We found that, under proinflammatory conditions, microRNA-146a (miR-146a) is transcriptionally upregulated by ligands of IL-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor family members via the activation of NF-κB in cultured renal proximal tubular cells. In vivo, more severe renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) associated with increased expression of miR-146a in both allografts and urine of human kidney transplant recipients, and unilateral IRI in mice induced miR-146a expression in injured kidneys. After unilateral IRI, miR-146a-/- mice exhibited more extensive tubular injury, inflammatory infiltrates, and fibrosis than wild-type mice. In vitro, overexpression or downregulation of miR-146a diminished or enhanced, respectively, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 expression and induced similar effects on C-X-C motif ligand 8 (CXCL8)/CXCL1 expression by injured tubular cells. Moreover, inhibition of CXCL8/CXCL1 signaling prevented the development of inflammation and fibrosis after IRI in miR-146a-/- mice. In conclusion, these results indicate that miR-146a is a key mediator of the renal tubular response to IRI that limits the consequences of inflammation, a key process in the development of AKI and CKD.

Urinary C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 Independently Improves the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection.

Urinary levels of C-X-C motif chemokine 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 can noninvasively diagnose T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) of renal allografts. However, performance of these molecules as diagnostic/prognostic markers of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is unknown. We investigated urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels in a highly sensitized cohort of 244 renal allograft recipients (67 with preformed donor-specific antibodies [DSAs]) with 281 indication biopsy samples. We assessed the benefit of adding these biomarkers to conventional models for diagnosing/prognosing ABMR. Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels, normalized to urine creatinine (Cr) levels (CXCL9:Cr and CXCL10:Cr) or not, correlated with the extent of tubulointerstitial (i+t score; all P<0.001) and microvascular (g+ptc score; all P<0.001) inflammation. CXCL10:Cr diagnosed TCMR (area under the curve [AUC]=0.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.68 to 0.92; P<0.001) and ABMR (AUC=0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.82; P<0.001) with high accuracy, even in the absence of tubulointerstitial inflammation (AUC=0.70; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.79; P<0.001). Although mean fluorescence intensity of the immunodominant DSA diagnosed ABMR (AUC=0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.82; P<0.001), combining urinary CXCL10:Cr with immunodominant DSA levels improved the diagnosis of ABMR (AUC=0.83; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89; P<0.001). At the time of ABMR, urinary CXCL10:Cr ratio was independently associated with an increased risk of graft loss. In conclusion, urinary CXCL10:Cr ratio associates with tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation of the renal allograft. Combining the urinary CXCL10:Cr ratio with DSA monitoring significantly improves the noninvasive diagnosis of ABMR and the stratification of patients at high risk for graft loss.

A Validated LC-MS/MS Method for Performing Belatacept Drug Monitoring in Renal Transplantation.

Belatacept, a CTLA4-Ig, was designed to prevent rejection and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. This immunotherapy showed a long-term clinical benefit mainly on renal function and better glycemic control but was also associated with a higher number of severe infectious diseases, particularly CMV disease, and lymphoproliferative disease. Therapeutic drug monitoring usually guides the benefit-risk assessment of long-term immunosuppression. In this study, an analytical method by LC-MS/MS was developed in 20 microL of plasma for the belatacept quantification. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy were lower than 20% for the limit of quantification, and 15% for higher concentrations. The method was implemented in our lab and provided data about the inter-variability (N = 108) and intra-variability (N = 33) of belatacept concentrations in kidney transplant recipients with a stable renal function, after conversion from a CNI- to a belatacept-based regimen.

CMV-related anterior and intermediate uveitis in a kidney transplant recipient treated with belatacept.

INTRODUCTION: Belatacept is associated with a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and atypical presentations. Ocular manifestations are rare, representing up to 5% of disease manifestations and previous cases consisted in isolated retinitis. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein, we report the case of an 81-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed an anterior and intermediate uveitis under belatacept therapy. The diagnosis was established using quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction assays in the aqueous humor. Belatacept was interrupted and oral and topical valganciclovir treatments were instituted. Lesions however extended, leading to intensify the treatment by intra-venous and intra-vitreal ganciclovir injections. Visual acuity stabilized and ocular inflammation was finally controlled after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of CMV infection as a cause of anterior uveitis under belatacept-based regimen, even in the absence of symptoms suggestive of systemic CMV replication.