Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Límite
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 64(2): 452-457, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27189769

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Multiple catheterizations and procedures on the femoral arteries can increase the risk of infection and eventual destruction of the overlying skin and subcutaneous tissue. Without adequate tissue coverage, vascular structures are exposed and, thus, vulnerable to disruption. This can lead to loss of limb and/or life and carries a significant mortality. We hypothesized that gracilis muscle flap (GMF) was a reliable adjunct in providing healthy tissue coverage for a complex surgical problem. METHODS: Retrospective review of charts was performed on all patients who had undergone GMF for groin infections at a tertiary care medical center. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2012, GMF was performed in 68 limbs (64 patients) by vascular surgeons for infectious etiology to cover the common femoral artery. At the time the GMF was placed, the femoral artery had synthetic graft/patch in 14 limbs, whereas 54 limbs had procedures with autologous conduit. Complete healing was achieved in 58 (85%) limbs. Treatment was deemed not successful in 10 limbs where patients continued to have persistent infection. Six out of 10 limbs had anastomosis disruption requiring emergent ligation of the common femoral artery. Nine patients died during the perioperative period (30-day). There were a total of 13 amputations in 12 patients. Limb salvage was achieved in 55 limbs (81%). Univariate analysis suggested that patients that had revascularization procedures with synthetic graft had a higher complication rate compared with autologous/vein reconstruction (24% vs 5%; P = .021). This group also has a higher rate of persistent infection compared with the autologous group (24% vs 2%; P = .006). Patients older than 75 years at the time of GMF had a higher incidence of GMF-related complications (57% vs 5%; P = .04). Multivariate analysis confirmed that presence of prosthesis led to higher incidence treatment failures and muscle flap complications at the surgical site (odds ratio, 6.6; P = .04; and odds ratio, 13.3; P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: GMF is technically simple to perform and provides durable soft tissue coverage with a high rate of healing for complex groin wounds even in the presence of synthetic conduit.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Músculo Grácil/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Infección de Heridas/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Arkansas , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Cateterismo Periférico/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Ingle , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuperación del Miembro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Punciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas , Infección de Heridas/diagnóstico , Infección de Heridas/microbiología , Infección de Heridas/mortalidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA