Association of hospital-based substance use supports on emergency department revisits: a retrospective cohort study in Sudbury, Canada from 2018 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: This study compares emergency department (ED) revisits for patients receiving hospital-based substance-use support compared to those who did not receive specialized addiction services at Health Sciences North in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The study is a retrospective observational study using administrative data from all patients presenting with substance use disorder (SUD) at Health Sciences North from January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2022 with ICD-10 codes from the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) and the National Ambulatory Care Database (NACRS). There were two interventions under study: addiction medicine consult services (AMCS group), and specialized addiction medicine unit (AMU group). The AMCS is a consult service offered for patients in the ED and those who are admitted to the hospital. The AMU is a specialized inpatient medical unit designed to offer addiction support to stabilize patients that operates under a harm-reduction philosophy. The primary outcome was all cause ED revisit within 30 days of the index ED or hospital visit. The secondary outcome was all observed ED revisits in the study period. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to measure the proportion of 30-day revisits by exposure group. Odds ratios and Hazard Ratios were calculated using logistic regression models with random effects and Cox-proportional hazard model respectively. RESULTS: A total of 5,367 patients with 10,871 ED index visits, and 2,127 revisits between 2018 and 2022 are included in the study. 45% (2,340/5,367) of patient were not admitted to hospital. 30-day revisits were less likely among the intervention group: Addiction Medicine Consult Services (AMCS) in the ED significantly reduced the odds of revisits (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.71, p < 0.01) and first revisits (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.53, p < 0.01). The AMU group was associated with lower revisits odds (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98, p = 0.03). For every additional year of age, the odds of revisits slightly decreased (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, p = 0.01) and males were found to have an increased risk compared to females (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.35-1.67, p < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: We observe statistically significant differences in ED revisits for patients receiving hospital-based substance-use support at Health Sciences North. Hospital-based substance-use supports could be applied to other hospitals to reduce 30-day revisits.

The SAFE (Social Accountability as the Framework for Engagement) for Health Institutions project: Rapid evidence narratives.

PROBLEM ADDRESSED: Family physicians stand to benefit from assistance with the implementation of social accountability strategies. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To develop rapid evidence narratives for key social accountability topics that summarize and mobilize evidence for practical use in social accountability strategies linking front-line, "bottom-up" actions with complementary "top-down" standards from the SAFE (Social Accountability as the Framework for Engagement) for Health Institutions evaluation tool. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The SAFE for Health Institutions project aims to accelerate transformation toward greater social accountability in family medicine practices and in other settings where family physicians work. A social accountability evaluation tool was developed to help with this transformation and includes a framework of 253 comprehensive top-down standards. Key social accountability topics linked to these standards were identified for rapid reviews of the literature, conducted between June and November 2021, with evidence reported as narratives. These rapid evidence narratives provide practical, evidence-based context including suggestions on how to address each topic across the micro, meso, and macro levels of care, connecting bottom-up actions with corresponding considerations for top-down policies, processes, and structures. Summaries of the rapid evidence narratives are being developed as a series of articles for Canadian Family Physician, focusing on what family physicians can do in clinical practices, with interdisciplinary teams, and in other work settings to accelerate change toward adopting or advancing socially accountable strategies. CONCLUSION: Rapid evidence narratives that summarize and mobilize evidence on key social accountability topics further the understanding of social accountability in family medicine and in other settings where family physicians work. Mapping actions across the micro, meso, and macro levels of care is a practical way to link front-line, bottom-up actions with a top-down social accountability strategy.

Commentary: Moral and Ethical Leadership in the Age of Diversity, Equity, Inclusiveness and Social Accountability.

This article weighs three important moral and ethical considerations for leaders in healthcare: their obligations to society, their privilege as leaders and how value goes beyond a simple cost analysis. Leaders highly motivated by the bottom line have avoided the long overdue action on moral and ethical considerations critical to a more just and fairer society. Leaders are now being tasked to develop strategies for health equity, anti-oppression, anti-racism, social justice, diversity, equity and inclusiveness, community engagement, the social determinants of health and environmental accountability, and to demonstrate that their disruptive work adds more value to society than what can be measured in spreadsheet metrics.

Exploring the development of a framework of social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery: a qualitative multipart, multimethods process.

OBJECTIVES: Social accountability is an equity-oriented health policy strategy that requires institutions to focus on local population needs. This strategy is well established in health professional education, but there is limited understanding of its application in healthcare service delivery. Building on what is known in the education setting, this study aimed to explore the development of a framework of comprehensive, evidence-based social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery institutions. DESIGN: This qualitative, multipart, multimethods study consisted of a modified Delphi process guided by an evidence-based social accountability tool for health professional education and complementary methods including developmental evaluation and a review of select literature to capture emerging evidence and contextual relevance. SETTING: The study took place in Northern Ontario, Canada at a medical school and a tertiary, regional academic health sciences centre that are both grounded in social accountability. PARTICIPANTS: Eight expert participants from diverse, multidisciplinary backgrounds, including a patient advocate, were purposefully recruited from both institutions, enrolled and seven completed the study. MAIN OUTCOME: The resulting framework of social accountability standards is organised into 4 major sections that capture broad and critical concepts; 17 key component reflective questions that address key themes; 39 aspirations that describe objective standards and 197 indicators linked to specific expectations. RESULTS: Three modified Delphi rounds were completed producing a framework of consensus derived standards. Developmental evaluation helped identify facilitators, barriers and provided real-time feedback to the study's processes and content. The literature reviewed identified 10 new concepts and 43 amendments. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the development of a comprehensive, evidence-based framework of social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery institutions. Future studies will aim to evaluate the application of these standards to guide equity-oriented social accountability health policy strategies in healthcare service delivery.