AMOBES (Active Mobility Very Early After Stroke): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intensive physical therapy (PT) facilitates motor recovery when provided during a subacute stage after stroke. The efficiency of very early intensive PT has been less investigated. We aimed to investigate whether intensive PT conducted within the first 2 weeks could aid recovery of motor control. METHODS: This multicentre randomized controlled trial compared soft PT (20-min/d apart from respiratory needs) and intensive PT (idem+45 minutes of intensive exercises/day) initiated within the first 72 hours after a first hemispheric stroke. The primary outcome was change in motor control between day (D) 90 and D0 assessed by the Fugl-Meyer score. Main secondary outcomes were number of days to walking 10 m unassisted, balance, autonomy, quality of life, and unexpected medical events. All analyses were by intent to treat. RESULTS: We could analyze data for 103 of the 104 included patients (51 control and 52 experimental group; 64 males; median age overall 67 [interquartile range 59-77], 67 right hemispheric lesions, 80 ischemic lesions, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥8 for 82%). Fugl-Meyer score increased over time (P<0.0001), with no significant effect of treatment (P=0.29) or interaction between treatment and time (P=0.40). The median change in score between D90 and D0 was 27.5 (12-40) and 22.0 (12-56) for control and experimental groups (P=0.69). Similar results were found for the secondary criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Very early after stroke, intensive exercises may not be efficient in improving motor control. This conclusion may apply to mainly severe stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01520636.

Rod and frame test and posture under optokinetic stimulation used to explore two complementary aspects of the visual influence in postural control after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Balance rehabilitation should consider individual comportments according to visual input (VI). Indeed, visual dependence (VD), defined as the predominance given to the VI whatever the circumstances, frequent after stroke it could disturb balance. Because the term VD is a bit restrictive and cannot be deduced from clinical tests, the term visual sensitivity (VS) is preferred here. HYPOTHESIS: VI could have different influence depending on the task for a given individual. METHODS: We retrospectively compared 2 VS tests routinely used: the rod and frame test (RFT) and optokinetic stimulation (OKS). In RFT, VS was defined by a misperception of the visual verticality induced by a tilted frame (VS RFT) and in OKS by tilted sitting posture induced by rotational OKS (VS OKS). We studied the relations between VS RFT and VS OKS. RESULTS: We analysed data for 84 patients, mean age 55±10years, 45±30days after stroke. Scores for both tests were correlated with autonomy measured by the functional independence measure (r=-0.3, p=0.01 and r=-0.2, p=0.02). VS OKS score was also correlated with balance measured by the postural assessment scale for stroke (r=-0.3, p=0.03). VS RFT score was not correlated with VS OKS score (p=0.4, r=0.04). DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION: A patient may display VS for one test without sensitivity for the other because these tests investigate different neural organisation - perception for RFT or action for OKS. Their relation to balance disorders should be further investigated to build individualized rehabilitation programs.