Waterbirth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite patient interest, there is little evidence regarding waterbirth. This review sought to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in waterbirth, compared with landbirth. This search was conducted using MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 15, 2021, with no language or geographic restrictions. Review was registered with PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42021288576. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of women with singleton cephalic gestations at ≥36 weeks comparing waterbirth to landbirth. The primary outcome was a perinatal composite outcome. Secondary outcomes included maternal and individual perinatal outcomes. Summary measures were reported as relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals using random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. I 2 (Higgins I 2) > 0% was used to identify heterogeneity. Six trials including 706 patients were included. When reported, all patients were ≥ 37 weeks' gestation. Labor augmentation (41.7 vs. 84.7%, p < 0.0001) and neuraxial anesthesia (10.5 vs. 72.4%, p < 0.0001) were less common with waterbirth. Estimated blood loss, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration, episiotomy, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes did not differ between groups. Chorioamnionitis and endometritis were not reported by any trial. Maternal satisfaction was higher (p = 0.01) and pain scores lower (p = 0.003) with waterbirth. Length of first stage (p < 0.00001), third stage (p = 0.02), and labor (p = 0.04) were shorter with waterbirth. The composite perinatal outcome could not be calculated due to lack of individual patient data. Compared with landbirth, waterbirth was associated with lower rates of neuraxial anesthesia and lower pain scores, with improved maternal satisfaction. KEY POINTS: · Data are limited regarding the safety and potential benefits of waterbirth.. · With waterbirth, maternal satisfaction was higher and pain scores lower. The first and third stages of labor and labor overall were shorter. No significant differences noted in other maternal outcomes, such as hemorrhage or laceration.. · Insufficient data are available regarding neonatal outcomes..

Preinvasive and Invasive Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Preceding Low-Risk or Negative Pap Result Increases Time to Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to investigate screening histories of women with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and adenocarcinoma (AdCa) of the cervix and to further evaluate screening for glandular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screening histories were retrospectively collected for patients with AIS or AdCa at a single large-volume academic institution from 2005 to 2015. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare AIS with AdCa patient characteristics, distribution of preceding Pap (i.e., trigger Pap) results, and high-risk human papillomavirus testing. The association between Pap result and time to diagnosis was evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty-seven cases, 50 AIS and 37 AdCa, met study criteria; median age was 31 and 43 years, respectively. Among the AIS cohort, 52.0% had a negative or low-risk trigger Pap result versus 24.3% of those with AdCa (p = .001). The time to diagnosis of AIS ranged from 8.4 to 18.8 weeks for those with high- versus low-risk or negative trigger Pap results, respectively (p = .002). The time to diagnosis of AdCa ranged from 14.6 to 44.7 weeks for those with high- versus low-risk or negative trigger Pap results, respectively (p = .003). Among those with high-risk human papillomavirus testing, 89.7% tested positive at the time of trigger Pap with 100% positivity among those with low-risk or negative trigger Pap results. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical AIS and AdCa affect many young nulliparous women and commonly preceded by low-risk or negative Pap testing. The interval to diagnosis increases with low-risk and negative Pap results, and therefore, further investigation into optimal screening for glandular lesions is needed.

Unplanned 30-day hospital readmission as a quality measure in gynecologic oncology.

OBJECTIVES: Thirty-day readmission is used as a quality measure for patient care and Medicare-based hospital reimbursement. The primary study objective was to describe the 30-day readmission rate to an academic gynecologic oncology service. Secondary objectives were to identify risk factors and costs related to readmission. METHODS: This was a retrospective, concurrent cohort study of all surgical admissions to an academic, high volume gynecologic oncology service during a two-year period (2013-2014). Data were collected on patient demographics, medical comorbidities, psychosocial risk factors, and results from a hospital discharge screening survey. Mixed logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-day readmission and costs of readmission were assessed. RESULTS: During the two-year study period, 1605 women underwent an index surgical admission. Among this population, a total of 177 readmissions (11.0%) in 135 unique patients occurred. In a surgical subpopulation with >1 night stay, a readmission rate of 20.9% was observed. The mean interval to readmission was 11.8days (SD 10.7) and mean length of readmission stay was 5.1days (SD 5.0). Factors associated with readmission included radical surgery for ovarian cancer (OR 2.87) or cervical cancer (OR 4.33), creation of an ostomy (OR 11.44), a Charlson score of ≥5 (OR 2.15), a language barrier (OR 3.36), a median household income in the lowest quartile (OR 6.49), and a positive discharge screen (OR 2.85). The mean cost per readmission was $25,416 (SD $26,736), with the highest costs associated with gastrointestinal complications at $32,432 (SD $32,148). The total readmission-related costs during the study period were $4,523,959. CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions to a high volume gynecologic oncology service were costly and related to radical surgery for ovarian and cervical cancer as well as to medical, socioeconomic and psychosocial patient variables. These data may inform interventional studies aimed at decreasing unplanned readmissions in gynecologic oncology surgical populations.

First-trimester uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the prediction of birth weight in a low-risk population.

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between first-trimester uterine artery (UtA) Doppler velocimetry and birth weight in an unselected, low-risk obstetric population. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 415 low-risk pregnant women who underwent a first-trimester ultrasound evaluation between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation. Blood flow velocimetry waveforms from both UtAs were obtained and the pulsatility index (PI) measured and recorded. Clinical records were reviewed for pregnancy outcomes. Birth weight was expressed as z-scores, and the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to calculate the relationship between the mean, delta, and lowest UtA PI values and birth weight. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the mean and delta UtA PI values and birth weight. However, a significant correlation between the lowest UtA PI value and birth weight (ρ = -0.121; p = 0.013) was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a clinically significant correlation between the lowest UtA PI value and birth weight in an unselected, low-risk pregnant population. Because fetal growth is a multifactorial process in which placentation is only one of the factors involved, the use of a single parameter such as Doppler velocimetry remote from the delivery to predict birth weight in a low-risk population seems to be less useful than in the high-risk population.

Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal deliveries.

Identification of patients at risk for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) may allow for prompt diagnosis and intervention. Individual risk factors, risk assessment tools and prediction models have been used for determining a patient's risk of PPH. Measures for the prevention of PPH include identification and management of iron deficiency anemia, unit readiness and preparedness through performing regular simulations and having a PPH cart or medication kit readily available, prophylactic uterotonic - carbetocin alone or dual agents such as oxytocin and misoprostol or oxytocin and methylergometrine or antifibrinolytic (oxytocin and tranexamic acid) use in the third stage of labor immediately after fetal head delivery, and controlled cord traction.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Pregnancy-Related End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Importance: The incidence of pregnancy-related acute kidney injury is increasing and is associated with significant maternal morbidity including progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Little is known about characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who develop pregnancy-related ESKD. Objectives: To examine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pregnancy-related ESKD and to investigate associations between pre-ESKD nephrology care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cohort study of 183 640 reproductive-aged women with incident ESKD between January 1, 2000, and November 20, 2020, from the US Renal Data System and maternal data from births captured in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publicly available natality data. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to June 2023. Exposure: Pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD, per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes reported at ESKD onset by the primary nephrologist on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 2728. Main Outcomes Measures: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models were constructed to examine time to (1) mortality, (2) access to kidney transplant (joining the waiting list or receiving a live donor transplant), and (3) receipt of transplant after joining the waitlist. Results: A total of 341 patients with a pregnancy-related primary cause of ESKD were identified (mean [SD] age 30.2 [7.3]). Compared with the general US birthing population, Black patients were overrepresented among those with pregnancy-related ESKD (109 patients [31.9%] vs 585 268 patients [16.2%]). In adjusted analyses, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had similar or lower hazards of mortality compared with those with glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19), diabetes or hypertension (aHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61), or other or unknown primary causes of ESKD (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.75). Despite this, patients with pregnancy-related ESKD had significantly lower access to kidney transplant compared with those with other causes of ESKD, including (1) glomerulonephritis or cystic kidney disease (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.43-0.66), (2) diabetes or hypertension (aSHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98), and (3) other or unkown cause (aSHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99). Those with pregnancy-related ESKD were less likely to have nephrology care or have a graft or arteriovenous fistula placed before ESKD onset (nephrology care: adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.56; graft or arteriovenous fistula placed: aRR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.57). Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, those with pregnancy-related ESKD had reduced access to transplant and nephrology care, which could exacerbate existing disparities in a disproportionately Black population. Increased access to care could improve quality of life and health outcomes among these young adults with high potential for long-term survival.

Evidence-based labor management: third stage of labor (part 5).

During the third stage of labor, oxytocin and tranexamic acid, oxytocin and misoprostol, oxytocin and methylergometrine, or carbetocin is recommended for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery. Intravenous oxytocin (10 IU) immediately after delivery of the neonate (after either anterior shoulder or whole-body delivery) and before delivery of the placenta is recommended. If oxytocin and tranexamic acid combination is chosen, intravenous tranexamic acid (1 g) in addition to intravenous oxytocin (10 IU) immediately after delivery of the neonate and before placental delivery is recommended. If oxytocin and misoprostol combination is chosen, sublingual misoprostol (400 µg) in addition to intravenous oxytocin (10 IU) immediately after delivery of the neonate is recommended. If there is no intravenous access or if in low-resource settings, sublingual misoprostol (400 µg) and intramuscular oxytocin (10 IU) are recommended. If oxytocin and methylergometrine combination is chosen, intramuscular methylergometrine (0.2 mg) and intravenous oxytocin (10 IU) immediately after delivery of the neonate are recommended. Single-dose intravenous or intramuscular carbetocin (100 µg) immediately after delivery of the neonate is recommended. Controlled cord traction and delayed cord clamping for approximately 60 seconds is recommended. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute umbilical cord milking, uterine massage, or nipple stimulation for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Repair of first- and second-degree lacerations with continuous synthetic suture technique is recommended. No repair of first-degree lacerations if hemostatic and normal cosmesis can be considered. Repair of third-degree lacerations with end-to-end or overlap continuous synthetic suture technique is recommended. Repair of fourth-degree lacerations with delayed absorbable 4-0 or 3-0 polyglactin or chromic suture in a running fashion is recommended. The use of single-dose second-generation cephalosporin at the time of third- or fourth-degree laceration repairs can be considered. Skin-to-skin contact after delivery is recommended. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute routine cord blood gas sampling after delivery. Public cord blood banking is recommended.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on wound complications after cesarean delivery in women with obesity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to assess whether negative pressure wound therapy affects the rate of wound complications when applied to women with obesity after cesarean delivery compared with standard postoperative dressings. DATA SOURCES: This research used PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials as electronic databases, from the inception of each database to January 2021, with randomized controlled trial as the publication type. There was no restriction applied for language or geographic location. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The selection criteria included only randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of negative pressure wound therapy with that of standard dressings on wound complications in women with obesity undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: The primary outcome was a wound complication composite outcome (wound infection, separation or dehiscence, hematoma, seroma, or readmission secondary to a wound concern). The wound complication composite was analyzed by counting events once per patient. The summary measures were reported as relative risk or as mean difference with 95% confidence intervals using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. An I-squared (Higgins I2) value of >0% was used to identify heterogeneity. RESULTS: Overall, 11 randomized controlled trials, which included 5746 participants with obesity undergoing cesarean delivery, were included. Of those participants, 2869 (49.9%) were randomized to the intervention group (negative pressure wound therapy), and 2877 (50.1%) were randomized to the control group (standard dressing). Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy was not associated with a significant change in the rate of wound complications (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.23) compared with standard postoperative dressings. However, the use of negative pressure wound therapy decreased the rate of wound infections (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66- 0.96) and increased the frequency of skin reactions (relative risk, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-16.38). Negative pressure wound therapy did not result in a significant difference in the rate of dehiscence, hematoma, seroma, readmission, reoperation, and antibiotic use for wound infection. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard postoperative incision dressings, negative pressure wound therapy did not affect the rate of wound complications but decreased the frequency of wound infections when applied to women with obesity after cesarean delivery. However, results should be interpreted with caution, as wound infection outcome includes different definitions per the individual trials. CONDENSATION: Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy has no effect on overall wound complications in women with obesity after cesarean delivery compared with standard dressings.

Outcomes among participants vs nonparticipants of randomized trials during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes among individuals who were eligible and approached for participation in a randomized controlled trial during pregnancy, comparing those who enrolled with those who declined participation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid were searched from study inception to May 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This study included all obstetrical randomized controlled trials that reported clinical outcomes for both participants and nonparticipants. METHODS: The primary outcome captured the presence of morbidity. It was a composite of the primary outcome of each study comparing the participant arm with the nonparticipant arm. If a primary outcome was not clearly defined, a surrogate was developed on the basis of the core outcomes for the clinical condition studied. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses for relevant obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were performed. The summary comparisons were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals computed using random-effects meta-analysis with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic. A funnel plot was used to examine publication bias, and there was no asymmetry. RESULTS: After reviewing more than 1100 abstracts, 17 obstetrical randomized controlled trials (103,610, with 26,293 participants and 77,317 nonparticipants) met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Of note, 9 studies were not rated as high quality, primarily for failing to control for confounding factors. Trial interventions were categorized as antepartum (n=11), intrapartum (n=5), or postpartum (n=1). Overall, participants in obstetrical randomized controlled trials had no difference in outcomes compared with nonparticipants (n=17: odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.49; I2=90%). Moreover, there was no difference seen when only randomized controlled trials that reported a primary outcome were included (n=12: odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.1.49; I2=93%). In addition, there was no difference noted in the subgroup where the randomized controlled trial intervention was not available to nonparticipants (n=7: odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.85; I2=68%). CONCLUSION: Pregnant individuals who agreed to participate in randomized controlled trials had no difference in outcomes compared with those who decline participation. Pregnant individuals should be provided with this reassuring information when offered to participate in a randomized controlled trial. Moreover, this information may improve patient recruitment into randomized controlled trials.

Etiology and Outcome of Isolated Fetal Ascites: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the etiology of isolated fetal ascites and associated perinatal outcomes, and to assess the progression of isolated fetal ascites to fetal hydrops. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched using the following keywords: "fetus" OR "foetal" OR "fetal" OR "foetus" AND "ascites" from inception to February 2020. The search was limited to the English language. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A total of 1,983 articles were identified through the search strategy. All studies containing five or more cases of isolated fetal ascites were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Eleven studies, involving 315 cases of isolated fetal ascites, were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. All included studies were evaluated using the tool for evaluating the methodologic quality of case reports and case series described by Murad et al. Data were summarized using narrative review and descriptive statistics. Two-tailed Fisher exact P values calculated from hypergeometric distribution were used to compare outcome by etiology. CIs were calculated with Clopper-Pearson exact binomial interval. The etiologies of isolated fetal ascites are genitourinary (24%), gastrointestinal (20%), viral or bacterial infections (9%), cardiac (9%), genetic disorders not otherwise categorized (8%), chylous ascites (6%), metabolic storage disorders (3%), other structural disorders (4%), other causes (4%) and idiopathic (13%). Survival is most favorable for cases of isolated fetal ascites as a result of chylous (100%), idiopathic (90%), gastrointestinal (77%) and genitourinary (77%) etiologies. Survival is least favorable for fetuses with isolated fetal ascites as a result of structural disorders (25%), cardiac etiology (32%) and metabolic storage disorders (33.3%). When pregnancy terminations were excluded, survival rates were similar between fetuses diagnosed at or after 24 weeks of gestation compared with those diagnosed at less than 24 weeks (74% vs 61%, P=.06). Progression of fetal ascites to fetal hydrops occurred in 6.6% (95% CI 3.6-9.6%) (17/259) of cases when pregnancies that were terminated were excluded. CONCLUSION: Isolated fetal ascites has a diverse etiology. Outcome is related to the etiology of isolated fetal ascites. In the majority of cases, fetal ascites does not progress to fetal hydrops. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42020213930.

Gynecologic cancer in HIV-infected women: treatment and outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gynecologic cancer treatments in HIV-infected women for adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and to describe survival by adherence to guidelines. DESIGN: Beyond cervical cancer, there are little data on treatment and outcomes for these women. This is a retrospective cohort study of HIV-infected women with gynecologic cancers. METHODS: HIV-infected women with gynecologic cancers from 2000 to 2015 were identified at two urban, comprehensive cancer centers. Chart reviews extracted demographic, HIV, and cancer-related variables. Cancer treatment was evaluated for adherence to NCCN guidelines. Overall survival was compared between those who received NCCN adherent and nonadherent cancer care. RESULTS: Fifty-seven women were identified; 15 vulvar (26%), 26 cervical (46%), nine ovarian (16%), and seven endometrial (12%) cancers. Median time from HIV to cancer diagnosis was 8.5 years, and 88% of women were black. Thirty patients (53%) had stage I, and 27 (47%) had stage II-IV disease. Overall, 28 women (49%) received NCCN-adherent care; 22 of 30 stage I (73%) and six of 27 stage II-IV patients (22%). Among 29 women not receiving NCCN-adherent care, 69% were due to patient-related factors or toxicity. Among women with II-IV cancers, 48-month survival was higher in women who received NCCN-adherent care than those who did not (60 versus 28%). CONCLUSION: Most HIV-infected women with advanced gynecologic cancers did not receive NCCN-adherent care and had worse survival compared to those who did. Focus on treatment-related toxicities and patient-related barriers to cancer care are necessary in this population.

"Little Big Things": A Qualitative Study of Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Their Experiences With the Health Care System.

PURPOSE: Navigation of a complex and ever-changing health care system can be stressful and detrimental to psychosocial well-being for patients with serious illness. This study explored women's experiences with navigating the health care system during treatment for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Focus groups moderated by trained investigators were conducted with ovarian cancer survivors at an academic cancer center. Personal experiences with cancer treatment, provider relationships, barriers to care, and the health care system were explored. Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by using grounded theory. Subsequently, one-on-one interviews were conducted to further evaluate common themes. RESULTS: Sixteen ovarian cancer survivors with a median age of 59 years participated in the focus group study. Provider consistency, personal touch, and patient advocacy positively affected the care experience. Treatment with a known provider who was well acquainted with the individual's medical history was deemed an invaluable aspect of care. Negative experiences that burdened patients, referred to as the "little big things," included systems-based challenges, which were scheduling, wait times, pharmacy, transportation, parking, financial, insurance, and discharge. Consistency, a care team approach, effective communication, and efficient connection to resources were suggested as ways to improve patients' experiences. CONCLUSION: Systems-based challenges were perceived as burdens to ovarian cancer survivors at our institution. The role of a consistent, accessible care team and efficient delivery of resources in the care of women with ovarian cancer should be explored further.

Low-grade serous carcinoma: molecular features and contemporary treatment strategies.

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma consists of several subtypes, including high-grade and low-grade serous carcinoma. In the recent past, women with all subtypes of epithelial ovarian carcinoma have been treated similarly and are included in the same clinical trials. However, a distinction has emerged between the type I, low-grade tumors and the type 2, higher-grade epithelial malignancies. Low-grade serous carcinoma exhibits different molecular and clinical features from the other epithelial subtypes, as well as some degree of chemotherapy resistance. This review summarizes the genetic, molecular and clinical characteristics of low-grade serous disease and provides an appraisal of the management strategies.