The radioprotective effect of the Cathpax® AIR cabin during interventional cardiology procedures.

BACKGROUND: The use of ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization interventions adversely impacts the medical staff. Traditional radiation protection equipment is only partially effective. The Cathpax® radiation protection cabin (RPC) has proven to significantly reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiological and neuroradiology interventions. Our objective was to analyze whether the Cathpax® RPC reduces radiation dose in coronary and cardiac structural interventions in unselected real-world procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this nonrandomized all-comers prospective study, 119 consecutive cardiac interventional procedures were alternatively divided into two groups: the RPC group (n = 59) and the non-RPC group (n = 60). No significant changes in the characteristics of patients and procedures, average contrast volume, air kerma (AK), dose area-product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time between both groups were apparent. In the RPC group, the first-operator relative radiation exposure was reduced by 78% at the chest and by 70% at the wrist. This effect was consistent during different types of procedures including complex percutaneous interventions and structural procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates, for the first time, that the Cathpax® cabin significantly and efficiently reduces relative operator radiation exposure during different types of interventional procedures, confirming its feasibility in a real-world setting.

Radiation therapy for the management of painful bone metastases: Results from a randomized trial.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two radiotherapy schedules in patients with bone metastases. BACKGROUND: We analyzed the need for re-irradiation, rates of pain control, pathological fractures, and functionality in patients randomized to single-fraction (8 Gy 1×) or multiple-fraction radiotherapy (3 Gy 10×) with at least 12 months follow-up, during five years. The hypothesis was that the two radiotherapy schedules are equally effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients with painful skeletal metastases were randomized to receive single fraction (8 Gy) or multiple fraction (3 Gy 10×) radiotherapy. RESULTS: In the single-fraction group, seven pathological fractures occurred (15.5%) versus two (4.4%) in the multiple-fraction group. There was no statistically significant difference between the time it took to suffer a pathological fracture in both groups (p = 0.099). Patients in the single-fraction group received twelve re-irradiations (26.6%), four in the multiple-fraction group (8.8%), with no significant difference between time elapsed before the first re-irradiation (p = 0.438). CONCLUSION: This study shows no difference between the two groups for the majority of patients with painful bone metastases. Patients were followed up during five years, and the trial showed no disadvantage for 8 Gy 1× compared to 3 Gy 10×. Despite the fact that the pathological fracture rate is 3.75 times higher in the single-fraction group, this schedule is considered more convenient for patients and more cost-effective for radiotherapy departments.

Braquiterapia intersticial de alta tasa de rescate en cáncer cabeza cuello previamente radiado / High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in previously irradiated recurrent head and neck cancer

A pesar de los avances en el tratamiento de cáncer de cabeza y cuello (CCC), el 15-50% de los pacientes presentan recurrencia locorregional. Para los pacientes que presentan enfermedad localmente recurrente o un segundo tumor primario en un campo previamente irradiado, las opciones terapéuticas de rescate son limitadas, siendo la resección quirúrgica con intención curativa la opción de elección para los pacientes con enfermedad limitada. Reirradiación con o sin la adición de quimioterapia puede ser una buena opción, obteniendo en pacientes seleccionados supervivencia a largo plazo. La braquiterapia de alta tasa de dosis (HDRBT) puede jugar un papel importante en el tratamiento de rescate en tumores de cabeza y cuello recurrentes. Presentamos un paciente de 56 años diagnosticado de cáncer de lengua sometido a cirugía y radioterapia externa adyuvante, y recurrencia metastásica ganglionar cervical contralateral a los 18 meses. Recibió tratamiento multidisciplinar con quimioterapia, cirugía y braquiterapia intersticial(AU)

Despite advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), 15-50% of patients present locoregional disease recurrence. The therapeutic options are limited for patients who present locally recurrent disease or a second primary tumor in a previously irradiated field. Surgical salvage with curative intent is the preferred option for patients with limited-volume disease. Re-irradiation with or without the addition of chemotherapy may hold promise for long-term survival for selected patients. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy can play an important role in the salvage treatment of previously irradiated recurrent head and neck cancer. The case reported was a 56-year old man diagnosed of tongue cancer who presented recurrent metastatic contralateral cervical node 1.5 years after radical treatment with surgery and adjuvant external radiotherapy. He received multidisciplinary treatment with chemotherapy, surgery and HDR interstitial brachytherapy(AU)