RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To optimize the postoperative phase following bariatric surgery, the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathway (ERABS) has been developed. The aim of ERABS is to create a care path that is as safe, efficient and patient-friendly as possible. Continuous evaluation and optimization of ERABS are important to ensure a safe treatment path and may result in better outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric surgery over 2014-2017, during which the ERABS protocol was continuously evaluated and optimized. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from patients undergoing a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between January 2014 and December 2017. Outcomes were early complications, unplanned hospital revisits, readmissions, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: 2889 patients underwent a primary bariatric procedure in a single center. There was a significant decrease in minor complications over the years from 7.0 to 1.9% (p < 0.001). Hospital revisit rates decreased after 2015 (p < 0.001). Readmission rates decreased over time (p < 0.001). The mean duration of surgery decreased from 52 (in 2014) to 41 (in 2017) minutes (p < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay decreased from 1.8 to 1.5 days in 2015 (p = 0.002) and remained stable since. CONCLUSION: An improvement of the ERABS protocol was associated with a decrease in minor complication rates, number of unplanned hospital revisits and readmission rates after primary bariatric procedures.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For metabolic laparoscopic surgery, higher pressures up to 20 mmHg are often used to create a surgical field of sufficient quality. This randomized pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility, safety and tolerability of low intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) to reduce postoperative pain. METHODS: In a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, 62 patients eligible for a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were randomized into one of four groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design: deep/moderate NMB and standard (20 mmHg)/low IAP (12 mmHg). Patient and surgical team were blinded. Primary outcome measure was the surgical field quality, scored on the Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS). Secondary outcome measures were (serious) adverse events, duration of surgery and postoperative pain. RESULTS: 62 patients were included. L-SRS was good or perfect in all patients that were operated under standard IAP with deep or moderate NMB. In 40% of patients with low IAP and deep NMB, an increase in IAP was needed to improve surgical overview. In patients with low IAP and moderate NMB, IAP was increased to improve surgical overview in 40%, and in 75% of these cases a deep NMB was requested to further improve the surgical overview. Median duration of surgery was 38 min (IQR34-40 min) in the group with standard IAP and moderate NMB and 52 min (IQR46-55 min) in the group with low IAP and deep NMB. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of moderate NMB and low IAP can create insufficient surgical overview. Larger trials are needed to corroborate the findings of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register: Trial NL7050, registered 28 May 2018. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7050 .
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Bloqueo Neuromuscular , Neumoperitoneo , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery can influence the prevalence and incidence of comorbidities, as well as the pharmacokinetics of drugs. This might lead to changes in the use of drugs. This study aimed to assess the influence of bariatric surgery on the use of medication in patients before and after surgery, focusing on type, number of medications, and daily dosage. METHODS: In a retrospective and prospective observational study, drug dispensing data from pharmacies of patients undergoing their first bariatric surgery between January 2008 and September 2011 was collected. Dispensing data from 1 month before until 12 months after surgery was analyzed. Drugs were classified according to the WHO-ATC classification system. Dosages of drugs were compared using defined daily dose (DDD). RESULTS: Among 450 patients, 12 months after surgery, the mean number of drugs per patient for antidiabetics, drugs acting on the cardiovascular system, anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs, and drugs for obstructed airway diseases decreased by, respectively, 71.3 % (95 % CI 57.2 to 85.4), 34.5 % (95 % CI 28.2 to 43.0), 45.5 % (95 % CI 13.3 to 72.6), and 33.1 % (95 % CI 15.3 to 53.2). Patients used lower median DDD of oral antidiabetics, beta-blocking agents, and lipid-modifying drugs. CONCLUSIONS: For some major drug classes 12 months after bariatric surgery, the use of drugs decreases in terms of mean number per patient. A reduction in dose intensity was observed for oral antidiabetics, beta-blocking agents, and lipid-modifying drugs. Dispensing data from pharmacies may provide detailed information on the use of medications by patients after bariatric surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Reguladores del Metabolismo de Lípidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países BajosRESUMEN
Background: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most performed metabolic surgical procedure worldwide. However, conflicting results offer no clear evidence about its long-term clinical comparability to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This study aims to determine their equivalent long-term weight loss effects. Methods: This randomised open-label controlled trial was conducted from 2012 until 2017 in two Dutch bariatric hospitals with a 5-year follow-up (last follow-up July 29th, 2022). Out of 4045 patients, 628 were eligible for metabolic surgery and were randomly assigned to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (intention-to-treat). The primary endpoint was weight loss, expressed by percentage excess body mass index (BMI) loss. The predefined clinically relevant equivalence margin was -13% to 13%. Secondary endpoints included percentage total kilograms weight loss, obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. This trial is registered with Dutch Trial Register NTR4741: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/25900. Findings: 628 patients were randomised between sleeve gastrectomy (n = 312) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 316) (mean age 43 [standard deviation (SD), 11] years; mean BMI 43.5 [SD, 4.7]; 81.8% women). Excess BMI loss at 5 years was 58.8% [95% CI, 55%-63%] after sleeve gastrectomy and 67.1% [95% CI, 63%-71%] after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (difference 8.3% [95% CI, -12.5% to -4.0%]). This was within the predefined margin (P < 0.001). Total weight loss at 5 years was 22.5% [95% CI, 20.7%-24.3%] after sleeve gastrectomy and 26.0% [95% CI, 24.3%-27.8%] after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (difference 3.5% [95% CI, -5.2% to -1.7%]). In both groups, obesity-related comorbidities significantly improved after 5 years. Dyslipidaemia improved more frequently after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (83%, 54/65) compared to sleeve gastrectomy (62%, 44/71) (P = 0.006). De novo gastro-oesophageal reflux disease occurred more frequently after sleeve gastrectomy (16%, 46/288) vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (4%, 10/280) (P < 0.001). Minor complications were more frequent after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (5%, 15/316) compared to sleeve gastrectomy (2%, 5/312). No statistically significant differences in major complications and health-related quality of life were encountered. Interpretation: In people living with obesity grades 2 and 3, sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass had clinically comparable excess BMI loss according to the predefined definition for equivalence. However, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass showed significantly higher total weight loss and significant advantages in secondary outcomes, including dyslipidaemia and GERD, yet at a higher rate of minor complications. Major complications, other comorbidities, and overall HRQoL did not significantly differ between the groups. Funding: Not applicable.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: By implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery protocols and day-care surgery, early discharge poses a challenge if excessive bleeding occurs after bariatric surgery. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has demonstrated efficacy in other surgical fields and in bariatric pilot studies. This trial aims to assess the efficacy of peroperative administration of TXA in reducing haemorrhage in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, phase III, double-blind randomised controlled trial in six high-volume bariatric centres in the Netherlands. A total of 1524 eligible patients, aged 18 years or older, undergoing primary gastric bypass surgery (either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or one-anastomosis gastric bypass) will be randomised between TXA and placebo (1:1, variable block, stratified for centre, day-care/overnight stay and type of surgery) after obtaining informed consent (2.5% less haemorrhage, power 80%, 2-sided-α 0.05 and 10% dropout). Exclusion criteria are pregnancy, amedical history of acute bleeding (without cause), venous thrombotic events (VTEs), epilepsy, anticoagulant use and iatrogenic bleeding during surgery (aside from staple line). The primary outcome is postoperative haemorrhage requiring intervention within 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures are staple line reinforcement, blood loss, duration of surgery, postoperative haemoglobin, vital parameters, minor and major complications, side effects of TXA (nausea, hypotension and VTE), length of hospital stay and directly made costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The protocol has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United, Nieuwegein, on 7 February 2023 (registration number: R22.102). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05464394.
Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos , Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Ácido Tranexámico , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Femenino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Adulto , Países Bajos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) ranges from 25% in the general population to 90% in patients with obesity scheduled for bariatric surgery. NAFLD can progress towards non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated with complications such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and cardiovascular disease. To date, losing weight and lifestyle modifications are the best known treatments for NASH. Bariatric surgery significantly improves NAFLD/NASH in the short term. However, the extent of this improvement is not yet clear and long-term data on the natural course of NAFLD/NASH after bariatric surgery are lacking. The factors involved in NAFLD/NASH regression after bariatric surgery have not been elucidated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an observational prospective cohort study including patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. Extensive metabolic and cardiovascular analyses will be carried out including measurements of carotid intima media thickness and pulse wave velocity. Genomic, proteomic, lipidomic and metabolomic studies will be done. Microbioma analyses before and 1 year after surgery will be done. Transient elastography measurements will be performed before and at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. For those with an elevated preoperative transient elastography measurement by Fibroscan, a laparoscopic liver biopsy will be performed during surgery. Primary outcome measures are the change of steatosis and liver fibrosis 5 years after surgery. Secondary outcome measure is the comparison of the transient elastography measurements with the NAFLD Activity Score from the biopsies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United, Nieuwegein, on 1 March 2022 (registration code R21.103/NL79423.100.21). The study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and data will be presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05499949.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/cirugía , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Proteómica , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso/efectos adversos , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are the most frequently performed procedures in bariatric surgery. In patients with morbid obesity and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), LRYGB is the most accepted procedure. For patients with a contraindication for LRYGB or a strong preference for LSG, the Nissen-Sleeve procedure may be a viable new option. The aim of this study is to compare effectiveness of Nissen-Sleeve with LRYGB. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, phase III, parallel-group randomised controlled trial in a high-volume bariatric centre in the Netherlands. A total of 88 patients with morbid obesity and GORD will be randomised to evaluate non-inferiority of Nissen-Sleeve versus LRYGB (non-inferiority margin 15%, power 80%, one-sided α 0.025, 9% drop out). Patients with morbid obesity aged 18 years and older with GORD according to the Montreal definition will be included after obtaining informed consent. Exclusion criteria are achalasia, neoplastic abnormalities diagnosed during endoscopy, super obesity (body mass index ≥50 kg/m2), Crohn's disease and medical history of major abdominal surgery. After randomisation, all patients will undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients in the Nissen-Sleeve arm will undergo a timed barium oesophagram to exclude oesophageal motility disorders. Patients will complete six questionnaires at baseline and every year until 5 years of follow-up. At day 1 postoperative, patients in the Nissen-Sleeve arm will undergo a swallow X-ray to confirm passage. At 1 year, all patients will undergo another endoscopy. The primary outcome is GORD status. Absence of GORD is defined as <8 points on the GORD questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures are long-term GORD improvement; failure rate of procedure; health-related quality of live; weight loss; proton pump inhibitor use; postoperative complications <30 days and >30 days; length of hospital stay; duration of primary surgery; effect on comorbidities; presence and grade of oesophagitis (grade A-D) and/or presence of Barrett's oesophagus and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U), Nieuwegein, on 15 September 2021. Written informed consent will be obtained for all participants in the study. The study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9789; The Netherlands Trial Registry.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In the multi-center Dutch Common Channel Trial (DUCATI), a very long Roux limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (VLRL-RYGB: BP-limb 60 cm, Roux limb variable, and common channel 100 cm) was compared to a standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (S-LRYGB: BP-limb 60 cm, Roux limb 150 cm, and common channel variable) in the treatment of morbidly obese patients. As all trial patients are beyond 3-year follow-up a midterm analysis was performed to investigate the effect of the VLRL-RYGB. METHODS: A total of 444 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either a VLRL-RYGB or a S-LRYGB. Follow-up results for weight loss, effect on obesity-related comorbid conditions, complications, reoperation, and malnutrition are investigated. RESULTS: At 3-year follow-up a significant difference in %TWL (34.0% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.017) and %EWL (84.7% vs. 76.6%, p = 0.043) was observed in favor of VLRL-LRYGB group. Overall complication rate 3-years after surgery was 15.8% in the VLRL-LRYGB group vs. 9% in the S-LRYGB group (p = 0.031). Eight (3.6%) patients in the VLRL-LRYGB group versus 2 (0.9%) in the S-LRYGB group (p = 0.055) required revisional surgery for malabsorption. In the VLRL-LRYGB group 71.9% of patients had resolution of T2DM versus 48.9% in the S-LRYGB group (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: At midterm FU a considerable, significantly increased effect on weight loss of the VLRL-LRYGB was observed compared to the S-LRYGB, with a higher risk of overall complications, but no significant nutritional side effects. These results might impact the current view on the value of the Roux limb in the discussion on optimum limb lengths in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Estudios de Seguimiento , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Fast-track protocols often include short-term thromboprophylaxis and short length of hospital stay. These treatment strategies may negatively affect the occurrence and diagnosis of postoperative haemorrhage. Over the years, the rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) have decreased, while there seems to be an increase in the occurrence of postoperative haemorrhage. Tranexamic acid (TXA) can potentially lower the incidence of postoperative haemorrhage. This trial aims to investigate whether preoperative administration of TXA reduces the preoperative and postoperative haemorrhage rates in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single centre double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. Patients undergoing an LSG are included after obtaining informed consent. Patients are randomised between two groups: (1) administration of placebo infusion and (2) administration of 1500 mg TXA. In both groups, the infusions will be administered during the induction phase of the procedure. Primary outcome measures are preoperative use of haemostatic clips, postoperative haemoglobin decrease and postoperative haemorrhage. Secondary outcome measure is the rates of VTE. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol version 3 was approved by the medical ethical committee Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U), Nieuwegein, on 29 July 2019. The trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and at conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Netherlands Trial Registry (NL8029); Pre-results.
Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Gastrectomía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia VenosaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) is the gold-standard bariatric procedure, it remains uncertain what the optimal bowel limb lengths are to accomplish maximal weight loss while minimizing nutritional deficiencies and related gastro-intestinal complaints. The aim of this randomized controlled multicenter trial is to investigate the effect of significant lengthening of the length of the Roux limb (RL) at the cost of the length of the common channel (CC) while keeping the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) lengths the same on both study arms. METHODS: Four hundred forty-four patients were randomized to receive either a Very Long Roux Limb LRYGB (VLRL-LRYGB) (variable RL length, BPL 60 cm, and CC 100 cm) or a Standard LRYGB (S-LRYGB) (RL 150 cm, BPL 60 cm, and a variable CC length). Results at 1-year follow-up for weight loss, effect on obesity-related comorbid conditions, complications, re-operation rate, malnutrition rate, and re-admission rate were investigated. RESULTS: Weight loss at 1-year showed no significant differences for %EWL (84.3% versus 85.3%, p = 0.72) and %TWL (34.2% versus 33.6%, p = 0.359) comparing VLRL-LRYGB versus S-LRYGB. Malabsorption requiring surgical bowel length adjustment was observed in 1.4% in VLRL-LRYGB group versus 0.9% in S-LRYGB group (p = 0.316). CONCLUSION: Significant lengthening of the RL at the cost of the common channel seems to have no effect on the weight loss at 1-year follow-up, which supports the theory that absorption of nutrients also occurs in the RL. Nevertheless, long-term results of the VLRL-LRYGB have to be awaited to draw final conclusions as part of the discussion towards optimal limb length in LRYGB surgery.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estándares de Referencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
Objective: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery induces major changes in the gastrointestinal tract that may alter the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs. Results from pharmacokinetic studies are sparse. This study aimed to investigate the effect of RYGB on the bioavailability of metoprolol from immediate release (IR) and controlled release (CR) tablets in female patient volunteers before and after surgery. Methods: An explorative, two-phase, single oral dose pharmacokinetic study of metoprolol in female patients undergoing RYGB was carried out. The dose was administered twice in each patient, 1 month before and 6 months after surgery. After intake of either 100 mg of metoprolol IR or CR tablet serum concentration-time profiles of metoprolol were determined. The endpoint was the ratio of AUCafter/AUCbefore of metoprolol. Results: Twelve patients were included in the study (metoprolol IR: 7; metoprolol CR: 5). After intake of a metoprolol IR tablet major intraindividual and interindividual differences for area under the serum concentration versus time curve (AUC) of metoprolol before and after surgery were observed (range ratio AUC0-10 hours after/AUC0-10 hours before: 0.74-1.98). For metoprolol CR tablets a significant reduction in bioavailability of metoprolol was observed after surgery (range ratio AUC0-24 hours after/AUC0-24 hours before: 0.43-0.77). Conclusion: RYGB may influence the bioavailability of metoprolol from an IR tablet. The magnitude of changes in bioavailability after RYGB requires close monitoring of patients using metoprolol IR tablets and dose adjustment if deemed necessary. RYGB clearly reduces the bioavailability of metoprolol from a CR tablet. After RYGB clinicians may consider to increase the dose according to clinical response.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/tendencias , Metoprolol/administración & dosificación , Metoprolol/sangre , Administración Oral , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/sangre , Adulto , Disponibilidad Biológica , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/metabolismo , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , ComprimidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current methods for weight loss assessment after bariatric surgery do not meet the high standards required to accurately judge patient outcome in a fair and evidence-based way. OBJECTIVES: To build an evidence-based, versatile tool to assess weight loss and weight regain and identify poor responders up to 7 years after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), for any preoperative body mass index (BMI). SETTING: Multicenter, observational study. METHODS: Bariatric weight loss charts were built with standard deviation (SD) percentile (p) curves p+2SD/p+1SD/p50(median)/p-1SD/p-2SD, based on all last measured weight results after primary LRYGB and LSG, performed in 3 large bariatric centers, expressed with percentage total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage-alterable weight loss (%AWL), a special BMI-independent metric. The p-1SD %AWL curves were compared with popular bariatric criteria 50% excess weight loss and 20%TWL. The p50 %TWL curves were compared with %TWL outcome in literature (external validation). RESULTS: In total, 9393 patients (5516 LRYGB, 3877 LSG, baseline BMI 43.7 (±SD 5.3) kg/m2, age 43 (±SD 10.9) years, 20% male, 21% type 2 diabetes) had mean follow-up 26 (range, 0-109) months, with .09% 30-day mortality. Independent outcome is presented in percentile charts for %AWL and %TWL. Percentile curves p+2SD/p+1SD/p50/p-1SD/p-2SD showed for LRYGB 72%/62%/50%/38%/28%AWL at nadir, 66%/55%/43%/30%/17%AWL at 4 years, 64%/52%/38%/25%/11%AWL at 7 years, and for LSG 69%/58%/46%/34%/22%AWL, 65%/53%/38%/23%/12%AWL, and 63%/51%/35%/22%/9%AWL, respectively. Bariatric criteria 50% excess weight loss and 20%TWL matched with most insufficient results for LSG, but not for LRYGB (low specificities). Both p50 %TWL curves are comparable with long-term weight loss in bariatric literature. CONCLUSIONS: Just as well-known growth charts are essential for pediatrics, weight loss charts should become the tools of choice for bariatrics. These multicenter charts are baseline BMI independent, superior to current bariatric criteria, and quite intuitive to use. They allow to readily detect poor responders in any postoperative phase, monitor the effect of extra counseling, judge weight regain, and manage patient expectations.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
Bariatric surgery is an effective tool in the treatment of patients with morbid obesity. In these case reports we describe 2 patients who developed liver failure after currently-practiced types of bariatric surgery, caused by a prolonged state of malnutrition provoked by psychiatric problems. Despite intensive guidance of a psychologist and dieticians after surgery, our patients deteriorated psychologically, resulting in a prolonged state of severe malnutrition and anorexia. Finally, a state of starvation was reached, passing a critical level of the liver capacity. Patients who present with signs of severe protein malnutrition after bariatric surgery should be closely monitored and checked for nutritional status. Specific attention should be given to patients who develop psychiatric problems post-bariatric surgery. If refeeding does not result in clinical improvement, reversal surgery should be considered in a timely manner.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients are at higher risk of complications after surgery. In bariatric surgery, pre- and intra-operative checklists are commonly used to identify high-risk patients preoperatively, to decrease the number of postoperative complications. This pilot study evaluates the effect of a postoperative checklist in bariatric surgery, addressing regularly measured parameters, on the occurrence and early recognition of complications. METHODS: An in-house developed postoperative checklist was used on the first postoperative day after bariatric surgery and included information on nausea, pain, temperature, heart rate, and laboratory markers. Complications were scored using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification, and three groups were formed: no complications (CD0), minor complications (CD1 and 2), and major complications (≥CD3a). Differences between groups were analyzed using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-four subjects were included (79.5% female, age 42.6 ± 10.8 years, BMI 43.8 ± 5.8 kg/m2). Twenty-nine subjects developed major complications within 30 days postoperatively. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Subjects with major complications were less willing to be discharged due to complaints, compared to subjects with no or minor complications (14.8 vs. 3.6 and 4.6%, respectively) and had a higher decrease of hemoglobin level (0.8 vs. 0.6 and 0.65 mmol/l, respectively). CONCLUSION: The patient's willingness for discharge, in combination with hemoglobin decrease, may be the best early predictors of major complications after bariatric surgery. This postoperative checklist may be an adequate instrument to identify patients who can be safely discharged home on the first postoperative day and thereby play a part in patient management after bariatric surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Lista de Verificación/normas , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Alta del Paciente/normas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/rehabilitación , Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/epidemiología , Náusea/etiología , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estándares de Referencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is the only treatment option that achieves sustained weight loss in obese patients and that also has positive effects on obesity-related comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) seems to achieve equal weight loss as laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), but there is still much debate about the quality of life (QOL) after LSG, mainly concerning the association with gastroesophageal reflux. Our hypothesis is that QOL after LSG is comparable with QOL after LRYGB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2013 and February 2014, 150 patients were randomized to undergo either LSG or LRYGB in our clinic. Differences in QOL were compared between groups by using multiple QOL questionnaires at follow-up moments preoperatively and 2 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: After 12 months of follow-up, 128 patients had returned the questionnaires. Most QOL questionnaires showed significant improvement in scores between the preoperative moment and after 12 months of follow-up. The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ) score deteriorated in the LSG group after 2 months, but recovered again after 12 months. After 2 months of follow-up, the mean GerdQ score was 6.95 ± 2.14 in the LSG group versus 5.50 ± 1.49 in the LRYGB group (p < 0.001). After 1 year, the mean GerdQ score was 6.63 ± 2.26 in the LSG group and 5.60 ± 1.07 in the LRYGB group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial shows that patients who underwent LSG have significantly higher GerdQ scores at both 2 and 12 months postoperatively than patients who underwent LRYGB, whereas overall QOL did not differ significantly.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/rehabilitación , Derivación Gástrica/rehabilitación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/epidemiología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/rehabilitación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pérdida de Peso/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification is the formation of bone in tissues outside the skeletal system. Ectopic bone in a midline laparotomy scar is usually asymptomatic. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 59-year-old man was referred by his GP to the surgical outpatient clinic because of dull epigastric pain along with a painful swelling. He had undergone a midline laparotomy 6 months earlier. A CT scan revealed a longitudinal ossification of 9 cm in length, extending from the xyphoid process to the umbilicus. The structure was excised because of progressive symptoms. The diagnosis of heterotopic ossification was confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSION: This case describes the clinical and histopathological presentation of heterotopic ossification in a laparotomy scar. Current insights and the pathophysiology of this condition are reviewed. Treatment is only indicated in symptomatic patients, and consists of surgical excision.
Asunto(s)
Cicatriz/patología , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Osificación Heterotópica/diagnóstico , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Cicatriz/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the influence of bariatric surgery on the use and pharmacokinetics of some frequently used drugs. A PubMed literature search was conducted. Literature was included on influence of bariatric surgery on pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacokinetics. Drug classes to be searched for were antidepressants, antidiabetics, statins, antihypertensive agents, corticosteroids, oral contraceptives, and thyroid drugs. A reduction in the use of medication by patients after bariatric surgery has been reported for various drug classes. Very few studies have been published on the influence of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. After bariatric surgery, theoretically, reduced drug absorption may occur. Correct dosing and choosing the right dosage form for drugs used by patients after bariatric surgery are necessary for optimal pharmacotherapy. Therefore, more clinical studies are needed on the influence of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetics of major drugs.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/farmacocinética , Antihipertensivos/farmacocinética , Antitiroideos/farmacocinética , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/farmacocinética , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/metabolismo , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been increasingly reported. It is induced by ß-cell hyperplasia often referred to as nesidioblastosis. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C]-5-hydroxytryptophan ((11)C-HTP) and 6-[18F]fluoro-3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine ((18)F-DOPA) has been successfully applied to image neuroendocrine tumors. No data are available of the usefulness of these functional imaging techniques in post-RYGB in this new endocrine disorder, neither for diagnostic purposes nor for follow-up. OBJECTIVE: We present a patient with post-RYGB hypoglycemia who underwent (11)C-HTP and (18)F-DOPA PET scintigraphy for diagnostic purposes and to evaluate the effect of additional laparoscopic adjustable banding of the pouch as a surgical therapy for this disorder. PATIENT: We describe a woman with biochemically confirmed post-RYGB hypoglycemia who showed diffuse uptake of the (11)C-HTP and (18)F-DOPA tracers in the entire pancreas. After failure of dietary and medical treatment options, she underwent a laparoscopic adjustable banding for pouch dilatation. Subjective improvement was noted, which coincided with decreased uptake of (18)F-DOPA and (11)C-HTP in the head of the pancreas. CONCLUSIONS: Functional imaging by (18)F-DOPA- and (11)C-HTP-PET can accurately visualize diffuse endocrine pancreatic activity in post-gastric bypass hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Both (11)C-HTP- and (18)F-DOPA-PET imaging appear to have a similar diagnostic performance in the presented case, and uptake of both tracers potentially relates to disease activity after surgical intervention.