Adherence to a risk-adapted screening strategy for prostate cancer: First results of the PROBASE trial.

PROBASE is a population-based, randomized trial of 46 495 German men recruited at age 45 to compare effects of risk-adapted prostate cancer (PCa) screening starting either immediately at age 45, or at a deferred age of 50 years. Based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, men are classified into risk groups with different screening intervals: low-risk (<1.5 ng/ml, 5-yearly screening), intermediate-risk (1.5-2.99 ng/ml, 2 yearly), and high risk (>3 ng/ml, recommendation for immediate biopsy). Over the first 6 years of study participation, attendance rates to scheduled screening visits varied from 70.5% to 79.4%, depending on the study arm and risk group allocation, in addition 11.2% to 25.4% of men reported self-initiated PSA tests outside the PROBASE protocol. 38.5% of participants had a history of digital rectal examination or PSA testing prior to recruitment to PROBASE, frequently associated with family history of PCa. These men showed higher rates (33% to 57%, depending on subgroups) of self-initiated PSA testing in-between PROBASE screening rounds. In the high-risk groups (both arms), the biopsy acceptance rate was 64% overall, but was higher among men with screening PSA ≥4 ng/ml (>71%) and with PIRADS ≥3 findings upon multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) (>72%), compared with men with PSA ≥3 to 4 ng/ml (57%) or PIRADS score ≤ 2 (59%). Overall, PROBASE shows good acceptance of a risk-adapted PCa screening strategy in Germany. Implementation of such a strategy should be accompanied by a well-structured communication, to explain not only the benefits but also the harms of PSA screening.

A randomized trial of risk-adapted screening for prostate cancer in young men-Results of the first screening round of the PROBASE trial.

There is no generally accepted screening strategy for prostate cancer (PCa). From February 2014 to December 2019 a randomized trial (PROBASE) recruited 46 642 men at age 45 to determine the efficacy of risk-adapted prostate-specific antigen-based (PSA) screening, starting at either 45 or 50 years. PSA tests are used to classify participants into a low (<1.5 ng/mL), intermediate (1.5-2.99 ng/mL) or high (≥3 ng/mL) risk group. In cases of confirmed PSA values ≥3 ng/mL participants are recommended a prostate biopsy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Half of the participants (N = 23 341) were offered PSA screening immediately at age 45; the other half (N = 23 301) were offered digital rectal examination (DRE) with delayed PSA screening at age 50. Of 23 301 participants who accepted baseline PSA testing in the immediate screening arm, 89.2% fell into the low, 9.3% into intermediate, and 1.5% (N = 344) into the high risk group. Repeat PSA measurement confirmed high-risk status for 186 men (0.8%), of whom 120 (64.5%) underwent a biopsy. A total of 48 PCas was detected (overall prevalence 0.2%), of which 15 had International Society of Uropathology (ISUP) grade 1, 29 had ISUP 2 and only 4 had ISUP ≥3 cancers. In the delayed screening arm, 23 194 participants were enrolled and 6537 underwent a DRE with 57 suspicious findings, two of which showed PCa (both ISUP 1; detection rate 0.03%). In conclusion, the prevalence of screen-detected aggressive (ISUP ≥3) PCa in 45-year-old men is very low. DRE did not turn out effective for early detection of PCa.

Value of T2 Mapping MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection and Classification.

BACKGROUND: Currently, multi-parametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) consists of a qualitative T2 , diffusion weighted, and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging. Quantification of T2 imaging might further standardize PCa detection and support artificial intelligence solutions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of T2 mapping to detect prostate cancer (PCa) and to differentiate PCa aggressiveness. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective single center cohort study. POPULATION: Forty-four consecutive patients (mean age 67 years; median PSA 7.9 ng/mL) with mpMRI and verified PCa by subsequent targeted plus systematic MR/ultrasound (US)-fusion biopsy from February 2019 to December 2019. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Standardized mpMRI at 3 T with an additionally acquired T2 mapping sequence. ASSESSMENT: Primary endpoint was the analysis of quantitative T2 values and contrast differences/ratios (CD/CR) between PCa and benign tissue. Secondary objectives were the correlation between T2 values, ISUP grade, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and PI-RADS, and the evaluation of thresholds for differentiating PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney test, Spearman's rank (rs ) correlation, receiver operating curves, Youden's index (J), and AUC were performed. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Median quantitative T2 values were significantly lower for PCa in PZ (85 msec) and PCa in TZ (75 msec) compared to benign PZ (141 msec) or TZ (97 msec) (P < 0.001). CD/CR between PCa and benign PZ (51.2/1.77), respectively TZ (19.8/1.29), differed significantly (P < 0.001). The best T2 -mapping threshold for PCa/csPCa detection was for TZ 81/86 msec (J = 0.929/1.0), and for PZ 110 msec (J = 0.834/0.905). Quantitative T2 values of PCa did not correlate significantly with the ISUP grade (rs  = 0.186; P = 0.226), ADC value (rs  = 0.138; P = 0.372), or PI-RADS (rs  = 0.132; P = 0.392). DATA CONCLUSION: Quantitative T2 values could differentiate PCa in TZ and PZ and might support standardization of mpMRI of the prostate. Different thresholds seem to apply for PZ and TZ lesions. However, in the present study quantitative T2 values were not able to indicate PCa aggressiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Robotic Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Small Volume Metastatic Testicular Cancer.

PURPOSE: Robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with testicular cancer is controversial. Lately, unusual recurrence patterns with adverse outcomes after robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection have been published. In this report we determine the feasibility, safety and early oncologic outcome of robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with small volume metastatic testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 27 consecutive patients with small volume metastatic testicular cancer (October 2010 to November 2019) who underwent robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (unilateral modified template). Intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as early oncologic outcomes are reported. Surgery was performed in the primary metastatic setting in 22 (81%), post-chemotherapy in 4 (15%) and for late relapse in 1 patient (4%). Initial clinical stage was IIA for 14 (52%), IIB for 12 (43%) and III for 1 (4%) patient. RESULTS: Median operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were 175 minutes, 50 ml and 4 days, respectively. Expectedly, viable tumor was found in 21/27 patients (78%) and 6 patients (22%) showed fibrosis, necrosis or no tumor. Overall 3 (11%) patients experienced intraoperative (Satava II) and 1 (4%) postoperative (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) complications, respectively. Median followup was 16.5 months (3-69), and 3 (11%) patients experienced relapse outside of the surgical field after 12, 22 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: In highly selected patients with low volume metastatic testicular cancer robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection may be indicated, and appears to be technically feasible and comparable with open surgery in terms of complications and early oncologic safety. Prospective data collection in larger series is necessary to clarify the role and specific indications of this approach.

Factors Associated with Low Sexual Desire in 45-Year-Old Men: Findings from the German Male Sex-Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although low sexual desire is 1 of the most common sexual dysfunctions in men, there is a lack of studies investigating associated factors in large, population-based samples of middle-aged men. AIM: To survey the prevalence of low sexual desire in a population-based sample of 45-year-old German men and to evaluate associations with a broad set of factors. METHODS: Data were collected between April 2014-April 2016 within the German Male Sex-Study. Participants were asked to fill out questionnaires about 6 sociodemographic, 5 lifestyle, and 8 psychosocial factors, as well as 6 comorbidities and 4 factors of sexual behavior. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were used to assess potential explanatory factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We found a notable prevalence of low sexual desire in middle-aged men and detected associations with various factors. RESULTS: 12,646 men were included in the analysis, and prevalence of low sexual desire was 4.7%. In the multiple logistic regression with backward elimination, 8 of 29 factors were left in the final model. Men having ≥2 children, higher frequency of solo-masturbation, perceived importance of sexuality, and higher sexual self-esteem were less likely to have low sexual desire. Premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, and lower urinary tract symptoms were associated with low sexual desire. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Low sexual desire is common in middle-aged men, and associating factors that can potentially be modified should be considered during assessment and treatment of sexual desire disorders. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The strength of our study is the large, population-based sample of middle-aged men and the broad set of assessed factors. However, because of being part of a prostate cancer screening trial, a recruiting bias is arguable. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that low sexual desire among 45-year-old men is a common sexual dysfunction, with a prevalence of nearly 5% and might be affected by various factors, including sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, as well as comorbidities and sexual behavior. Meissner VH, Schroeter L, Köhn F-M, et al. Factors Associated with Low Sexual Desire in 45-Year-Old Men: Findings from the German Male Sex-Study. J Sex Med 2019;16:981-991.

Oncological outcome of patients treated with spot-specific salvage lymphnode dissection (sLND) for positron-emission tomography (PET)-positive prostate cancer (PCa) relapse.

OBJECTIVES: To report pre-, postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients treated with spot-specific sLND for patients with exclusive nodal recurrence after PCa primary treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With regard to salvage treatment failure (sTF), 46 consecutive patients, undergoing 52 sLND for nodal recurrence detected by PET/CT scan were stratified in 3 groups (group A: post-sLND PSA nadir < 0.01 ng/ml and in follow-up reaching a value > 0.2 ng/ml, group B: post-sLND PSA nadir > 0.01 ng/ml and in follow-up reaching a value equal to pre-sLND PSA; group C: additional salvage treatment administration). Surgical outcome of patients was analyzed by descriptive statistics (Student's t test for continuous variables, Chi-square and Fisher's test for categorial ones). Time to sTF of each group was analyzed and compared by Kaplan-Meier method and correlations regarding sTF and pre-sLND PSA, time from PCa primary treatment to PET/CT scan, time from PCa primary treatment to sLND and number of positive PET/CT scan spots were assessed. RESULTS: Median PSA at PET/CT scan was 2.9 ng/ml (IQR 1.2-6.1). Open and laparoscopic sLND were performed in 40/52 (77%) and 12/52 (23%), respectively. Median number of removed lymph nodes was 6 (IQR 4-13). Histological report was positive for PCa in 39/52 sLND (75%). Median blood loss was 50 ml (IQR 0-50, range 0-600). Median length of hospital stay was 5 days (IQR 4-6). 4 and 7 patients had low-grade (I/II) and high-grade (≥ III) Clavien-Dindo complications, respectively. Readmission rates at 30 and 90 days were 5/52 (9.6%) and 1/52 (2%), respectively. sTF was observed in 2/7 (group A), 12/12 (group B) and 22/22 patients (group C). Median time to sTF in group B and C was 3.5 (IQR 1.7-13.2) and 4 months (IQR 2.0-10), respectively. CONCLUSION: Even spot-specific PET/CT sLND harbors a measurable (CD > III) morbidity in 1 out of 7 patients. Only patients with positive histological report and a PSA nadir < 0.01 ng/ml after sLND seem to experience a long-term benefit. Patients with a PSA nadir > 0.01 ng/ml have a delay of systemic treatment of up to 4 months. sLND remains an experimental approach and long-term oncological benefit needs an improved selection of patients.

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required?

PURPOSE: For multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy the number of biopsy cores obtained is arbitrarily established by urologists. Moreover, a general consensus is lacking on the number of biopsy cores to be obtained from a single magnetic resonance imaging lesion. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of obtaining only 1 biopsy core per magnetic resonance imaging lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 2,128 biopsy cores of 1,064 prostatic lesions (2 cores per lesion) in 418 patients in regard to prostate cancer detection (histology) and the Gleason score of the first biopsy core compared to the second biopsy core. Two analyses were performed, including patient level analysis based on prostate cancer detection per patient and lesion level analysis based exclusively on the histology of each lesion regardless of the overall histological outcome of the case. RESULTS: The overall prostate cancer detection rate was 45.7% (191 of 418 patients). The first biopsy core detected 170 of all 191 prostate cancers (89%). In 17 of these 170 prostate cancers (10%) the second biopsy core revealed Gleason score upgrading. Nine of the 21 prostate cancers (43%) missed by the first biopsy core had a Gleason score of 6. Altogether 537 of the 2,128 biopsy cores were positive, including 283 first (26.6%) and 254 second (24%) biopsy cores (p ≤0.001). The concordance between the first and second biopsy cores was 89% (κ = 0.71). There was a discrepancy with Gleason score upgrading in 28 of 212 lesions (13.2%) with positive first and second biopsy cores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that obtaining more than 1 biopsy core per magnetic resonance imaging lesion only slightly improves the prostate cancer detection rate and Gleason grading.

Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.

PURPOSE: We systematically analyzed the records of patients with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) 3 lesions, which are called equivocal according to PI-RADS version 2, using prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies. Systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies served as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive patients were retrospectively included in the study. In these patients the overall PI-RADS score was 3 after 3 Tesla T2-weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as well as subsequent targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsies plus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies. The study end points were the prostate cancer detection rate, the Gleason score distribution, the prostate cancer location and risk stratification by subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 13 of 118 patients for a detection rate of 11%, including 5 patients (4.2%) with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 or greater. Three of the 212 lesions (1.4%) in the transition zone and 6 of the 64 (9.4%) in the peripheral zone were positive for prostate cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging revealed patterns of peripheral prostatitis combined with diffuse stromal hyperplasia in 54% of the patients with prostate cancer. Prostate volume was significantly lower in patients with prostate cancer (p = 0.015) but differences in prostate specific antigen levels were not statistically significant (p = 0.87). Prostate specific antigen density was higher in patients with prostate cancer (0.19 vs 0.12 ng/ml/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Low grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) can develop in patients with an overall PI-RADS score of 3. Prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 or greater can be detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with a high degree of certainty. Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 or greater prostate cancer is unlikely in PI-RADS 3 lesions. Therefore, these patients should primarily undergo followup multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. In patients with a combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging aspects of extensive prostatitis and diffuse stromal hyperplasia low prostate volume and/or high prostate specific antigen density biopsy might be considered.

[Prostate cancer screening: controversies and suggested solutions]. / Prostatakrebsscreening: Kontroversen und mögliche Lösungen.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in industrialized countries. The annual incidence rate in Germany is about 60,000. Every year, 13,000 men die of this disease. Nevertheless, the 10-year survival rate is relatively favorable compared to other carcinomas.Prostate cancer screening is discussed controversially both nationally and internationally. This is due to the fact that the determination of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for tumor detection beginning in the 1980s led to over-diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer and consequently to over-therapy-usually by radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.This review article will discuss the largest randomized controlled trials of PSA-based prostate cancer screening to date. It will highlight the advantages and disadvantages of this screening and give an outlook on the development of future strategies for prostate cancer screening.For PSA screening, the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) study showed a relative reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality of approximately 21% after a median follow-up period of 13 years. However, in absolute figures, relatively few men will benefit from population-based screening and the rate of over-diagnosed men remains high.The procedure in a Swedish long-term study, in which risk-adapted screening intervals were applied on the basis of the assessment of a baseline PSA level at a young age (40-50) showed promising results and may provide a solution to this dilemma. This strategy is the basis for the currently largest study on risk-adapted prostate cancer screening ( www.PROBASE.de ), which evaluates this concept for the first time with a randomized design.

Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsy (IB-GB) and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (FUS-GB) with additional systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy within a prospective randomized trial. METHODS: Two hundred and ten consecutive patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IB-GB and prior intrarectal instillation of a 2% lidocaine gel (n = 106) or FUS-GB plus additional systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy and prior application of a periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) with 2% mepivacaine (n = 104). The maximal procedural pain (MPP) on a 0-10 visual analog scale and the operating room time were recorded for each biopsy session. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and mean number of targeted biopsy cores (5.6 ± 0.8 vs 5.4 ± 1.2 for IB-GB and FUS-GB, respectively; p = 0.278) were similar in both study arms. In relation to the IB-GB arm, the total number of biopsy cores in the FUS-GB arm, including the systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy, was significantly higher (17.4 ± 1.2; p < 0.001). Patients with IB-GB had significantly higher MPP scores (2.95 ± 2.15) compared with subjects with FUS-GB (1.95 ± 1.56; p < 0.001). FUS-GB required significantly less time (28.22 ± 11.61 min) in comparison with IB-GB (42.09 ± 11.37 min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PPNB can easily be administered just prior to performing FUS-GB. Thus, patients have significantly lower pain levels in comparison with IB-GB, which is usually done with intrarectal anesthetic gels. Although the addition of a systematic 12-core TRUS-guided biopsy significantly increases the number of biopsy cores, FUS-GB still requires significantly less time in comparison with IB-GB.

MRI-Guided In-Bore Biopsy: Differences Between Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization in Primary and Secondary Biopsy Settings.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate transrectal MRI-guided in-bore biopsy in patients who either were biopsy-naive (primary biopsy) or had undergone at least one previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (secondary biopsy) with regard to cancer detection rate, tumor localization, and lesion size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1602 biopsy cores from 297 consecutive patients (mean ± SD, 66.1 ± 7.8 years; median prostate-specific antigen value, 8.2 ng/mL) in primary (n = 160) and secondary (n = 137) prostate biopsy settings were evaluated in this retrospective study. All patients previously underwent prostate MRI (T2-weighted imaging, DWI, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging) at 3 T. All described lesions were biopsied with MRI-guided in-bore biopsy and were examined histologically. RESULTS: In 148 patients, overall 511 cores were positive for prostate cancer. Clinically significant prostate cancer (any Gleason pattern ≥ 4) was found in 82.4% of patients. The prostate cancer detection rate for patients who underwent primary biopsies was 55.6% and was 43.1% for patients who underwent secondary biopsies. In patients with primary versus secondary biopsies, prostate cancer was located peripherally in 62.9% versus 49.5% (p = 0.04), in the transition zone in 27.4% versus 27.5% (p = 1.0), and in the anterior stroma in 10.3% versus 22.9% (p < 0.01), respectively. The prostate cancer detection rates for patients with smaller prostate volumes (< 30 vs 30-50 vs > 50 mL; p < 0.01) or for patients with larger lesions (> 0.5 vs 0.25-0.5 vs < 0.25 cm(3); p < 0.01) were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided in-bore biopsy led to high detection rates in primary and secondary prostate biopsies. Prostate cancer detection rates were significantly higher for patients with larger lesions and smaller prostate glands. In patients who underwent secondary biopsies, prostate cancer was located in the anterior stroma at a significantly more frequent rate.

Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is increasingly performed to diagnose prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of well controlled, prospective trials to support this treatment method. We prospectively compared magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 132 biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen (greater than 4 ng/ml). After 3 Tesla functional multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging patients were referred for magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy of prostate lesions (maximum 3) followed by standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (12 cores). We analyzed the detection rates of prostate cancer and significant prostate cancer (greater than 5 mm total cancer length or any Gleason pattern greater than 3). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients with a mean ± SD age of 66.1 ± 8.1 years met all study requirements. Median prostate specific antigen was 6.7 ng/ml (IQR 5.1-9.0). Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsies provided the same 53.1% detection rate, including 79.4% and 85.3%, respectively, for significant prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies missed 7.8% and 9.4% of clinically significant prostate cancers, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging biopsy required significantly fewer cores and revealed a higher percent of cancer involvement per biopsy core (each p <0.01). Combining the 2 methods provided a 60.9% detection rate with an 82.1% rate for significant prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore and systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies achieved equally high detection rates in biopsy naïve patients with increased prostate specific antigen. Magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsies required significantly fewer cores and revealed a significantly higher percent of cancer involvement per biopsy core.

Increased signal intensity of prostate lesions on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a predictive sign of malignancy.

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of lesions detected in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with increased signal intensity (SI) on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a sign of malignancy. METHODS: One hundred and three consecutive patients with prostate MRI examination and MRI-guided in-bore biopsy were retrospectively included in the study. MRI-guided in-bore biopsy histologically confirmed prostate cancer in 50 patients (n = 92 lesions). The other 53 patients (n = 122 lesions) had negative bioptical results. RESULTS: In patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer, 46 of the 92 lesions had visually increased SI on the high b-value images compared with the peripheral zone (SI = +27 ± 16%) or the central gland (SI = +37 ± 19%, P < 0.001 respectively). In patients with a negative biopsy, ten of the 122 lesions had visually increased SI (compared with the peripheral zone, SI = +29 ± 18%, and with the central gland, SI = +41 ± 15%, P < 0.001 respectively). Neither the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values nor the Gleason Score of lesions with increased SI were significantly different from lesions without increased SI. CONCLUSIONS: Visually increased SI on the high b-value images of diffusion-weighted imaging using standard b-values is a sign of malignancy but can occasionally also be a feature of benign lesions. However, it does not indicate more aggressive tumours. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used to diagnose prostatic cancer • Reduced signal intensity (SI) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping is characteristic • Prostatic tumours usually exhibit increased SI on high b-value images • But benign lesions can also yield increased SI on high b-value images.

MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the accuracy of MR sequences [T2-, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (T2WI, DWI, and DCE) imaging] at 3T, based on the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) scoring system [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)] using MR-guided in-bore prostate biopsies as reference standard. METHODS: In 235 consecutive patients [aged 65.7 ± 7.9 years; median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 8 ng/ml] with multiparametric prostate MRI (mp-MRI), 566 lesions were scored according to PI-RADS. Histology of all lesions was obtained by targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy. RESULTS: In 200 lesions, biopsy revealed prostate cancer (PCa). The area under the curve (AUC) for cancer detection was 0.70 (T2WI), 0.80 (DWI), and 0.74 (DCE). A combination of T2WI + DWI, T2WI + DCE, and DWI + DCE achieved an AUC of 0.81, 0.78, and 0.79. A summed PI-RADS score of T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved an AUC of 0.81. For higher grade PCa (primary Gleason pattern ≥ 4), the AUC was 0.85 for T2WI + DWI, 0.84 for T2WI + DCE, 0.86 for DWI + DCE, and 0.87 for T2WI + DWI + DCE. The AUC for T2WI + DWI + DCE for transitional-zone PCa was 0.73, and for the peripheral zone 0.88. Regarding higher-grade PCa, AUC for transitional-zone PCa was 0.88, and for peripheral zone 0.96. CONCLUSION: The combination of T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved the highest test accuracy, especially in patients with higher-grade PCa. The use of ≤2 MR sequences led to lower AUC in higher-grade and peripheral-zone cancers. KEY POINTS: • T2WI + DWI + DCE achieved the highest accuracy in patients with higher grade PCa • T2WI + DWI + DCE was more accurate for peripheral- than for transitional-zone PCa • DCE increased PCa detection accuracy in the peripheral zone • DWI was the leading sequence in the transitional zone.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Active Surveillance Without Annual Rebiopsy in Patients with Grade Group 1 or 2 Prostate Cancer: The Prospective PROMM-AS Study.

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may allow patients with prostate cancer (PC) on active surveillance (AS) to avoid repeat prostate biopsies during monitoring. Objective: To assess the ability of mpMRI to reduce guideline-mandated biopsy and to predict grade group upgrading in patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) 1 or GG 2 PC using Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scores. The hypothesis was that the AS disqualification rate (ASDQ) rate could be reduced to 15%. Design setting and participants: PROMM-AS was a prospective study assessing 2-yr outcomes for an mpMRI-guided AS protocol. A 12 mo after AS inclusion on the basis of MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy (FBx), all patients underwent mpMRI. For patients with stable mpMRI (PRECISE 1-3), repeat biopsy was deferred and follow-up mpMRI was scheduled for 12 mo later. Patients with mpMRI progression (PRECISE 4-5) underwent FBx. At the end of the study, follow-up FBx was indicated for all patients. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for upgrading to GG 2 in the GG 1 group, and to GG 3 in the GG 2 group on MRI. We performed regression analyses that included clinical variables. Results and limitations: The study included 101 patients with PC (60 GG 1 and 41 GG 2). Histopathological progression occurred in 31 patients, 18 in the GG 1 group and 13 in the GG 2 group. Thus, the aim of reducing the ASDQ rate to 15% was not achieved. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for PRECISE scoring of MRI were 94%, 64%, 81%, and 88% in the GG 1 group, and 92%, 50%, 92%, and 50%, respectively, in the GG 2 group. On regression analysis, initial prostate-specific antigen (p < 0.001) and higher PRECISE score (4-5; p = 0.005) were significant predictors of histological progression of GG 1 PC. Higher PRECISE score (p = 0.009), initial Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score (p = 0.009), previous negative biopsy (p = 0.02), and percentage Gleason pattern 4 (p = 0.04) were significant predictors of histological progression of GG 2 PC. Limitations include extensive MRI reading experience, the small sample size, and limited follow-up. Conclusions: MRI-guided monitoring of patients on AS using PRECISE scores avoided unnecessary follow-up biopsies in 88% of patients with GG 1 PC and predicted upgrading during 2-yr follow-up in both GG 1 and GG 2 PC. Patient summary: We investigated whether MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scores can be used to guide whether patients with lower-risk prostate cancer who are on active surveillance (AS) need to undergo repeat biopsies. Follow-up biopsy was deferred for 1 year for patients with a stable score and performed for patients whose score progressed. After 24 months on AS, all men underwent MRI and biopsy. Among patients with grade group 1 cancer and a stable MRI score, 88% avoided biopsy. For patients with MRI score progression, AS termination was correctly recommended in 81% of grade group 1 and 92% of grade group 2 cases.

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been suggested as a tool for guiding biopsy recommendations in prostate cancer (PC) screening. OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in young men at age 45 yr who participated in a PC screening trial (PROBASE) on the basis of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants with confirmed PSA ≥3 ng/ml were offered mpMRI followed by MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FBx) with targeted and systematic cores. mpMRI scans from the first screening round for men randomised to an immediate PSA test in PROBASE were evaluated by local readers and then by two reference radiologists (experience >10 000 prostate MRI examinations) blinded to the histopathology. The PROBASE trial is registered as ISRCTN37591328 OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The local and reference Prostate Imaging-Data and Reporting System (PI-RADS) scores were compared, and the sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for both readings for different cutoffs (PI-RADS 3 vs 4). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 186 participants, 114 underwent mpMRI and FBx. PC was detected in 47 (41%), of whom 33 (29%) had clinically significant PC (csPC; International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2). Interobserver reliability between local and reference PI-RADS scores was moderate (k = 0.41). At a cutoff of PI-RADS 4, reference reading showed better performance for csPC detection (sensitivity 79%, NPV 91%, accuracy of 85%) than local reading (sensitivity 55%, NPV 80%, accuracy 68%). Reference reading did not miss any PC cases for a cutoff of PI-RADS <3. If PI-RADS ≥4 were to be used as a biopsy cutoff, mpMRI would reduce negative biopsies by 68% and avoid detection of nonsignificant PC in 71% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate MRI in a young screening population is difficult to read. The MRI accuracy of for csPC detection is highly dependent on reader experience, and double reading might be advisable. More data are needed before MRI is included in PC screening for men at age 45 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY: Measurement of prostate specific antigen (PSA) is an effective screening test for early detection of prostate cancer (PC) and can reduce PC-specific deaths, but it can also lead to unnecessary biopsies and treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after a positive PSA test has been proposed as a way to reduce the number of biopsies, with biopsy only recommended for men with suspicious MRI findings. Our results indicate that MRI accuracy is moderate for men aged 45 years but can be increased by a second reading of the images by expert radiologists. For broad application of MRI in routine screening, double reading may be advisable.

Risk-adjusted Screening for Prostate Cancer-Defining the Low-risk Group by Data from the PROBASE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Risk-adjusted screening for prostate cancer (PCa) aims to reduce harms by less frequent retesting, especially in men at a low risk of PCa. Definitions of low risk are based mainly on studies in men starting screening at age 55-60 yr. OBJECTIVE: To identify men at age 45 yr with a low risk of PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based, risk-adjusted PCa screening trial was conducted in Germany using baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) starting in young men (PROBASE). INTERVENTION: PSA measurements starting at the age of 45 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The incidence of PCa within 5 yr was assessed in men with screen-negative baseline PSA <1.5 ng/ml compared with those with PSA 1.5-≤3.0 ng/ml. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 23301 men who received a first PSA test at age 45 yr, 0.79% had a screen-positive PSA value of ≥3 ng/ml. Among the 89% of men who had a screen-negative baseline PSA value of <1.5 ng/ml, only 0.45% received a positive PSA test ≥3 ng/ml upon retesting after 5 yr. By contrast, for those with a screen-negative baseline PSA value of 1.5-3 ng/ml, 13% surpassed 3 ng/ml upon biennial testing within the next 4 yr. The incidence of PCa in subsequent screening rounds increased with increasing baseline PSA levels, from 0.13 per 1000 person-years for men with initial PSA level of <1.5 ng/ml to 8.0 per 1000 person-years for those with PSA levels of 1.5-3.0 ng/ml. A limitation is a follow-up time of only 5 yr, so far. CONCLUSIONS: Men with baseline PSA <1.5 ng/ml at age 45 yr are at a very low risk of PCa over the next 5 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY: The PROBASE study showed that men with baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <1.5 ng/ml at age 45 yr have a very low prostate cancer detection rate over 5 yr and do not need PSA retesting during this time.

3-T in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy based on a scoring system for target lesions characterization.

BACKGROUND: To estimate potential malignant lesions within the prostate gland, the usage of a scoring system has recently been proposed by a European consensus meeting. PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate a scoring system for functional prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using in-bore MR-guided prostate biopsy at 3-T. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prostate MRI examinations of 59 patients (between February 2011 and May 2012) with no known prostate cancer, elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and unsuspicious digital rectal examination were included in the study. In each patient up to three lesions were defined and scored using a 5-point scoring system for each MR sequence (T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging). Following MRI-guided in-bore biopsy these lesions were correlated to the histopathological findings. RESULTS: A total number of 144 lesions were defined in 59 patients. In 28 patients (51 lesions) MR-guided in-bore biopsy was positive for tumor (Gleason grade 6 or higher). A cut-off limit of 10 or more points in summation of the individual scores of all three sequences was used, leading to a 90% sensitivity, 63% specificity, 58% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: A simple 5-point scoring system of functional prostate MRI achieves excellent sensitivity and moderate specificity for directing 3-T-guided prostate biopsy relative to the histopathological findings.

Phase 2 Single-arm Trial of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Seminomatous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors with Clinical Stage IIA/B (PRIMETEST).

BACKGROUND: Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for clinical stage (CS) IIA/B seminoma without adjuvant treatment is an experimental treatment to avoid radiotherapy- or chemotherapy-related toxicity from standard treatment. OBJECTIVE: The PRIMETEST trial aimed to prospectively evaluate the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of primary RPLND. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: PRIMETEST is a single-arm, single-center prospective phase 2 trial. Patients with seminoma, unilateral retroperitoneal lymph node metastases <5 cm, and human chorionic gonadotropin levels <5 mU/ml were included. Patients with CS IIA/B seminoma at initial diagnosis, and recurrence under active surveillance or following adjuvant carboplatin for CS I disease were eligible. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Unilateral open or robot-assisted primary RPLND was performed. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) after 36 mo. The trial was considered positive if <30% of patients experienced a recurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Between 2016 and 2021, 33 patients were accrued (nine with primary CS IIA/B, 19 recurrences during active surveillance, and five recurrences following adjuvant carboplatin). Thirteen and 20 patients had CS IIA and IIB, respectively. Open and robot-assisted RPLND procedures were performed in 14 (42%) and 19 (58%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 32 mo (interquartile range 23-46), ten recurrences were detected (30%, 95% confidence interval: 16-49%); thus, the primary endpoint was not met. Infield recurrences occurred in three of ten patients. The current analysis of risk factors could not identify the predictors of recurrence. Three of 33 patients (9%) presented with pN0. CONCLUSIONS: The PRIMETEST trial did not meet its primary endpoint. Nevertheless, PFS of 70% after a median follow-up of 32 mo suggests this approach to be of interest for highly selected patients. Selection criteria, however, need to be defined and validated in a larger prospective cohort of patients. Until then, surgery alone for the treatment of patients with CS IIA/B seminoma cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we investigated primary surgery as an alternative to conventional treatment (chemotherapy or radiation therapy) in patients with metastatic seminoma. The primary objective of the study, to prevent at least 30% of patients from recurrence, was not met. However, certain patients may benefit from this approach and thereby avoid chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Predictive factors need to be analyzed to better select patients for this surgery-only approach.

Digital Rectal Examination Is Not a Useful Screening Test for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Annual digital rectal examination (DRE) is recommended as a stand-alone screening test for prostate cancer (PCa) in Germany for 45+ yr olds. DRE diagnostic performance in men as young as 45 yr old has not been proved by a screening trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine DRE diagnostic performance in a screening trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This analysis was conducted within the multicentric, randomized PROBASE trial, which enrolled >46 000 men at age 45 to test risk-adapted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for PCa. INTERVENTION: (1) DRE was analyzed as a one-time, stand-alone screening offer at age 45 in 6537 men in one arm of the trial and (2) PCa detection by DRE was evaluated at the time of PSA-screen-driven biopsies (N = 578). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: (1) True-/false-positive detection rates of DRE as compared with PSA screening and (2) DRE outcome at the time of a prostate biopsy were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: (1) A prospective analysis of 57 men with suspicious DRE at age 45 revealed three PCa. Detection rate by DRE was 0.05% (three of 6537) as compared with a four-fold higher rate by PSA screening (48 of 23 301, 0.21%). The true-positive detection rate by DRE relative to screening by PSA was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.07-0.72]) and the false-positive detection rate by DRE was 2.2 (95% CI = [1.50-3.17]). (2) Among PSA-screen-detected PCa cases, 86% had unsuspicious DRE (sensitivity relative to PSA was 14%), with the majority of these tumors (86%) located in the potentially accessible zones of the prostate as seen by magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of stand-alone DRE to screen for PCa is poor. DRE should not be recommended as a PCa screening test in young men. Furthermore, DRE does not improve the detection of PSA-screen-detected PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our report demonstrated the poor diagnostic performance of digital rectal examination in the screening for prostate cancer in young men.