Comparison of mitral annulus geometry between patients with ischemic and non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation: implications for transcatheter mitral valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a new therapeutic option for high surgical risk patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Mitral valve (MV) geometry quantification is of paramount importance for success of the procedure and transthoracic 3D echocardiography represents a useful screening tool. Accordingly, we sought to asses MV geometry in patients with functional MR (FMR) that would potentially benefit of TMVR, focusing on the comparison of mitral annulus (MA) geometry between patients with ischemic (IMR) and non ischemic mitral regurgitation (nIMR). METHODS: We retrospectively selected 94 patients with severe FMR: 41 (43,6%) with IMR and 53 (56,4%) with nIMR. 3D MA analysis was performed on dedicated transthoracic 3D data sets using a new, commercially-available software package in two moments of the cardiac cycle (early-diastole and mid-systole). We measured MA dimension and geometry parameters, left atrial and left ventricular volumes. RESULTS: Maximum (MA area 10.7 ± 2.5 cm2 vs 11.6 ± 2.7 cm2, p > 0.05) and the best fit plane MA area (9.9 ± 2.3 cm2 vs 10.7 ± 2.5 cm2, p > 0.05, respectively) were similar between IMR and nIMR. nIMR patients showed larger mid-systolic 3D area (9.8 ± 2.3 cm2 vs 10.8 ± 2.7 cm2, p < 0.05) and perimeter (11.2 ± 1.3 cm vs 11.8 ± 1.5 cm, p < 0.05) with longer and larger leaflets, and wider aorto-mitral angle (135 ± 10° vs 141 ± 11°, p < 0.05). Conversely, the area of MA at the best fit plane did not differ between IMR and nIMR patients (9 ± 1.1 cm2 vs 9.9 ± 1.5 cm2, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic etiology of FMR have similar maximum dimension, yet systolic differences between the two groups should be taken into account to tailor prosthesis's selection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N.A.

Left bundle branch block: from cardiac mechanics to clinical and diagnostic challenges.

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) results in an altered pattern of left ventricular (LV) activation and subsequent contraction, causing remarkable changes in LV mechanics, perfusion and workload and ultimately leading to pathologic cardiac remodelling. Clinical and diagnostic notions about the LBBB phenomenon had evolved from just an electrocardiographic pattern to a critically important finding affecting diagnostic and clinical management of many patients and adversely influencing their outcomes. Recent advances in imaging techniques significantly improved the assessment of patients with LBBB and provided additional insights into pathophysiological mechanisms of LV remodelling. In the current review we summarized currently available data on the LBBB epidemiology, diagnosis, its impact on clinical management and prognosis, and the role and place of various imaging modalities in assessing cardiac mechanics and perfusion abnormalities, as well as their potential implications for diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Current Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: When the Technique Makes the Difference.

Advances in ultrasound, computer, and electronics technology have permitted three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) to become a clinically viable imaging modality, with significant impact on patient diagnosis, management, and outcome. Thanks to the inception of a fully sampled matrix transducer for transthoracic and transesophageal probes, 3DE now offers much faster and easier data acquisition, immediate display of anatomy, and the possibility of online quantitative analysis of cardiac chambers and heart valves. The clinical use of transthoracic 3DE has been primarily focused, albeit not exclusively, on the assessment of cardiac chamber volumes and function. Transesophageal 3DE has been applied mostly for assessing heart valve anatomy and function. The advantages of using 3DE to measure cardiac chamber volumes derive from the lack of geometric assumptions about their shape and the avoidance of the apical view foreshortening, which are the main shortcomings of volume calculations from two-dimensional echocardiographic views. Moreover, 3DE offers a unique realistic en face display of heart valves, congenital defects, and surrounding structures allowing a better appreciation of the dynamic functional anatomy of cardiac abnormalities in vivo. Offline quantitation of 3DE data sets has made significant contributions to our mechanistic understanding of normal and diseased heart valves, as well as of their alterations induced by surgical or interventional procedures. As reparative cardiac surgery and transcatheter procedures become more and more popular for treating structural heart disease, transesophageal 3DE has expanded its role as the premier technique for procedure planning, intra-procedural guidance, as well as for checking device function and potential complications after the procedure.

Outcomes of transapical mitral valve repair with neochordae implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Transapical off-pump beating-heart neochord implantation (NC) has shown encouraging early results in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic 5-year outcomes of patients who underwent NC. METHODS: All patients who underwent NC at our institution from November 2013 to March 2016 were included. Indications were severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse/flail. Patients were classified as having favorable anatomy (FA) and unfavorable anatomy (UA) on the basis of the extent and severity of mitral valve disease. All patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes were on the basis of the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium guidelines. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were included in the analysis (FA: 81%; UA: 19%). Median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 58-76) and median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II was 1.4% (interquartile range, 0.7-2.3). Technical and procedural success were 98% and 94%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 2%. Device success was 94%, 92%, and 78%, at 30 days, 1-year, and 5 years, respectively. Patient success at 1 year was 92%. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. At 5 years, overall survival was 83% with no difference between FA and UA patients. Cumulative incidence of severe mitral regurgitation recurrence at 5 years was 14% (95% CI, 6.5%-22.8%) in FA patients and 63% (95% CI, 39.7%-86.2%) in UA patients, respectively (P < .001). Patients with FA compared with UA had a lower incidence of reintervention (14.7% vs 43.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Transapical off-pump beating heart NC might represent an acceptable option in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease and FA.

Dyspnea in Post-Acute COVID-19: A Multi-Parametric Cardiopulmonary Evaluation.

Post-acute COVID-19 is characterized by the persistence of dyspnea, but the pathophysiology is unclear. We evaluated the prevalence of dyspnea during follow-up and factors at admission and follow-up associated with dyspnea persistence. After five months from discharge, 225 consecutive patients hospitalized for moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia were assessed clinically and by laboratory tests, echocardiography, six-minute walking test (6MWT), and pulmonary function tests. Fifty-one patients reported persistent dyspnea. C-reactive protein (p = 0.025, OR 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.02)) at admission, longer duration of hospitalization (p = 0.005, OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.10)) and higher body mass index (p = 0.001, OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.06-1.28)) were independent predictors of dyspnea. Absolute drop in SpO2 at 6MWT (p = 0.001, OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.13-1.69)), right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain (p = 0.016, OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.25)) and RV global longitudinal strain/systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio (p = 0.034, OR 0.14 (95% CI 0.02-0.86)) were independently associated with post-acute COVID-19 dyspnea. In conclusion, dyspnea is present in many patients during follow-up after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia. While higher body mass index, C-reactive protein at admission, and duration of hospitalization are predictors of persistent dyspnea, desaturation at 6MWT, and echocardiographic RV dysfunction are associated with this symptom during the follow-up period.

Subclinical Myocardial Injury in Patients Recovered from COVID-19 Pneumonia: Predictors and Longitudinal Assessment.

(1) Background: Emerging data regarding patients recovered from COVID-19 are reported in the literature, but cardiac sequelae have not yet been clarified. To quickly detect any cardiac involvement at follow-up, the aims of the research were to identify: elements at admission predisposing subclinical myocardial injury at follow up; the relationship between subclinical myocardial injury and multiparametric evaluation at follow-up; and subclinical myocardial injury longitudinal evolution. (2) Methods and Results: A total of 229 consecutive patients hospitalised for moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia were initially enrolled, of which 225 were available for follow-up. All patients underwent a first follow-up visit, which included a clinical evaluation, a laboratory test, echocardiography, a six-minute walking test (6MWT), and a pulmonary functional test. Of the 225 patients, 43 (19%) underwent a second follow-up visit. The median time to the first follow-up after discharge was 5 months, and the median time to the second follow-up after discharge was 12 months. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and right ventricular free wall strain (RVFWS) were reduced in 36% (n = 81) and 7.2% (n = 16) of the patients, respectively, at first the follow-up visit. LVGLS impairment showed correlations with patients of male gender (p 0.008, OR 2.32 (95% CI 1.24-4.42)), the presence of at least one cardiovascular risk factor (p < 0.001, OR 6.44 (95% CI 3.07-14.9)), and final oxygen saturation (p 0.002, OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1)) for the 6MWTs. Subclinical myocardial dysfunction had not significantly improved at the 12-month follow-ups. (3) Conclusions: in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, left ventricular subclinical myocardial injury was related to cardiovascular risk factors and appeared stable during follow-up.

Accuracy of intracardiac echocardiography for aortic root assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has generally been accepted as the most accurate modality fulfilling this purpose with good reproducibility. A major drawback of MSCT consists in the use of contrast dye, which may be unsafe in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients who frequently are affected by renal failure. We sought to appraise the accuracy of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in measurements of structures in the aortic root in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: Aortic annulus and sinus of Valsalva diameters were measured using ICE, performed during standard invasive preprocedural assessment in 30 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI. Multislice computed tomography was performed in all patients afterward, and aortic root measurements were made by an independent radiologist. RESULTS: Effective ICE measurements were obtained in all patients, easily and without any complication. Mean aortic annulus diameters were 21.9 ± 1.8 mm using ICE, 22.0 ± 1.9 mm using MSCT (3-chamber [3-C] view) and 22.8 ± 1.8 mm using the mean of long-axis and short-axis (L-ax/S-ax) view MSCT (P = .192, ICE vs 3-C MSCT; P < .001, ICE vs L-ax/S-ax MSCT, respectively). Correlation between ICE and both MSCT measurements was good (r(2) = 0.83, P < .001; r(2) = 0.80, P < .001, respectively). Mean sinus of Valsalva diameters were 32.3 ± 3.3 mm using ICE and 32.5 ± 3.1 mm using 3-C MSCT view (P = .141). Even in this case, correlation between ICE and both MSCT measurements was excellent (r(2) = 0.96, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for TAVI, measurements of the aortic annulus and the sinus of Valsalva using ICE compare favorably with those made at MSCT. This approach might be a useful and reproducible strategy in patients with severe renal impairment to avoid the administration of contrast dye during MSCT.

Early- and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with logistic EuroSCORE less than 20%: a comparative analysis between different risk strata.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging alternative to medical therapy reserved to a limited population with severe aortic stenosis. The European consensus document recommended TAVI for prohibitive-risk patients not eligible for conventional surgery (prohibitive risk defined as expected mortality ≥ 20% calculated with the Logistic EuroScore (LES) in association with clinical judgment). To date, there is lack of clarity on data about outcomes of TAVI in lower risk patients. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with LES ≥ 20% in comparison with patients with LES < 20%. METHOD: Of 165 patients who underwent TAVI using the 18-French Medtronic CoreValve (N = 153) and the Sapien Edwards™ (N = 12) at our Institution between June 2007 and September 2010, we identified those with LES < 20%, with prosthesis implantation (n = 84), and reported on their clinical outcome compared with patients with LES ≥ 20% (n = 78). The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall death and major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCE) at 30-day and midterm follow-up stratifying patients by clinical characteristics. RESULTS: At 30-day, a significant higher incidence of MACCE (20.8% vs. 6.0%, odds ratio [OR] 4.08 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-11.74, P = 0.009) and death (15.6% vs. 2.4%, OR 7.45 95% CI 1.61-34.48, P = 0.010) was reported in the LES ≥ 20% group as compared with the LES < 20% group, respectively. The 12-month MACCE rates was (27.1% vs. 11.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.47 95% CI 0.93-6.63, P = 0. 071) for LES ≥ 20% and LES < 20% patients, respectively (mortality rates was 25.7% vs. 6.8% HR 4.21 95% CI 1.24-14.30, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: This study tends to suggest that current mortality reported after TAVI could be significantly affected by the very-high risk profile of the population which currently undergoes this procedure, making comparison with surgical series rather unreliable.

Novel Transcatheter Mitral Prosthesis Designed to Preserve Physiological Ventricular Flow Dynamics.

BACKGROUND: Current mitral bioprostheses are akin to the aortic valve and therefore abolish the left ventricular (LV) physiological vortex. We evaluated the hemodynamic performance and the effects on intraventricular flow dynamics (IFD) of a novel mitral bioprosthesis that presents an innovative design mimicking the native valve. METHODS: A D-shaped self-expandable stent-bovine pericardium monoleaflet valve was designed to provide physiological asymmetric intraventricular flow. Transapical implantation was consecutively performed in 12 juvenile sheep. Postimplant studies using Doppler echocardiography and IFD using echo particle imaging velocimetry were obtained immediately after the implantation and at 3 months to assess the hemodynamic performance of the prostheses. RESULTS: There were 3 deaths during follow-up, 1 due to valve misplacement because of poor imaging visualization and 2 not valve related. The mean transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area were 2.2 ± 1.2 mm Hg and 4.0 ± 1.1 cm2 after implantation and 3.3 ± 1.5 mm Hg and 3.5 ± 0.5 cm2 at 3 months, respectively. LV vortex dimension, orientation, and physiological anticlockwise rotation were preserved compared with preoperative normal LV flow pattern. One animal showed a moderate paravalvular leak, others mild or none. LV outflow tract obstruction, valve thrombosis, and hemolysis were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our preclinical in vivo results confirm the good hemodynamic performance of this new transcatheter bioprosthesis with preservation of the physiological IFD. Clinical studies are needed to document whether these characteristics will foster LV recovery and improve the clinical outcome of patients with mitral regurgitation.

Value of Left Ventricular Indexed Ejection Time to Characterize the Severity of Aortic Stenosis.

Aims: The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity is still challenging, especially in abnormal hemodynamic conditions. Left ventricular ejection time (LVET) has been historically related to AS severity, but it also depends on heart rate (HR) and systolic function. Our aim was to verify if correcting LVET (LVET index, LVETI) by its determinants is helpful for the assessment of AS severity, irrespective of hemodynamic conditions. Methods and results: We retrospectively studied 152 patients with AS and 378 patients with heart failure and no-AS. At multivariate analysis, LVET (assessed with pulsed-wave Doppler) showed a strong correlation with stroke volume index (SVI) (Beta 0.354; p < 0.001), HR (−0.385; p < 0.001), AS grade (Beta 0.301; p < 0.001) and, less significantly, ejection fraction (LVEF) (Beta 0.108; p = 0.001). AS grade was confirmed to be a major determinant of LVET, irrespective of forward flow (assessed by SVI and transvalvular flow rate) and LVEF (above and below 50%). A regression equation was derived to index LVET (LVETI) to HR and SVI. By using this formula, LVETI detected severe AS more accurately (AUC 0.812, p < 0.001) than LVET alone (AUC 0.755, p for difference = 0.005). Similar results were observed in patients with abnormal flow status. As an exploratory finding, we observed that the highest tertile of LVETI was associated with a higher rate of aortic valve interventions during follow-up. Conclusions: LVETI correlates with AS severity better than uncorrected LVET, independently from hemodynamic conditions, and may help to discriminate severe AS. This finding needs confirmation in larger prospective multicenter studies.

Role of Cardiac Imaging Modalities in the Evaluation of COVID-19-Related Cardiomyopathy.

Cardiac involvement has been described during the course of SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19), with different manifestations. Several series have reported only increased cardiac troponin without ventricular dysfunction, others the acute development of left or right ventricular dysfunction, and others myocarditis. Ventricular dysfunction can be of varying degrees and may recover completely in some cases. Generally, conventional echocardiography is used as a first approach to evaluate cardiac dysfunction in patients with COVID-19, but, in some cases, this approach may be silent and more advanced cardiac imaging techniques, such as myocardial strain imaging or cardiac magnetic resonance, are necessary to document alterations in cardiac structure or function. In this review we sought to discuss the information provided by different cardiac imaging techniques in patients with COVID-19, both in the acute phase of the disease and after discharge from hospital, and their diagnostic and prognostic role. We also aimed at verifying whether a specific form of cardiac disease due to the SARS-CoV-2 can be identified.

Feasibility and Role of Right Ventricular Stress Echocardiography in Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: The great technological advancements in the field of echocardiography have led to applications of stress echocardiography (SE) in almost all diagnostic fields of cardiology, from ischemic heart disease to valvular heart disease and diastolic function. However, the assessment of the right ventricle (RV) in general, and in particular in regard to the contractile reserve of the RV, is an area that has not been previously explored. We, therefore, propose a study to investigate the potential use of SE for the assessment of RV function in adult patients. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to evaluate the feasibility of right ventricular SE. The secondary aim is to assess right ventricular contractile reserve. MATHERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing a physical or dobutamine stress echocardiogram for cardiovascular risk stratification or chest pain were the subject of the study. An exercise leg cycle using a standard WHO protocol was used to simultaneously assess the right and left ventricular global and regional function as well as acquiring Doppler data. Whereas the patient had limitations in mobility, a dobutamine SE was be performed. We evaluated the average values of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), S-wave, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), and right ventricle global longitudinal (free wall) strain (RVGLS) during baseline and at the peak of the effort. RV contractile reserve was defined as the change in RVGLS from rest to peak exercise. We also assessed the reproducibility of these measurements between two different expert operators (blind analysis). RESULTS: At least 3 over 5 RV function parameters were measurable both during baseline and at the peak of the effort in 95% of patients, while all 5 parameters in 65% of our population, demonstrating an excellent feasibility. All RV-studied variables showed a statistically significant increase (P < 0.001) at peak compared to the baseline. The average percentage increases at peak were 31.1% for TAPSE, 24.8% for FAC, 50.6% for S-wave, 55.2% for PAPS, and 39.8% for RV strain. The reproducibility between operators at baseline and peak was excellent. Our study demonstrates that TAPSE, FAC, and S-wave are highly feasible at rest and at peak, while TAPSE, S-wave, and sPAP are the most reliable measurements during RV stress echo. CONCLUSION: RVGLS is useful in the assessment of RV contractile reserve in patients with good acoustic window. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of contrast echocardiography in improving RV contractile reserve assessment during SE.

Management of implant failure during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging alternative to palliative medical therapy for nonsurgical patients with severe aortic stenosis. There is a paucity of detailed data on the management and outcome of complications related to the sub-optimal deployment of the prosthesis. We appraised the incidence and management of early implant failure occurring during TAVI. METHODS: Of 110 patients who underwent TAVI using the third generation 18-French CoreValve ReValving System (Medtronic, MN) in our Institution between June 2007 and January 2010, we identified those experiencing early implant failure and reported on their management and clinical outcome. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) at 30 days and mid-term follow up. RESULTS: Early implant failure occurred in 18 of 110 patients (16.3%). The most common cause was prosthesis under-expansion conditioning moderate to severe peri-valvular leak (44.4%). Prosthesis deployment too low or too high with respect to the aortic annulus leading to severe peri-valvular leak occurred in 22.2% and 5.5% of patients, respectively. Need of valve retrieve after the first attempt of deployment occurred in four cases (22.2%). Prosthesis embolization in the ascending aorta occurred in 5.5% of patients who experienced early implant failure. All implant failure cases were managed percutaneously with gain in aortic valve area from 0.44 ± 0.17 to 1.28 ± 0.27 cm(2) (P < 0.001), decrease of mean transaortic gradient from 55.00 ± 19.51 to 11.58 ± 5.91 mmHg (P < 0.001) and no MACCE at 30 days. After 11 ± 6 months, MACCE occurred cumulatively in two patients (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Early implant failure can complicate the TAVI procedure with the CoreValve system, but it can be managed safely and effectively with bailout transcatheter techniques, avoiding surgery, with good early and mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results.

Postprocedural management of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure with self-expanding bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) carries higher risk of post-procedural adverse events than conventional percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. We report our experience about postoperative management protocol adopted in our Division. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients underwent TAVI and 108 were transferred to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) after procedure. During the first 48 hours, vital parameters were monitored continuously. Close attention was given to rhythm and atrio-ventricular conduction disturbances, systemic blood pressure, fluid balance and vascular accesses. RESULTS: The most common complications were renal impairment (21.3%), femoral artery pseudo-aneurysms (FAP) (11%), new complete atrioventricular block (20.3 %), cerebral vascular accident (4.5%) and cardiac perforation due to temporary pacemaker lead (1.8%). Ultrasound-guided compression repair was considered the first line treatment for FAP, but in 6 cases surgical treatment was immediately performed due to the rapid expansion of FAP. Complete atrio-ventricular block occurred in 22 patients (20.3 %) within the first 24 hours after TAVI and a permanent pacemaker was implanted in 21 patients (19.1%). Acute kidney injury occurred in 18 patients (35%) with pre-procedural chronic renal failure and in 5 patients (9%) without preoperative renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: After TAVI, cardiovascular complications are common and therefore accurate standardized management of patients in CICU during the first 48 hours is mandatory to early detect and manage complications and to decrease the rate of adverse events and the length of in-hospital stay. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Functional Regurgitation of Atrioventricular Valves and Atrial Fibrillation: An Elusive Pathophysiological Link Deserving Further Attention.

In patients with structurally normal atrioventricular valvular apparatus, functional regurgitation of the mitral or tricuspid valves has been attributed mainly to ventricular dilation and/or dysfunction, through a combination of annulus dilation and tethering of the valve leaflets. The occurrence of functional regurgitation of atrioventricular valves in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and atrial dilation but normal ventricular size and function has received much less attention, and its peculiar mechanisms still remain to be understood. This distinct form of functional regurgitation (i.e., "atrial functional regurgitation") may require different treatment and interventional repair approaches than the classical functional regurgitation due to ventricular dilatation and dysfunction ("ventricular functional regurgitation"), and current guideline recommendations do not yet address this distinction. Clarifying the differences in the pathophysiology of atrial functional regurgitation and its management implications is of paramount importance. This review describes briefly the comparative anatomy of mitral and tricuspid apparatus and the pathophysiology and typical echocardiographic features of atrial functional regurgitation compared with ventricular functional regurgitation, as well as the added value of three-dimensional echocardiography as an essential imaging tool to clarify the mechanisms involved in its development.

Relative Prognostic Importance of Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Cardiac Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed (1) to assess the prognostic value of three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) derived right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) and (2) to evaluate relative prognostic importance of reduced and preserved left ventricular (LV) EF and RVEF to predict all-cause mortality and cardiac death in a large cohort of patients with cardiac diseases. METHODS: LV and RV volumes and EF were assessed by 3DE in 394 patients with various cardiovascular diseases. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) normal LVEF (≥50%) and normal RVEF (≥45%), n = 183; (2) reduced LVEF (<50%) and normal RVEF (≥45%), n = 75; (3) normal LVEF (≥50%) and reduced RVEF (<45%), n = 61; (4) reduced LVEF (<50%) and reduced RVEF (<45%), n = 75. The patients were followed up for 3.7 ± 1.1 years. RESULTS: Reduced 3DE-derived RVEF was associated with all-cause mortality (P < .0001). The four groups had significantly different survival (P < .0001). Both all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with reduced RVEF and normal LVEF were significantly higher than in those with reduced LVEF and normal RVEF (P = .0007 and P = .0091, respectively) and did not differ significantly from patients with reduced EF of both ventricles (P = .2198 and P = .0846, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced 3DE-derived RVEF was associated with all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with various cardiovascular diseases. Impairment of RVEF carried a significantly higher risk of mortality independent of LVEF.

[Current clinical applications of three-dimensional echocardiography]. / Principali applicazioni dell'ecocardiografia tridimensionale nell'attuale pratica clinica.

Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) represents one of the most innovative advances in cardiovascular imaging over the last 20 years. Recent technological developments have fueled the full implementation of 3DE in clinical practice and expanded its impact on patient diagnosis, management, and prognosis. One of the most important clinical applications of transthoracic 3DE has been the quantitation of cardiac chamber volumes and function. The main limitations affecting two-dimensional echocardiography calculations of chamber volumes (i.e. geometric assumptions about cardiac chamber shape and view foreshortening) are overcome by 3DE that allows an actual measurement of their volumes. Transesophageal 3DE has been applied mainly to assess the anatomy and function of heart valves, congenital defects and masses in the beating heart. As reparative cardiac surgery and transcatheter procedures have become more and more popular to treat structural heart disease, transesophageal 3DE has become not only one of the main imaging modalities for procedure planning but also for intra-procedural guidance and assessment of procedural results. New image rendering modalities such as 3D printing, holographic display, and fusion of 3DE images with other radiological or nuclear modalities will further expand the clinical applications and indications of 3DE.

Comparison Between Four-Chamber and Right Ventricular-Focused Views for the Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Size and Function.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) function plays a pivotal prognostic role in multiple cardiac diseases. Echocardiography guidelines recommend that RV quantification be performed in the RV-focused view, which is theoretically more reproducible than the four-chamber (4Ch) view. However, differences between views in RV size and function measurements have never been systematically studied. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare (1) RV size and function parameters obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views and (2) test-retest variability between these two views. METHODS: Fifty patients (26 men; mean age, 63 ± 18 years) undergoing clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent three repeated acquisitions of the 4Ch and RV-focused views by two sonographers. The first operator performed two acquisitions at the beginning and the end of the clinical transthoracic echocardiographic study, and the second operator performed the third acquisition afterward. RV size and function measurements were obtained from the two views and compared using paired t-test analysis and Bland-Altman analysis. Intra- and interoperator test-retest and intra- and interreader variability for both views were assessed using intraclass correlations and coefficients of variation. RESULTS: All RV size parameters were significantly larger when measured in the RV-focused view compared with the 4Ch view. Also, all RV function parameters, including RV free wall and global longitudinal strain, were larger in magnitude when measured in the RV-focused view. Measurements variability was consistently better for the RV-focused view. CONCLUSIONS: RV size and function measurements obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views are not interchangeable. RV size and function parameters measured from the RV-focused view are more reproducible than from 4Ch acquisitions. Therefore, only the RV-focused view should be used for quantitative assessment of the right ventricle.

Added Value of 3- Versus 2-Dimensional Echocardiography Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction to Predict Arrhythmic Risk in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the potential clinical impact of using 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients considered for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation and to assess the predictive value of 3DE LVEF for arrhythmic events. BACKGROUND: ICD therapy is currently recommended to prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with symptomatic heart failure and LVEF ≤35%, and in asymptomatic patients with ischemic heart disease and LVEF ≤30%. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is currently used to calculate LVEF. However, 3DE has been reported to be more reproducible and accurate than 2DE to measure LVEF. METHODS: The study prospectively enrolled 172 patients with LV dysfunction (71% ischemic). Both 2DE and 3DE LVEF were obtained during the same study. The outcome was the occurrence of major arrhythmic events (sudden cardiac death, aborted cardiac arrest, appropriate ICD therapy). RESULTS: After a median follow up of 56 (range 18 to 65) months, major arrhythmic events occurred in 30% of the patients. Compared with 2DE, 3DE changed the assignment above or below the LVEF thresholds for ICD implantation in 20% of patients, most of them having 2DE LVEFs within ± 10% from threshold. By cause-specific hazard model, 3DE LVEF was the only independent predictor of the occurrence of major arrhythmic events. CONCLUSIONS: LVEF by 3DE was an independent predictor of major arrhythmic events and improved arrhythmic risk prediction in patients with LV dysfunction. When compared with 2DE LVEF, 3DE measurement of LVEF may change the decision to implant an ICD in a sizable number of patients.