Barbed sutures and skin adhesives improve wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to formulate evidence-based recommendations for optimising wound management in hip and knee arthroplasty by exploring alternative methods such as barbed sutures and skin adhesives. METHODS: A Delphi panel, comprising seven orthopaedic surgeons, one musculoskeletal infectious disease specialist, and one health economics expert, was convened to evaluate the use of barbed sutures and skin adhesives for wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty. Two systematic reviews informed the development of questionnaires, with panelists ranking their agreement on statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was achieved if ≥75% agreement. Unresolved statements were revisited in a second round. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 11 statements, providing evidence-based recommendations. The expert panel advocates for a multilayer watertight technique using barbed sutures to prevent surgical site infections (SSI), reduce complications, shorten surgical times, optimise resources and improve cosmetic appearance. For skin closure, the panel recommends topical adhesives to decrease wound dehiscence, enhance cosmetic appearance, promote patient compliance, prevent SSIs, and optimise resources. CONCLUSION: The Delphi consensus by Italian total joint arthroplasty experts underscores the pivotal role of barbed sutures and skin adhesives in optimising outcomes. While guiding clinical decision-making, these recommendations are not prescriptive and should be adapted to local practices. The study encourages further research to enhance current evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.

Total joint arthroplasty is the recommended treatment for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, as it reduces disability and pain and restores joint function. However, prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of this procedure, with the two-stage exchange being the most common treatment method. While there is consensus on diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, there is a lack of agreement on the parameters that can guide the surgeon in performing definitive reimplantation in a two-stage procedure. One approach that has been suggested to improve the accuracy of microbiologic investigations before definitive reimplantation is to observe a holiday period from antibiotic therapy to improve the accuracy of cultures from periprosthetic tissues, but these cultures report some degree of aspecificity. Therefore, several pieces of evidence highlight that performing reimplantation using continuous antibiotic therapy should be considered a safe and effective approach, leading to higher cure rates and a shorter period of disability. Dosage of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ERS) and D-dimer are helpful in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, but only D-dimer has shown sufficient accuracy in predicting the risk of infection recurrence after a two-stage procedure. Synovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has been shown to be the most accurate in predicting recurrence, and new cutoff values for leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage have shown a useful predictive rule to identify patients at risk of unfavourable outcome. A new scoring system based on a numerical score calculated from the beta coefficient derived through multivariate analysis of D-dimer levels, synovial fluid leukocytes and relative neutrophils percentage has demonstrated high accuracy when it comes to guiding the second step of two-stage procedure. In conclusion, reimplantation may be a suitable option for patients who are on continuous therapy without local symptoms, and with CRP and ERS within the normal range, with low synovial fluid leukocytes (< 952/mL) and a low relative neutrophil percentage (< 52%) and D-dimer below 1100 µg/mL. A numerical score derived from analysing these three parameters can serve as a valuable tool in determining the feasibility of reimplantation in these patients.

Ideal Timing of Reimplantation in Patients with Periprosthetic Knee Infection Undergoing 2-Stage Exchange: A Diagnostic Scoring System.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated appropriate thresholds for serum biomarkers, synovial fluid white blood cell (SF-WBC) count, and synovial fluid neutrophil (polymorphonuclear leukocyte [PMN]) percentage to predict infection in a patient group who underwent definitive reimplantation after receiving a continuous course of antibiotic therapy for chronic knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). These thresholds were then used to generate a scoring system to predict recurrence (or persistence) of infection. METHODS: The study included 153 patients with a median age of 73 years (range, 46 to 91 years) who underwent 2-stage revision for chronic knee PJI. Staphylococci were identified at baseline in 107 (70%) of the patients. After the 96-week follow-up period, 12% (19) of the 153 patients had recurrence of the PJI. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the predictive value of common serum biomarkers and SF aspiration before reimplantation, and the area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated. Variables that were significantly different between patients with and without infection recurrence were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model. A half-integer-point scoring system was created based on the final beta coefficients. RESULTS: Regarding the prediction of recurrent infection, a D-dimer level of >1110 ng/mL yielded a sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 61%, and AUC of 0.69; an SF-WBC count of >934 cells/µL showed a sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 90%, and AUC of 0.79; and an SF-PMN percentage of >52% showed a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 90%, and AUC of 0.82. The beta coefficients were approximated to 1.5 for the D-dimer level and to 2 for the SF-WBC count and SF-PMN percentage. A total score of >2 was used to classify patients with a high risk of infection recurrence. The ability to discriminate infection recurrence was demonstrated by an AUC of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a score of >2 on our proposed scoring system based on serum biomarkers, SF-WBC count, and SF-PMN percentage should not undergo reimplantation, as they are at a high risk for recurrent PJI. Patients with a score of ≤2 can undergo definitive reimplantation with the lowest risk of recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmented Articulating Spacers in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a prominent subject of discussion in orthopedics and are frequently debated at conferences and congresses. In the context of PJIs affecting the knee, the decision between following a one-stage or two-stage treatment approach has historically been a pivotal consideration. The first option is limited by indications and potentially devastating complications in case of failure, whereas the second is widely accepted as the gold standard. Initially, the spacer was conceived solely to restore and maintain knee space after removal of the implant. An articulating spacer was introduced to mitigate patient limitations and improve knee function and quality of life. Two main types of articulating spacers are utilized in knee PJI treatment: the mold spacer and the metal-on-poly spacer. This text outlines a technique for metal-on-poly spacer implants. Based on our experience and the existing literature, this approach facilitates early full weight bearing and faster recovery of the knee's range of motion, ultimately improving the quality of life after surgery, thus allowing the spacer retention for an extended period, as suggested by the 1.5-stage revision.

Changes in the Lipid Asset of HIV/HCV Patients after a Successful Course of Direct-Acting Antivirals.

Background: Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) for HIV infection and Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAA) for HCV infection currently represent the main treatment options for HIV/HCV co-infected patients. However, HAART has been associated with increased lipids. This study aimed to evaluate lipid profile changes after the DAA cycle in HIV/HCV co-infected patients undergoing HAART/DAA therapy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, observational study among HIV/HCV co-infected patients undergoing HAART/DAA treatment was conducted at the Infectious Diseases Unit of the University Hospital of Salerno. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, written informed consent, completion of the DAA cycle, and virologic suppression on HAART. Changes in the lipid profile were analyzed from baseline during and after DAA therapy at 12, 24, and 48 weeks after the sustained virologic response (SVR). A t-test was used to compare continuous variables. An analysis of variance was performed for each antiretroviral drug and genotype. Results: Fifty-four HIV/HCV patients (men/women n. 34/20 [68/32%], median age 56 years), all naïve to HCV therapy, were enrolled. HCV infection was caused by genotype 1 in 55% of cases and by genotype 3 in 29%. An increase in total cholesterol was recorded after the DAA treatment (from 165.03 ± 46.5 to 184.7 ± 44.9 mg/dL, p < 0.0001), after 12, 24, and 48 weeks, and in LDL-C at 24 weeks follow-up (at baseline 86.7 ± 34 mg/dL to 103.4 ± 41.38 mg/dL, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Changes in the lipid profile after combined DAA/HAART treatment represent an important prognostic index. Further evaluation of cardiovascular-associated risk is necessary to implement appropriate prevention strategies.

Sex-related differences in periprosthetic joint infection research.

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have emerged as a focal point in the realm of orthopedics, garnering widespread attention owing to the escalating incidence rates and the profound impact they impose on patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). Year after year, there has been a growing trend in the analysis of multiple risk factors, complication rates, and surgical treatments in the field. This study aims to illuminate the status of the sex-related differences in periprosthetic joint infections and advance research in this field. Methods: A systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The final reference list comprised longitudinal studies (both retrospective and prospective) and randomized controlled trials. A sex-based analysis was conducted to assess differences between males and females. Results: A total of 312 studies were initially identified through online database searches and reference investigations. Nine studies were subsequently included in the review. Eight out of nine studies examined the risk of developing PJI after total joint replacement. Notably, only half of these studies demonstrated a statistically significant value, with a p  value  < 0.05 , indicating a higher risk of infectious complications in males compared to females. Conclusion: According to the current literature, there appears to be a propensity for males to develop periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty at a higher rate than the female population. Enhancing sex-related analysis in this field is imperative for gathering more robust evidence and insights.

Antiseptics' Concentration, Combination, and Exposure Time on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilm Eradication.

Background: This study aims to assess the activity of solutions containing povidone-iodine (PI) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) alone or combined on the biofilm of microbial species in the contest of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods: Different antiseptic solutions were tested on 2-day-old biofilms of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi at 1 and 3 minutes of exposure. The efficacy of these solutions was evaluated by measuring the biofilm metabolic activity by methoxynitrosulfophenyl-tetrazolium carboxanilide (XTT) reduction assay. The anti-biofilm effect of 5% PI and 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 was tested on a 5-day-old biofilm using colony-forming unit counts and an XTT reduction assay. Results: PI and H2O2 solutions showed concentration-dependent anti-biofilm activity except for E. faecalis. PI at 5% was the most active solution against the 2-day-old biofilm of all test microorganisms. The 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 solution had a significant effect only at 3 minutes. The 5% PI and 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 effect was evaluated on 5-day-old biofilms. PI at 5% produced a significant reduction in metabolic activity at both 1 and 3 minutes; 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 caused a significant activity against all Gram-positive strains after 3 minutes, with a greater metabolic activity reduction than 5% PI. Conclusions: In the case of PJI caused by Gram-positive bacteria, 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 could be used for wound irrigation for 3 minutes of exposure. In the case of PJI with a different etiological agent or PJI with an unknown etiology, it is advisable to use 5% PI for 1 minute of exposure.