Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 51: 26-31, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34662785

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for contacting the emergency medical services (EMS). About 15% of these chest pain patients have a high-risk condition, while many of them have a low-risk condition with no need for acute hospital care. It is challenging to at an early stage distinguish whether patients have a low- or high-risk condition. The objective of this study has been to develop prediction models for optimising the identification of patients with low- respectively high-risk conditions in acute chest pain early in the EMS work flow. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 2578 EMS missions concerning patients who contacted the EMS in a Swedish region due to chest pain in 2018. All the patients were assessed as having a low-, intermediate- or high-risk condition, i.e. occurrence of a time-sensitive diagnosis at discharge from hospital. Multivariate regression analyses using data on symptoms and symptom onset, clinical findings including ECG, previous medical history and Troponin T were carried out to develop models for identification of patients with low- respectively high-risk conditions. Developed models where then tested hold-out data set for internal validation and assessing their accuracy. RESULTS: Prediction models for risk-stratification based on variables mutual for both low- and high-risk prediction were developed. The variables included were: age, sex, previous medical history of kidney disease, atrial fibrillation or heart failure, Troponin T, ST-depression on ECG, paleness, pain debut during activity, constant pain, pain in right arm and pressuring pain quality. The high-risk model had an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.85 and the corresponding figure for the low-risk model was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: Models based on readily available information in the EMS setting can identify high- and low-risk conditions with acceptable accuracy. A clinical decision support tool based on developed models may provide valuable clinical guidance and facilitate referral to less resource-intensive venues.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor en el Pecho/sangre , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Suecia , Triaje , Troponina T/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA