Incidence and outcome of colorectal cancer in liver transplant recipients: A national, multicentre analysis on 8115 patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: De novo malignancies after liver transplantation represent one of the leading causes of death in the long-term. It remains unclear whether liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and whether this negatively impacts on survival, particularly in those patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this national multicentre cohort retrospective study, the incidence of colorectal cancer in 8115 evaluable adult patients undergoing a liver transplantation between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2010 was compared to the incidence in the general population through standardised incidence ratios. RESULTS: Fifty-two (0.6%) cases of colorectal cancer were identified at a median of 5.6 years postliver transplantation, predominantly grade 2 (76.9%) and stage T3 (50%) at diagnosis. The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in the whole liver transplant population was similar to the general UK population (SIR: 0.92), but significantly higher (SIR: 7.0) in the group of patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis. One-, five- and ten-year survival rates from colorectal cancer diagnosis were 71%, 48% and 31%, respectively, and the majority of colorectal cancer patients died of cancer-specific causes. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation alone is not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer development. The primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis liver transplant population showed a significantly higher risk of colorectal cancer development than the general population, with a high proportion of advanced stage at diagnosis and a reduced patient survival.

Risk factors for recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is well recognised. However, the relationship between IBD and recurrent PSC (rPSC) is less well understood. We assessed the prevalence of rPSC and analysed the factors associated with rPSC post-liver transplantation and its influence on graft and patient survival. METHODS: This is a UK multicentre observational cohort study across six of the seven national liver transplant units. All patients undergoing a first liver transplant for PSC between January 1 1990 and December 31 2010 were included. Prospectively collected liver transplant data was obtained from NHSBT and colitis data was retrospectively collected from individual units. RESULTS: There were 679 (8.8%) first transplants for PSC. 347 patients (61.4%) had IBD, of which 306 (88.2%) had ulcerative colitis (UC). 81 (14.3%) patients developed rPSC and 37 (48.7%) of them developed graft failure from rPSC. Presence of UC post-liver transplant (HR=2.40, 95% CI 1.44-4.02) and younger age (HR=0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.93) were the only factors significantly associated with rPSC. rPSC was associated with over a 4-fold increase in the risk of death (HR=4.71, 95% CI 3.39, 6.56) with 1, 5, and 10-year graft survival rates of 98%, 84%, and 56% respectively compared to 95%, 88%, and 72% in patients who did not develop rPSC. CONCLUSION: The presence of UC post-liver transplant is associated with a significantly increased risk of rPSC. Furthermore, the presence of rPSC increases the rate of graft failure and death, with higher re-transplantation rates.

Presentation, diagnosis, and management of early hepatic venous outflow complications in whole cadaveric liver transplant.

Early hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) can be a devastating complication leading to graft loss after liver transplantation (LT). A retrospective study on 777 adult LT recipients over a 5-year period (August 2007 to August 2012) was undertaken to determine the incidence of early HVOO presenting within 3 months of transplant, its clinical features and management, and potential technical risk factors related to the implanting technique. Cases of early HVOO were screened for by identifying recipients with problematic ascites within 3 months of transplant. Definitive diagnosis for HVOO was based on a wedge pressure of >12 mm Hg. Considering only whole livers, the incidence of early problematic ascites was 3% (20/695) of which more than one-third (35%, 7/20) were then confirmed to have HVOO. Overall, the incidence of early HVOO was 1% (7/695). Two hepatic veins (HVs) with extension piggybacks (PBs; n = 423) were the dominant implanting technique in the time period of study rather than the 3 HV PB (n = 182) and caval replacement techniques (n = 82). Considering the implantation technique, all cases of HVOO occurred after 2 HVs when extension PBs had been used with an incidence of 1.7% (7/423). Institutionally, early HVOO was mainly managed surgically by either cavoplasty within a month of transplant (n = 4) or retransplant (n = 1), and the remainder (n = 2) were medically managed with diuretics. In conclusion, early HVOO is rare, and there is no evidence from this study that a given implantation technique is at a higher risk of developing HVOO (2 HV with extension versus 3 HV and caval replacement; P = 0.11). However, early revisional surgery for HVOO can preserve graft function with retransplantation being reserved for when surgical cavoplasty or radiological stenting is technically not possible.