Predictors of operative management in diabetic foot ulcers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Surgery plays a key role in the management of complicated diabetic foot disease (DFD). Currently, indications for medical versus surgical management are poorly defined. Prompt identification of patients who require surgery may reduce morbidities and length of hospital stay. This study aims to analyse factors in DFD that necessitate early surgical interventions. METHODS: All patients admitted under a multi-disciplinary diabetic foot team in a tertiary institution over 2 years were included in a retrospective case-control study comparing patients who received medical management and patients who received surgical management. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with surgical management of diabetic foot complications. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty patients were included. 49% of patients required surgical management. Toe ulceration, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and the presence of osteomyelitis were associated with surgical management. Multivariate analysis calculated an odds ratio (OR) of 1.01 for CRP (p < 0.001), OR 2.19 (p < 0.019) favouring surgical management for forefoot ulcers, and OR 2.2 (p < 0.019) if osteomyelitis was present. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with elevated CRP levels, a forefoot diabetic ulcer and established osteomyelitis were more likely to undergo surgical management. Prompt recognition of these patients has the potential benefit of earlier decision making in definitive surgical interventions.

Implication of Peripheral Neuropathy on Unplanned Readmissions in Patients Hospitalized for Complicated Diabetic Foot Disease.

Introduction. Unplanned readmissions are common following discharge in patients after hospitalization for diabetic foot disease (DFD) complications. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with readmissions in these high-risk patients, treated in a multidisciplinary setting and the implication of measures that could effectively reduce readmission rates. Methods. Patients presenting with DFDs admitted between 2015 and 2017 were studied retrospectively in a single-centre patient database. The demographics and clinical comorbidities were analyzed and comparison was made between 2 groups: patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge and those who did not require readmission. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with readmissions. Results. In total, 340 patients were included. The unplanned readmission rate was 10.9%. More than half of readmissions (71%) were related to wound deterioration and infection. In the readmission group, the patients had lower body mass index, higher rate of osteomyelitis, lower rate of debridement, and evidence of peripheral vascular disease below the knee in the index admissions but these were not significant. In the multivariate analysis, peripheral neuropathy was the only significant risk associated with unplanned readmissions (odds ratio: 2.78, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-6.29, P = .014). Conclusion. This study demonstrates a significant association between peripheral neuropathy and unplanned readmissions. The implications of this nonmodifiable risk factor in reducing readmissions include all levels of patient care delivery such as adequate preparation for discharge and transition back into the community. Recognition and education in successful long-term offloading of insensate diabetic feet may help reduce rates of unplanned readmission.

Hyperosmolar Hyperglycaemic State (HHS) complicated by life-threatening large vessel occlusive arterial thrombosis - A mini case series and important reminder for clinicians.

Hyperosmolar Hyperglycaemic State (HHS) is a known life-threatening complication of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). As the incidence of T2DM continues to grow, it is important to remember some of its lesser-known complications. HHS has been described in the literature to result in small vessel thrombosis, leading to coronary or cerebral arterial thrombosis, resulting in acute myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents. The underlying pathology of this relates to the prothrombotic and hyperviscous state caused by HHS. On our review of the literature, however, we are unable to find a consistent description or HHS complicated by large vessel thrombotic occlusion. The authors of this paper present a mini case series describing two cases of HHS which were complicated by life or limb-threatening large vessel occlusive arterial thrombosis. This is particularly unique as we have otherwise only been able to identify single case reports in the existing literature from other authors. The purpose of this case discussion is to highlight this rare complication of HHS and to encourage clinicians to remember that HHS is not just a physiological or biochemical derangement, can also lead to true surgical emergencies requiring immediate treatment.

Initial radiologic appearance rather than management strategy predicts the outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy leaks.

BACKGROUND: Initial radiologic appearance rather than management strategy predicts the outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy leaks. OBJECTIVE: Multiple modalities have been advocated for the treatment of sleeve gastrectomy leak, and there remains no consensus on the best treatment paradigm. For more than 10 years, we have variably attempted luminal occlusive therapies and repeated endoscopic debridement as treatment options. By evaluating the outcomes from these approaches, we aimed to determine whether the first management strategy is superior to the second in terms of outcomes. METHODS: Patients were analyzed by group (luminal occlusive therapy versus repeated endoscopic debridement). Leaks were then stratified by radiologic appearance on computed tomography, defined as phlegmon, collection, contrast medium leak, or fistula. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were comprehensive complication index and the need for resection. RESULTS: There were 54 patients, with 22 in the luminal occlusion group and 32 in the repeated debridement group. There was no difference in LOS (59.8 ± 41.6 versus 46.5 ± 51.2 days, P = .179) and no difference in the requirement for resection (4 versus 3 resections, p = .425). Subset analysis suggested that patients who underwent operative versus conservative management (P = .006) had a longer LOS. Excluding management strategy, radiologic appearance on admission significantly predicted LOS (P = .0053). Patients presenting with fistula (84 ± 25.4 days) and contrast medium leak (64.1 ± 40 days) had a significantly longer LOS than those diagnosed with phlegmon (13.5 ± 5.5 days). Radiologic appearance was predictive of complication severity (P < .0001) and salvage resection (P = .008). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated with intraluminal occlusion or repeated debridement. Initial radiologic appearance was predictive of LOS and complication severity. This highlights the need for routine use of a validated classification system in studies reporting outcomes and treatment of sleeve leaks.