Comparison of lower extremity fasciotomy wound closure techniques in children: vacuum-assisted closure device versus temporary synthetic skin replacement.

PURPOSE: No clear consensus on the optimal treatment of fasciotomy wounds due to acute compartment syndrome of the lower leg in children exists. We therefore compared two commonly used methods to close fasciotomy wounds, Epigard, a temporary synthetic skin replacement (SSR) and the vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) device, in respect of treatment duration and complication rates. METHODS: We studied the cases of 27 patients who were treated at our institution for acute compartment syndrome of the lower leg with a fasciotomy over a 10-year period. The fasciotomy wound was either treated with SSR or V.A.C. device. We recorded the number of procedures to definitive wound closure, days to wound closure, hospitalization days and sequelae rate. RESULTS: In the V.A.C. device group (18 patients) the mean number of procedures until definitive wound closure was 3.1, mean days until wound closure was 9.4 and mean days of hospitalization was 16.2. One patient suffered from a wound infection and one patient required a full thickness skin graft. In the SSR group (9 patients), the mean number of procedures was 1.8, mean days until definitive wound closure was 4.9 and mean days of hospitalization was 9.9. No sequelae were recorded. There was a statistically significant smaller number of procedures (p value 0.018), fewer days to definitive wound closure (p value 0.002) and fewer hospitalization days (p value 0.005) in the SSR group. CONCLUSIONS: Both SSR and V.A.C. device are safe and reliable for closure of fasciotomy wounds in children, whereas SSR seems to lead to shorter time until definitive wound closure.

Correction to: Compartment pressures in children with normal and fractured lower extremities.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the author name Sasha Job Tharakan. The corrected name is given above.

Compartment pressures in children with normal and fractured lower extremities.

PURPOSE: Needle manometry is a tool to confirm suspected acute compartment syndrome (ACS). There is scarce evidence of normal pressure values of the lower extremities in children. The aim of this study is to assess the normal compartment pressures in non-injured lower extremities of children. METHODS: This prospective study included children up to the age of 16 years with lower extremity fractures that needed reduction. Between June 2009 and August 2015, 20 children were included. We used needle manometry to measure the pressures in the superficial (SPC), deep posterior (DPC) and in the anterior compartments (AC) on both the lower legs. RESULTS: On the healthy leg, the mean compartment pressure was 15.15 mmHg in the AC (range 7-30 mmHg), 14.32 mmHg in the SPC (range 8-24 mmHg) and 13.00 mmHg in the DPC (range 4-21 mmHg). On the injured leg, the mean compartment pressure was 24.07 mmHg in the AC (range 5-40 mmHg), 17.21 mmHg in the SPC (range 7-29 mmHg) and 17.13 mmHg in the DPC (range 6-37 mmHg). We found a perfusion gradient (diastolic blood pressure-compartment pressure) < 30 mmHg in at least one compartment of the fractured and healthy leg in 13 patients. Five patients underwent fasciotomy for suspected ACS and their data was excluded for the injured leg. CONCLUSION: We could show that children have higher normal compartment pressures than adults in the lower leg. They seem to be able to tolerate higher absolute compartment pressures and lower pressure gradients before ACS occurs. More studies are needed to make a final statement on tolerable compartment pressures in children.

Intraventricular catheter placement by electromagnetic navigation safely applied in a paediatric major head injury patient.

INTRODUCTION: In the management of severe head injuries, the use of intraventricular catheters for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and the option of cerebrospinal fluid drainage is gold standard. In children and adolescents, the insertion of a cannula in a compressed ventricle in case of elevated intracranial pressure is difficult; therefore, a pressure sensor is placed more often intraparenchymal as an alternative option. DISCUSSION: In cases of persistent elevated ICP despite maximal brain pressure management, the use of an intraventricular monitoring device with the possibility of cerebrospinal fluid drainage is favourable. We present the method of intracranial catheter placement by means of an electromagnetic navigation technique.