Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 62(3): 350-61, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22482292

RESUMEN

Open beef cattle feedlots emit various air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM) with equivalent aerodynamic diameter of 10 microm or less (PM10); however limited research has quantified PM10 emission rates from feedlots. This research was conducted to determine emission rates of PM10 from large cattle feedlots in Kansas. Concentrations of PM10 at the downwind and upwind edges of two large cattle feedlots (KS1 and KS2) in Kansas were measured with tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) PM10 monitors from January 2007 to December 2008. Weather conditions at the feedlots were also monitored. From measured PM10 concentrations and weather conditions, PM10 emission rates were determined using reverse modeling with the American Meteorological Society/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD). The two feedlots differed significantly in median PM10 emission flux (1.60 g/m2-day for KS1 vs. 1.10 g/m2-day for KS2) but not in PM10 emission factor (27 kg/1000 head-day for KS1 and 30 kg/1000 head-day KS2). These emission factors were smaller than published U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emission factor for cattle feedlots.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/química , Contaminación del Aire/prevención & control , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Modelos Teóricos , Material Particulado/química , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Bovinos , Humanos , Kansas
2.
J Environ Qual ; 40(5): 1503-9, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21869512

RESUMEN

Emission of particulate matter (PM) is one of the major air quality concerns for large beef cattle feedlots. Effective treatments on the uncompacted soil and manure mixture of the pen surface may help in reducing PM emission from feedlots. A laboratory apparatus was developed for measuring dust-emission potential of cattle feedlot surfaces as affected by pen surface treatments. The apparatus was equipped with a simulated pen surface, four mock cattle hooves, and samplers for PM with equivalent aerodynamic diam. ≤ 10 µm (PM(10)). The simulated pen surface had a layer of dry, loose feedlot manure with a compacted soil layer underneath. Mock hooves were moved horizontally on the manure layer to simulate horizontal action of cattle hooves on the pen surface. High-volume PM samplers were used to collect emitted dust. Effects of hoof speed, depth of penetration, and surface treatments with independent candidate materials (i.e., sawdust, wheat straw, hay, rubber mulch, and surface water application) on PM(10) emission potential of the manure layer were investigated. Our laboratory study showed PM(10) emission potential increased with increasing depth of penetration and hoof speed. Of the surface treatments evaluated, application of water (6.4 mm) and hay (723 g m(-2)) exhibited the greatest percentage reduction in PM(10) emission potential (69 and 77%, respectively) compared with the untreated manure layer. This study indicated application of hay or other mulch materials on the pen surface might be good alternative methods to control dust emission from cattle feedlots.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal , Polvo , Laboratorios , Animales , Bovinos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Tamaño de la Partícula
3.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 60(2): 210-8, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20222534

RESUMEN

Mixing ratios of total and gaseous ammonia were measured at an open-air cattle feeding facility in the Texas Panhandle in the summers of 2007 and 2008. Samples were collected at the nominally upwind and downwind edges of the facility. In 2008, a series of far-field samples was also collected 3.5 km north of the facility. Ammonium concentrations were determined by two complementary laboratory methods, a novel application of visible spectrophotometry and standard ion chromatography (IC). Results of the two techniques agreed very well, and spectrophotometry is faster, easier, and cheaper than chromatography. Ammonia mixing ratios measured at the immediate downwind site were drastically higher (approximately 2900 parts per billion by volume [ppbv]) than thos measured at the upwind site (< or = 200 ppbv). In contrast, at 3.5 km away from the facility, ammonia mixing ratios were reduced to levels similar to the upwind site (< or = 200 ppbv). In addition, PM10 (particulate matter < 10 microm in optical diameter) concentrations obtained at each sampling location using Grimm portable aerosol spectrometers are reported. Time-averaged (1-hr) volume concentrations of PM10 approached 5 x 10(12) nm3 cm(-3). Emitted ammonia remained largely in the gas phase at the downwind and far-field locations. No clear correlation between concentrations of ammonia and particles was observed. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of ammonia emissions from open-air animal feeding operations, especially under the hot and dry conditions present during these measurements.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Amoníaco/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/prevención & control , Algoritmos , Animales , Bovinos , Cromatografía por Intercambio Iónico , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Material Particulado/análisis , Texas , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Viento
4.
Syst Rev ; 6(1): 210, 2017 10 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061188

RESUMEN

Authors' response to comments letter to the editor from Nachman KE et al.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal , Salud Pública , Animales
5.
Syst Rev ; 6(1): 86, 2017 04 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420442

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to update a systematic review of associations between living near an animal feeding operation (AFO) and human health. METHODS: The MEDLINE® and MEDLINE® In-Process, Centre for Agricultural Biosciences Abstracts, and Science Citation Index databases were searched. Reference lists of included articles were hand-searched. Eligible studies reported exposure to an AFO and an individual-level human health outcome. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. RESULTS: The search returned 3702 citations. Sixteen articles consisting of 10 study populations were included in the analysis. The health outcomes were lower and upper respiratory tracts, MRSA, other infectious disease, neurological, psychological, dermatological, otologic, ocular, gastrointestinal, stress and mood, and other non-infectious health outcomes. Most studies were observational and used prevalence measures of outcome. An association between Q fever risk and proximity to goat production was reported. Other associations were unclear. Risk of bias was serious or critical for most exposure-outcome associations. Multiplicity (i.e., a large number of potentially correlated outcomes and exposures assessed on the same study subjects) was common in the evidence base. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies reported an association between surrogate clinical outcomes and AFO proximity for respiratory tract-related outcomes. There were no consistent dose-response relationships between surrogate clinical outcome and AFO proximity. A new finding was that Q fever in goats is likely associated with an increased Q fever risk in community members. The review results for the non-respiratory health outcomes were inconclusive because only a small number of studies were available or the between-study results were inconsistent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010521.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Animales , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/etiología
6.
Am J Vet Res ; 65(6): 860-4, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15198229

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of transportation stress on serum concentrations of oxidative stress biomarkers of calves. ANIMALS: 105 crossbred beef steer calves (mean [+/-SD] body weight, 207 +/- 21.2 kg). PROCEDURE: Calves were assembled at 1 location in Tennessee, and pretransit (day -3) blood samples were collected. Calves were allotted randomly by body weight into 2 groups. Calves were transported 1,930 miles to a feedlot in Texas, and 1 group received tilmicosin phosphate (33 microg/kg, s.c.) upon arrival. Calves were weighed and blood samples collected on the day of arrival (day 1) and on days 15, 22, and 28. Calves were scored daily for signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Serum total antioxidant capacity (TACA) and serum malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Transportation stress significantly decreased mean serum TACA concentrations (from 147 +/- 31.2 U/mL to 133 +/- 20.1 U/mL) and significantly increased serum MDA concentrations (from 10.9 +/- 18.3 microg/mL to 30.2 +/- 50.5 microg/mL). Calves that died had a 43% increase in serum MDA concentration on day 1, compared with calves that lived (42.2 +/- 67.0 microg/mL vs 29.4 +/- 49.4 microg/mL, respectively). Calves that had > or =3 episodes of BRD had 2-fold higher serum MDA concentrations on day 1 than healthy calves. Tilmicosin-treated calves had a 20.8% significantly greater average daily gain and significantly greater serum TACA concentration than nontreated calves on day 28. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Transportation stress increases serum concentrations of oxidative stress biomarkers that are related to episodes of BRD and mortality in calves.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/análisis , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/fisiopatología , Malondialdehído/sangre , Enfermedades Respiratorias/veterinaria , Estrés Fisiológico/veterinaria , Animales , Peso Corporal , Bovinos , Peroxidación de Lípido , Estrés Fisiológico/fisiopatología , Transportes
7.
Syst Rev ; 3: 99, 2014 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25200608

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Livestock and poultry operations that feed large numbers of animals are common. Facility capacity varies, but it is not uncommon for facilities to house 1,000 swine with multiple barns at a single site, feedlots to house 50,000 cattle, and poultry houses to house 250,000 hens. There is primary research that suggests livestock facilities that confine animals indoors for feeding can represent a health hazard for surrounding communities. In this protocol, we describe a review about the association between proximity to animal-feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals in nearby communities. A systematic review of the topic was published by some members of our group in 2010. The purpose of this review is to update that review. METHODS/DESIGN: The populations of interest are people living in communities near livestock production facilities. Outcomes of interest are any health outcome measured in humans such as respiratory disease, gastrointestinal disease, and mental health. Measures of antibiotic resistance in people from the communities compared to measures of resistance found in animals and the environment on animal-feeding operations will also be summarized. The exposure of interest will be exposure to livestock production using a variety of metrics such as distance from facilities, endotoxin levels, and measures of odor. Electronic searches will be conducted using MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process (via OvidSP), CAB Abstracts (via Web of Knowledge), and Science Citation Index (via Web of Knowledge). No language or date restriction will be applied. We will access the risk of bias using a pilot version of a tool developed by the Methods Groups of the Cochrane Collaboration for non-randomized interventions.We propose to conduct a meta-analysis for each health metric (e.g., combining all respiratory disease outcomes, combining all gastrointestinal outcomes). A planned subgroup analysis will be based on the domains of the risk of bias. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide synthesis of current evidence reporting the association between living near an animal-feeding operation and human health. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010521.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Estado de Salud , Proyectos de Investigación , Alimentación Animal , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Animales , Humanos , Ganado , Salud Mental , Aves de Corral , Características de la Residencia , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
8.
Appl Spectrosc ; 65(9): 1056-61, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21929861

RESUMEN

Visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR, 350-2500 nm) diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) models built from "as-collected" samples of solid cattle manure accurately predict concentrations of moisture and crude ash. Because different organic molecules emit different spectral signatures, variations in livestock diet composition may affect the predictive accuracy of these models. This study investigates how differences in livestock diet composition affect Vis-NIR DRS prediction of moisture and crude ash. Spectral signatures of solid manure samples (n = 216) from eighteen groups of cattle on six different diets were used to calibrate and validate partial least squares (PLS) regression models. Seven groups of PLS models were created and validated. In the first group, two-thirds of all samples were randomly selected as the calibration set and the remaining one-third were used for the validation set. In the remaining six groups, samples were grouped by livestock diet (ration). Each ration in turn was held out of calibrations and then used as a validation set. When predicting crude ash, the fully random calibration model produced a root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 2.5% on a dry basis (db), ratio of standard error of prediction to the root mean squared deviation (RPD) of 3.1, bias of 0.14% (db), and correlation coefficient r(2) of 0.90., When predicting moisture, an RMSD of 1.5% on a wet basis (wb), RPD of 4.3, bias of -0.09% (wb), and r(2) of 0.95 was achieved. Model accuracy and precision were not impaired by exclusion of any single ration from model calibration.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal , Ceniza del Carbón/análisis , Estiércol/análisis , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta/métodos , Agua/análisis , Animales , Bovinos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Ganado , Tamaño de la Partícula , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
9.
PLoS One ; 5(3): e9530, 2010 Mar 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20224825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A systematic review was conducted for the association between animal feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals living near AFOs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The review was restricted to studies reporting respiratory, gastrointestinal and mental health outcomes in individuals living near AFOs in North America, European Union, United Kingdom, and Scandinavia. From June to September 2008 searches were conducted in PUBMED, CAB, Web-of-Science, and Agricola with no restrictions. Hand searching of narrative reviews was also used. Two reviewers independently evaluated the role of chance, confounding, information, selection and analytic bias on the study outcome. Nine relevant studies were identified. The studies were heterogeneous with respect to outcomes and exposures assessed. Few studies reported an association between surrogate clinical outcomes and AFO proximity. A negative association was reported when odor was the measure of exposure to AFOs and self-reported disease, the measure of outcome. There was evidence of an association between self-reported disease and proximity to AFO in individuals annoyed by AFO odor. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There was inconsistent evidence of a weak association between self-reported disease in people with allergies or familial history of allergies. No consistent dose response relationship between exposure and disease was observable.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Unión Europea , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Humanos , Salud Mental , América del Norte , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades Respiratorias/etiología , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos , Reino Unido
10.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol ; 293(5): L1163-70, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17720876

RESUMEN

Individuals exposed to dusts from concentrated animal feeding operations report increased numbers of respiratory tract symptoms, and bronchoalveolar lavage samples from such individuals demonstrate elevated lung inflammatory mediators, including interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-6. We previously found that exposure of bronchial epithelial cells to hog barn dusts resulted in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent increase in IL-6 and IL-8 release. We hypothesized that cattle feedlot dusts would also generate bronchial epithelial interleukin release in vitro. To test this, we used interleukin ELISAs and direct PKC isoform assays. We found that a dust extract from cattle feedlots [feedlot dust extract (FLDE)] augments PKC activity of human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. A 5-10% dilution of FLDE stimulated a significant release of IL-6 and IL-8 at 6-24 h in a PKC-dependent manner vs. control medium-treated cells. An increase in PKCalpha activity was observed with 1 h of FLDE treatment, and PKCepsilon activity was elevated at 6 h of FLDE exposure. The PKCalpha inhibitor, Gö-6976, did not inhibit FLDE-stimulated IL-8 and IL-6 release. However, the PKCepsilon inhibitor, Ro 31-8220, effectively inhibited FLDE-stimulated IL-8 and IL-6 release. Inhibition of FLDE-stimulated IL-6 and IL-8 was confirmed in a dominant-negative PKCepsilon-expressing BEAS-2B cell line but not observed in a PKCalpha dominant negative BEAS-2B cell line. These data support the hypothesis that FLDE exposure stimulates bronchial epithelial IL-8 and IL-6 release via a PKCepsilon-dependent pathway.


Asunto(s)
Bronquios/citología , Polvo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Interleucina-8/metabolismo , Proteína Quinasa C-epsilon/metabolismo , Mucosa Respiratoria/metabolismo , Alimentación Animal/análisis , Animales , Bovinos , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Activación Enzimática/inmunología , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Humanos , Interleucina-6/genética , Interleucina-8/genética , Proteína Quinasa C-epsilon/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mucosa Respiratoria/citología , Factores de Tiempo
11.
J Agromedicine ; 10(4): 55-64, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16702123

RESUMEN

There is concern that livestock operations for fattening cattle and raising hogs known as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) release substances into the air that have negative effects on the health of persons living nearby. These substances include dust containing endotoxin and other microbial products as well as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and a variety of volatile organic compounds. Odors from these farms are considered offensive by some neighbors. A variety of medical complaints are reported to be more common in those people who live near CAFOs for raising hogs than in people without this exposure. Respiratory health effects, including symptoms of pulmonary disease and lung function test result abnormalities, have been described in workers employed in CAFOs where hogs are raised. Health effects after inhalation exposure of neighbors to substances released into the ambient air from these farms is less well characterized. It must be noted that CAFO workers may differ from neighbors in terms of their exposures and general health status. The presence of dust and other substances from cattle feedlots also causes some neighbors to voice concerns about the impact on their health but this exposure has been studied less extensively than exposure to substances released from CAFOs where hogs are raised. Further research needs to be done to look for measurable health effects attributable to living near all CAFOs in order to better understand the impact of these farms.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Contaminación Ambiental/efectos adversos , Estado de Salud , Salud Pública , Animales , Bovinos , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Odorantes/análisis , Odorantes/prevención & control , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA