Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(4): 1667-1684, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conventional three-access laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) is currently the gold standard treatment, however, Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy (SILA) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis was to evaluate safety and efficacy of SILA compared with conventional approach. METHODS: Per PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CLA vs SILA for acute appendicitis. The randomised Mantel-Haenszel method was used for the meta-analysis. Statistical data analysis was performed with the Review Manager software and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" assessment tool. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (RCTs) were selected (2646 patients). The operative time was significantly longer in the SILA group (MD = 7,32), confirmed in both paediatric (MD = 9,80), (Q = 1,47) and adult subgroups (MD = 5,92), (Q = 55,85). Overall postoperative morbidity was higher in patients who underwent SILA, but the result was not statistically significant. In SILA group were assessed shorter hospital stays, fewer wound infections and higher conversion rate, but the results were not statistically significant. Meta-analysis was not performed about cosmetics of skin scars and postoperative pain because different scales were used in each study. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis show that SILA, although associated with fewer postoperative wound infection, has a significantly longer operative time. Furthermore, the risk of postoperative general complications is still present. Further studies will be required to analyse outcomes related to postoperative pain and the cosmetics of the surgical scar.

2.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 92, 2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The anatomic variants of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) represent a potential risk of injuries during surgical procedure such as axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer and melanoma patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the different origins and branching patterns of the intercostobrachial nerve also providing an analysis of the prevalence, through the analysis of the literature available up to September 2023. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protocol for this study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023447932), an international prospective database for reviews. The PRISMA guideline was respected throughout the meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. A search was performed in grey literature through google. RESULTS: We included a total of 23 articles (1,883 patients). The prevalence of the ICBN in the axillae was 98.94%. No significant differences in prevalence were observed during the analysis of geographic subgroups or by study type (cadaveric dissections and in intraoperative dissections). Only five studies of the 23 studies reported prevalence of less than 100%. Overall, the PPE was 99.2% with 95% Cis of 98.5% and 99.7%. As expected from the near constant variance estimates, the heterogeneity was low, I2 = 44.3% (95% CI 8.9%-65.9%), Q = 39.48, p = .012. When disaggregated by evaluation type, the difference in PPEs between evaluation types was negligible. For cadaveric dissection, the PPE was 99.7% (95% CI 99.1%-100.0%) compared to 99.0% (95% CI 98.1%-99.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ICBN variants was very high. The dissection of the ICBN during axillary lymph-node harvesting, increases the risk of sensory disturbance. The preservation of the ICBN does not modify the oncological radicality in axillary dissection for patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma or breast cancer. Therefore, we recommend to operate on these patients in high volume center to reduce post-procedural pain and paresthesia associated with a lack of ICBN variants recognition.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Melanoma , Humanos , Femenino , Melanoma/cirugía , Nervios Intercostales/patología , Nervios Intercostales/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Axila/patología , Cadáver
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 25(7): 1361-1370, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317032

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive evidence-based assessment of the discontinuity of the marginal artery at the splenic flexure (SF) and the rectosigmoid junction (RSJ). METHOD: A systematic review was conducted of literature published to 26 December 2022 in the electronic databases PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis using the Metafor package in R. The primary outcomes were the pooled PPEs of the marginal artery at the SF and the RSJ. The secondary outcome was the size of vascular anastomoses. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (n = 2,864 patients) were included. The marginal artery was present at the splenic flexure in 82% (95% CI: 62-95) of patients. Approximately 81% (95% CI: 63-94%) of patients had a large macroscopic anastomosis, while the remainder (19%) had small bridging ramifications forming the vessel. The marginal artery was present at the RSJ in 82% (95% CI: 70-91%) of patients. CONCLUSION: The marginal artery may be absent at the SF and the RSJ in up to 18% of individuals, which may confer a higher risk of ischaemic colitis. As a result of high interstudy heterogeneity noted in our analysis, further well-powered studies to clarify the prevalence of the marginal artery at the SF and the RSJ, as well as its relationship with other complementary colonic collaterals (intermediate and central mesenteric), are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Colon Transverso , Humanos , Colon Transverso/cirugía , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Recto/irrigación sanguínea , Colon/irrigación sanguínea , Arterias
4.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 329, 2023 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37615738

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The present meta-analysis compares laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal (LLIR) with open loop ileostomy reversal (OLIR) to evaluate the advantages of the laparoscopic technique compared to the traditional open technique in ileostomy reversal. METHODS: Primary endpoints were hospital stay and overall complications. Secondary endpoints were operative time, EBL, readmission, medical complications, surgical complications, reoperation, wound infection, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction, and cost of the procedures. The included studies were also divided based on the type of anastomotic approach: extracorporeal laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal (ELLIR) and intracorporeal laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal (ILLIR). RESULTS: In the analysis, 4 studies were included. Three hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled. As primary outcomes, a significant difference was found in hospital stay between the LLIR and OLIR groups (MD = -0.67, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.19, P = 0.007). The overall complications outcome resulted in favor of the LLIR group (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95, P = 0.03). As secondary outcomes, the operative time was in favor of the OLIR group (MD = 19.18, 95% CI 10.20-28.16, P < 0.001). Surgical complications were lower in the LLIR group than in the OLIR group. No other differences between the secondary endpoints were found. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in hospital stay between the ILLIR and OLIR groups (MD = -0.92, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.30, P = 0.004). The overall complications outcome significantly favored the ILLIR group (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.96, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows an advantage in terms of shorter post-operative hospitalization and reduction of complications of LLIR compared to OLIR. The sub-group analysis shows that performing an extracorporeal anastomosis exposes the same risks of the open technique.


Asunto(s)
Ileostomía , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Fuga Anastomótica , Hospitalización , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados no Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 286, 2023 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the current scientific evidence regarding the impact of the level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation on post-operative and oncological outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to 06 September 2022. Included were RCTs that compared patients who underwent high (HL) vs. anterior (LL) IMA ligation for resection of rectal cancer. The literature search was performed on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science without any language restrictions. The primary endpoint was overall anastomotic leakage (AL). Secondary endpoints were oncological outcomes, intraoperative complications, urogenital functional outcomes, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (1331 patients) were included. The overall rate of AL was lower in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.96). The overall number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (MD 0.93, 95% CI - 2.21 to 0.34). The number of lymph nodes harvested was assessed in 256 patients, and all had a laparoscopic procedure. The number of lymph nodes was higher when LL was associated with lymphadenectomy of the vascular root than when IMA was ligated at its origin, but there the difference was not statistically significant (MD - 0.37, 95% CI - 1.00 to 0.26). Overall survival at 5 years was slightly better in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05). Disease-free survival at 5 years was higher in the LL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.04). CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support HL or LL according to results in terms of AL or oncologic outcome. Moreover, there is not enough evidence to determine the impact of the level of IMA ligation on functional outcomes. The level of IMA ligation should be chosen case by case based on expected functional and oncological outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Ligadura/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos
6.
Surg Today ; 53(2): 163-173, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34997332

RESUMEN

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most fearsome complication in low rectal resection. The temporary diverting stoma (DS) is recommended to prevent AL, but it may cause relevant morbidity and needs a second surgical procedure to be closed. Therefore, the use of a transanal drainage tube (TDT) has been proposed as an alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the peri-operative outcomes in patients undergoing elective anterior rectal resection (ARR) with TDT alone or DS alone. Six studies were meta-analyzed, including a total of 735 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the incidences of AL, surgery-related complications, infective complications, and 30-day reoperation after ARR with low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis did not differ significantly between patients undergoing positioning of TDT and those undergoing DS. Furthermore, overall complications were significantly rarer in patients undergoing TDT. A meta-analysis of the randomized control trial (RCT) and no-RCT subgroups did not detect any statistically significant differences in any outcomes. These results suggest that it might be reasonable to employ a TDT in place of a DS to protect low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis, with consequent considerable advantages in terms of the short- and long-term post-operative outcomes. However, more well-designed RCTs are needed to definitively assess this issue.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Drenaje/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(8)2023 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37629647

RESUMEN

Background: The axilla is a region of fundamental importance for the implications during oncological surgery, and there are many classifications of axillary lymph node subdivision: on the basis of studies on women with breast cancer, we used Clough's and Li's classification. However, currently we do not have a gold-standard classification regarding axillary lymphatic drainage in melanoma patients. Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate how these classifications could be adapted to sentinel lymph node evaluation in skin-melanoma patients and to look for a possible correlation between the most recent classifications of axillary lymph node location and Oeslner's classification, one of the most common anatomical classifications still widespread today. Methods: We analyzed data from 21 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy between January 2021 and January 2022. Results: Our study demonstrates that, to an extent, there is a possible difference in the use of the various classifications, hinting at possible limits of each. The data we obtained underline how cutaneous melanoma presents extremely heterogenous lymphatic drainage at the level of the axillary cavity. However, the limited data in our possession do not allow us to obtain, at the moment, results that are statistically significant, although we are continuing to enroll patients and collect data. Conclusions: Results of this study support the evidence that the common classifications used for breast cancer do not seem to be exhaustive. Therefore, a specific axillary lymph node classification is necessary in skin melanoma patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Femenino , Melanoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
8.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(1): 1-14, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34557938

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the last two decades, there has been a Copernican revolution in the decision-making for the treatment of Diverticular Disease. PURPOSE: This article provides a report on the state-of-the-art of surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: Acute diverticulitis is the most common reason for colonic resection after cancer; in the last decade, the indication for surgical resection has become more and more infrequent also in emergency. Currently, emergency surgery is seldom indicated, mostly for severe abdominal infective complications. Nowadays, uncomplicated diverticulitis is the most frequent presentation of diverticular disease and it is usually approached with a conservative medical treatment. Non-Operative Management may be considered also for complicated diverticulitis with abdominal abscess. At present, there is consensus among experts that the hemodynamic response to the initial fluid resuscitation should guide the emergency surgical approach to patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. In hemodynamically stable patients, a laparoscopic approach is the first choice, and surgeons with advanced laparoscopic skills report advantages in terms of lower postoperative complication rates. At the moment, the so-called Hartmann's procedure is only indicated in severe generalized peritonitis with metabolic derangement or in severely ill patients. Some authors suggested laparoscopic peritoneal lavage as a bridge to surgery or also as a definitive treatment without colonic resection in selected patients. In case of hemodynamic instability not responding to fluid resuscitation, an initial damage control surgery seems to be more attractive than a Hartmann's procedure, and it is associated with a high rate of primary anastomosis.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis del Colon , Diverticulitis , Perforación Intestinal , Laparoscopía , Peritonitis , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colostomía , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Lavado Peritoneal , Peritonitis/cirugía
10.
BMC Surg ; 18(Suppl 1): 22, 2019 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: TIR3B thyroid nodules are considered to be at risk of malignancy (15-30%) but guidelines recommend conservative surgery with lobectomy with primary diagnostic porpoise. Risk stratification mainly based on ultrasound, elastography and genetic mutations usually may influences the surgical approach. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 cases of TIR3B underwent between 2015 and 2017 total thyroidectomy (TT) and lobectomy (L), focusing mainly on the observed rate of malignancy. Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact probability test were used for analysis, considering a P values less than 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: Out of 52 patients 49 underwent TT and 3 L. In TT group a multinodular goiter was associated in 67.3% of patients. Malignancy rate was 81.6 and 33.3% respectively after TT and L (P 0.003). Multicentric and contralateral tumors were detected respectively in 36.7% and in 32.6% of patients underwent TT. No main post-operative complications were registered. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound and elastography are useful to define within the TIR3B group those lesions at higher risk and therefore requiring a more radical approach. TT seems an appropriate approach to TIR3B lesions, especially in multinodular goiter, considering the incidence of malignancy with probably higher rate than previously reported.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Proliferación Celular , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiroidectomía/efectos adversos
11.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(Suppl 1): 23-28, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27830521

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly fragile patients presents clinical difficulties due to severity of symptoms and related comorbidity. The optimal surgical approach for this group of patients is still debated. AIM: The aim of the study was to define the optimal technique of parathyroidectomy in elderly patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: Retrospective analysis in a series of 253 patients including 35 elderly individuals at a single institution was carried out. Postoperative parathyroid hormone decrease, surgical complications and symptoms control were analyzed for all patients in relation to the types of parathyroidectomy performed. RESULTS: In elderly patients, total parathyroidectomy was the most used approach. Subtotal parathyroidectomy was mostly reserved for younger patients suitable for kidney transplantation. No elderly patients treated with total parathyroidectomy were autotransplanted. No significant difference in surgical complications was observed between younger and elderly patients and considering the different procedures. Adequate symptom control after surgery was achieved in almost 90% of patients. A limited rate of recurrence requiring repeat surgery was observed only after subtotal parathyroidectomy. DISCUSSION: Considering the features of all types of parathyroidectomy, very low recurrence rate, contained postoperative hypocalcemia and limited complications following total parathyroidectomy, might represent specific advantages for elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Total parathyroidectomy without parathyroid transplantation is safe for elderly patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism and a good alternative to the well-established total parathyroidectomy with autografting.


Asunto(s)
Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/cirugía , Paratiroidectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paratiroidectomía/clasificación , Periodo Posoperatorio , Recurrencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(Suppl 1): 65-71, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837462

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colon cancer therapy is primarily surgical. Advanced age does not represent a contraindication to surgery. We analyse the results of surgery in ultra 75 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer by examining the correlation between the comorbidity and any post-operative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We surgically treated 66 patients for colorectal cancer, aged over 75. The examined subjects were compromised for various reasons. We have evaluated the different influences of risk factors in elective and urgency operation. DISCUSSION: Several studies have shown that age alone is not a significant prognostic factor in survival after colonic surgery. The assessment of general conditions in elderly patients, as demonstrated by the literature, is a fundamental moment in the management of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical choice should be made case by case (custom-made), not based on age only.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Edad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(Suppl 1): 83-89, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27830520

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease of the colon also affects older people. Generally, older patients with diverticulitis may be regarded as too risky to undergo surgery. This retroprospective multicentric observational study aims to assess the safety and benefits of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) in elderly patients with perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We hospitalized in urgency 100 patients, aged over 75, for sigmoid diverticulitis. Sixty-nine patients were treated with conservative medical therapy, while 31 were treated surgically, in which the surgery was performed in urgency in 18 cases, while in election in 13 cases. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage was made in urgency in five cases. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 81.72. Thirty-one patients underwent surgery, and five patients were treated in urgency with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage. Perioperative mortality was zero. None of the patients who underwent laparoscopic peritoneal lavage showed recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy can be useful in elderly patient, since these patients may benefit from a more conservative surgical strategy. The selection of patients to be subjected to laparoscopic lavage must be very rigorous.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Diverticulitis , Laparoscopía , Lavado Peritoneal/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Diverticulitis/complicaciones , Diverticulitis/diagnóstico , Diverticulitis/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/prevención & control , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Ajuste de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(Suppl 1): 121-126, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27830519

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Even with the advances in surgical technique and perioperative care, morbidity and mortality after colorectal cancer surgery remain considerable, and patients (pt) who present as an emergency have an even higher mortality and morbidity rate. METHODS: A total of 35 pt with caecum or ascending colon cancer between January 2007 and June 2015, three departments in Italy and in Poland, were included in the study. The intention of surgery in all cases was curative resection with ileo-colic anastomosis. Comparative statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Acute bowel obstruction was the major complication of CRC that led to an emergency hemicolectomy. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were in total 12.5 and 28.1%, respectively. All the deaths happened in Poland. Of the pt, 42.8% had morbidity in Poland and 16.6% in Italy. Out of the pt, 25% presenting with perforation: 25% died, 25% had wound dehiscence, 12.5% had pulmonary oedema, and 12.5% had an intra-abdominal abscess. The mean age of the pt with complications in Poland and in Italy was 79.3 and 72.0 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed that particularly lethal combination is older age, perforation with peritonitis and advanced stage of the cancer.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Neoplasias del Colon , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Obstrucción Intestinal , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Colectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Italia , Masculino , Mortalidad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Polonia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(Suppl 1): 1-6, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27844452

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms (85%) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract; duodenal GISTs constitute 3-5% of all GISTs and represent 10-30% of all malignant tumours of the duodenum. Rarely, patients present severe bowel obstruction, perforation or severe bleeding. The radical resection with complete removal of the tumour remains the main therapeutic approach. We performed a local resection in patients with suspected GIST admitted for emergency treatment for GI bleeding. CASES: We present three cases of patients admitted for GI bleeding. The cause could be a GIST bleeding. In all cases, local resection was performed without a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Histological examination on surgical preparations showed that in two cases it was a GIST and in one case, it was a leiomyoma. DISCUSSION: Surgery remains the treatment of choice in the case of a GIST primitive without evidence of metastases, even for patients who are hospitalized for a bleeding emergency. Wide resections are not needed; it is important to remove completely the disease. In the case of duodenal GIST, it is important to get negative margins near the head of the pancreas, and this could take a PD. According to our experience and to the literature review, we believe that if the duodenal papilla or the periampullary region is not interested, you must perform a local resection. This is also because non-malignant tumours may present as GISTs and in these cases it is not recommended to run a PD. CONCLUSION: The treatment of choice for duodenal GISTs is complete surgical resection with negative resection margins. When the papilla or the periampullary region is involved we choose to perform pancreaticoduodenectomy; otherwise it is better to perform a local resection. In fact, local resection has lower morbidity and mortality, with a comparable outcome.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Leiomioma/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD010989, 2015 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26301722

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgery used to be the treatment of choice in cases of blunt hepatic injury, but this approach gradually changed over the last two decades as increasing non-operative management (NOM) of splenic injury led to its use for hepatic injury. The improvement in critical care monitoring and computed tomographic scanning, as well as the more frequent use of interventional radiology techniques, has helped to bring about this change to non-operative management. Liver trauma ranges from a small capsular tear, without parenchymal laceration, to massive parenchymal injury with major hepatic vein/retrohepatic vena cava lesions. In 1994, the Organ Injury Scaling Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) revised the Hepatic Injury Scale to have a range from grade I to VI. Minor injuries (grade I or II) are the most frequent liver injuries (80% to 90% of all cases); severe injuries are grade III-V lesions; grade VI lesions are frequently incompatible with survival. In the medical literature, the majority of patients who have undergone NOM have low-grade liver injuries. The safety of NOM in high-grade liver lesions, AAST grade IV and V, remains a subject of debate as a high incidence of liver and collateral extra-abdominal complications are still described. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of non-operative management compared to operative management in high-grade (grade III-V) blunt hepatic injury. SEARCH METHODS: The search for studies was run on 14 April 2014. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, The Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase Classic+Embase (Ovid), PubMed, ISI WOS (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S & CPSI-SSH), clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and we screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials that compare non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently applied the selection criteria to relevant study reports. We used standard methodological procedures as defined by the Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS: We were unable to find any randomised controlled trials of non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In order to further explore the preliminary findings provided by animal models and observational clinical studies that suggests there may be a beneficial effect of non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury, large, high quality randomised trials are needed.


Asunto(s)
Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Hígado/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/clasificación
17.
In Vivo ; 38(2): 523-530, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418112

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the application of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance guidelines, the detection of early neoplastic lesions might be difficult in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To explore the risk of post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) in patients with IBD we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed (PROSPERO; no. CRD42023453049). We included studies reporting the 3-year PCCRC (PCCRC-3y) prevalence, according to World Endoscopy Organization (WEO)-endorsed definition, in IBD and non-IBD patients. As primary outcome we evaluated the PCCRC-3y prevalence, according to WEO definitions, in IBD- and non-IBD patients and calculated the odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was to assess risk factors for PCCRC development in IBD patients. RESULTS: Three retrospective observational cohort studies were included. The pooled PCCRC-3y rate in patients with IBD was 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)=24.4-37.5%] and in non-IBD patients was 6.8% (95%CI=6.2-7.4%). The PCCRC-3y occurrence in IBD patients was significantly higher than that in non-IBD patients (OR=6.04; 95%CI=4.04-9.4; I2=95%), but a high heterogeneity among studies was noted. Furthermore, patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) had a significantly higher prevalence of PCCRC than patients with Crohn's Disease (CD): 30.9% (95%CI=27.8-34.2%) vs. 22.3% (95%CI=18-27%), respectively (OR=1.6, 95%CI=1.2-2.2; I2=0%). CONCLUSION: One-third of CRC in IBD patients were PCCRC, and these numbers were significantly higher when compared with those in non-IBD patients. Furthermore, the prevalence of PCCRC in patients with UC was higher compared to those with CD. However, prospective studies are required to better characterize risk factors for PCCRC development in patients with IBD.

18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752233

RESUMEN

The history of liver surgery is a tale of progressive resolution of issues presenting one after another from ancient times to the present days when dealing with liver ailments. The perfect knowledge of human liver anatomy and physiology and the development of a proper liver resective surgery require time and huge efforts and, mostly, the study and research of giants of their own times, whose names are forever associated with anatomical landmarks, thorough descriptions, and surgical approaches. The control of parenchymal bleeding after trauma and during resection is the second issue that surgeons have to resolve. A good knowledge of intra and extrahepatic vascular anatomy is a necessary condition to develop techniques of vascular control, paving the way to liver transplantation. Last but not least, the issue of residual liver function after resection requires advanced techniques of volume redistribution through redirection of blood inflow. These are the same problems any young surgeon would face when approaching liver surgery for the first time. Therefore, obtaining a wide picture of historical evolution of liver surgery could be a great starting point to serve as an example and a guide.

19.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 105(2): 76-81, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37564944

RESUMEN

Purpose: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is caused by typical adenoma (TA), multiglandular disease (MD), or parathyroid carcinoma (PC), and in a smaller percentage of cases by atypical parathyroid tumor (APT). The objective of this study is the retrospective analysis of clinical features and parathyroid hormone (PTH)/calcium response to surgery in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for symptomatic PHPT with histological evidence of APT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional experience in the management of PHPT from January 2016 to December 2021 focusing on those patients presenting APTs. We analyzed the clinical features of this disease and PTH/calcium response to surgical treatment in APTs compared to the other pathological conditions causing PHPT. Results: In a cohort of 125 patients with PHPT we found 112 TAs (89.6%), 6 APTs (4.8%), 6 PCs (4.8%), and only 1 MD (0.8%). APTs in comparison to other parathyroid diseases showed peculiar features such as adhesion to the surrounding structures and a frequent intrathyroidal location, which may justify thyroid loboistmectomy adopted in most of the observed cases. APTs showed significantly higher preoperative PTH values compared to TA + MD and were relevant to PC. Conclusion: Due to its rarity, there is a lack of specific indications in the management of APTs. Biochemical features observed in APT and PC can be related to similar biological behavior. However, some specific features observed preoperatively in some cases of PHPT might suggest presence of an APT, which could be helpful mostly in surgical and postoperative management. Further studies are required to confirm the results of the present preliminary report.

20.
J Clin Med ; 12(15)2023 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of vascular anatomy and its possible variations is essential for performing embolization or revascularization procedures and complex surgery in the pelvis. The obturator artery (OA) is a branch of the anterior division of the internal iliac artery (IIA), and it has the highest frequency of variation among branches of the internal iliac artery. Possible anomalies of the origin of the obturator artery (OA) should be known when performing pelvic and groin surgery, where its control or ligation may be required. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis, based on Sanudo's classification, is to analyze the origin of the obturator artery (OA) and its variants. METHODS: Thirteen articles published between 1952 and 2020 were included. RESULTS: The obturator artery (OA) was present in almost all cases (99.8%): the pooled prevalence estimate for the origin from the IIA axis was 77.7% (95% CI 71.8-83.1%) vs. 22.3% (95% CI 16.9-28.2%) for the origin from EIA axis. In most cases, the obturator artery (OA) originated from the anterior division trunk of the internal iliac artery (IIA) (61.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Performing preoperative radiological examination to determine the pelvic vascular pattern and having the awareness to evaluate possible changes in the obturator artery can reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury and complications.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA