Association between a Recalled Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Device and Incident Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The real-world consequences of a Philips/Respironics recall for positive airway pressure (PAP) devices distributed between 2009 and 2021 are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based study using health administrative databases (Ontario, Canada) on all new adult PAP users identified through the provincial funding system, free of cancer at baseline, who initiated (claimed) PAP treatment between 2012 and 2018. Everyone was followed from the PAP claim date to the earliest of incident cancer diagnosis, death, or the end of the follow-up (March 2022). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between individuals on recalled devices and those on devices from other manufacturers. Weighted hazard ratios of incident cancer were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 231 692 individuals identified, 58 204 (25.1%) claimed recalled devices, and 173 488 (74.9%) from other manufacturers. A meaningful baseline difference between groups (standardised difference≥0.10) was noted only by location-relevant covariates; other variables were mostly equally distributed (standardised differences≤0.06). Over a median follow-up of 6.3 years (IQR: 4.9-8.0), 11 166 (4.8%) developed cancer: unadjusted rates per 10 000 Person-Year (95 CI%) of 78.8 (76.0-81.7) in the recall group versus74.0 (72.4-75.6) in others (p=0.0034). Propensity score weighting achieved excellent balance in baseline characteristics between groups (standardised differences≤0.07). On a weighted sample, there was no statistical difference in the hazard of incident cancer between groups: cause-specific hazard ratio (recalled versus others) of 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89-1.06. CONCLUSION: In our real-world population study, compared to other manufacturers and adjusting for confounders, recalled devices do not appear to be independently associated with developing cancer.

Air pollution, weather and positive airway pressure treatment adherence in adults with sleep apnea: a retrospective community-based repeated-measures longitudinal study.

We assessed the relation between air pollution, weather, and adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in a retrospective community-based repeated-measures study of adults with obstructive sleep apnea who purchased PAP devices from a registered provider between 2013 and 2017 (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and had at least one day of data. Daily PAP-derived data, air pollution, and weather databases were linked using postal code. The exposures were mean nocturnal (8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.) (i) residential concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ), fine particulate matter <=2.5 µm (PM2.5 ), ozone (O3 ), and Air Quality Health Index (AQHI), and (ii) temperature, relative humidity, and barometric pressure. Covariates in the main model were demographics, season, exposure year, and PAP therapy mode. We analysed 8148 adults (median age of 54 years and 61% men) and 2,071,588 days of data. Based on daily data, the median (interquartile range) daily PAP usage was 416 (323-487) min. Using mixed-effect regression analyses to incorporate daily data and clustering by individuals, we found a statistically significant decrease in adherence for increased levels of NO2 , PM2.5 , and AQHI. The largest effect was for NO2 : a decrease in daily PAP use while comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles (Qs) was 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-3.9) min. Decreased PAP adherence was also associated with increased temperature (Q4 versus Q1: 2.6 [95% CI: 1.5-3.7] min) and decreased barometric pressure (Q1 versus Q4: 2.0 [95% CI 1.5-2.5] min). We observed modest but statistically significant acute effects of air pollution and weather on daily PAP adherence.

Obstructive sleep apnea severity, circulating biomarkers, and cancer risk.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine if obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and/or biomarkers of inflammation/angiogenesis are associated with incident cancer in this clinical cohort. METHODS: Consenting adult patients at the University of British Columbia Hospital between 2003-2014 completed a questionnaire about their medical history and sleep habits prior to undergoing a polysomnogram (PSG). Blood samples were collected the morning after PSG and processed for biomarkers of inflammation and angiogenesis. The clinical, PSG, and biomarker data were linked to the British Columbia Cancer Registry to ascertain incident cancer diagnoses. Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess the association between OSA severity and biomarker concentrations with cancer risk. RESULTS: A total of 1,990 patients were included in the analysis with a mean follow-up time of 12.8 years; 181 of them (9.1%) developed cancer after PSG. OSA severity was significantly associated with cancer risk after controlling for relevant covariates (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08 per 10 events/h apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) increase, CI = 1.02-1.15, p=0.015). In an exploratory analysis, two biomarkers were significantly associated with an increased cancer risk after controlling for relevant covariates (HR per interquartile range (IQR) pg/mL increase of endostatin = 1.45, CI = 1.12-1.87, p=0.01 and HR for IQR pg/mL increase of VCAM-1 = 1.48, CI = 1.04-2.11, p=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OSA severity was an independent risk factor for cancer. Furthermore, two circulating markers were significantly associated with cancer risk. If these preliminary findings can be reproduced in other cohorts, biomarkers could potentially be used to prognosticate OSA patients with respect to cancer risk.

Association between sleep microarchitecture and cognition in obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) increases the risk of cognitive impairment. Measures of sleep microarchitecture from EEG may help identify patients at risk of this complication. METHODS: Participants with suspected OSA (n=1142) underwent in-laboratory polysomnography and completed sleep and medical history questionnaires, and tests of global cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RAVLT) and information processing speed (Digit-Symbol Coding, DSC). Associations between cognitive scores and stage 2 NREM sleep spindle density, power, frequency and %-fast (12-16Hz), odds-ratio product (ORP), normalized EEG power (EEGNP) and the delta:alpha ratio were assessed using multivariable linear regression (MLR) adjusted for age, sex, education, and total sleep time. Mediation analyses were performed to determine if sleep microarchitecture indices mediate the negative effect of OSA on cognition. RESULTS: All spindle characteristics were lower in participants with moderate and severe OSA (p≤0.001, versus no/mild OSA) and positively associated with MoCA, RAVLT and DSC scores (false discovery rate corrected p-value, q≤0.026), except spindle power which was not associated with RAVLT (q=0.185). ORP during NREM sleep (ORPNREM) was highest in severe OSA participants (p≤0.001) but neither ORPNREM (q≥0.230) nor the delta:alpha ratio were associated with cognitive scores in MLR analyses (q≥0.166). In mediation analyses, spindle density and EEGNP (p≥0.048) mediated moderate-to-severe OSA's negative effect on MoCA scores while ORPNREM, spindle power and %-fast spindles mediated OSA's negative effect on DSC scores (p≤0.018). CONCLUSION: Altered spindle activity, ORP and normalized EEG power may be important contributors to cognitive deficits in patients with OSA.

Oral appliance therapy and hypoglossal nerve stimulation as non-positive airway pressure treatment alternatives for obstructive sleep apnea: a narrative expert review.

This perspective on alternatives to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) summarizes the proceedings of a focus group that was conducted by the Sleep Research Society Foundation. This perspective is from a multidisciplinary panel of experts from sleep medicine, dental sleep medicine, and otolaryngology that aims to identify the current role of oral appliance therapy and hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of OSA with emphasis on the US practice arena. A secondary aim is to identify-from an implementation science standpoint-the various barriers and facilitators for adoption of non-PAP treatment that includes access to care, multidisciplinary expertise, reimbursement, regulatory aspects, current treatment guidelines, health policies, and other factors related to the delivery of care. The panel has contextualized the review with recent events-such as a large-scale PAP device recall compounded by supply chain woes of the pandemic-and emerging science in the field of OSA and offers solutions for multidisciplinary approaches while identifying knowledge gaps and future research opportunities.

All Obstructive Sleep Apnea Events Are Not Created Equal: The Relationship between Event-related Hypoxemia and Physiologic Response.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity is typically assessed by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), a frequency-based metric that allocates equal weight to all respiratory events. However, more severe events may have a greater physiologic impact. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of event-related hypoxemia would be associated with the postevent physiologic response. Methods: Patients with OSA (AHI, ⩾5/h) from the multicenter Canadian Sleep and Circadian Network cohort were studied. Using mixed-effect linear regression, we examined associations between event-related hypoxic burden (HBev) assessed by the area under the event-related oxygen saturation recording with heart rate changes (ΔHRev), vasoconstriction (vasoconstriction burden [VCBev] assessed with photoplethysmography), and electroencephalographic responses (power ratio before and after events). Results: Polysomnographic recordings from 658 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 55.00 [45.00, 64.00] yr; AHI, 27.15 [14.90, 64.05] events/h; 42% female) were included in the analyses. HBev was associated with an increase in all physiologic responses after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, sleep stage, total sleep time, and study centers; for example, 1 standard deviation increase in HBev was associated with 0.21 [95% confidence interval, 0.2, 0.22], 0.08 [0.08, 0.09], and 0.22 [0.21, 0.23] standard deviation increases in ΔHRev, VCBev, and ß-power ratio, respectively. Conclusions: Increased event-related hypoxic burden was associated with greater responses across a broad range of physiologic signals. Future metrics that incorporate information about the variability of these physiologic responses may have promise in providing a more nuanced assessment of OSA severity.

Circulating markers of oxidative stress and risk of incident cardiovascular events in obstructive sleep apnea.

The identification of which patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are more likely to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a challenge. OSA causes oxidative stress (OS) which may contribute to CVD pathogenesis. Therefore, OS markers could be useful in risk-stratifying cardiovascular (CV) risk in OSA patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess whether three OS marker levels could be associated with incident CVD in suspected OSA patients. Morning plasma levels of 8-isoprostane, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were measured in patients with suspected OSA referred for a polysomnogram (PSG). A composite outcome of CV events was defined by linkage with provincial administrative health databases. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between the levels of OS markers and events. 352 patients were included (mean age of 51.4 years, 68% male, median apnea hypopnea index of 16/h). Thirty-one first CV events occurred over an 8-year follow-up. In univariate or fully adjusted models, none of the OS markers were significantly associated with incident CV events (hazard ratio in adjusted models of: 1.25 (95% CI 0.56-2.80, p = 0.59), 1.15 (0.52-2.57, p = 0.73), 0.77 (0.37-1.61, p = 0.48), for 8-OHdG, 8-isoprostane and SOD; however, confidence intervals were wide. In this small preliminary study, oxidative stress markers were not significantly associated with risk of CV events. However, moderate associations between these markers and risk of CV events are possible and should be the focus of future larger studies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-022-00399-0.