Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(2): 547-555, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600932

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short term outcomes related to the use of the Zenith TX2 Dissection Endovascular Graft (ZDEG) and the Zenith Dissection Bare stent (ZDES) for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissections. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter case cohort study collated data from 10 European institutions for patients with both complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection treated with ZDEG and ZDES between 2011 and 2018. The primary end point was mortality at 30 and 90 days. Secondary end points included complications related to TEVAR, such as, type Ia endoleak, stroke, paraparesis, paraplegia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). Statistical analysis was carried out using the t test, or one-way analysis of variance and the χ2 or Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: We treated 120 patients (87 male; mean age, 62.7 ± 12.2years) either in the acute 76 (63.3%), subacute 16 (13.3%), or chronic 28 (23.3%) phase. Seven patients (5.8%) died within 30 days after the index procedure and two (1.7%) between 30 and 90 days. There was one instance of postoperative RTAD in a patient treated for rupture. Stroke and paraplegia occurred in three (2.5%) and five (4.2%), patients, respectively. Eight patients (6.7%) had a type Ia endoleak in the perioperative period. There were no instances of paraplegia, no permanent dialysis, and no requirement for adjunctive superior mesenteric or celiac artery stenting in the 33 patients (27.5%) who were treated by concurrent placement of ZDES distal to the ZDEG. The length and distal oversizing of ZDEG components used was less in this group. CONCLUSIONS: The present series demonstrates a low (<1%) RTAD rate and favorable morbidity and mortality. The lower rate of paraplegia, dialysis, and visceral artery stenting in the cohort that had adjunctive use of ZDES is compelling and merits further assessment.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Stents , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 171(33): 2277-81, 2009 Aug 10.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19732506

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recent years have seen the introduction of catheter-based aortic valve substitution with stent valves to treat aortic valve stenosis in patients who were deemed inoperable via conventional open heart surgery. We here report our initial experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Register-based study with prospective registration of prespecified parameters. A total of 26 patients were treated with an aortic stent valve, 12 via transfemoral (TFA-AVI) and 14 via transapical (TAP-AVI) access. In the TFA-AVI group, 75% were women and the average age was 85 4.5 years; in the TAP-AVI group, 71% were women and the average age was 79 8.4 years. RESULTS: In the TFA-AVI group, successful stent valve implantation was performed in 9/12 (75%) and TAP-AVI in 13/14 (93%) patients. Mortality after 30 days was 25% in the TFA-AVI and 7% in the TAP-AVI group. The aortic valve area increased from 0.6 0.13 cm(2) to 1.6 0.39 (2) in the TFA-AVI group and from 0.7 0.2 (2) to 1.6 0.37 (2) in the TAP-AVI group. 91% of patients showed clinical improvement after treatment. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation of conventional unresectable patients requires close cooperation between different specialities. The treatment seems to be a realistic alternative to medical treatment for inoperable patients and may even be used in operable high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bioprótesis , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA