Efficiency of different flows for apneic oxygenation when using high flow nasal oxygen application - a technical simulation.

BACKGROUND: Preoxygenation and application of apneic oxygenation are standard to prevent patients from desaturation e.g. during emergency intubation. The time before desaturation occurs can be prolonged by applying high flow oxygen into the airway. Aim of this study was to scientifically assess the flow that is necessary to avoid nitrogen entering the airway of a manikin model during application of pure oxygen via high flow nasal oxygen. METHODS: We measured oxygen content over a 20-min observation period for each method in a preoxygenated test lung applied to a human manikin, allowing either room air entering the airway in control group, or applying pure oxygen via high flow nasal oxygen at flows of 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 L/min via nasal cannula in the other groups. Our formal hypothesis was that there would be no difference in oxygen fraction decrease between the groups. RESULTS: Oxygen content in the test lung dropped from 97 ± 1% at baseline in all groups to 43 ± 1% in the control group (p < 0.001 compared to all other groups), to 92 ± 1% in the 10 L/min group, 92 ± 1% in the 20 L/min group, 90 ± 1% in the 40 L/min group, 89 ± 0% in the 60 L/min group and 87 ± 0% in the 80 L/min group. Apart from comparisons 10 l/ min vs. 20 L/min group (p = .715) and 10/L/min vs. 40 L/min group (p = .018), p was < 0.009 for all other comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Simulating apneic oxygenation in a preoxygenated manikin connected to a test lung over 20 min by applying high flow nasal oxygen resulted in the highest oxygen content at a flow of 10 L/min; higher flows resulted in slightly decreased oxygen percentages in the test lung.

Recommendations for treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 : Version 3 S1 guideline.

Since December 2019 a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread around the world resulting in an acute respiratory illness pandemic. The immense challenges for clinicians and hospitals as well as the strain on many healthcare systems has been unprecedented.The majority of patients present with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, 5-8% become critically ill and require intensive care treatment. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with severe dyspnea and an increased respiratory rate (>30/min) usually leads to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At this point bilateral pulmonary infiltrates are typically seen. Patients often develop a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).So far, remdesivir and dexamethasone have shown clinical effectiveness in severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The main goal of supportive treatment is to ascertain adequate oxygenation. Invasive mechanical ventilation and repeated prone positioning are key elements in treating severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients.Strict adherence to basic infection control measures (including hand hygiene) and correct use of personal protection equipment (PPE) are essential in the care of patients. Procedures that lead to formation of aerosols should be carried out with utmost precaution and preparation.

[S2k Guideline - Recommendations for Inpatient Therapy of Patients with COVID-19]. / S2k-Leitlinie ­ Empfehlungen zur stationären Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19.

Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Corona Virus-2) has been spreading rapidly in the sense of a global pandemic. This poses significant challenges for clinicians and hospitals and is placing unprecedented strain on the healthcare systems of many countries. The majority of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) present with only mild symptoms such as cough and fever. However, about 6 % require hospitalization. Early clarification of whether inpatient and, if necessary, intensive care treatment is medically appropriate and desired by the patient is of particular importance in the pandemic. Acute hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency with dyspnea and high respiratory rate (> 30/min) usually leads to admission to the intensive care unit. Often, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates/consolidations or even pulmonary emboli are already found on imaging. As the disease progresses, some of these patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Mortality reduction of available drug therapy in severe COVID-19 disease has only been demonstrated for dexamethasone in randomized controlled trials. The main goal of supportive therapy is to ensure adequate oxygenation. In this regard, invasive ventilation and repeated prone positioning are important elements in the treatment of severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. Strict adherence to basic hygiene, including hand hygiene, and the correct wearing of adequate personal protective equipment are essential when handling patients. Medically necessary actions on patients that could result in aerosol formation should be performed with extreme care and preparation.

[Quality indicators and structural requirements for Cardiac Arrest Centers-Update 2021]. / Qualitätskriterien und strukturelle Voraussetzungen für Cardiac Arrest Zentren ­ Update 2021: Deutscher Rat für Wiederbelebung/German Resuscitation Council (GRC).

An update of the first description of quality indicators and structural requirements for Cardiac Arrest Centers from 2017 based on first experiences and certifications is presented. Criteria were adjusted, substantiated and in some parts redefined for feasibility in everyday clinical use.

[Analgesia for trauma patients in emergency medicine]. / Analgesie bei Traumapatienten in der Notfallmedizin.

Adequate analgesia is one of the most important measures of emergency care in addition to treatment of vital function disorders and, if indicated, should be promptly undertaken; however, a large proportion of emergency patients receive no or only inadequate pain therapy. The numeric rating scale (NRS) is recommended for pain assessment but is not applicable to every group of patients; therefore, vital signs and body language should be included in the assessment. Pain therapy should reduce the NPRS to <5 points. Ketamine and fentanyl, which have an especially rapid onset of action, and also morphine are suitable for analgesia in spontaneously breathing patients. Basic prerequisites for safe and effective analgesia by healthcare professionals are the use of adequate monitoring, the provision of well-defined emergency equipment, and the mastery of emergency procedures. In a structured competence system, paramedics and nursing personnel can perform safe and effective analgesia.

[Why do we need cardiac arrest centers?] / Warum brauchen wir Cardiac-Arrest-Zentren?

In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the prognosis is influenced by various factors. In the prehospital setting, the duration of ischemia from the time of onset of cardiac arrest to the beginning of effective resuscitation measures is by far the most critical and determining factor for outcome. This interval can be shortened by an increase in the rate of lay CPR measures. With respect to intrahospital follow-up care, a number of structural factors have a relevant influence on prognosis. According to the literature, case volume, size of the hospital and the number of post-OHCA patients treated per year also have a large influence on the further prognosis. The crucial factor here is the availability and permanent readiness of a catheterization laboratory with the possibility of an immediate coronary intervention. In OHCA patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the time passed until the reopening of the occluded infarcted vessel is of paramount importance for survival. The 24/7 around the clock availability of a catheterization laboratory is therefore one of the indispensable prerequisites for a cardiac arrest center (CAC). In addition, a number of technical, structural, and organizational arrangements must be implemented in the CAC clinics in order to fulfil the requirements for such a center. The certification of CACs is currently being implemented by the German Resuscitation Council (GRC) and the German Society of Cardiology (DGK). As an important aim the GRC and the medical societies involved are hoping to avoid misallocation of post-OHCA patients to the nearest hospital, which may not be a suitable center for the treatment of these patients. Future studies will show whether CACs can indeed comprehensively improve the prognosis of OHCA patients following successful prehospital resuscitation.

[Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC]. / Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR) : Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.

The choice of the hypnotic drug (volatile or propofol) for maintenance of anesthesia does not influence surgical conditions during cranioplasty.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In contrast to propofol, volatile agents are often considered harmful to maintain anesthesia due to increasing brain volume and potential deleterious effects. Patients for cranioplasty, including patients with large bone defects, could be susceptible for intraoperative complications but have not properly been investigated so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate brain swelling, intraoperative conditions, surgical course, and postoperative complication rates of propofol-based vs. volatile-based anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this monocentric, retrospective, and observational study, we collected demographic, clinical, and outcome data of patients undergoing cranioplasty between December 2010 and September 2014. According to the hypnotic drug used, patients were assigned to either a propofol or a volatile group. The primary outcome parameter was brain swelling. For comparison of the groups, univariate analysis was performed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-U test. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were identified in the period. Twenty-three patients were excluded due to cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Baseline characteristics and preoperative conditions did not vary between the groups except a higher body mass index and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in the propofol group. The choice of anesthesia (volatile or intravenous) influence neither the intraoperative local conditions nor postoperative complication rate. No significant risk factor for impaired bone flap placement was identified. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-defined cohort, the choice of the anesthetic agent does not influence the degree of intraoperative brain swelling, bone flap fit, and postoperative course.

["Kids Save Lives"-resuscitation training for schoolchildren : Systematic review]. / "Kids Save Lives" ­ Wiederbelebungstrainings für Schulkinder : Systematische Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: Even in western developed countries, the probability of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is only 6-10%. In order to improve survival after OHCA, early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by laypersons is essential. Introduction of CPR training in schoolchildren seems to be effective to increase lay-CPR rates. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present investigation was to elucidate educational aspects of teaching schoolchildren in CPR and to summarize campaigns related to a comprehensive establishment of lay-CPR worldwide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature research in PubMed was performed, the cutoff date was 27 February 2017. Overall, 192 abstracts were analyzed; 51 articles were considered relevant and included in the manuscript. An additional keyword research in Google revealed >230,000 entries, and 20 of those were included in the present manuscript. RESULTS: A minimum age of 12-13 years is required to achieve a comparable quality of CPR to adult basic life support (BLS). Key issues are (i) the correct detection of a cardiac arrest, (ii) a correctly performed call for help, (iii) thoracic compressions and (iv) if applicable, the initiation of adequate mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Practical training showed a significantly higher CPR quality compared to theoretical training only or to the use of instruction or online videos only. Worldwide implementation of a 2-h BLS training per year in children from the age of 12 or younger is recommended by the "Kids Save Lives"- statement since 2015. In Germany, implementation at the level of the federal states has progressed to different degrees.

[Care for severely injured persons : Update of the 2016 S3 guideline for the treatment of polytrauma and the severely injured]. / Versorgung von Schwerverletzten : Update der S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung 2016.

In 2011 the first interdisciplinary S3 guideline for the management of patients with serious injuries/trauma was published. After intensive revision and in consensus with 20 different medical societies, the updated version of the guideline was published online in September 2016. It is divided into three sections: prehospital care, emergency room management and the first operative phase. Many recommendations and explanations were updated, mostly in the prehospital care and emergency room management sections. These two sections are of special interest for anesthesiologists in field emergency physician roles or as team members or team leaders in the emergency room. The present work summarizes the changes to the current guideline and gives a brief overview of this very important work.

Local anesthetic toxicity: Who is ready for lipid resuscitation? A survey of German Hospitals.

PURPOSE: Toxic reactions to local anesthetics are rare but potentially lethal. In fact, animal studies and case reports demonstrate that the administration of lipid emulsions after initializing cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising treatment option. The aim of this study was to determine how many hospitals in Germany are prepared to treat toxic reactions to local anesthetics with lipid infusion and to identify how often and what type of toxic reactions occur and if treatment was successful. Further, we aimed to elucidate if current guidelines lead to more immediate availability of lipid emulsions in direct proximity to the room where regional anesthesia is performed. METHODS: A standardized survey was sent to 1,305 German hospitals. The main question was whether lipid emulsions are readily available and if published guidelines contributed to this availability. Additionally, we asked whether local anesthetic toxicity had already successfully been treated by lipid emulsions and what type of symptoms were treated. RESULTS: We received replies from n = 509 (39%) hospitals. In 338 (66%) of the responding hospitals, lipid emulsions are readily available. Hospitals with standard operating procedures (SOPs) implemented according to published guidelines have lipids significantly more often immediately available than hospitals with just SOPs (chi-square test of independence, p-value < 0.01). Of all responding hospitals 287 (56%) have implemented a SOP for the treatment of toxic reactions to local anesthetics and 196 (39%) of the hospitals introduced the SOP because of the guidelines. In 28 (6%) of the hospitals, local anesthetic toxicity had already caused cardiac arrest with subsequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in at least one patient. In 132 (26%) hospitals, local anesthetic toxicity had already been treated by infusing lipid emulsions. Of these hospitals 128 (96%) state this therapeutic approach was successful. Treatment with lipid emulsions was performed frequently after prodromal symptoms 83 (63%) were witnessed. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surveyed German hospitals are prepared to treat toxic reactions to local anesthetics and published guidelines contributed to this preparedness. The infusion of lipid emulsions is a promising measure to deal with toxic reactions to local anesthetics. Since toxic reactions to local anesthetics are potentially lethal, it seems desirable that lipid emulsions are generally available in routine clinical practice. Currently, the treatment of toxic reactions to local anesthetics is mostly performed in situations (e.g. treatment of prodromal symptoms) that are not recommended by current guidelines. Further research is necessary to better define the future use of lipid emulsions in routine clinical practice.

Economic burden of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea: a cost-of-illness study from a German tertiary care hospital.

PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD) is the most common cause of health-care-associated infectious diarrhoea. In the context of the German health-care system, direct and indirect costs of an initial episode of CDAD and of CDAD recurrence are currently unknown. METHODS: We defined CDAD as presence of diarrhoea (≥3 unformed stools/day) in association with detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in an unformed faecal sample. Patients treated with metronidazole (PO or IV) and/or vancomycin (PO) were included. Comprehensive data of patients were retrospectively documented into a database using the technology of the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut). Patients with CDAD were matched to control patients in a 1:1 ratio. Analysis was split in three groups: incidence group (CDAD patients without recurrence), recurrence group (CDAD patients with ≥1 recurrence) and control group (matched non-CDAD patients). RESULTS: Between 02/2010 and 12/2011, 150 patients with CDAD (114 patients in the incidence and 36 (24 %) in the recurrence group) and 150 controls were analysed. Mean length of stay was: 32 (95 %CI: 30-37), 94 (95 %CI: 76-112) and 24 days (95 %CI: 22-27; P = <0.001), resulting in mean overall direct treatment costs per patient of €18,460 (95 %CI: €14,660-€22,270), €73,900 (95 %CI: €50,340-€97,460) and €14,530 (95 %CI: €11,730-€17,330; P = <0.001). In the incidence and recurrence group, the mean cumulative number of antibiotic CDAD treatment days was 11 (95 %CI: 10-12) and 36 (95 %CI: 27-45; P = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Especially CDAD recurrence was associated with excessive costs, which were mostly attributable to a significantly longer overall length of stay. Innovative treatment strategies are warranted to reduce treatment costs and prevent recurrence of CDAD.