Decision making at the end of life--cancer patients' and their caregivers' views on artificial nutrition and hydration.

PURPOSE: Deciding on artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) at the end of life (EoL) may cause concerns in patients and their family caregivers but there is scarce evidence regarding their preferences. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of factors associated with ANH decision making. METHODS: Prospective, Cross-sectional survey. Adult patients admitted to hospital for symptoms of advanced cancer as well as their family caregivers completed a self-administered questionnaire. Items included personal views and concerns about ANH. Family caregivers additionally recorded their preference for their loved one and, if applicable, previous experience with ANH decisions. RESULTS: Thirty-nine out of sixty-five patients and 30/72 relatives responded. Higher age of the patient was significantly correlated with both the patient's and the relative's decision to forgo ANH (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.01). Thirty-nine percent of patients, 37 % of relatives if deciding for themselves, and 24 % of relatives if deciding on behalf of their loved one opted against ANH; 36, 40 and 52 % preferred artificial hydration (AH) only (χ (2) test, p <0.001), while 23, 23 and 24 %, respectively, wished to receive ANH. Patients felt more confident about decisions on artificial nutrition (AN) than caregivers (T test, p < 0.05) and less concerned about adverse effects of forgoing ANH on pain, agitation and sensation of hunger and thirst (χ (2) test, p < 0.05). Satisfaction of patients with communication regarding forgoing ANH (5.0 ± 2.8 on a Likert scale from 0 to 10) correlated with their confidence (Spearman's rho, p < 0.01). A thorough consultation with the attending physician on ANH issues was the favoured source of support for 77 % of patients and 97 % of relatives. A majority of patients considered their relatives' opinion (67 %) and their own advance directives (62 %) as crucial for making ANH decisions, and 46 % of them had such a document completed. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients and their relatives have similar preferences regarding ANH at the EoL, but relatives are reluctant to withhold AH if deciding for their loved one. While patients seem to be confident with ANH decision making, their caregivers may particularly benefit from discussing ANH options to dissipate fears.

[Pharmacological treatment of malignant bowel obstruction in severely ill and dying patients : a systematic literature review]. / Medikamentöse therapie der gastrointestinalen obstruktion bei schwerkranken und sterbenden patienten : eine systematische literaturübersicht.

BACKGROUND: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) occurs in 3-6% of patients suffering from advanced cancer. The incidence of MBO is highest in patients with gynaecological and colorectal malignancies. Typical symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and constipation. Initially, these symptoms may be isolated and sporadic, becoming more and more intense later on. The suggested treatment includes surgical, interventional and pharmacological strategies depending on the symptom pattern and the performance status of the patient. This study investigates the current evidence of pharmacological treatment for MBO during the last days of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of the electronic databases PubMed/Medline and Embase from 1966-2011 was conducted. All retrieved publications were screened for relevance with regard to content and methodology on the basis of title and abstract. The full text was obtained for all relevant articles and for those articles where classification was unsure. RESULTS: The systematic literature search identified 5,431 papers. After screening, 90 publications were analyzed in detail. A total of 69 publications were excluded due to content or methodology. Finally, 21 manuscripts were considered for review. Only a few studies used high quality methodology and they all had rather small sample sizes. In summary, they show weak positive signs of efficacy for the use of somatostatin analogues or anticholinergics in the pharmacological treatment of MBO. CONCLUSION: These results do not lead to a clear evidence base for the pharmacological treatment of MBO in the last days of life. As adverse events were infrequent and clinical studies suggest efficient symptom relief, the authors recommend the use of octreotide as the first line medication. Butylscopolamine may be an alternative, where octreotide is not available. Higher costs for octreotide compared with butylscopolamine have to be considered. Available data do not allow assessing the effect of corticosteroids on symptoms caused by MBO when given during the last days of life. The English full text version of this article will be available in SpringerLink as of November 2012 (under "Supplemental").

Clinical value of cystatin C determination.

It has been reported that cystatin C (cys-C) is elevated in patients with malignant disease. In order to investigate whether this phenomenon is linked to or independent of renal function, and at the same time examine the role of this marker in other pathological situations, cys-C concentrations were compared with 24-h creatinine clearance values in three groups of patients; the first group were undergoing treatment for malignant disease, the second group were renal transplant patients and the third randomly taken from patients for whom a routine creatinine clearance had been requested. Several patients with malignant disease had high cys-C levels without any correspondence to creatinine clearance values. Additionally, although cys-C shows a high sensitivity for detecting impaired glomerular function in renal transplant patients, the specificity was very low, with little discrimination being observed between patients with normal and pathological creatinine clearance levels. In other patients both the sensitivity and specificity of cys-C could be shown to be very good. Thus although cys-C can generally be recommended as a marker of the glomerular filtration rate, there are some patients for whom the clinical relevance is unclear.

Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To identify the most effective of two combinations, irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) and irinotecan/cisplatin, in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, for investigation in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive irinotecan [80 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.)], FA (500 mg/m2 i.v.) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU (2000 mg/m2 i.v.), weekly for 6 weeks with a 1-week rest, or irinotecan (200 mg/m2 i.v.) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 i.v.), on day 1 for 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were eligible for analysis in the per-protocol population. The overall response rate in the irinotecan/5-FU/FA arm (n=59) was 42.4%, with a complete response rate of 5.1%. Corresponding figures for the irinotecan/cisplatin arm (n=56) were 32.1% and 1.8%, respectively. The median time to progression was 6.5 months (irinotecan/5-FU/FA) and 4.2 months (irinotecan/cisplatin) (P < 0.0001), with median survival times of 10.7 and 6.9 months, respectively (P=0.0018). The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia, which was more pronounced with irinotecan/cisplatin than with irinotecan/5-FU/FA (65.7% versus 27%). Diarrhea was the main grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity with both irinotecan/5-FU/FA (27.0%) and irinotecan/cisplatin (18.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Both combinations were active, with acceptable safety profiles. Irinotecan/5-FU/FA was selected as the most effective combination for investigation in a phase III trial in advanced gastric cancer.